Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Label Errors in the Tobacco3482 Dataset

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.13140 v1 pith:KN6T2VMW submitted 2024-12-17 cs.CV

Label Errors in the Tobacco3482 Dataset

classification cs.CV
keywords datasetlabelbenchmarkfindissuesmistakesmodelproblems
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Tobacco3482 is a widely used document classification benchmark dataset. However, our manual inspection of the entire dataset uncovers widespread ontological issues, especially large amounts of annotation label problems in the dataset. We establish data label guidelines and find that 11.7% of the dataset is improperly annotated and should either have an unknown label or a corrected label, and 16.7% of samples in the dataset have multiple valid labels. We then analyze the mistakes of a top-performing model and find that 35% of the model's mistakes can be directly attributed to these label issues, highlighting the inherent problems with using a noisily labeled dataset as a benchmark. Supplementary material, including dataset annotations and code, is available at https://github.com/gordon-lim/tobacco3482-mistakes/.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Revising RVL-CDIP: Quantifying Errors and Test-Train Overlap

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    RVL-CDIP contains 12% label errors and 35% train-test duplicates; correcting labels improves OOD generalization while deduplication reduces in-distribution accuracy.