REVIEW 2 cited by
Are $f(R, {\rm Matter})$ theories really relevant to cosmology?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
We examine $f(R, \text{Matter})$ theories that directly couple the curvature $R$ or $R_{\mu\nu}$ with the matter sector in the action, in addition to the universal coupling. We argue that if the matter sector includes the Standard Model (SM), such theories are either inconsistent or already excluded by experiments unless they are a rewriting of $f(R)$ gravity or general relativity. If these theories genuinely couple the SM to curvature, they suffer from the presence of ghost states at energies within their domain of application for cosmological purposes. Therefore, we raise questions about their relevance to cosmology. Moreover, if such theories do not include the SM, they should just be seen as scalar-tensor, vector-tensor, ..., theories, depending on the additional degrees of freedom. They should thus be studied accordingly.}
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Lagrangian Identity and Mass Evolution of Particle-like Objects in Nonminimally Coupled Gravity
Nambu-Goto p-branes satisfy L_[p]=T_[p]/(p+1), so their rest mass scales as f2^{-p/(p+1)} under nonminimal matter-geometry coupling in FLRW cosmologies.
-
CUDA Assisted Swampland and Black Hole Thermodynamics
Charged black holes in a Gauss-Bonnet-modified theory are claimed to become unstable when Q/M > 2√π, linking black hole thermodynamics to swampland constraints.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.