Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Learning to Recover from Plan Execution Errors during Robot Manipulation: A Neuro-symbolic Approach

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.18948 v1 pith:KQCTVJ6D submitted 2024-05-29 cs.RO cs.LG

classification cs.ROcs.LG
keywords approachfailureslearningfunctionplanstatedistanceerrors
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Automatically detecting and recovering from failures is an important but challenging problem for autonomous robots. Most of the recent work on learning to plan from demonstrations lacks the ability to detect and recover from errors in the absence of an explicit state representation and/or a (sub-) goal check function. We propose an approach (blending learning with symbolic search) for automated error discovery and recovery, without needing annotated data of failures. Central to our approach is a neuro-symbolic state representation, in the form of dense scene graph, structured based on the objects present within the environment. This enables efficient learning of the transition function and a discriminator that not only identifies failures but also localizes them facilitating fast re-planning via computation of heuristic distance function. We also present an anytime version of our algorithm, where instead of recovering to the last correct state, we search for a sub-goal in the original plan minimizing the total distance to the goal given a re-planning budget. Experiments on a physics simulator with a variety of simulated failures show the effectiveness of our approach compared to existing baselines, both in terms of efficiency as well as accuracy of our recovery mechanism.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Interventional Causal Circuits for Safe Robot Action Testing and Failure Recovery

    cs.RO 2026-07 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    A causal circuit built from a Joint Probability Tree lets a robot correct rejected motion plans in one shot, cutting failed safety-test attempts by 10–37% in simulation.

Pith tools