REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by
Monitored interacting Dirac fermions
T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash
Pith's one-line read Monitored one-dimensional Dirac fermions undergo a Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless transition: attractions keep correlations algebraic below a critical measurement rate, while any nonzero rate localizes free fermions.
desk verdict A genuine refinement of the group's earlier Dirac-fermion result, with a plausible critical-endpoint scenario for free fermions, but the load-bearing complex RG rotation in Sec. III D is asserted rather than derived. read the letter →
The pith
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
The reading
What carries the argument
The load-bearing object is the replicated Keldysh path-integral action of the bosonized model. After the $k=0$ center-of-mass (heating) mode is integrated out exactly, the action reduces to a complex sine-Gordon theory whose forward and backward contours decouple: on each contour $S_\sigma[\varphi_\sigma] = \frac{K_\sigma}{2\pi}\sum_{k>0}\int_{p,\omega} \varphi_\sigma^{(k)*}(p^2+\omega^2)\varphi_\sigma^{(k)} + i\lambda_\sigma \sum_{r\neq r'}\int_{x,t} \cos 2(\varphi_\sigma^{(r)}-\varphi_\sigma^{(r')})$, with $K_\sigma = g(1 - 2i\sigma\gamma/\pi v g)$ and $\lambda_\sigma = im^2\gamma$. The argument is carried by a scale-dependent complex Wick rotation that rescales space and time by an angle $\beta_\sigma = s\,\mathrm{Im}(1/K_\sigma)$ at every RG step; this rotation preserves the exact Hermiticity symmetry $S[\varphi_+,\varphi_-] = -S^*[\varphi_-,\varphi_+]$ and converts the complex flow into the real BKT equations $\partial_s Y = 2XY$, $\partial_s X = Y^2$, with conserved $\delta = Y^2 - 2X^2$. The sign of the bare value $\delta \simeq (8m^4 I/\pi^3)\gamma^2/v^2 - 2\Delta g^2$ decides whether the cosine term is relevant: negative $\delta$ yields a line of fixed points (algebraic correlations), positive $\delta$ yields a runaway flow and a finite correlation length, and the leading $\gamma^2$ term in $\delta$ is exactly what forces $\gamma_c = 0$ at $\Delta g = 0$.
What would settle it
Simulate the bosonized replica action, or a discretized Dirac chain with weak monitoring, and compute the stationary density-density correlation function $C(x)$: along the free line $\Delta g = 0$ the claim requires exponential decay with $\log \xi \sim 1/\gamma$ for every nonzero $\gamma$, so a single value of $\gamma$ with algebraic decay would falsify $\gamma_c = 0$; for $\Delta g < 0$ the claim requires algebraic decay for some $\gamma > 0$ below a critical rate, so observing exponential decay at arbitrarily small $\gamma$ for fixed $\Delta g < 0$ would falsify the BKT phase. A complementary analytic check computes the $O(\gamma^2)$ corrections to $\delta$ from the second-order flow of $\mathrm{Re}\,K_\sigma$ and asks whether $\delta$ stays positive at $\Delta g = 0$.
Extended reading notes
Core claim
At the paper's core is the claim that the competition between unitary evolution and local particle-number measurements in one-dimensional Dirac fermions is governed by a sine-Gordon-type nonlinearity in replica space, whose relevance is decided by a BKT flow. For attractive interactions (Luttinger parameter $g < 1$) and measurement strength $\gamma$ below a critical $\gamma_c \sim -\Delta g$, the nonlinearity is irrelevant: density-density correlations decay algebraically, $C(x) \simeq -c/2\pi^2 x^2$, and the correlation length is infinite. For $\gamma > \gamma_c$ the nonlinearity flows to strong coupling, producing a finite correlation length $\xi$ and exponentially decaying correlations, with the essential BKT scaling $\log \xi \sim 1/\sqrt{\gamma - \gamma_c}$. The paper's central new prediction is the non-interacting limit $g = 1$: because the control parameter is $\delta \sim \gamma^2$ there rather than $\delta \sim \gamma - \gamma_c$, the critical point shifts to $\gamma_c = 0$ and the correlation length diverges only as $\log \xi \sim 1/\gamma$, matching weak-localization phenomenology. Along the free-fermion line the system is therefore localized for every nonzero $\gamma$ in the thermodynamic limit, and the entanglement entropy, computed from density correlations via the Klich-Levitov relation, obeys an area law with no entanglement transition.
Load-bearing premise
Everything rests on one renormalization-group prescription: at every step, space and time are rotated by a complex angle chosen to keep the density operator Hermitian, which converts the complex flow into the standard real Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless flow equations. If that rotation is not a legitimate scheme, or if dropped second-order terms in the measurement rate change which of the two phases is favored near zero interaction, the predicted phase diagram does not follow.
Editorial extensions
If this is right
- For any attractive interaction $\Delta g < 0$ there is a genuine BKT transition at a nonzero critical rate $\gamma_c \simeq -\Delta g\,\pi^{3/2}/(2m^2 I)$: correlations are algebraic below it and exponentially decaying above it, with $\log \xi \sim 1/\sqrt{\gamma - \gamma_c}$.
- For free Dirac fermions the critical rate collapses to $\gamma_c = 0$: every nonzero measurement strength produces a finite correlation length, with the modified scaling $\log \xi \sim 1/\gamma$ rather than the BKT form.
- Free monitored fermions are localized in the thermodynamic limit for any $\gamma > 0$: entanglement entropy saturates to an area law, so no entanglement transition occurs as a function of $\gamma$.
- Below the correlation length the entanglement entropy retains the free-fermion logarithmic form $S_{\mathrm{vN}} \simeq (c/3)\log L$ with $c = \mathrm{Re}(1/K_+) \to 1$ as $\gamma \to 0$, so the free point is a doubly fine-tuned critical endpoint of the BKT line.
- By the duality $g \leftrightarrow 1/g$, $\hat\theta \leftrightarrow \hat\varphi$, the same BKT physics describes monitoring the current density with repulsive interactions, so a symmetric phase diagram is expected when both density and current measurements are applied at equal rates.
Reading between the lines
- A concrete experimental signature follows from the paper's logic even though the authors do not spell it out: prepare a nearly free one-dimensional gas, monitor its density weakly, and measure the density-density correlations; they should turn from algebraic to exponential at a distance that grows like $\exp(1/\gamma)$, so the algebraic phase is visible only as $\gamma \to 0$.
- The same formalism implies an operator-asymmetry test: monitoring the current density instead of the particle density should flip the sign of the interaction axis (the paper's duality), so on a single experimental platform the two monitoring channels should yield phase diagrams that are mirror images in $\Delta g$.
- An implicit consequence of the critical-endpoint picture is that the free monitored ensemble is conformal (central charge $c = 1$) only at exactly $\gamma = 0$; any nonzero $\gamma$ flows to a gapped, area-law state, so the usual free-fermion criticality and the monitored ensemble belong to the same universality class only in the zero-measurement limit.
- A numerical check that would go beyond the paper: compute the stationary covariance matrix of a weakly monitored tight-binding chain with approximately linear dispersion and extract $\xi$; if $\log \xi$ is linear in $1/\gamma$ over a wide range, the continuum prediction is robust to the lattice regularization, and if not, the $\gamma_c = 0$ endpoint is a continuum artifact.
Signed reviews
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper analyzes a continuum model of monitored interacting Dirac fermions (Thirring model) in one dimension using a replica Keldysh path integral. The central claims are: (i) for attractive interactions, a BKT-type transition occurs at a critical measurement rate γ_c, separating an algebraic critical phase from a localized phase with exponentially decaying density-density correlations; (ii) in the non-interacting limit γ_c = 0, so any nonzero measurement strength gives a finite correlation length with log ξ ~ 1/γ; (iii) along the non-interacting line, the entanglement entropy obeys an area law for any γ > 0 in the thermodynamic limit. The derivation combines exact bosonization, a replica Keldysh action, integration of a divergent center-of-mass mode, and a second-order perturbative RG. The critical step is a complex space-time rotation used at each RG step to convert complex flow equations into the real BKT flow.
Significance. If the central results hold, the paper provides a rare analytical treatment of measurement-induced phase transitions in a continuum interacting fermion model, going beyond non-interacting lattice calculations. The prediction that weak measurements in the free case are a doubly fine-tuned critical endpoint with log ξ ~ 1/γ is conceptually striking and connects to weak-localization phenomenology. The authors are careful to derive the replica master equation, the bosonized action, and the Gaussian observables in appendices, and they compute the key integral I=0.07805 explicitly. The main physical claim depends on a nontrivial complex Wick rotation whose validity is not established in the manuscript, which is the reason for my conditional assessment.
major comments (3)
- [Sec. III D, Eqs. (44)-(48)] The conversion of the complex flow equations (44)-(45) into the real BKT equations (46)-(48) is the load-bearing step for the entire phase diagram, including γ_c=0 and log ξ ~ 1/γ. This conversion is achieved by the scale-dependent complex space-time rescaling (x,t) → (x,t)e^{iβσ}/b with βσ = s Im(1/Kσ). The paper does not show that this rotation is a symmetry of the Wilsonian effective action, that it commutes with the momentum-shell integration used to derive (44)-(45), or that the rotated coordinates still describe the same physical correlation length. The assertion that this rotation is 'uniquely defined' is not substantiated, and no alternative scheme-independence check is provided. This is a central technical gap, not a presentation issue.
- [Sec. III E, Eq. (50) and following discussion] The claim that δ = Y^2 - 2X^2 is positive for Δg=0 and hence γ_c=0 relies on the bare values X=O(γ^2) and Y^2 ~ m^4 γ^2. While the O(γ^4) terms in X^2 are indeed subleading to Y^2 near γ=0, the O(γ^3) terms neglected in the flow equations (44)-(45) are not controlled at the RG scale s* ~ 1/γ, where X(s) diverges and the perturbative expansion in the nonlinearity is no longer small. The authors should quantify the size of the neglected terms at s* or argue why the standard BKT extraction of the correlation length from the one-loop flow remains valid in this complex-coupling non-equilibrium setting.
- [Sec. III D, paragraph after Eq. (43), and Sec. III E, Eq. (52)] The identification of the RG scale s* with the physical correlation length ξ requires that the complex rescaling factor e^{iβσ} in the step (x,t) → (x,t)e^{iβσ}/b does not alter the mapping between the RG time s and the physical distance. The paper states that this phase 'does not need to be tracked' and 'does not enter' the computation of observables, but this is stated without proof. Since βσ is scale-dependent, the relation between s and the original coordinates could acquire an additional factor, potentially affecting the numerical coefficient in log ξ ~ 1/γ and the identification of the critical point. A derivation or an explicit argument that the rotation is a pure gauge is needed.
minor comments (3)
- [Sec. III D, Eq. (39)] The transition from the action (35) to the Euclidean form (39) involves a Wick rotation t → iσt and a simultaneous rescaling of space and time that depends on the complex phase of ησ. The text would benefit from stating the precise transformation of the fields and the measure under this combined rotation, rather than referring only to Fig. 5.
- [App. G, Eq. (G20)] The constant I is defined by a double integral that is evaluated numerically. The paper reports the numerical value 0.07805, but it would be helpful to state the integration limits and the numerical method used, and to note the claimed fifth-digit agreement between the x^2 and t^2 integrals.
- [Sec. II B, Eq. (10)] The statement that the measurement operator is 'unique up to a global prefactor' is slightly imprecise, since the relative coefficient m between O1 and O2 is a free parameter that is later assumed O(1). The text should clarify that the global prefactor is absorbed into γ while m remains a physical parameter.
Circularity Check
No significant circularity: the BKT flow and the gamma_c=0 claim follow from the derived RG equations and bare couplings, not from fitted data or load-bearing self-citation.
full rationale
The derivation is self-contained: the replicated Keldysh action (18)-(22) is built directly from the microscopic measurement and Hamiltonian, the Gaussian action (25)/(27) fixes c = Re 1/K_+, and the perturbative RG in Sec. III D derives the complex flow (44)-(45) with the constant I ≈ 0.07805 evaluated numerically in App. G rather than fitted to a target observable. The least secure step is the complex spacetime rotation in Sec. III D, where beta_sigma = s Im(1/K_sigma) is imposed to preserve Hermiticity and the passage from the complex flow to the real BKT equations (46)-(48) is asserted rather than derived; however, this is a renormalization-scheme assumption, not a case in which a predicted quantity is defined to be its own input. The central claims gamma_c ~ -Delta g, log xi ~ 1/sqrt(gamma - gamma_c), and log xi ~ 1/gamma at Delta g = 0 follow algebraically from the sign of delta in Eq. (50), which is fixed by the bare X and Y definitions. Self-citations, especially to Ref. [13], are contextual: the paper states that its improved replica treatment 'does not change the results compared to the previous work [13]' but derives those results here rather than importing them. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no uniqueness theorem from prior work is invoked to force the chosen scheme. The real vulnerability is correctness of the complex-rotation step, not circularity.
Assumptions & free parameters
free parameters (1)
- beta_sigma =
s Im(1/K_sigma) at each RG step
assumptions (8)
- domain assumption Replica trick: analytic continuation in replica number R and limit R -> 1.
- standard math Exact bosonization of the massless Thirring model in the spatial continuum.
- domain assumption Keldysh path integral for the generalized Lindblad replica master equation.
- domain assumption Second-order perturbative RG in the sine-Gordon nonlinearity.
- ad hoc to paper Complex Wick rotation with angle beta_sigma = s Im(1/K_sigma).
- domain assumption Identification of RG scale s* with physical correlation length xi.
- standard math Klich-Levitov relation and leading-cumulant approximation for entanglement entropy.
- domain assumption Power-counting assumption m = O(1).
Cite this review
Pith. "Pith review of Monitored interacting Dirac fermions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KRFF7VIB
@misc{pith2026250202645,
author = {Pith},
title = {Pith review of: Monitored interacting Dirac fermions},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KRFF7VIB}},
note = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.02645}
}
abstract
We analytically study interacting Dirac fermions, described by the Thirring model, under weak local particle number measurements with monitoring rate $\gamma$. This system maps to a bosonic replica field theory, analyzed via the renormalization group. For a nonzero attractive interaction, a phase transition occurs at a critical measurement strength $\gamma_c$. When $\gamma>\gamma_c$, the system enters a localized phase characterized by exponentially decaying density-density correlations beyond a finite correlation length; for $\gamma<\gamma_c$, the correlations decay algebraically. The transition is of BKT-type, reflected by a characteristic scaling of the correlation length. In the non-interacting limit, $\gamma_c\to0$ shifts to zero, reducing the algebraic phase to a single point in parameter space. This identifies weak measurements in the free case as an implicit double fine-tuning to the critical endpoint of the BKT phase transition. Along the non-interacting line, we compute the entanglement entropy from density-density correlation functions and find no entanglement transition at nonzero measurement strength in the thermodynamic limit.
Figures
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Replica Keldysh field theory of quantum-jump processes: General formalism and application to imbalanced and inefficient fermion counting
A replica Keldysh field theory for general quantum-jump processes is derived; for imbalanced and inefficient 1D fermion counting it predicts no measurement-induced transition and an inefficiency scale ξ∼(1−η)^{−1/2}, ...
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
M. A. Norcia, W. B. Cairncross, K. Barnes, P . Battaglino, A. Brown, M. O. Brown, K. Cassella, C.-A. Chen, R. Coxe, D. Crow, J. Epstein, C. Griger, A. M. W. Jones, H. Kim, J. M. Kindem, J. King, S. S. Kondov, K. Kotru, J. Lauigan, M. Li, M. Lu, E. Megidish, J. Marjanovic, M. McDonald, T. Mittiga, J. A. Muniz, S. Narayanaswami, C. Nishiguchi, R. Notermans,...
2023
-
[2]
ˆO = ˆφ, ˆθ, but also any nonlinear function thereof
This definition applies to arbitrary op- erators, i.e. ˆO = ˆφ, ˆθ, but also any nonlinear function thereof. It is di fferent from the usual definition of classical and quan- tum fields in the Keldysh formalism, where it is only used in this form for linear combinations of field operators. The def - inition we use here makes sure that the correlation function ...
-
[3]
(iii) For X = 0, the parameter δ = 8Im4 π3 γ2 v2 > 0 is always positive
To leading order we find logξ ∼ 1√γ −γc , (53) which matches the BKT essential scaling. (iii) For X = 0, the parameter δ = 8Im4 π3 γ2 v2 > 0 is always positive. This shifts the critical measurement strength γc → 0 in this limit, implying that the correlation length is alway s fi- niteξ <∞ for any non-zero measurement strength γ> 0. For γc = 0 the scaling cl...
-
[4]
There, a volume-law phase is predicted for su f- ficiently large measurement and interaction strength [ 16, 22]
By our approach we do not find a phase with volume-law entanglement, in contrast to recent results for lat- tice fermions. There, a volume-law phase is predicted for su f- ficiently large measurement and interaction strength [ 16, 22]. (v) Relation to previous works on monitored Dirac fermions: Compared to previous work on monitored non- interacting Dirac f...
2004
-
[5]
Graham, L
T. Graham, L. Phuttitarn, R. Chinnarasu, Y . Song, C. Poole, K. Jooya, J. Scott, A. Scott, P . Eichler, and M. Sa ffman, Mid- circuit measurements on a single-species neutral alkali at om quantum processor, Physical Review X 13 (2023)
2023
-
[6]
J. M. Koh, S.-N. Sun, M. Motta, and A. J. Minnich, Measurement-induced entanglement phase transition on a su - perconducting quantum processor with mid-circuit readout , Nature Physics 19, 1314–1319 (2023)
2023
-
[7]
DeCross, E
M. DeCross, E. Chertkov, M. Kohagen, and M. Foss-Feig, Qubit-reuse compilation with mid-circuit measurement and reset, Phys. Rev. X 13, 041057 (2023)
2023
-
[8]
Wolff, J.-S
S. Wolff, J.-S. Bernier, D. Poletti, A. Sheikhan, and C. Kollath, Evolution of two-time correlations in dissipative quantum spin systems: Aging and hierarchical dynamics, Phys. Rev. B 100, 165144 (2019)
2019
Show all 115 references
-
[9]
S. Wolff, A. Sheikhan, and C. Kollath, Numerical evaluation of two-time correlation functions in open quantum systems wit h matrix product state methods: a comparison, SciPost Phys. Core 3, 10 (2020)
2020
-
[10]
Poletti, J.-S
D. Poletti, J.-S. Bernier, A. Georges, and C. Kollath, Interaction-induced impeding of decoherence and anomalou s diffusion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 045302 (2012)
2012
-
[11]
Pichler, A
H. Pichler, A. J. Daley, and P . Zoller, Nonequilibrium dynam- ics of bosonic atoms in optical lattices: Decoherence of man y- body states due to spontaneous emission, Phys. Rev. A 82, 063605 (2010)
2010
-
[12]
A. J. Daley, Quantum trajectories and open many-body quan- tum systems, Advances in Physics 63, 77 (2014)
2014
-
[13]
S. F. Edwards and P . W. Anderson, Theory of spin glasses, Journal of Physics F: Metal Physics 5, 965 (1975)
1975
-
[14]
V . J. Emery, Critical properties of many-component systems , Phys. Rev. B 11, 239 (1975)
1975
-
[15]
Grinstein and A
G. Grinstein and A. Luther, Application of the renormalization group to phase transitions in disordered systems, Phys. Rev. B 13, 1329 (1976)
1976
-
[16]
Buchhold, Y
M. Buchhold, Y . Minoguchi, A. Altland, and S. Diehl, E ffec- tive theory for the measurement-induced phase transition o f dirac fermions, Phys. Rev. X 11, 041004 (2021)
2021
-
[17]
Poboiko, P
I. Poboiko, P . P¨ opperl, I. V . Gornyi, and A. D. Mirlin, The- ory of free fermions under random projective measurements, Phys. Rev. X 13, 041046 (2023)
2023
-
[18]
Poboiko, I
I. Poboiko, I. V . Gornyi, and A. D. Mirlin, Measurement- induced phase transition for free fermions above one dimen- sion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 110403 (2024)
2024
-
[19]
Poboiko, P
I. Poboiko, P . P¨ opperl, I. V . Gornyi, and A. D. Mirlin, Measurement-induced transitions for interacting fermion s, Phys. Rev. B 111, 024204 (2025)
2025
-
[20]
Y . Bao, S. Choi, and E. Altman, Theory of the phase transition in random unitary circuits with measurements, Phys. Rev. B 101, 104301 (2020)
2020
-
[21]
Jian, Y .-Z
C.-M. Jian, Y .-Z. Y ou, R. V asseur, and A. W. W. Ludwig, Measurement-induced criticality in random quantum circui ts, Phys. Rev. B 101, 104302 (2020)
2020
-
[22]
Skinner, J
B. Skinner, J. Ruhman, and A. Nahum, Measurement-induced phase transitions in the dynamics of entanglement, Phys. Rev. X 9, 031009 (2019)
2019
-
[23]
M. Fava, L. Piroli, T. Swann, D. Bernard, and A. Nahum, Non- linear sigma models for monitored dynamics of free fermions , Phys. Rev. X 13, 041045 (2023)
2023
-
[24]
M. Fava, L. Piroli, D. Bernard, and A. Nahum, Monitored fermions with conserved u(1) charge, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 043246 (2024)
2024
-
[25]
H. Guo, M. S. Foster, C.-M. Jian, and A. W. W. Lud- wig, Field theory of monitored, interacting fermion dynamics with charge conservation (2024), arXiv:2410.07317 [cond– mat.stat-mech]
2024 arXiv
-
[26]
Y . Li, X. Chen, and M. P . A. Fisher, Quantum zeno e ffect and the many-body entanglement transition, Phys. Rev. B 98, 205136 (2018)
2018
-
[27]
Y . Li, X. Chen, and M. P . A. Fisher, Measurement-driven en- tanglement transition in hybrid quantum circuits, Phys. Rev. B 100, 134306 (2019)
2019
-
[28]
S. Choi, Y . Bao, X.-L. Qi, and E. Altman, Quantum error correction in scrambling dynamics and measurement-induce d phase transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 030505 (2020)
2020
-
[29]
Zabalo, M
A. Zabalo, M. J. Gullans, J. H. Wilson, S. Gopalakrish- nan, D. A. Huse, and J. H. Pixley, Critical properties of the measurement-induced transition in random quantum circuit s, Phys. Rev. B 101, 060301 (2020). 12
2020
-
[30]
Agrawal, A
U. Agrawal, A. Zabalo, K. Chen, J. H. Wilson, A. C. Pot- ter, J. H. Pixley, S. Gopalakrishnan, and R. V asseur, Entan- glement and charge-sharpening transitions in u(1) symmetr ic monitored quantum circuits, Phys. Rev. X 12, 041002 (2022)
2022
-
[31]
Zabalo, M
A. Zabalo, M. J. Gullans, J. H. Wilson, R. V asseur, A. W. W. Ludwig, S. Gopalakrishnan, D. A. Huse, and J. H. Pixley, Operator Scaling Dimensions and Multifractal - ity at Measurement-Induced Transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 050602 (2022)
2022
-
[32]
M. J. Gullans and D. A. Huse, Dynamical purification phase transition induced by quantum measurements, Phys. Rev. X 10, 041020 (2020)
2020
-
[33]
R. Fan, S. Vijay, A. Vishwanath, and Y .-Z. Y ou, Self-organized error correction in random unitary circuits with measureme nt, Phys. Rev. B 103, 174309 (2021)
2021
-
[34]
Li and M
Y . Li and M. P . A. Fisher, Statistical mechanics of quantum error correcting codes, Phys. Rev. B 103, 104306 (2021)
2021
-
[35]
Nahum, S
A. Nahum, S. Roy, B. Skinner, and J. Ruhman, Measurement and entanglement phase transitions in all-to-all quantum c ir- cuits, on quantum trees, and in landau-ginsburg theory, PRX Quantum 2, 010352 (2021)
2021
-
[36]
Fuji and Y
Y . Fuji and Y . Ashida, Measurement-induced quantum criti- cality under continuous monitoring, Phys. Rev. B 102, 054302 (2020)
2020
-
[37]
S.-K. Jian, C. Liu, X. Chen, B. Swingle, and P . Zhang, Measurement-induced phase transition in the monitored sachdev-ye-kitaev model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 140601 (2021)
2021
-
[38]
E. V . H. Doggen, Y . Gefen, I. V . Gornyi, A. D. Mirlin, and D. G. Polyakov, Generalized quantum measurements with ma- trix product states: Entanglement phase transition and clu ster- ization, Physical Review Research 4 (2022)
2022
-
[39]
Ippoliti and V
M. Ippoliti and V . Khemani, Postselection-free entangleme nt dynamics via spacetime duality, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 060501 (2021)
2021
-
[40]
Ippoliti, T
M. Ippoliti, T. Rakovszky, and V . Khemani, Fractal, logarit h- mic, and volume-law entangled nonthermal steady states via spacetime duality, Physical Review X 12 (2022)
2022
-
[41]
Biella and M
A. Biella and M. Schir´ o, Many-body quantum zeno effect and measurement-induced subradiance transition, Quantum 5, 528 (2021)
2021
-
[42]
Block, Y
M. Block, Y . Bao, S. Choi, E. Altman, and N. Y . Yao, Measurement-induced transition in long-range interactin g quantum circuits, Physical Review Letters 128 (2022)
2022
-
[43]
Behrends, F
J. Behrends, F. V enn, and B. B´ eri, Surface codes, quantum circuits, and entanglement phases, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 013137 (2024)
2024
-
[44]
S. P . Kelly and J. Marino, Entanglement transitions inducedby quantum-data collection, Phys. Rev. A 111, L010402 (2025)
2025
-
[45]
Sierant, M
P . Sierant, M. Schir` o, M. Lewenstein, and X. Turkeshi, Measurement-induced phase transitions in (d +1)-dimensional stabilizer circuits, Phys. Rev. B 106, 214316 (2022)
2022
-
[46]
Turkeshi, R
X. Turkeshi, R. Fazio, and M. Dalmonte, Measurement- induced criticality in (2 + 1)-dimensional hybrid quantum cir- cuits, Phys. Rev. B 102, 014315 (2020)
2020
-
[47]
Lavasani, Y
A. Lavasani, Y . Alavirad, and M. Barkeshli, Topological order and criticality in (2 + 1)D monitored random quantum circuits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 235701 (2021)
2021
-
[48]
O. Lunt, M. Szyniszewski, and A. Pal, Measurement-induced criticality and entanglement clusters: A study of one- dimensional and two-dimensional cli fford circuits, Phys. Rev. B 104, 155111 (2021)
2021
-
[49]
Ippoliti, M
M. Ippoliti, M. J. Gullans, S. Gopalakrishnan, D. A. Huse, an d V . Khemani, Entanglement phase transitions in measurement- only dynamics, Phys. Rev. X 11, 011030 (2021)
2021
-
[50]
Klocke and M
K. Klocke and M. Buchhold, Majorana loop models for measurement-only quantum circuits, Physical Review X 13 (2023)
2023
-
[51]
X. Cao, A. Tilloy, and A. D. Luca, Entanglement in a fermion chain under continuous monitoring, SciPost Phys. 7, 024 (2019)
2019
-
[52]
Alberton, M
O. Alberton, M. Buchhold, and S. Diehl, Entanglement tran- sition in a monitored free-fermion chain: From extended cri t- icality to area law, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 170602 (2021)
2021
-
[53]
X. Chen, Y . Li, M. P . A. Fisher, and A. Lucas, Emergent conformal symmetry in nonunitary random dynamics of free fermions, Phys. Rev. Research 2, 033017 (2020)
2020
-
[54]
Bernard and T
D. Bernard and T. Jin, Open quantum symmetric simple ex- clusion process, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 080601 (2019)
2019
-
[55]
L´ oio, A
H. L´ oio, A. De Luca, J. De Nardis, and X. Turkeshi, Purifi- cation timescales in monitored fermions, Phys. Rev. B 108, L020306 (2023)
2023
-
[56]
R. D. Soares, Y . L. Gal, and M. Schir` o, Entanglement tran- sition due to particle losses in a monitored fermionic chain (2024), arXiv:2408.03700 [cond-mat.stat-mech]
2024 arXiv
-
[57]
Turkeshi, L
X. Turkeshi, L. Piroli, and M. Schir` o, Density and cur- rent statistics in boundary-driven monitored fermionic ch ains, Phys. Rev. B 109, 144306 (2024)
2024
-
[58]
Szyniszewski, O
M. Szyniszewski, O. Lunt, and A. Pal, Disordered monitored free fermions, Phys. Rev. B 108, 165126 (2023)
2023
-
[59]
C.-M. Jian, B. Bauer, A. Keselman, and A. W. W. Ludwig, Criticality and entanglement in nonunitary quantum circui ts and tensor networks of noninteracting fermions, Phys. Rev. B 106, 134206 (2022)
2022
-
[60]
M¨ uller, S
T. M¨ uller, S. Diehl, and M. Buchhold, Measurement-induced dark state phase transitions in long-ranged fermion system s, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 010605 (2022)
2022
-
[61]
Ladewig, S
B. Ladewig, S. Diehl, and M. Buchhold, Monitored open fermion dynamics: Exploring the interplay of measurement, decoherence, and free hamiltonian evolution, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 033001 (2022)
2022
-
[62]
Barratt, U
F. Barratt, U. Agrawal, S. Gopalakrishnan, D. A. Huse, R. V asseur, and A. C. Potter, Field theory of charge sharpen- ing in symmetric monitored quantum circuits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 120604 (2022)
2022
-
[63]
Kells, D
G. Kells, D. Meidan, and A. Romito, Topological transitions in weakly monitored free fermions, SciPost Phys. 14, 031 (2023)
2023
-
[64]
L. M. Sieberer, M. Buchhold, and S. Diehl, Keldysh field the- ory for driven open quantum systems, Reports on Progress in Physics 79, 096001 (2016)
2016
-
[65]
L. M. Sieberer, M. Buchhold, J. Marino, and S. Diehl, Universality in driven open quantum matter (2023), arXiv:2312.03073 [cond-mat.stat-mech]
2023 arXiv
-
[66]
Starchl, M
E. Starchl, M. H. Fischer, and L. M. Sieberer, Generalized zeno e ffect and entanglement dynamics induced by fermion counting (2024), arXiv:2406.07673 [quant-ph]
2024 arXiv
-
[67]
Buchhold, T
M. Buchhold, T. M¨ uller, and S. Diehl, Revealing mea- surement-induced phase transitions by pre-selection (2022), arXiv:2208.10506 [cond-mat.dis-nn]
2022 arXiv
-
[68]
Minato, K
T. Minato, K. Sugimoto, T. Kuwahara, and K. Saito, Fate of measurement-induced phase transition in long-range inter ac- tions, Physical Review Letters 128 (2022)
2022
-
[69]
Lumia, E
L. Lumia, E. Tirrito, R. Fazio, and M. Collura, Measurement- induced transitions beyond gaussianity: A single particle de- scription, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 023176 (2024)
2024
-
[70]
Zhang, S.-K
P . Zhang, S.-K. Jian, C. Liu, and X. Chen, Emergent replica conformal symmetry in non-hermitian syk chains, Quantum 13 5, 579 (2021)
2021
-
[71]
Chatterjee and R
P . Chatterjee and R. Modak,Measurement-induced phase tran- sition in periodically driven free-fermionic systems (2024), arXiv:2412.01917 [cond-mat.stat-mech]
2024 arXiv
-
[72]
B. Xing, X. Turkeshi, M. Schir´ o, R. Fazio, and D. Poletti, In - teractions and integrability in weakly monitored hamilton ian systems, Phys. Rev. B 109, L060302 (2024)
2024
-
[73]
V . L. Berezinskiˇi, Destruction of Long-range Order in One- dimensional and Two-dimensional Systems having a Contin- uous Symmetry Group I. Classical Systems, Soviet Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics 32, 493 (1971)
1971
-
[74]
V . L. Berezinskiˇi, Destruction of Long-range Order in One- dimensional and Two-dimensional Systems Possessing a Con- tinuous Symmetry Group. II. Quantum Systems, Soviet Jour- nal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics 34, 610 (1972)
1972
-
[75]
J. M. Kosterlitz and D. J. Thouless, Ordering, metastabilit y and phase transitions in two-dimensional systems, Journal of Physics C Solid State Physics 6, 1181 (1973)
1973
-
[76]
Nahum, J
A. Nahum, J. Ruhman, S. Vijay, and J. Haah, Quantum entan- glement growth under random unitary dynamics, Phys. Rev. X 7, 031016 (2017)
2017
-
[77]
C. M. Caves and G. J. Milburn, Quantum-mechanical model for continuous position measurements, Phys. Rev. A 36, 5543 (1987)
1987
-
[78]
Gisin and I
N. Gisin and I. C. Percival, The quantum-state diffusion model applied to open systems, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 25, 5677 (1992)
1992
-
[79]
H. M. Wiseman and G. J. Milburn, Interpretation of quantum jump and di ffusion processes illustrated on the bloch sphere, Phys. Rev. A 47, 1652 (1993)
1993
-
[80]
de V ega and D
I. de V ega and D. Alonso, Dynamics of non-markovian open quantum systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 015001 (2017)
2017
-
[81]
Di´ osi, N
L. Di´ osi, N. Gisin, and W. T. Strunz, Non-markovian quantum state diffusion, Phys. Rev. A 58, 1699 (1998)
1998
-
[82]
Percival, Quantum State Di ffusion (Cambridge University Press, 1998)
I. Percival, Quantum State Di ffusion (Cambridge University Press, 1998)
1998
-
[83]
We set ℏ= 1 throughout this work
-
[84]
Chahine and M
K. Chahine and M. Buchhold, Entanglement phases, localiza- tion, and multifractality of monitored free fermions in two di- mensions, Phys. Rev. B 110, 054313 (2024)
2024
-
[85]
Non-commuting operators cannot be measured simultane- ously. Therefore, it is important to specify the temporal or - der in which the respective generalized projections are app lied at each time-step, and corresponding terms cannot simply be added
-
[86]
An alternative approach involves the introduction of auxil iary super-symmetric degrees of freedom to account for the nor- malization [ 109– 112], which is subject of current research
-
[87]
{ ˆψd(x), ˆψd′ (x′)} = 0 and { ˆψd(x), ˆψ† d′ (x′)} =δdd′δ(x − x′)
-
[88]
J. M. Luttinger, An Exactly Soluble Model of a Many-Fermion System, Journal of Mathematical Physics 4, 1154 (1963)
1963
-
[89]
W. E. Thirring, A soluble relativistic field theory, Annals of Physics 3, 91 (1958)
1958
-
[90]
The measurement rate here carries dimension [ γ] = 1/time × length (a density in space and time), as the measurement is applied on every point in a continuous fashion
-
[91]
von Delft and H
J. von Delft and H. Schoeller, Bosonization for beginners — refermionization for experts, Annalen der Physik 510, 225–305 (1998)
1998
-
[92]
Tomonaga, Remarks on Bloch’s Method of Sound Waves applied to Many-Fermion Problems, Progress of Theoretical Physics 5, 544 (1950)
S.-i. Tomonaga, Remarks on Bloch’s Method of Sound Waves applied to Many-Fermion Problems, Progress of Theoretical Physics 5, 544 (1950)
1950
-
[93]
F. D. M. Haldane, ’luttinger liquid theory’ of one-dimensio nal quantum fluids. i. properties of the luttinger model and thei r extension to the general 1d interacting spinless fermi gas, Jour- nal of Physics C: Solid State Physics 14, 2585 (1981)
1981
-
[94]
D. C. Mattis and E. H. Lieb, Exact Solution of a Many- Fermion System and Its Associated Boson Field, Journal of Mathematical Physics 6, 304 (1965)
1965
-
[95]
Giamarchi, Quantum Physics in One Dimension (Oxford University Press, 2003)
T. Giamarchi, Quantum Physics in One Dimension (Oxford University Press, 2003)
2003
-
[96]
Klich and L
I. Klich and L. Levitov, Quantum noise as an entanglement meter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 100502 (2009)
2009
-
[97]
Bastianello, R´ enyi entanglement entropies for the compact- ified massless boson with open boundary conditions, Journal of High Energy Physics 2019 (2019)
A. Bastianello, R´ enyi entanglement entropies for the compact- ified massless boson with open boundary conditions, Journal of High Energy Physics 2019 (2019). [95] ∫ p,ω = ∫∞ −∞ d p 2π ∫∞ −∞ dω 2π
2019
-
[98]
This property is preserved by the RG flow which justifies to keep these definitions for a re-scaled e ffective theory
-
[99]
We re-introduced the short distance cuto ffa in the parameter m → m/a to eliminate the cuto ffdependence of the critical point
-
[100]
This power counting argument relies on m = O(1)
-
[101]
Coppola, E
M. Coppola, E. Tirrito, D. Karevski, and M. Collura, Growth of entanglement entropy under local projective measurements, Phys. Rev. B 105, 094303 (2022)
2022
-
[102]
Paviglianiti and A
A. Paviglianiti and A. Silva, Multipartite entanglement in the measurement-induced phase transition of the quantum ising chain, Phys. Rev. B 108, 184302 (2023)
2023
-
[103]
Turkeshi, A
X. Turkeshi, A. Biella, R. Fazio, M. Dalmonte, and M. Schir´ o, Measurement-induced entanglement transitions in the quan - tum ising chain: From infinite to zero clicks, Phys. Rev. B 103, 224210 (2021)
2021
-
[104]
Malakar, M
M. Malakar, M. Brenes, D. Segal, and A. Silva, Measurement- induced entanglement transition in chaotic quantum ising chain, Phys. Rev. B 110, 134316 (2024)
2024
-
[105]
Tirrito, A
E. Tirrito, A. Santini, R. Fazio, and M. Collura, Full counti ng statistics as probe of measurement-induced transitions in the quantum Ising chain, SciPost Phys. 15, 096 (2023)
2023
-
[106]
Weinstein, R
Z. Weinstein, R. Sajith, E. Altman, and S. J. Garratt, Non- locality and entanglement in measured critical quantum isi ng chains, Phys. Rev. B 107, 245132 (2023)
2023
-
[107]
Lecheminant, A
P . Lecheminant, A. O. Gogolin, and A. A. Nersesyan, Critical- ity in self-dual sine-Gordon models, Nuclear Physics B 639, 502 (2002)
2002
-
[108]
Gritsev, G
V . Gritsev, G. Japaridze, M. Pletyukhov, and D. Baeriswyl, Competing effects of interactions and spin-orbit coupling in a quantum wire, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 137207 (2005)
2005
-
[109]
B. L. Altshuler, D. Khmel’nitzkii, A. I. Larkin, and P . A. Lee, Magnetoresistance and hall e ffect in a disordered two- dimensional electron gas, Phys. Rev. B 22, 5142 (1980)
1980
-
[110]
Finkel’stein, Weak localization and coulomb interactio n in disordered systems, Z
A. Finkel’stein, Weak localization and coulomb interactio n in disordered systems, Z. Physik B - Condensed Matter 56, 189–196 (1984)
1984
-
[111]
T. A. Sedrakyan and K. B. Efetov, Supersymmetry method for interacting chaotic and disordered systems: The sachdev-y e- kitaev model, Physical Review B 102 (2020)
2020
-
[112]
Efetov, Supersymmetry in Disorder and Chaos (Cambridge University Press, 1996)
K. Efetov, Supersymmetry in Disorder and Chaos (Cambridge University Press, 1996)
1996
-
[113]
V erbaarschot, H
J. V erbaarschot, H. Weidenm¨ uller, and M. Zirnbauer, Grass- mann integration in stochastic quantum physics: The case of compound-nucleus scattering, Physics Reports 129, 367 (1985)
1985
-
[114]
M. R. Zirnbauer, The supersymmetry method of random ma- trix theory (2004), arXiv:math-ph/0404057 [math-ph]. 14 Appendix A: Construction of the replica master equation We intend to compute the replica density operator ˆρM for M ≥ 2. Suppose we drop the normalization condition ...
2004 arXiv
-
[115]
Here, however, the correlation functions of arb itrary observables are governed by the respective ’classic al’ fields as defined above
In the usual Keldysh formalism, this definition is only use d for field operators. Here, however, the correlation functions of arb itrary observables are governed by the respective ’classic al’ fields as defined above. Additionally, in contrast to the usual Keldys h formalism, the...
Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.