pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.25397 · v1 · pith:KQETZ6C4new · submitted 2026-06-24 · 🪐 quant-ph · physics.optics

Quantum tomography of free electrons

Y. Fang , J. Kuttruff , Z. Zhao , L. Moehrle , P. Hommelhoff , P. Baum This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-25 21:08 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph physics.optics
keywords quantum tomographyfree electronsdensity matrixlaser interferencequantum state reconstructionelectron beamsCoulomb interactionscontinuous variables
0
0 comments X

The pith

Two spectrally shifted laser waves produce interfering quantum paths that directly reveal the density matrix of free electrons.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Free electrons in beams are typically incoherent, making their full quantum state difficult to measure beyond special cases. The paper demonstrates that two monochromatic laser waves with a spectral shift create multiple interfering quantum paths for each electron. The resulting interference pattern encodes the entire continuous-variable density matrix, from which wavepacket properties, ensemble statistics, and inter-particle links can be extracted. This matters for applications in electron microscopy and quantum optics because it turns an otherwise hidden quantum description into measurable data. As an example, the approach shows how Coulomb interactions within an electron gas alter a single electron's state.

Core claim

Two monochromatic but spectrally shifted laser waves produce interfering quantum paths that directly reveal the density matrix and thus all essential properties of the pure wavepackets, the ensemble, and their interlinks. As a first application, the quantum state of a single electron is shown to be modified by many-body Coulomb interactions of a surrounding electron gas.

What carries the argument

Interfering quantum paths induced by two monochromatic but spectrally shifted laser waves, whose observed pattern is inverted to recover the continuous-variable density matrix.

If this is right

  • Arbitrary free-electron quantum states in continuous variables become measurable without requiring discrete energy sidebands.
  • Many-body Coulomb interactions within an electron gas produce observable modifications to a single electron's quantum state.
  • Hidden correlations inside electron beams can be extracted from the reconstructed density matrix.
  • Quantum states of electrons can be characterized and then optimized for use in quantum electron microscopy or free-electron quantum optics.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same laser-path interference principle could be adapted to probe quantum states in other continuous-variable particle beams if the interaction remains coherent.
  • Integration with existing ultrafast electron microscopes would add full density-matrix information to conventional imaging.
  • Once calibrated, the method might enable feedback control loops that actively shape electron wavepackets toward desired states.

Load-bearing premise

The electron-laser interaction must generate clean interfering quantum paths that invert directly to the full density matrix without dominant decoherence, higher-order effects, or artifacts.

What would settle it

A controlled test in which the density matrix reconstructed from the laser interference pattern fails to predict independently measured electron coherence times or energy distributions would falsify the reconstruction method.

read the original abstract

Determining the quantum state of a given quantum-mechanical system is a fundamental task in physics. Quantum-state tomography has been pivotal for establishing quantum optics [1-4] and for revealing the properties of bound charges in materials [5-7]. An emerging other object for studying and utilizing quantum effects are free electrons, elementary particles that are central to high-resolution microscopy [8,9], electron-based quantum optics [10-17], ul-trafast electron microscopy [18-24] and particle accelerators [25-27]. However, free electrons are intrinsically incoherent, and we lack a broadly applicable method to measure and control their quantum state beyond special cases with discrete energy sidebands [28,29]. Here, we report a universal approach to measure arbitrary free-electron quantum states in continuous variables. Two monochromatic but spectrally shifted laser waves produce interfering quan-tum paths that directly reveal the density matrix and thus all essential properties of the pure wavepackets, the ensemble, and their interlinks. As a first application, we show how the quantum state of a single electron is modified by many-body Coulomb interactions of a sur-rounding electron gas. The reported concepts and results provide insight into otherwise hid-den correlations in electron beams and enable the controlled optimization of exceptional quantum states for free-electron quantum optics or quantum electron microscopy.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a universal method for quantum tomography of arbitrary continuous-variable states of free electrons. Two monochromatic but spectrally shifted laser waves are used to generate interfering quantum paths whose measured interference pattern is asserted to directly encode and allow reconstruction of the full density matrix, thereby revealing properties of pure wave packets, mixed ensembles, and their correlations. An application to the modification of a single-electron state by many-body Coulomb interactions in an electron gas is presented.

Significance. If the claimed linear, invertible mapping from the two-laser interference pattern to the continuous-variable density matrix holds and is experimentally robust, the work would address a recognized gap in free-electron quantum optics by extending tomography beyond discrete sideband cases. This could enable characterization and optimization of quantum states relevant to electron microscopy and accelerators. The manuscript correctly situates the proposal against prior work in quantum optics and ultrafast electron microscopy.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract / method description] Abstract and main text (method section): No explicit reconstruction operator, kernel, or linear map is supplied that relates the measured far-field or energy-resolved interference pattern to the off-diagonal elements of an arbitrary continuous-variable density matrix. Without this formula and a demonstration that the map is bijective over the space of physical (including mixed) states, the central claim that the pattern 'directly reveals the density matrix' cannot be verified.
  2. [Application to many-body interactions] Application section on Coulomb interactions: The reported modification of the single-electron state by the surrounding electron gas is presented without quantitative details on the reconstructed density-matrix elements, error propagation, or comparison to a no-interaction baseline. This leaves the claimed insight into hidden correlations unsupported by the data or derivation shown.
  3. [Discussion / assumptions] Discussion of assumptions: The text does not address the impact of higher-order photon processes, finite laser bandwidth, residual decoherence, or detector response on the uniqueness of the inversion. These factors are load-bearing for the claim of a 'universal approach' that works for arbitrary states.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract contains hyphenation artifacts ('ul-trafast', 'sur-rounding').
  2. [Method] Notation for the two laser frequencies and the resulting interference pattern should be defined consistently with standard continuous-variable quantum optics conventions.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive feedback. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly to strengthen the presentation of the method and its application.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / method description] Abstract and main text (method section): No explicit reconstruction operator, kernel, or linear map is supplied that relates the measured far-field or energy-resolved interference pattern to the off-diagonal elements of an arbitrary continuous-variable density matrix. Without this formula and a demonstration that the map is bijective over the space of physical (including mixed) states, the central claim that the pattern 'directly reveals the density matrix' cannot be verified.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit reconstruction formula would make the central claim more verifiable. The manuscript derives the interference pattern from the two-laser interaction but does not present the closed-form linear map or its invertibility proof. In the revised version we will add the explicit operator (a Fourier-like integral over the measured momentum distribution) together with a short proof of bijectivity on the space of trace-class, positive-semidefinite operators, placed in the methods section. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Application to many-body interactions] Application section on Coulomb interactions: The reported modification of the single-electron state by the surrounding electron gas is presented without quantitative details on the reconstructed density-matrix elements, error propagation, or comparison to a no-interaction baseline. This leaves the claimed insight into hidden correlations unsupported by the data or derivation shown.

    Authors: The application is intended as a first illustration rather than a full quantitative study. We will augment the section with explicit plots of selected density-matrix elements before and after the interaction, together with error bars obtained from simulated shot noise and a direct comparison to the non-interacting reference state, thereby substantiating the claimed insight into hidden correlations. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Discussion / assumptions] Discussion of assumptions: The text does not address the impact of higher-order photon processes, finite laser bandwidth, residual decoherence, or detector response on the uniqueness of the inversion. These factors are load-bearing for the claim of a 'universal approach' that works for arbitrary states.

    Authors: We concur that these experimental limitations must be quantified to support the universality claim. The revised discussion will include order-of-magnitude estimates for each effect, showing the parameter regimes in which the linear map remains invertible to within a stated fidelity, and will note the conditions under which higher-order corrections become negligible. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: new experimental concept with independent reconstruction claim

full rationale

The abstract and described method introduce a two-laser interference approach for continuous-variable electron density matrix reconstruction as a novel technique. No equations, self-citations, or fitted parameters are shown that reduce the claimed invertibility or density-matrix revelation to a definition or prior self-result by construction. The central mapping is asserted as arising from the electron-laser interaction physics, not presupposed. This is the common case of an externally falsifiable experimental proposal.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the domain assumption that free-electron laser interactions can be modeled as interfering quantum paths whose pattern directly encodes the density matrix; no free parameters or invented entities are mentioned in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Free-electron interactions with laser fields produce interfering quantum paths that can be inverted to recover the density matrix
    This modeling choice is the load-bearing premise of the tomography method.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5774 in / 1219 out tokens · 26563 ms · 2026-06-25T21:08:27.574225+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    We see that a small detuning ΔEph=70 meV probes the coherence within each |Eel+ΔE⟩ and |Eel−ΔE⟩ (Fig

    with realistic spectral resolution and noise. We see that a small detuning ΔEph=70 meV probes the coherence within each |Eel+ΔE⟩ and |Eel−ΔE⟩ (Fig. 3c), while a larger detuning ΔEph=620 meV probes the coherence between |Eel+ΔE⟩ and |Eel−ΔE⟩ (Fig. 3d). Consequently, we obtain insight into the density matrix by following the above-described procedure and ca...

  2. [2]

    A. I. Lvovsky, M. G. Raymer, Continuous-variable optical quantum-state tomography. Re- views of Modern Physics 81, 299–332 (2009)

    2009

  3. [3]

    Breitenbach, S

    G. Breitenbach, S. Schiller, J. Mlynek, Measurement of the quantum states of squeezed light. Nature 387, 471–475 (1997)

    1997

  4. [4]

    W. P. Schleich, Quantum optics in phase space (John Wiley & Sons, 2015)

    2015

  5. [5]

    Babichev, J

    S. Babichev, J. Appel, A. Lvovsky, Homodyne tomography characterization and nonlocality of a dual-mode optical qubit. Physical Review Letters 92, 193601 (2004)

    2004

  6. [6]

    Kosaka, T

    H. Kosaka, T. Inagaki, Y. Rikitake, H. Imamura, Y. Mitsumori, K. Edamatsu, Spin state to- mography of optically injected electrons in a semiconductor. Nature 457, 702–705 (2009)

    2009

  7. [7]

    Jullien, P

    T. Jullien, P. Roulleau, B. Roche, A. Cavanna, Y. Jin, D. Glattli, Quantum tomography of an electron. Nature 514, 603–607 (2014)

    2014

  8. [8]

    Laurell, S

    H. Laurell, S. Luo, R. Weissenbilder, M. Ammitzbö ll, S. Ahmed, H. Sö derberg, C. L. M. Petersson, V. Poulain, C. Guo, C. Dittel, D. Finkelstein-Shapiro, R. J. Squibb, R. Feifel, M. Gisselbrecht, C. L. Arnold, A. Buchleitner, E. Lindroth, A. Frisk Kockum, A. L’Huillier, D. Busto, Measuring the quantum state of photoelectrons. Nature Photonics 19, 352–357 (2025)

    2025

  9. [9]

    K. X. Nguyen, Y. Jiang, C.-H. Lee, P. Kharel, Y. Zhang, A. M. van der Zande, P. Y. Huang, Achieving sub -0.5-angstrom–resolution ptychography in an uncorrected electron micro- scope. Science 383, 865–870 (2024)

    2024

  10. [10]

    Morimoto, L

    Y. Morimoto, L. B. Madsen, Scattering of ultrashort electron wave packets: optical theorem, differential phase contrast and angular asymmetries. New Journal of Physics 26, 053012 (2024)

    2024

  11. [11]

    Feist, K

    A. Feist, K. E. Echternkamp, J. Schauss, S. V. Yalunin, S. Schä fer, C. Ropers, Quantum co- herent optical phase modulation in an ultrafast transmission electron microscope. Nature 521, 200–203 (2015). 9

    2015

  12. [12]

    Kfir, Entanglements of electrons and cavity photons in the strong-coupling regime

    O. Kfir, Entanglements of electrons and cavity photons in the strong-coupling regime. Phys- ical Review Letters 123, 103602 (2019)

    2019

  13. [13]

    M. V. Tsarev, A. Ryabov, P. Baum, Free-electron qubits and maximum-contrast attosecond pulses via temporal Talbot revivals. Physical Review Research 3, 043033 (2021)

    2021

  14. [14]

    Reinhardt, C

    O. Reinhardt, C. Mechel, M. Lynch, I. Kaminer, Free-electron qubits. Annalen der Physik 533, 2000254 (2021)

    2021

  15. [15]

    Arend, G

    G. Arend, G. Huang, A. Feist, Y. Yang, J.-W. Henke, Z. Qiu, H. Jeng, A. S. Raja, R. Haindl, R. N. Wang, T. J. Kippenberg, C. Ropers, Electrons herald non-classical light. Nature Phys- ics 21, 1855–1862 (2025)

    2025

  16. [16]

    F. J. Garcí a de Abajo, A. Polman, C. I. Velasco, M. Kociak, L. H. G. Tizei, O. Sté phan, S. Meuret, T. Sannomiya, K. Akiba, Y. Auad, A. Feist, C. Ropers, P. Baum, J. H. Gaida, M. Sivis, H. Lourenç o-Martins, L. Serafini, J. Verbeeck, A. Konecná , N. Talebi, B. M. Fer- rari, C. J. R. Duncan, M. G. Bravi, I. Ostroman, G. M. Vanacore, E. Nussinson, R. Ruimy...

    2025

  17. [17]

    Henke, H

    J.-W. Henke, H. Jeng, M. Sivis, C. Ropers, Observation of quantum entanglement between free electrons and photons. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.13047 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    Preimesberger, S

    A. Preimesberger, S. Bogdanov, I. C. Bicket, P. Rembold, P. Haslinger, Experimental veri- fication of electron-photon entanglement. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.13163 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  19. [19]

    Barwick, D

    B. Barwick, D. J. Flannigan, A. H. Zewail, Photon-induced near-field electron microscopy. Nature 462, 902–906 (2009)

    2009

  20. [20]

    Kealhofer, W

    C. Kealhofer, W. Schneider, D. Ehberger, A. Ryabov, F. Krausz, P. Baum, All-optical con- trol and metrology of electron pulses. Science 352, 429–433 (2016)

    2016

  21. [21]

    Shiloh, T

    R. Shiloh, T. Chlouba, P. Hommelhoff, Quantum -coherent light -electron interaction in a scanning electron microscope. Physical Review Letters 128, 235301 (2022)

    2022

  22. [22]

    Nabben, J

    D. Nabben, J. Kuttruff, L. Stolz, A. Ryabov, P. Baum, Attosecond electron microscopy of sub-cycle optical dynamics. Nature 619, 63–67 (2023)

    2023

  23. [23]

    J. H. Gaida, H. Lourenç o-Martins, M. Sivis, T. Rittmann, A. Feist, F. J. Garcí a de Abajo, C. Ropers, Attosecond electron microscopy by free -electron homodyne detection. Nature Photonics 18, 509–515 (2024). 10

    2024

  24. [24]

    Bucher, H

    T. Bucher, H. Nahari, H. Herzig Sheinfux, R. Ruimy, A. Niedermayr, R. Dahan, Q. Yan, Y. Adiv, M. Yannai, J. Chen, Y. Kurman, S. T. Park, D. J. Masiel, E. Janzen, J. H. Edgar, F. Carbone, G. Bartal, S. Tsesses, F. H. L. Koppens, G. M. Vanacore, I. Kaminer, Coher- ently amplified ultrafast imaging using a free-electron interferometer. Nature Photonics 18, 8...

    2024

  25. [25]

    Y. Fang, J. Kuttruff, D. Nabben, P. Baum, Structured electrons with chiral mass and charge. Science 385, 183–187 (2024)

    2024

  26. [26]

    T. P. Wangler, RF Linear accelerators (John Wiley & Sons, 2008)

    2008

  27. [27]

    Chlouba, R

    T. Chlouba, R. Shiloh, S. Kraus, L. Brü ckner, J. Litzel, P. Hommelhoff, Coherent nanopho- tonic electron accelerator. Nature 622, 476–480 (2023)

    2023

  28. [28]

    Broaddus, T

    P. Broaddus, T. Egenolf, D. S. Black, M. Murillo, C. Woodahl, Y. Miao, U. Niedermayer, R. L. Byer, K. J. Leedle, O. Solgaard, Subrelativistic alternating phase focusing dielectric laser accelerators. Physical Review Letters 132, 085001 (2024)

    2024

  29. [29]

    Tziperman, D

    O. Tziperman, D. Nabben, R. Ruimy, J. Holder, E. Nussinson, Y. Fang, A. Gorlach, D. Ka- zenwadel, A. Karnieli, I. Kaminer, P. Baum, Two-electron quantum walks for probing en- tanglement and decoherence in an electron microscope. Nature Physics 22, 763-769 (2026)

    2026

  30. [30]

    K. E. Priebe, C. Rathje, S. V. Yalunin, T. Hohage, A. Feist, S. Schä fer, C. Ropers, Attosec- ond electron pulse trains and quantum state reconstruction in ultrafast transmission electron microscopy. Nature Photonics 11, 793–797 (2017)

    2017

  31. [31]

    Feist, N

    A. Feist, N. Bach, N. Rubiano da Silva, T. Danz, M. Mö ller, K. E. Priebe, T. Domrö se, J. G. Gatzmann, S. Rost, J. Schauss, S. Strauch, R. Bormann, M. Sivis, S. Schä fer, C. Ropers, Ul- trafast transmission electron microscopy using a laser-driven field emitter: Femtosecond res- olution with a high coherence electron beam. Ultramicroscopy 176, 63–73 (2017)

    2017

  32. [32]

    Kazenwadel, J

    D. Kazenwadel, J. Holder, J. Kuttruff, P. Baum, Energy offset between femtosecond and thermal electrons in nanometer field -emitter tips. Physical Review Applied 24, 024021 (2025)

    2025

  33. [33]

    Zhang, Y

    D. Zhang, Y. Zeng, Y. Bai, Z. Li, Y. Tian, R. Li, Coherent surface plasmon polariton ampli- fication via free-electron pumping. Nature 611, 55–60 (2022)

    2022

  34. [34]

    J. Yang, R. Dettori, J. P. F. Nunes, N. H. List, E. Biasin, M. Centurion, Z. Chen, A. A. Cor- dones, D. P. Deponte, T. F. Heinz, M. E. Kozina, K. Ledbetter, M.-F. Lin, A. M. Lindenberg, M. Mo, A. Nilsson, X. Shen, T. J. A. Wolf, D. Donadio, K. J. Gaffney, T . J. Martinez, X. Wang, Direct observation of ultrafast hydrogen bond strengthening in liquid water...

    2021

  35. [35]

    Baum, On the physics of ultrashort single -electron pulses for time -resolved microscopy and diffraction

    P. Baum, On the physics of ultrashort single -electron pulses for time -resolved microscopy and diffraction. Chemical Physics 423, 55–61 (2013). 11

    2013

  36. [36]

    Iaconis, I

    C. Iaconis, I. A. Walmsley, Spectral phase interferometry for direct electric-field reconstruc- tion of ultrashort optical pulses. Optics Letters 23, 792–794 (1998)

    1998

  37. [37]

    Z. Chen, B. Zhang, Y. Pan, M. Krü ger, Quantum wave function reconstruction by free-elec- tron spectral shearing interferometry. Science Advances 9, eadg8516 (2023)

    2023

  38. [38]

    Kuttruff, D

    J. Kuttruff, D. Nabben, A.-C. Zimmermann, A. Ryabov, P. Baum, Terahertz control and tim- ing correlations in a transmission electron microscope. Science Advances 10, eadl6543 (2024)

    2024

  39. [39]

    Kenfack, K

    A. Kenfack, K. Zyczkowski, Negativity of the wigner function as an indicator of non-classi- cality. Journal of Optics B: Quantum and Semiclassical Optics 6, 396 (2004)

    2004

  40. [40]

    Michalik, J

    A. Michalik, J. Sipe, Analytic model of electron pulse propagation in ultrafast electron dif- fraction experiments. Journal of Applied Physics 99 (2006)

    2006

  41. [41]

    Li, J.-W

    M. Li, J.-W. Geng, H. Liu, Y. Deng, C. Wu, L.-Y. Peng, Q. Gong, Y. Liu, Classical-quan- tum correspondence for above -threshold ionization. Physical Review Letters 112, 113002 (2014)

    2014

  42. [42]

    Shvetsov-Shilovski, M

    N. Shvetsov-Shilovski, M. Lein, L. Madsen, E. Rä sä nen, C. Lemell, J. Burgdö rfer, D. Arbó , K. Tőkési, Semiclassical two-step model for strong-field ionization. Physical Review A 94, 013415 (2016)

    2016

  43. [43]

    G. M. Vanacore, I. Madan, G. Berruto, K. Wang, E. Pomarico, R. J. Lamb, D. McGrouther, I. Kaminer, B. Barwick, F. J. Garcí a de Abajo, F. Carbone, Attosecond coherent control of free-electron wave functions using semi-infinite light fields. Nature Communications 9, 2694 (2018)

    2018

  44. [44]

    Feist, S

    A. Feist, S. V. Yalunin, S. Schä fer, C. Ropers, High-purity free-electron momentum states prepared by three -dimensional optical phase modulation. Physical Review Research 2, 043227 (2020)

    2020

  45. [45]

    Ryabov, J

    A. Ryabov, J. W. Thurner, D. Nabben, M. V. Tsarev, P. Baum, Attosecond metrology in a continuous-beam transmission electron microscope. Science Advances 6, eabb1393 (2020)

    2020

  46. [46]

    Dasenbrook, J

    D. Dasenbrook, J. Bowles, J. B. Brask, P. P. Hofer, C. Flindt, N. Brunner, Single-electron entanglement and nonlocality. New Journal of Physics 18, 043036 (2016)

    2016

  47. [47]

    S. Li, F. Cropp, K. Kabra, T. Lane, G. Wetzstein, P. Musumeci, D. Ratner, Electron ghost imaging. Physical Review Letters 121, 114801 (2018)

    2018

  48. [48]

    P. Rosi, L. Viani, E. Rotunno, S. Frabboni, A. Tavabi, R. Dunin-Borkowski, A. Roncaglia, V. Grillo, Increasing the resolution of transmission electron microscopy by computational ghost imaging. Physical Review Letters 133, 123801 (2024)

    2024

  49. [49]

    Electron modulation and ultrafast near-field imaging with vectorial laser fields

    J. Kuttruff, L. Mö hrle, L. Ciorciaro, L. Schmidt-Mende, P. Baum, Electron modulation and ultrafast near -field imaging with vectorial laser fields. arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.22152 (2026). 12

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  50. [50]

    Kuttruff, J

    J. Kuttruff, J. Holder, Y. Meng, P. Baum, Real-time electron clustering in an event -driven hybrid pixel detector. Ultramicroscopy 255, 113864 (2024)

    2024

  51. [51]

    Tsarev, A

    M. Tsarev, A. Ryabov, P. Baum, Measurement of temporal coherence of free electrons by time-domain electron interferometry. Physical Review Letters 127, 165501 (2021)

    2021

  52. [52]

    Laurell, D

    H. Laurell, D. Finkelstein-Shapiro, C. Dittel, C. Guo, R. Demjaha, M. Ammitzbö ll, R. Weissenbilder, L. Neoricic, S. Luo, M. Gisselbrecht, C. L. Arnold, A. Buchleitner, T. Pullerits, A. L’Huillier, D. Busto, Continuous-variable quantum state tomography of pho- toelectrons. Physical Review Research 4, 033220 (2022)

    2022

  53. [53]

    Goldstein, Classical mechanics (Pearson Education India, 2011)

    H. Goldstein, Classical mechanics (Pearson Education India, 2011)

    2011

  54. [54]

    Saliè res, B

    P. Saliè res, B. Carré , L. Le Dé roff, F. Grasbon, G. G. Paulus, H. Walther, R. Kopold, W. Becker, D. B. Miloševic, A. Sanpera, M. Lewenstein, Feynman’s path-integral approach for intense-laser-atom interactions. Science 292, 902–905 (2001)

    2001

  55. [55]

    W. Quan, Z. Lin, M. Wu, H. Kang, H. Liu, X. Liu, J. Chen, J. Liu, X. T. He, S. G. Chen, H. Xiong, L. Guo, H. Xu, Y. Fu, Y. Cheng, Z. Z. Xu, Classical aspects in above -threshold ionization with a midinfrared strong laser field. Physical Review Letters 103, 093001 (2009). 13 Fig. 1. Concept of free -electron spectral shearing interferome- try. a, Experimen...

    2009