Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 61 references

The paper claims that a single switch-off, trap-quenched collimation sequence — exciting collective modes in a magnetic trap, then releasing at maximum size — can collimate a space-borne 87Rb condensate to picokelvin expansion energies, and

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-02 11:25 UTC pith:KWPYH666

load-bearing objection Trap-quenched collimation works in CAL, but the 15 pK eigenaxis value and the 10^-15 UFF claim are model-based projections, not measured results. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2606.14577 v2 pith:KWPYH666 submitted 2026-06-12 physics.atom-ph cond-mat.quant-gasquant-ph

Trap-Quenched Matter-Wave Optics in Space

Gabriel M\"uller , Timoth\'e Estrampes , Claudia Puertas Gonz\'alez , Jannik Str\"ohle , David B. Reinhardt , Dana Codruta Marinica , Ethan R. Elliott , Jason R. Williams
show 7 more authors
Nathan Lundblad Eric Charron Ernst M. Rasel Matthias Meister Wolfgang P. Schleich Naceur Gaaloul Nicholas P. Bigelow
This is my paper
classification physics.atom-ph cond-mat.quant-gasquant-ph
keywords trap-quenched collimationmatter-wave lensingcollective mode excitationBose-Einstein condensatedual-species atom interferometryuniversality of free fallpicokelvin expansion energyatom-chip magnetic trap
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper proposes and demonstrates a way to slow a Bose-Einstein condensate's expansion in microgravity without the usual multi-pulse delta-kick sequence. By suddenly stiffening the magnetic trap to excite collective breathing modes, then quenching to a weak trap and releasing at the moment of maximum size, the authors collimate an 87Rb cloud to a measured two-dimensional expansion energy of kB·78±9 pK in the imaging plane, with their model indicating kB·15+12-5 pK along two intrinsic axes. The key advantage for future space experiments is that the whole sequence requires only one trap switch-off, avoiding the differential kicks that plague two-species delta-kick collimation. The paper then simulates the same sequence for a 41K–87Rb mixture and reports simultaneous 3D expansion energies of (3/2)kB·48.3 pK and (3/2)kB·43 pK, which it claims satisfies the expansion-energy requirement for a universality-of-free-fall test at 10^-15. A sympathetic reader would care because dual-species, source-ready, picokelvin collimation in space is a bottleneck for next-generation equivalence-principle tests.

Core claim

The central claim is that a trap-quenched collimation protocol — a fast trap-frequency jump to excite collective modes, a quenched weak trap to let the cloud expand in size, and a single timed release — can reduce a condensate's expansion energy to picokelvin scales while keeping the atoms trapped and under continuous control until the single switch-off. In the experimental demonstration, free expansion was observed up to 700 ms, the 2D expansion energy in the imaging plane was measured at kB·78±9 pK, and the detailed magnetic-field model indicates the true 2D expansion energy along the condensate eigenaxes is about kB·15+12-5 pK. For the dual-species extension, the paper predicts that with

What carries the argument

The central object is the trap-quenched collimation sequence: an in-trap excitation of collective (breathing) modes by a fast increase of trap frequency, transfer of that energy into a quenched weak trap where size oscillations grow, and release at the maximum in-trap size so residual interaction energy and hence expansion velocity are minimal. The quantitative description rests on a scaling approach for the Thomas-Fermi radii, evaluated with locally varying trap curvatures from a gauged atom-chip magnetic-field model, plus an effective model with rotating BEC eigenaxes and second-/third-order potentials to describe the semi-free expansion during time-of-flight.

Load-bearing premise

The 10^-15 dual-species feasibility claim rests on assuming that 41K–87Rb interactions do not shift the collective-mode frequencies or modify densities, that residual center-of-mass motion can be made to vanish, and that performance at 10^4 simulated atoms carries over to 2.5×10^6 atoms.

What would settle it

Measure the 3D expansion energies of a 41K–87Rb mixture after the proposed sequence with the real interspecies scattering length and the target 2.5×10^6 atoms per species; if either species exceeds (3/2)kB·50 pK, or the relative CoM velocity after release exceeds the UFF budget, the claimed 10^-15 compatibility is false. Alternatively, image the third axis in the single-species experiment: if the 15 pK eigenaxis energy is not confirmed by direct 3D size measurements, the model's projection is wrong.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • A single-switch-off collimation sequence reaches expansion energies comparable to delta-kick collimation, while keeping the atoms trapped under continuous control until release.
  • Because only one switch-off is needed, the differential center-of-mass kicks that complicate two-species delta-kick sequences can in principle be avoided.
  • Simulations indicate the same sequence can simultaneously collimate 87Rb and 41K to expansion energies below the (3/2)kB·50 pK benchmark, clearing the expansion-energy requirement for a 10^-15 universality-of-free-fall test.
  • The demonstrated 700 ms free-expansion times, limited by magnetic gradients rather than expansion velocity, open longer interrogation windows for atom interferometry if magnetically insensitive states are used.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the model's eigenaxis numbers hold, transferring the atoms to a magnetically insensitive state and shimming residual magnetic curvatures could push 3D expansion energies well below the demonstrated imaging-plane values, since the measured 78 pK appears dominated by axis-projection and curvature effects rather than by the collimation itself.
  • The single-switch-off property suggests a natural architecture for dual-species interferometers: one common transport and release sequence instead of per-species pulse trains; a testable prediction is that relative CoM velocities between species remain below the 10^-15 requirement with the proposed timing.
  • A direct next step would be to apply the same sequence to heteronuclear molecules or other mixtures, where collective-mode frequencies differ by mass ratios; the frequency-scaling relation f_K = sqrt(87/41) f_Rb used here may generalize.
  • Because the optimal holding time (8.5 ms) was not sampled experimentally, a small timing scan around it would test the model's prediction of kB·13+6-3 pK eigenaxis energy without any new apparatus.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper reports a trap-quenched collimation scheme for Bose-Einstein condensates in NASA's Cold Atom Laboratory aboard the ISS. The authors first characterize center-of-mass and size dynamics in a single-species 87Rb condensate using a gauged atom-chip model and an effective model with a semi-free-expansion potential. They measure a 2D expansion energy of k_B·(78±9) pK in the imaging plane after 9 ms of holding in the quenched trap, and an effective model indicates a corresponding 2D energy of about k_B·15 pK along two BEC eigenaxes. They then numerically extend the scheme to a 41K–87Rb mixture for N=10^4 atoms per species, assuming no inter-species interaction and vanishing residual CoM dynamics, and find simultaneous 3D collimation energies of (3/2)k_B·48.3 pK (Rb) and (3/2)k_B·43.0 pK (K), which they state fulfills the expansion-energy requirement for a UFF test at the 10^-15 level. The paper is candid about several limitations: the eigenaxis value is model-derived rather than directly measured, the experimental expansion-energy fits use manually restricted time-of-flight windows that induce a bias, and the dual-species prediction neglects interspecies interactions and uses a smaller atom number than the final target.

Significance. If the experimental results hold, this is a valuable demonstration of a single-switch-off collimation method in microgravity that reaches picokelvin-scale expansion energies, complementing delta-kick collimation and offering a path toward dual-species matter-wave sources for equivalence-principle tests. The combination of a detailed gauged chip model, a semi-free expansion description, and a scaling-model analysis is sophisticated and the paper ships a substantial amount of modeling detail. The claimed 78±9 pK imaging-plane measurement is plausibly robust, and the paper explicitly distinguishes measured from model-inferred quantities in the body text. However, the headline '15 pK eigenaxis' value and the UFF feasibility claim are load-bearing model outputs whose assumptions are not fully tested; both need qualification or additional analysis before the claims can be accepted at face value.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and §II (Fig. 4, Table I)] The abstract presents the eigenaxis value k_B·15 pK as what the measurement 'corresponds to,' but this quantity is not directly measured. It is an output of the effective model, which uses two heuristic, independently unmeasured rotation angles (θz, θx; Table II) and a fitted non-ballistic semi-free expansion potential (Eq. 7). The paper itself notes 'there remains some incertitude in the estimated rotation angles and curvature landscape' (Discussion). Because the projection of the simulated Thomas-Fermi radii onto the camera axes depends on these angles, the 15 pK value may be substantially influenced by the choice of θz and θx. Please add a sensitivity analysis of E_sim^{x'z'} with respect to θz, θx and the semi-free potential parameters within their uncertainties, or rephrase the abstract to clearly label this as a model estimate with potentially unquantified systematic error.
  2. [§II, Fig. 5 and Discussion] The dual-species simulation claims simultaneous collimation to (3/2)k_B·48.3 pK and 43.0 pK, which is stated to 'fulfill the requirement in terms of expansion energy for a UFF test at the level of 10^-15'. This prediction is obtained with the explicit assumptions of 'no inter-species interaction' and N=10^4 atoms per species, with the K trap frequencies scaled as sqrt(87/41) f_Rb. For a 41K–87Rb mixture this is not a harmless simplification: the interspecies scattering length is significant, and the mixture can be immiscible, shifting collective-mode frequencies and modifying the density profiles (Refs. 50–53). Since the predicted energies are close to the 50 pK threshold, even a moderate shift could invalidate the UFF claim. The abstract should carry a clear qualifier (e.g., 'in the non-interacting, N=10^4 case'), and ideally the authors should provide an interacting two-species simulat
  3. [§II 'Expansion energy measurement' and Fig. 7] The experimental 78±9 pK value is obtained by fitting Eq. (1) to Thomas-Fermi radii over manually restricted ToF windows, chosen where 'no significant impact of the residual curvature is visually apparent.' The paper acknowledges that this 'induces a bias' (Discussion). The agreement with the ballistic effective model (E_sim = 86^{+16}_{-16} pK) is reassuring, but the effective model parameters are fitted to the same size data, so it does not constitute an independent validation of the bias correction. Please quantify the systematic uncertainty by repeating the fits with different ToF windows (e.g., truncating at 250, 300, 400 ms) and reporting the spread as a systematic error, or by explicitly comparing with unrestricted model predictions in the same figure.
minor comments (6)
  1. [First line of full text] Typo: 'T rap-Quenched' should be 'Trap-Quenched'.
  2. [Discussion] The text states 'E_exp^{xy} = k_B · 78±9 pK' but Table I and Fig. 4 use 'E_exp^{xz}' for the same quantity. Use consistent axis labels.
  3. [Methods, Trapped-quenched collimation sequence] Duplicate phrase: 'After after holding the atoms' should be 'After holding the atoms'.
  4. [Fig. 4 axis label] The y-axis label 'Exp. energy ( d 2 kB ·pK)' appears garbled; likely should be 'Exp. energy (d/2 k_B · pK)' or similar.
  5. [Eq. (4)] In the definition of aho and R_{j,0}, the notation \(\bar\omega(0)\) and \(\omega_j(0)\) is used; please define \(\bar\omega\) explicitly (geometric mean of the three frequencies) near the equation.
  6. [Data availability] The data availability statement says data are available upon reasonable request; consider depositing the processed expansion-energy data and the effective-model parameters in a public repository to strengthen reproducibility, given that NASA CAL data are scheduled for public release.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the measured expansion energy is a direct fit, the eigenaxis value is a disclosed model interpretation, and the dual-species result is a forward simulation with stated assumptions.

full rationale

The paper's central experimental claim is the measured 2D expansion energy of kB·78±9 pK in the camera frame, obtained by fitting Eq. (1) to time-of-flight Thomas-Fermi radii. This is standard measurement reduction, not circular. The 15 pK eigenaxis value is explicitly presented as a model estimate: the effective model parameters (initial sizes, size velocities, CoM kinematics, rotation angles, semi-free-expansion potentials) are fitted to the same camera-frame data shown in Fig. 3, and the eigenaxis number is obtained by 'omitting the projection onto the camera frame.' The paper labels this with 'modeling indicates' and 'the simulation suggests,' not as an independent prediction. This is a model-interpretation/uncertainty issue—the paper itself notes 'some incertitude in the estimated rotation angles and curvature landscape'—not a by-construction equivalence between an output and a fitted input. The dual-species prediction of 48.3 pK and 43.0 pK is a forward simulation using the scaling equations Eq. (5), with the assumptions 'no inter-species interaction,' N=10^4 atoms per species, and 'vanishing residual CoM dynamics.' These are explicitly acknowledged limitations and conditional gaps, not circular reductions; the paper does not fit the result to the 50 pK UFF requirement, and it flags the missing treatment of inter-species interactions and the extrapolation to 2.5×10^6 atoms. The 50 pK requirement is imported from the STE-QUEST design study (Ref. 13), which has overlapping authorship, but this is a citation-practice concern rather than a circular chain: the simulated energies are generated independently of that target. No equation in the paper defines any claimed result in terms of its own outcome, and no load-bearing argument reduces to a self-citation. The result is therefore self-contained as an experimental measurement plus a clearly labeled, assumption-limited modeling study.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

8 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central result rests on a large set of fitted parameters: chip-model gauging, effective-model initial conditions, rotation angles, semi-free expansion coefficients, and per-ToF fit parameters. The paper is transparent about this, but the headline 15 pK eigenaxis value and the UFF-level dual-species prediction inherit the uncertainty of these fitted components. No new physical entities are postulated; the semi-free expansion and rotation are fitted model elements, not new particles or forces.

free parameters (8)
  • Chip-model gauging parameters (t_coil, t_wire, slew rates, x_offset, layer heights, coil current factors, residual B-fie = Tab. II left panel (e.g., t_coil = 0.4003 ms, ȧI_X = 65.90 µA/ms, B_z = 48.43 mG, ∂_y B_y = 13.00 mG/cm)
    Optimized against experimental CoM dynamics to calibrate the ab initio chip model used throughout the sequence simulations.
  • Effective-model initial CoM kinematics (x0, y0, z0, vx0, vy0, vz0) = Tab. II: z0 = −40.3 ± 0.8 µm, vz0 = −2138 ± 121 µm/s, etc.
    Fitted to quenched-trap CoM and size data; these initial conditions directly shape all later expansion predictions.
  • Effective-model initial TF size scales λx′, λy′, λz′ and their velocities = Tab. II: λy′ = 20.0 ± 2.3, λz′ = 17.0 ± 0.5, dλy′ = −1895 ± 94, dλz′ = 2508 ± 74
    Fitted to holding-time size scans; these parameters set the released expansion velocities and hence the inferred expansion energies.
  • Eigenaxis rotation angles θz and θx = θz = −8.3 ± 0.6°, θx = 3.0 ± 0.3°
    Heuristic rotations mixing BEC eigenaxes into the camera frame; they are central to converting camera-frame fits into the 15 pK eigenaxis claim.
  • Semi-free expansion polynomial coefficients c_x0, c_x1, c_z0, c_z1, c_z2 and offsets γx, γz = Tab. II: c_x0 = 10.90 ± 0.17 mm/s², c_z2 = −19.3 ± 1.0 mm⁻¹s⁻², γx = 1 mm, γz = −1 mm
    Fitted to CoM ToF data up to 700 ms to describe residual magnetic curvature during expansion; this heuristic model controls the interpretation of long-ToF size data.
  • Per-ToF expansion-energy fit parameters R_j,0 and dR_j/dt = e.g., T_z = 14 ± 2 pK at t_hold = 9 ms; T_x = 142 ± 17 pK
    The reported 2D expansion energies are obtained by fitting Eq. (1) to Thomas-Fermi radii, so the headline numbers are fit outputs rather than raw observables.
  • Per-experiment-group chi-square scaling factors in the effective-model optimization = normalized so the largest is 1
    Chosen by hand to emphasize realistic CoM oscillations and z-size expansion; the authors state these are 'necessary to guide the optimization' because of model incompleteness, and they inflate parameter uncertainties.
  • Dual-species sequence control durations and frequency ratio α = optimized to yield 3D energies 48.3 pK (Rb) and 43.0 pK (K)
    Chosen by numerical optimization to minimize simulated expansion energies; not fitted to experimental data, but the UFF feasibility prediction depends on these values.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption Thomas-Fermi scaling equations (Eq. 5, Castin-Dum/Kagan) remain valid for the size dynamics, including during anti-trapping (negative curvature) after release.
    The paper extends a standard scaling approach to non-convex potentials and cites prior use in cooling; the extension is reasonable but not independently verified in this system.
  • domain assumption The expansion velocity distribution is isotropic enough that σ_v,i = dR_i/dt / √7 and E = (d/2) k_B T (Eq. 2).
    This standard TF-to-temperature conversion is used to turn fitted radii expansion rates into expansion energies.
  • ad hoc to paper Residual magnetic curvature during ToF is well described by fitted second/third-order polynomial potentials (Eq. 7).
    The semi-free expansion model is heuristic, fitted to CoM data, and the paper notes the chip model alone cannot explain the magnitude of these curvatures.
  • ad hoc to paper The BEC eigenaxes rotate relative to the camera frame by two constant heuristic angles θz and θx, with no direct measurement of the rotation.
    The rotation angles are fitted parameters that are essential for converting camera-frame quantities into the 15 pK eigenaxis estimate.
  • domain assumption The dual-species simulation assumes no inter-species interaction, Thomas-Fermi regime, N = 10^4 atoms per species, and vanishing residual CoM dynamics.
    Explicitly stated in the paper; the authors acknowledge that inter-species interactions could modify collective-mode frequencies and density profiles.
  • domain assumption The UFF 10^-15 expansion-energy requirement of (3/2) k_B · 50 pK per species, taken from ref. 13, remains applicable at the extrapolated atom number 2.5 × 10^6.
    The comparison to the UFF requirement uses an external mission-study benchmark and assumes the same requirement holds at much larger atom number.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 22396 in / 14492 out tokens · 151195 ms · 2026-08-02T11:25:03.363558+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Dual-species atomic sources in space promise to be the testbed for a multitude of searches in quantum gas physics such as a precise test of the Universality of Free Fall (UFF), few-body physics, cold molecules and quantum bubbles. These experiments demand exquisite control over the expansion energies of both condensed ensembles as well as over their differential center-of-mass dynamics. We propose a trap-quenched collimation technique featuring in-trap excitations of collective modes compatible with state-of-the-art atom-chip setups. Using NASA's Cold Atom Laboratory aboard the International Space Station, we demonstrate it on a single-species $^{87}$Rb condensate. By controlling the center-of-mass release dynamics, we observe free expansion times up to 700 ms and measure a two-dimensional expansion energy of $k_B \cdot 78\pm 9 \;\mathrm{pK}$ in the imaging plane. A detailed model of the magnetically-induced dynamics indicates that this corresponds to a two-dimensional expansion energy of about $k_B \cdot 15^{+12}_{-5}\; \mathrm{pK}$ along two of the condensate's eigenaxes. Finally, we theoretically study this trap-quenched collimation scheme for a $^{41}$K-$^{87}$Rb mixture, predicting a simultaneous collimation that meets the expansion energy requirements for a state-of-the-art UFF test at the $10^{-15}$ accuracy level.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.14577 by Claudia Puertas Gonz\'alez, Dana Codruta Marinica, David B. Reinhardt, Eric Charron, Ernst M. Rasel, Ethan R. Elliott, Gabriel M\"uller, Jannik Str\"ohle, Jason R. Williams, Matthias Meister, Naceur Gaaloul, Nathan Lundblad, Nicholas P. Bigelow, Timoth\'e Estrampes, Wolfgang P. Schleich.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Scheme of the trap-quenched collimation technique. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Comparison of different experimental sequences with ab [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Size dynamics from base and lensing trap. Panels (a) and (b) show the evolution of the BEC size along the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Time evolution of the expansion energies in the different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Extension of the trap-quenched collimation technique to a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Schematic overview of the CAL atom chip reduced to only [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Experimental size data for all ToF dynamics presented in this manuscript and fits for extraction of expansion energies in the camera [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Impact of the semi-free expansion on the classical trajecto [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 27 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Damour \ and\ author A

    author author T. Damour \ and\ author A. Polyakov ,\ title title The string dilation and a least coupling principle , \ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(94)90143-0 journal journal Nuclear Physics B \ volume 423 ,\ pages 532--558 ( year 1994 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(94)90143-0 1994

  2. [2]

    Su , author B

    author author Y. Su , author B. R. \ Heckel , author E. G. \ Adelberger , author J. H. \ Gundlach , author M. Harris , author G. L. \ Smith ,\ and\ author H. E. \ Swanson ,\ title title New tests of the universality of free fall , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.50.3614 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 50 ,\ pages 3614--3636 ( year 1994 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.50.3614 1994

  3. [3]

    Schlamminger , author K.-Y

    author author S. Schlamminger , author K.-Y. \ Choi , author T. A. \ Wagner , author J. H. \ Gundlach ,\ and\ author E. G. \ Adelberger ,\ title title Test of the equivalence principle using a rotating torsion balance , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.041101 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 100 ,\ pages 041101 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.100.041101 2008

  4. [4]

    author author T. A. \ Wagner , author S. Schlamminger , author J. H. \ Gundlach ,\ and\ author E. G. \ Adelberger ,\ title title Torsion-balance tests of the weak equivalence principle , \ https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/29/18/184002 journal journal Classical and Quantum Gravity \ volume 29 ,\ pages 184002 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1088/0264-9381/29/18/184002 2012

  5. [5]

    author author C. O. \ Alley , author R. F. \ Chang , author D. G. \ Curri , author J. Mullendore , author S. K. \ Poultney , author J. D. \ Rayner , author E. C. \ Silverberg , author C. A. \ Steggerda , author H. H. \ Plotkin , author W. Williams , author B. Warner , author H. Richardson ,\ and\ author B. Bopp ,\ title title Apollo 11 laser ranging retro...

    work page doi:10.1126/science.167.3917.368 1970

  6. [6]

    author author J. G. \ Williams , author S. G. \ Turyshev ,\ and\ author D. H. \ Boggs ,\ title title Progress in lunar laser ranging tests of relativistic gravity , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.261101 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 93 ,\ pages 261101 ( year 2004 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.93.261101 2004

  7. [7]

    , author M\"uller, J

    author author Hofmann, F. , author M\"uller, J. ,\ and\ author Biskupek, L. ,\ title title Lunar laser ranging test of the nordtvedt parameter and a possible variation in the gravitational constant , \ https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201015659 journal journal A&A \ volume 522 ,\ pages L5 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201015659 2010

  8. [8]

    Hofmann \ and\ author J

    author author F. Hofmann \ and\ author J. Müller ,\ title title Relativistic tests with lunar laser ranging , \ https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/aa8f7a journal journal Classical and Quantum Gravity \ volume 35 ,\ pages 035015 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1088/1361-6382/aa8f7a 2018

  9. [9]

    ammerzahl , author V. Lebat , author F. m. c. \ Liorzou , author M. List , author F. L\

    author author P. Touboul , author G. M\'etris , author M. Rodrigues , author J. Berg\'e , author A. Robert , author Q. Baghi , author Y. Andr\'e , author J. Bedouet , author D. Boulanger , author S. Bremer , author P. Carle , author R. Chhun , author B. Christophe , author V. Cipolla , author T. Damour , author P. Danto , author L. Demange , author H. Dit...

    2022

  10. [10]

    Touboul , author G

    author author P. Touboul , author G. Métris , author M. Rodrigues , author J. Bergé , author A. Robert , author Q. Baghi , author Y. André , author J. Bedouet , author D. Boulanger , author S. Bremer , author P. Carle , author R. Chhun , author B. Christophe , author V. Cipolla , author T. Damour , author P. Danto , author L. Demange , author H. Dittus , ...

    2022

  11. [11]

    Schlippert , author J

    author author D. Schlippert , author J. Hartwig , author H. Albers , author L. L. \ Richardson , author C. Schubert , author A. Roura , author W. P. \ Schleich , author W. Ertmer ,\ and\ author E. M. \ Rasel ,\ title title Quantum test of the universality of free fall , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.203002 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ vo...

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.112.203002 2014

  12. [12]

    Asenbaum , author C

    author author P. Asenbaum , author C. Overstreet , author M. Kim , author J. Curti ,\ and\ author M. A. \ Kasevich ,\ title title Atom-interferometric test of the equivalence principle at the 10 ^ - 12 level , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.191101 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 125 ,\ pages 191101 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.191101 2020

  13. [13]

    Ahlers , author L

    author author H. Ahlers , author L. Badurina , author A. Bassi , author B. Battelier , author Q. Beaufils , author K. Bongs , author P. Bouyer , author C. Braxmaier , author O. Buchmueller , author M. Carlesso , author E. Charron , author M. L. \ Chiofalo , author R. Corgier , author S. Donadi , author F. Droz , author R. Ecoffet , author J. Ellis , autho...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2211.15412 2022

  14. [14]

    B\'eguin , author T

    author author A. B\'eguin , author T. Rodzinka , author L. Calmels , author B. Allard ,\ and\ author A. Gauguet ,\ title title Atom interferometry with coherent enhancement of bragg pulse sequences , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.143401 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 131 ,\ pages 143401 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.131.143401 2023

  15. [15]

    Rodzinka , author E

    author author T. Rodzinka , author E. Dionis , author L. Calmels , author S. Beldjoudi , author A. B \'e guin , author D. Gu \'e ry-Odelin , author B. Allard , author D. Sugny ,\ and\ author A. Gauguet ,\ title title Optimal Floquet state engineering for large scale atom interferometers , \ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-54539-w journal journal Nature...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-024-54539-w 2024

  16. [16]

    Alibabaei , author P

    author author A. Alibabaei , author P. Mönkeberg , author F. Fitzek , author A. Gauguet , author B. Allard , author K. Hammerer ,\ and\ author N. Gaaloul ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.00365 title Fundamental limits of large momentum transfer in optical lattices , \ ( year 2026 ),\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.00365 arXiv:2602.00365 [physics.atom-ph] NoStop

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  17. [17]

    author author M. A. \ Kasevich , author E. Riis , author S. Chu ,\ and\ author R. G. \ DeVoe ,\ title title rf spectroscopy in an atomic fountain , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.63.612 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 63 ,\ pages 612--615 ( year 1989 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.63.612 1989

  18. [18]

    van Zoest , author N

    author author T. van Zoest , author N. Gaaloul , author Y. Singh , author H. Ahlers , author W. Herr , author S. T. \ Seidel , author W. Ertmer , author E. Rasel , author M. Eckart , author E. Kajari , author S. Arnold , author G. Nandi , author W. P. \ Schleich , author R. Walser , author A. Vogel , author K. Sengstock , author K. Bongs , author W. Lewoc...

    2010

  19. [19]

    Becker , author M

    author author D. Becker , author M. D. \ Lachmann , author S. T. \ Seidel , author H. Ahlers , author A. N. \ Dinkelaker , author J. Grosse , author O. Hellmig , author H. M \"u ntinga , author V. Schkolnik , author T. Wendrich , author A. Wenzlawski , author B. Weps , author R. Corgier , author T. Franz , author N. Gaaloul , author W. Herr , author D. L ...

    2018

  20. [20]

    Lotz , author T

    author author C. Lotz , author T. Froböse , author A. Wanner , author L. Overmeyer ,\ and\ author W. Ertmer ,\ title title Einstein-elevator: A new facility for research from g to 5 g , \ https://doi.org/10.2478/gsr-2017-0007 journal journal Gravitational and Space Research \ volume 5 ,\ pages 11--27 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.2478/gsr-2017-0007 2017

  21. [21]

    author author D. C. \ Aveline , author J. R. \ Williams , author E. R. \ Elliott , author C. Dutenhoffer , author J. R. \ Kellogg , author J. M. \ Kohel , author N. E. \ Lay , author K. Oudrhiri , author R. F. \ Shotwell , author N. Yu ,\ and\ author R. J. \ Thompson ,\ title title Observation of Bose -- Einstein condensates in an Earth-orbiting research ...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2346-1 2020

  22. [22]

    He , author X

    author author M. He , author X. Chen , author J. Fang , author Q. Chen , author H. Sun , author Y. Wang , author J. Zhong , author L. Zhou , author C. He , author J. Li , author D. Zhang , author G. Ge , author W. Wang , author Y. Zhou , author X. Li , author X. Zhang , author L. Qin , author Z. Chen , author R. Xu , author Y. Wang , author Z. Xiong , aut...

    2023

  23. [23]

    Struckmann , author R

    author author C. Struckmann , author R. Corgier , author S. Loriani , author G. Kleinsteinberg , author N. Gox , author E. Giese , author G. M \'e tris , author N. Gaaloul ,\ and\ author P. Wolf ,\ title title Platform and environment requirements of a satellite quantum test of the weak equivalence principle at the \ 10 ensuremath - 17 \ level , \ https:/...

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.064010 2024

  24. [24]

    Deppner , author W

    author author C. Deppner , author W. Herr , author M. Cornelius , author P. Stromberger , author T. Sternke , author C. Grzeschik , author A. Grote , author J. Rudolph , author S. Herrmann , author M. Krutzik , author A. Wenzlawski , author R. Corgier , author E. Charron , author D. Gu\'ery-Odelin , author N. Gaaloul , author C. L\"ammerzahl , author A. P...

    2021

  25. [25]

    Corgier , author S

    author author R. Corgier , author S. Amri , author W. Herr , author H. Ahlers , author J. Rudolph , author D. Gu \'e ry-Odelin , author E. M. \ Rasel , author E. Charron ,\ and\ author N. Gaaloul ,\ title title Fast manipulation of Bose -- Einstein condensates with an atom chip , \ https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/aabdfc journal journal New Journal of Ph...

    work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/aabdfc 2018

  26. [26]

    Masuda \ and\ author K

    author author S. Masuda \ and\ author K. Nakamura ,\ title title Fast-forward of adiabatic dynamics in quantum mechanics , \ https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2009.0446 journal journal Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences \ volume 466 ,\ pages 1135--1154 ( year 2009 ) ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/https://royalsocietyp...

    arXiv 2009

  27. [27]

    Torrontegui , author S

    author author E. Torrontegui , author S. Ibáñez , author S. Martínez-Garaot , author M. Modugno , author A. del Campo , author D. Guéry-Odelin , author A. Ruschhaupt , author X. Chen ,\ and\ author J. G. \ Muga ,\ title title Chapter 2 - shortcuts to adiabaticity , \ in\ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-408090-4.00002-5 booktitle Advances...

    doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-408090-4.00002-5 2013

  28. [28]

    Gu\'ery-Odelin , author A

    author author D. Gu\'ery-Odelin , author A. Ruschhaupt , author A. Kiely , author E. Torrontegui , author S. Mart\' nez-Garaot ,\ and\ author J. G. \ Muga ,\ title title Shortcuts to adiabaticity: Concepts, methods, and applications , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.91.045001 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 91 ,\ pages 045001 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.91.045001 2019

  29. [29]

    Gaaloul , author M

    author author N. Gaaloul , author M. Meister , author R. Corgier , author A. Pichery , author P. Boegel , author W. Herr , author H. Ahlers , author E. Charron , author J. R. \ Williams , author R. J. \ Thompson , author W. P. \ Schleich , author E. M. \ Rasel ,\ and\ author N. P. \ Bigelow ,\ title title A space-based quantum gas laboratory at picokelvin...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-022-35274-6 2022

  30. [30]

    Ammann \ and\ author N

    author author H. Ammann \ and\ author N. Christensen ,\ title title Delta kick cooling: A new method for cooling atoms , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.2088 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 78 ,\ pages 2088--2091 ( year 1997 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.78.2088 2088

  31. [31]

    u ntinga , author V. Schkolnik , author S. T. \ Seidel , author T. Wendrich , author A. Wenzlawski , author B. Carrick , author N. Gaaloul , author D. L \

    author author M. D. \ Lachmann , author H. Ahlers , author D. Becker , author A. N. \ Dinkelaker , author J. Grosse , author O. Hellmig , author H. M \"u ntinga , author V. Schkolnik , author S. T. \ Seidel , author T. Wendrich , author A. Wenzlawski , author B. Carrick , author N. Gaaloul , author D. L \"u dtke , author C. Braxmaier , author W. Ertmer , ...

    2021

  32. [32]

    u ller , author H. M \

    author author J. R. \ Williams , author C. A. \ Sackett , author H. Ahlers , author D. C. \ Aveline , author P. Boegel , author S. Botsi , author E. Charron , author E. R. \ Elliott , author N. Gaaloul , author E. Giese , author W. Herr , author J. R. \ Kellogg , author J. M. \ Kohel , author N. E. \ Lay , author M. Meister , author G. M \"u ller , author...

    2024

  33. [33]

    Meister , author G

    author author M. Meister , author G. Müller , author P. Boegel , author A. Roura , author A. Pichery , author D. B. \ Reinhardt , author T. Estrampes , author J. Ströhle , author E. Giese , author H. Ahlers , author W. Herr , author C. Schubert , author Éric Charron , author H. Müller , author J. R. \ Williams , author E. M. \ Rasel , author W. P. \ Schle...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    u ller , author H. M \

    author author E. R. \ Elliott , author D. C. \ Aveline , author N. P. \ Bigelow , author P. Boegel , author S. Botsi , author E. Charron , author J. P. \ D'Incao , author P. Engels , author T. Estrampes , author N. Gaaloul , author J. R. \ Kellogg , author J. M. \ Kohel , author N. E. \ Lay , author N. Lundblad , author M. Meister , author M. E. \ Mossman...

    2023

  35. [35]

    \ Zhang , author J.-T

    author author D.-F. \ Zhang , author J.-T. \ Li , author W.-Z. \ Wang , author W.-H. \ Xu , author J.-Y. \ Wei , author X. Li , author Y.-B. \ Wang , author D.-F. \ Gao , author J.-Q. \ Zhong , author B. Tang , author L. Zhou , author R.-B. \ Li , author H.-Y. \ Sun , author Q.-F. \ Chen , author L. Qin , author M. zhen An , author Z.-F. \ Li , author S.-...

    arXiv 2026

  36. [36]

    Piest , author J

    author author B. Piest , author J. Böhm , author T. Estrampes , author A. Pichery , author P. Arciszewski , author W. Bartosch , author S. Boles , author K. Döringshoff , author M. Elsen , author P. Guggilam , author O. Hellmig , author C. Kürbis , author D. Leopoldt , author G. Müller , author A. Papakonstantinou , author C. Reichelt , author A. Wenzlaws...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    Estrampes , author J

    author author T. Estrampes , author J. P. \ D'Incao , author J. R. \ Williams , author T. A. \ Schulze , author E. M. \ Rasel , author E. Charron ,\ and\ author N. Gaaloul ,\ title title Delta-kick collimation of heteronuclear feshbach molecules , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/858b-f2k9 journal journal Phys. Rev. Res. \ volume 7 ,\ pages 043015 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/858b-f2k9 2025

  38. [38]

    Chu , author J

    author author S. Chu , author J. E. \ Bjorkholm , author A. Ashkin , author J. P. \ Gordon ,\ and\ author L. W. \ Hollberg ,\ title title Proposal for optically cooling atoms to temperatures of the order of 10 6 k , \ https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.11.000073 journal journal Opt. Lett. \ volume 11 ,\ pages 73--75 ( year 1986 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1364/ol.11.000073 1986

  39. [39]

    Monroe , author W

    author author C. Monroe , author W. Swann , author H. Robinson ,\ and\ author C. Wieman ,\ title title Very cold trapped atoms in a vapor cell , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.1571 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 65 ,\ pages 1571--1574 ( year 1990 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.65.1571 1990

  40. [40]

    Dalfovo , author S

    author author F. Dalfovo , author S. Giorgini , author L. P. \ Pitaevskii ,\ and\ author S. Stringari ,\ title title Theory of bose-einstein condensation in trapped gases , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.71.463 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 71 ,\ pages 463--512 ( year 1999 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.71.463 1999

  41. [41]

    author author S. M. \ Dickerson , author J. M. \ Hogan , author A. Sugarbaker , author D. M. S. \ Johnson ,\ and\ author M. A. \ Kasevich ,\ title title Multiaxis inertial sensing with long-time point source atom interferometry , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.083001 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 111 ,\ pages 083001 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.111.083001 2013

  42. [42]

    author author D. S. \ Jin , author J. R. \ Ensher , author M. R. \ Matthews , author C. E. \ Wieman ,\ and\ author E. A. \ Cornell ,\ title title Collective excitations of a bose-einstein condensate in a dilute gas , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.420 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 77 ,\ pages 420--423 ( year 1996 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.420 1996

  43. [43]

    \ Mewes , author M

    author author M.-O. \ Mewes , author M. R. \ Andrews , author N. J. \ van Druten , author D. M. \ Kurn , author D. S. \ Durfee , author C. G. \ Townsend ,\ and\ author W. Ketterle ,\ title title Collective excitations of a bose-einstein condensate in a magnetic trap , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.988 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 7...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.988 1996

  44. [44]

    Stringari ,\ title title Collective excitations of a trapped bose-condensed gas , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.2360 journal journal Phys

    author author S. Stringari ,\ title title Collective excitations of a trapped bose-condensed gas , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.2360 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 77 ,\ pages 2360--2363 ( year 1996 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.2360 1996

  45. [45]

    Albers , author R

    author author H. Albers , author R. Corgier , author A. Herbst , author A. Rajagopalan , author C. Schubert , author C. Vogt , author M. Woltmann , author C. L \"a mmerzahl , author S. Herrmann , author E. Charron , author W. Ertmer , author E. M. \ Rasel , author N. Gaaloul ,\ and\ author D. Schlippert ,\ title title All-optical matter-wave lens using ti...

    work page doi:10.1038/s42005-022-00825-2 2022

  46. [46]

    Herbst , author T

    author author A. Herbst , author T. Estrampes , author H. Albers , author R. Corgier , author K. Stolzenberg , author S. Bode , author E. Charron , author E. M. \ Rasel , author N. Gaaloul ,\ and\ author D. Schlippert ,\ title title Matter-wave collimation to picokelvin energies with scattering length and potential shape control , \ https://doi.org/10.103...

    work page doi:10.1038/s42005-024-01621-w 2024

  47. [47]

    Castin \ and\ author R

    author author Y. Castin \ and\ author R. Dum ,\ title title Bose-einstein condensates in time dependent traps , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.5315 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 77 ,\ pages 5315--5319 ( year 1996 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.5315 1996

  48. [48]

    Kagan , author E

    author author Y. Kagan , author E. L. \ Surkov ,\ and\ author G. V. \ Shlyapnikov ,\ title title Evolution of a bose-condensed gas under variations of the confining potential , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.54.R1753 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 54 ,\ pages R1753--R1756 ( year 1996 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.54.r1753 1996

  49. [49]

    Meister , author S

    author author M. Meister , author S. Arnold , author D. Moll , author M. Eckart , author E. Kajari , author M. A. \ Efremov , author R. Walser ,\ and\ author W. P. \ Schleich ,\ title title Efficient description of bose--einstein condensates in time-dependent rotating traps , \ in\ @noop booktitle Advances in atomic, molecular, and optical physics ,\ Vol....

    2017

  50. [50]

    Sartori \ and\ author A

    author author A. Sartori \ and\ author A. Recati ,\ title title Dynamics of highly unbalanced bose-bose mixtures: miscible vs. immiscible gases , \ @noop journal journal The European Physical Journal D \ volume 67 ,\ pages 260 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    2013

  51. [51]

    Fort \ and\ author M

    author author C. Fort \ and\ author M. Modugno ,\ title title Dipole modes of a trapped bosonic mixture: Fate of the sum-rule approach , \ @noop journal journal Physical Review A \ volume 106 ,\ pages 043311 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    2022

  52. [52]

    Esry , author C

    author author B. Esry , author C. H. \ Greene , author J. P. \ Burke Jr ,\ and\ author J. L. \ Bohn ,\ title title Hartree-fock theory for double condensates , \ @noop journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 78 ,\ pages 3594 ( year 1997 ) NoStop

    1997

  53. [53]

    \ Ho \ and\ author V

    author author T.-L. \ Ho \ and\ author V. Shenoy ,\ title title Binary mixtures of bose condensates of alkali atoms , \ @noop journal journal Physical review letters \ volume 77 ,\ pages 3276 ( year 1996 ) NoStop

    1996

  54. [54]

    Pichery , author M

    author author A. Pichery , author M. Meister , author B. Piest , author J. B \"o hm , author E. M. \ Rasel , author E. Charron ,\ and\ author N. Gaaloul ,\ title title Efficient numerical description of the dynamics of interacting multispecies quantum gases , \ https://doi.org/10.1116/5.0163850 journal journal AVS Quantum Science \ volume 5 ,\ pages 04440...

    work page doi:10.1116/5.0163850 2023

  55. [55]

    Amri , author R

    author author S. Amri , author R. Corgier , author D. Sugny , author E. M. \ Rasel , author N. Gaaloul ,\ and\ author E. Charron ,\ title title Optimal control of the transport of Bose-Einstein condensates with atom chips , \ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41784-z journal journal Scientific Reports \ volume 9 ,\ pages 5346 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-019-41784-z 2019

  56. [56]

    Müller , author V

    author author G. Müller , author V. J. \ Martínez-Lahuerta , author I. Sekulic , author S. Burger , author P.-I. \ Schneider ,\ and\ author N. Gaaloul ,\ title title Bayesian optimization for state engineering of quantum gases , \ https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565/ad9050 journal journal Quantum Science and Technology \ volume 10 ,\ pages 015033 ( year 202...

    work page doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ad9050 2058

  57. [57]

    author author R. A. \ Carollo , author D. C. \ Aveline , author B. Rhyno , author S. Vishveshwara , author C. Lannert , author J. D. \ Murphree , author E. R. \ Elliott , author J. R. \ Williams , author R. J. \ Thompson ,\ and\ author N. Lundblad ,\ title title Observation of ultracold atomic bubbles in orbital microgravity , \ https://doi.org/10.1038/s4...

    doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04639-8 2022

  58. [58]

    experiments

    author author L. Verlet ,\ title title Computer "experiments" on classical fluids. i. thermodynamical properties of lennard-jones molecules , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.159.98 journal journal Phys. Rev. \ volume 159 ,\ pages 98--103 ( year 1967 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physrev.159.98 1967

  59. [59]

    Chen , author A

    author author X. Chen , author A. Ruschhaupt , author S. Schmidt , author A. del Campo , author D. Gu\'ery-Odelin ,\ and\ author J. G. \ Muga ,\ title title Fast optimal frictionless atom cooling in harmonic traps: Shortcut to adiabaticity , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.063002 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 104 ,\ pages 063002 ( ye...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.104.063002 2010

  60. [60]

    Plock , author K

    author author M. Plock , author K. Andrle , author S. Burger ,\ and\ author P.-I. \ Schneider ,\ title title Bayesian target-vector optimization for efficient parameter reconstruction , \ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/adts.202200112 journal journal Advanced Theory and Simulations \ volume 5 ,\ pages 2200112 ( year 2022 ) ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs...

    work page doi:10.1002/adts.202200112 2022

  61. [61]

    Sekulic , author J

    author author I. Sekulic , author J. Schaible , author G. M \"u ller , author M. Plock , author S. Burger , author V. J. \ Mart \'i nez-Lahuerta , author N. Gaaloul ,\ and\ author P.-I. \ Schneider ,\ title title Physics-informed Bayesian optimization of expensive-to-evaluate black-box functions , \ https://doi.org/10.1088/2632-2153/ae1f5f journal journal...

    work page doi:10.1088/2632-2153/ae1f5f 2025