Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

From Graph to Word Bag: Introducing Domain Knowledge to Confusing Charge Prediction

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.04369 v3 pith:KUNASV6L submitted 2024-03-07 cs.AI cs.CL

classification cs.AIcs.CL
keywords confusingchargeschargeconstituentelementswordattentiondomain
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Confusing charge prediction is a challenging task in legal AI, which involves predicting confusing charges based on fact descriptions. While existing charge prediction methods have shown impressive performance, they face significant challenges when dealing with confusing charges, such as Snatch and Robbery. In the legal domain, constituent elements play a pivotal role in distinguishing confusing charges. Constituent elements are fundamental behaviors underlying criminal punishment and have subtle distinctions among charges. In this paper, we introduce a novel From Graph to Word Bag (FWGB) approach, which introduces domain knowledge regarding constituent elements to guide the model in making judgments on confusing charges, much like a judge's reasoning process. Specifically, we first construct a legal knowledge graph containing constituent elements to help select keywords for each charge, forming a word bag. Subsequently, to guide the model's attention towards the differentiating information for each charge within the context, we expand the attention mechanism and introduce a new loss function with attention supervision through words in the word bag. We construct the confusing charges dataset from real-world judicial documents. Experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of our method, especially in maintaining exceptional performance in imbalanced label distributions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. AppealCase: A Dataset and Benchmark for Civil Case Appeal Scenarios

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    AppealCase is a new paired first- and second-instance Chinese civil judgment benchmark with five appellate LegalAI tasks on which current models score below 50% F1 for reversal prediction from the first-instance perspective.

Pith tools