Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Localizing Memorization in SSL Vision Encoders

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.19069 v3 pith:KS4523JE submitted 2024-09-27 cs.LG cs.CV

classification cs.LGcs.CV
keywords memorizationdataencoderslocalizingpointsencodertraineddownstream
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent work on studying memorization in self-supervised learning (SSL) suggests that even though SSL encoders are trained on millions of images, they still memorize individual data points. While effort has been put into characterizing the memorized data and linking encoder memorization to downstream utility, little is known about where the memorization happens inside SSL encoders. To close this gap, we propose two metrics for localizing memorization in SSL encoders on a per-layer (layermem) and per-unit basis (unitmem). Our localization methods are independent of the downstream task, do not require any label information, and can be performed in a forward pass. By localizing memorization in various encoder architectures (convolutional and transformer-based) trained on diverse datasets with contrastive and non-contrastive SSL frameworks, we find that (1) while SSL memorization increases with layer depth, highly memorizing units are distributed across the entire encoder, (2) a significant fraction of units in SSL encoders experiences surprisingly high memorization of individual data points, which is in contrast to models trained under supervision, (3) atypical (or outlier) data points cause much higher layer and unit memorization than standard data points, and (4) in vision transformers, most memorization happens in the fully-connected layers. Finally, we show that localizing memorization in SSL has the potential to improve fine-tuning and to inform pruning strategies.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Captured by Captions: On Memorization and its Mitigation in CLIP Models

    cs.CV 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    CLIPMem, a leave-one-out alignment-difference metric, shows CLIP memorizes mis-captioned and atypical image-text pairs most, and text-side augmentation or removal of memorized samples can cut memorization while raisin...

Pith tools