Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Bayesian averaging of computer models with domain discrepancies: a nuclear physics perspective

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1904.04793 v2 pith:KTGORFR7 submitted 2019-04-09 stat.ME nucl-thphysics.data-anstat.AP

classification stat.MEnucl-thphysics.data-anstat.AP
keywords modelmodelsnuclearaveragingbayesiancompetingcomputerdomain
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

This article studies Bayesian model averaging (BMA) in the context of competing expensive computer models in a typical nuclear physics setup. While it is well known that BMA accounts for the additional uncertainty of the model itself, we show that it also decreases the posterior variance of the prediction errors via an explicit decomposition. We extend BMA to the situation where the competing models are defined on non-identical study regions. Any model's local forecasting difficulty is offset by predictions obtained from the average model, thus extending individual models to the full domain. We illustrate our methodology via pedagogical simulations and applications to forecasting nuclear observables, which exhibit convincing improvements in both the BMA prediction error and empirical coverage probabilities.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools