Some patterns of sleep quality and Daylight Saving Time across countries: a predictive and exploratory analysis

Bhanu Sharma; Eugene Pinsky

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 26 references

Some patterns of sleep quality and Daylight Saving Time across countries: a predictive and exploratory analysis

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Countries that observe Daylight Saving Time report longer average sleep, a gap that widens with latitude, per a 61-country sleep-app dataset.

desk verdict The simple DST-vs-non-DST comparison holds in the data, but the latitude-duration headline is not in the reported results; this is a fixable but substantial rewrite. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.03358 v1 pith:KY5752W6 submitted 2025-09-03 cs.LG

Bhanu Sharma , Eugene Pinsky This is my paper

classification cs.LG

keywords DaylightSavingTimesleepdurationqualitylatitudecross-countryanalysissleep-trackingdataclassificationseasonalvariation

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to show that Daylight Saving Time is associated with longer reported sleep in a cross-country dataset, and that the size and direction of that association depend on latitude. On average, countries observing DST report 7.63 hours of sleep versus 7.16 hours in non-DST countries, along with higher sleep quality. The paper further claims that DST countries at mid and high latitudes report longer sleep than their non-DST counterparts, while at low latitudes the relationship weakens or reverses. If correct, these results would suggest that DST policy decisions should account for geography, and that simple geophysical variables can predict which countries are likely to adopt DST.

What carries the argument

The argument moves through country-level aggregates of five sleep variables from the app, augmented by computed geophysical features: latitude, hemisphere, longest night duration at winter solstice, equinox night duration, and their ratio. Pearson correlation matrices compare DST and non-DST groups, showing sleep quality and duration correlate at r=0.97 overall and that bedtime correlates with sleep quality much more strongly in DST countries (r=-0.72) than in non-DST countries (r=-0.24). Latitude stratification splits countries into 0-30°, 30-45°, and 45-60° bands, and four classifiers use latitude plus the longest-night/equinox ratio to predict DST adoption.

What would settle it

A population-representative survey or actigraphy study of the same 61 countries, stratified by latitude, comparing average sleep duration between DST and non-DST countries while controlling for income and work hours; if the 7.63 vs 7.16 hour gap disappears or reverses, the central association is an artifact of app-user selection. At minimum, adding more non-DST countries above 45° latitude would test the strongest latitude claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that, in a cross-country dataset of average sleep statistics from a commercial sleep-tracking app, countries that observe Daylight Saving Time report longer average sleep durations than countries that do not (7.63 vs 7.16 hours) and higher average sleep quality (0.77 vs 0.73). It further claims this association is moderated by latitude: at low latitudes DST countries report shorter sleep than non-DST countries, while at mid and high latitudes DST countries report longer sleep. The paper presents this as evidence that DST's relationship with sleep is geographically contingent, and that geophysical variables—latitude and seasonal daylight variation—can predict which countries

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the app's country-level sleep averages represent each nation's actual sleep behavior; app users are a self-selected group, and the paper does not validate these averages against representative surveys or laboratory measurements.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If DST is tied to longer sleep mainly at mid and high latitudes, abolishing it would not be sleep-neutral everywhere: equatorial countries could see little change, while high-latitude countries might lose the association.
Because sleep quality and sleep duration correlate at r=0.97 across countries, national sleep-quality scores in this dataset are largely a proxy for sleep duration, so future DST studies can focus on duration.
The much stronger bedtime–sleep-quality correlation in DST countries (r=-0.72 vs -0.24) implies that where DST is observed, sleep timing is a bigger lever for sleep quality, so policies that shift bedtimes may matter more there.
Geophysical features alone—latitude and seasonal daylight ratio—predict DST status with AUC 0.86, so a country's position on the map contains reliable information about whether it will be a DST adopter.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The dataset comes from self-selected sleep-app users, so the observed DST advantage may reflect who uses sleep trackers as much as DST itself; a replication with representative national time-use surveys would separate the two.
The high-latitude comparison rests on a single non-DST country, so the pronounced DST advantage above 45° is the least secure part of the latitude gradient; adding more high-latitude non-DST countries is a direct test.
The classification result shows DST adoption is geographically patterned, not that DST causes better sleep; a within-country before/after analysis around the spring and fall clock changes would test causality.
A natural extension is to test whether the latitude gradient holds for objective sleep measures such as actigraphy rather than self-reported app averages, and whether it persists after controlling for GDP, work hours, and culture.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Short version: the simple DST-vs-non-DST comparison is real, and the paper is honest about its limitations, but the headline latitude-duration claim is not in the reported results. The stress-test note is correct: §4.2 is about sleep quality, not sleep duration. Tables 4 and 5 do show that DST countries in the Sleep Cycle sample sleep longer (7.63 vs 7.16 hours) and report higher quality (0.77 vs 0.73). If the paper stopped there, it would be a modest but legitimate descriptive finding.

What's new: I don't know of another public description of these Sleep Cycle country aggregates split by DST. The authors also provide data on GitHub, which makes the comparison independently checkable. The correlation matrices are straightforward, and the latitude figure, despite the tiny cells, at least makes the seasonal-daylight story visible.

Soft spots: - The abstract's moderation claim about duration by latitude cannot be checked from Tables 4/5 or §4.2. There is no duration-by-latitude table. Low-latitude DST is n=2, high-latitude non-DST is n=1 (Russia), and there are no confidence intervals or tests. So the headline is unsupported as written. - The Sleep Cycle data are self-selected app users; the paper treats country averages as national sleep behavior. That's a standard limitation, but it is load-bearing here because every comparison is between these averages. - The ML section uses latitude and longest/equinox night ratio to classify DST labels. AUC ~0.86 in 10-fold CV mostly restates the known fact that DST is practiced at high latitudes with strong seasonal variation. It is not evidence about sleep. - Minor: Table 3 says sleep quality std is 0.029 hours; that looks like a units typo.

For whom: someone wanting a quick descriptive snapshot of Sleep Cycle's country-level stats; this is not a policy-grade result and not a contribution to the DST-sleep causal literature.

Recommendation: I'd send it to peer review rather than desk-reject—there is a reloadable data link and a non-empty descriptive comparison—but I'd expect substantial revision: reconcile the abstract with §4.2, report the duration-by-latitude table or drop the claim, and add intervals. If the venue doesn't want exploratory descriptive work, desk rejection is defensible.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes country-level sleep statistics from the Sleep Cycle app for 61 countries, augmented with DST observance, latitude, hemisphere, and seasonal daylight metrics (longest-night/equinox-night ratio). It compares sleep metrics between DST and non-DST countries (Tables 4–5), examines sleep quality across latitude bands (Section 4.2), and trains four classifiers to predict DST from latitude and seasonal daylight ratio (Section 4.3). The abstract claims that, on average, DST countries report longer sleep durations, and that latitude moderates this relationship: at lower latitudes DST countries have shorter durations, at higher latitudes longer. The paper concludes with policy implications about DST.

Significance. If the central claims were supported, the paper would contribute a cross-country observational pattern relevant to the DST policy debate. The global descriptive comparison in Tables 4–5 is straightforward and the machine-learning experiments are standard, with cross-validated metrics and an explicit data-availability link. However, the headline latitude–duration interaction is not derivable from any analysis shown in the paper, and the severe subgroup imbalances (n=2, n=1) plus the absence of inferential statistics prevent robust conclusions. The paper is transparent about some limitations, which is commendable, but the main result as stated is unsupported.

major comments (4)

[Abstract vs. Section 4.2] The abstract states that 'at lower latitudes, DST-observing countries reported shorter sleep durations compared to non-DST countries, while at higher latitudes, DST-observing countries reported longer average sleep durations.' This is the paper's headline result, but Section 4.2, titled 'Latitude Considerations,' analyzes only Sleep Quality by latitude (Figures 5 and 6). No table or figure presents Sleep Duration stratified by DST status and latitude. The only duration comparisons are global (Tables 4–5, Figure 3). A reader cannot verify the central claim from the reported statistics; it appears to rest on an omitted analysis or a conflation of duration and quality.
[Section 4.2, Tables 4–5] The latitude-stratified groups are extremely unbalanced: low-latitude DST n=2 vs non-DST n=16, and high-latitude non-DST n=1 vs DST n=24. The paper acknowledges the n=1 limitation but still asserts a 'pronounced DST advantage' at high latitudes. Moreover, no confidence intervals, effect sizes, or significance tests are provided for any group comparison. The observed differences in Tables 4–5 and Figure 5 could arise from sampling variability or confounders such as economic development, culture, or geography. Claims that 'DST countries demonstrate better sleep metrics' and that 'DST may be particularly beneficial' require inferential support that is absent.
[Section 2 (Dataset)] The analysis relies entirely on Sleep Cycle app aggregate country averages. App users are a self-selected, likely non-representative subset of each population (smartphone owners, health-conscious individuals willing to track sleep). The paper does not address this selection bias or validate the country-level averages against any population-representative survey or polysomnography study. This assumption is load-bearing because every comparison between DST and non-DST countries is a comparison of these app-derived averages.
[Sections 4.3 and 5] The classification experiments (AUC 0.75–0.86) demonstrate only that DST adoption is predictable from latitude and seasonal daylight variation. This is unsurprising given the historical geographic distribution of DST and does not provide evidence about sleep outcomes. The statement in Section 5 that 'geophysical realities rather than solely political or historical precedent could better inform DST policy' overinterprets correlational classification results. The ML section is tangential to the sleep-quality and sleep-duration claims and should be repositioned or removed.

minor comments (5)

[Throughout] The paper uses 'Daylight Savings Time' in the title and body; the standard spelling is 'Daylight Saving Time.' Please correct for consistency.
[Section 5 vs. Table 7] Section 5 states that 'all models achieved mean accuracies above 80%,' but Table 7 reports K-Nearest Neighbors and Gaussian Naive Bayes at 0.783 accuracy. Reconcile the text with the table.
[Section 2 and Table 3] Table 1 lists five core variables (Country, Sleep Quality, Sleep Duration, Wake-up Time, Bedtime), but Figure 1 and Table 3 include Snore Duration. The source and definition of Snore Duration should be described.
[Table 3] Sleep Quality is a unitless score, but the text reports its standard deviation as 'σ = 0.029 hours.' The units are incorrect; quality is not measured in hours.
[References] Reference [22] is a medRxiv preprint; if a peer-reviewed version exists, it should be cited. Also, the claim that 'as of 2025, DST is practiced in approximately 71 countries' would benefit from a citation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the paper's DST-sleep comparisons and ML classification are direct descriptive/supervised analyses, not inputs relabeled as outputs.

full rationale

The paper's central empirical claims are group comparisons (Tables 4/5) and a latitude-stratified sleep-quality analysis (Section 4.2). These are computed directly from Sleep Cycle country averages and DST labels; DST status is not defined in terms of sleep duration or quality, and sleep measures are not derived from DST status. The ML section (4.3) trains four classifiers to predict the DST label from latitude and the longest-night/equinox ratio under 10-fold cross-validation; this is standard supervised prediction, and the target is not constructed from the features. There are no self-citations, no imported uniqueness theorems, and no fitted parameter that is later renamed a prediction. The abstract's claim of a latitude-dependent duration pattern is not supported by the reported §4.2 analysis of sleep quality, and the high-latitude non-DST cell has n=1; the dataset's representativeness is also questionable. These are substantive validity/reporting concerns, but they are not instances of the paper's derivation reducing by construction to its own inputs. Hence no circularity is found.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on an unvalidated self-selected dataset, a simplification of country latitude to a capital city, and hand-picked classifier hyperparameters. No new physical or conceptual entities are postulated. The heaviest burden falls on the representativeness of Sleep Cycle data and on the extremely unbalanced latitude subgroups that drive the moderation claim.

free parameters (3)

Random Forest n_estimators = 6
Chosen without any reported tuning or justification. With n=61, this is a hand-selected hyperparameter that can influence CV results.
KNN n_neighbors = 4
Chosen without a grid search or held-out validation. A different k could change the reported accuracy.
Latitude band cutoffs = 0-30, 30-45, 45-60
Post-hoc grouping choices. The bands are extremely unbalanced (n=2, n=24, n=1 in key cells), and the moderation conclusion depends on these cutoffs.

assumptions (6)

domain assumption Sleep Cycle app data is representative of country-level sleep patterns
All country averages come from an opt-in sleep tracking app. Self-selection and smartphone penetration differences across countries mean the averages may reflect app users, not national populations. This is invoked in Section 2 and is load-bearing for every cross-country comparison.
domain assumption DST status labels are correct as of 2025
The paper assigns a binary DST label to each of the 61 countries but does not cite a single authoritative DST database. Misclassification of countries with regional or religious time changes would shift group means.
domain assumption Latitude of the capital city approximates the population-center latitude
Longest night and equinox night are computed from this single latitude. Large countries like the US, Russia, and Australia span many latitudes, so one value is a crude approximation. Used in Section 3.
standard math Astronomical formulas for longest night and equinox night are correct
Standard spherical astronomy; the paper relies on it without deriving or citing the specific formulas. This is a reasonable background assumption.
standard math Pearson correlation after z-score normalization is appropriate
Assumes linear relationships. The paper does not test for nonlinearity or use rank correlations, and the small n makes the correlation estimates noisy.
standard math 10-fold cross-validation accuracy is a valid measure of predictive power
Standard practice, but with n=61 and hyperparameters chosen on the same data, the CV estimates are likely optimistic and cannot establish out-of-sample predictive value for policy.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Some patterns of sleep quality and Daylight Saving Time across countries: a predictive and exploratory analysis." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KY5752W6

@misc{pith2026250903358,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Some patterns of sleep quality and Daylight Saving Time across countries: a predictive and exploratory analysis},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KY5752W6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.03358}
}

read the original abstract

In this study we analyzed average sleep durations across 61 countries to examine the impact of Daylight Saving Time (DST) practices. Key metrics influencing sleep were identified, and statistical correlation analysis was applied to explore relationships among these factors. Countries were grouped based on DST observance, and visualizations compared sleep patterns between DST and non-DST regions. Results show that, on average, countries observing DST tend to report longer sleep durations than those that do not. A more detailed pattern emerged when accounting for latitude: at lower latitudes, DST-observing countries reported shorter sleep durations compared to non-DST countries, while at higher latitudes, DST-observing countries reported longer average sleep durations. These findings suggest that the influence of DST on sleep may be moderated by geographical location.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

26 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages

[1]

Whose time is it anyway? a brief history of standardized time zones in the united states, November 2024

Jennifer Davis. Whose time is it anyway? a brief history of standardized time zones in the united states, November 2024. In Custodia Legis (Law Library of Congress Blog)

work page 2024
[2]

The railroad’s important role in time zones

Union Pacific. The railroad’s important role in time zones. https://www.up.com/ news/service/tr031020-time-zones, n.d. https://www.up.com/news/ service/tr031020-time-zones

work page
[3]

The history and use of time zones

Matt Rosenberg. The history and use of time zones. https://www.thoughtco.com/ what-are-time- zones-1435358, 2025. Accessed: 2025-06-20

work page 2025
[4]

How can social jetlag affect health? Nature Reviews Endocrinology, 2023

Till Roenneberg. How can social jetlag affect health? Nature Reviews Endocrinology, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41574-023-00851-2

work page doi:10.1038/s41574-023-00851-2 2023
[5]

A walk through time – early clocks

National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). A walk through time – early clocks. Web page, n.d. Available at https://www.nist.gov/pml/time-and-frequency-division/popular- links/walk- through-time/walk-through-time-early-clocks (Accessed: 2025-07-09)

work page 2025
[6]

Gregory S. Aldrete. Daily Life in the Roman City: Rome, Pompeii and Ostia. Greenwood Publishing Group, 2004

work page 2004
[7]

Benjamin franklin and daylight saving time

WebExhibits. Benjamin franklin and daylight saving time. https://www. webexhibits.org/daylightsaving/franklin.html, n.d. Accessed: 2025-07- 17

work page 2025
[8]

7 interesting things about daylight saving time

Missouri Retired Teachers Association (MRTA). 7 interesting things about daylight saving time. Blog post, n.d. Available at https://www.mrta.org/index.php/legislative/blog/7- interesting-things- about-daylight-saving-time (Accessed: 2025-07-09)

work page 2025

Show all 26 references

[9]

New zealand adopts a standard time

National Library of New Zealand. New zealand adopts a standard time. https:// natlib.govt.nz/records/22358153, n.d. Accessed: 2025-07-17

2025
[10]

The builder who changed how the world keeps time

Bramleys Luxury. The builder who changed how the world keeps time. Blog post, n.d. Available at https://www.bramleysluxury.com/blogs/news/the-builder-who-changed- how-the-world-keeps- time (Accessed: 2025-07-09)

2025
[11]

Daylight saving time begins, 1916

Jessie Kratz. Daylight saving time begins, 1916. Blog post, 2019. Available at https://text - message.blogs.archives.gov/2019/03/26/daylight-saving-time-begins-1916/ (Accessed: 2025-07-09)

1916
[12]

Daylight saving time once known as ‘war time’

Katie Lange. Daylight saving time once known as ‘war time’. Web page, 2019. Available at https://www.defense.gov/News/Feature-Stories/story/Article/1779177/daylight- saving-time-once- known-as-war-time/ (Accessed: 2025-07-09)

2019
[13]

Winnebeck, and Elizabeth B

Till Roenneberg, Eva C. Winnebeck, and Elizabeth B. Klerman. Daylight saving time and artificial time zones - a battle between biological and social times. Frontiers in Physiology, 10:944, 2019. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.00944

2019
[14]

Daylight saving time is a solution for which many forgot the problems

Jose´ Mar´ıa Mart´ın -Olalla and Jorge Mira. Daylight saving time is a solution for which many forgot the problems. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, 20(5):833, 2024. https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.11042

2024 doi
[15]

Perspective: Daylight saving time —an advocacy for a balanced view and against fanning fear

Christine Blume and Manuel Schabus. Perspective: Daylight saving time —an advocacy for a balanced view and against fanning fear. Clocks & Sleep, 2(1):19 –25, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/clockssleep2010003

2020 doi
[16]

Coogan, Sarah Richardson, and Sridhar Raman

Andrew N. Coogan, Sarah Richardson, and Sridhar Raman. A data -informed perspective on public preferences for retaining or abolishing biannual clock changes. Journal of Biological Rhythms, 37(4):351–357, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 07487304221096390

2022
[17]

It is time to abolish the clock change and adopt permanent standard time in the united states: a sleep research society position statement

Beth A Malow. It is time to abolish the clock change and adopt permanent standard time in the united states: a sleep research society position statement. Sleep, 45(12):zsac236, 2022

2022
[18]

Rishi, Omar Ahmed, Jose H

Monique A. Rishi, Omar Ahmed, Jose H. Barrantes Perez, Mark Berneking, Jonathan Dom - browsky, Erin E. Flynn-Evans, Valerie Santiago, Shannon S. Sullivan, Ruckshanda Upen - der, Kyle Yuen, Fariha Abbasi -Feinberg, Ranaan N. Aurora, Kathleen A. Carden, David B. Kirsch, David A....

2020
[19]

W. H. Walker, J. C. Walton, A. C. DeVries, and R. J. Nelson. Circadian rhythm disruption and mental health. Translational Psychiatry, 10:28, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41398-020-0694-0. International Journal of Data Mining & Knowledge Management Process (IJDKP), Vol.15, N...

2020
[20]

Daylight savings time & your health

Northwestern Medicine. Daylight savings time & your health. https://www.nm.org/ healthbeat/healthy-tips/daylight-savings-time-your- health#:˜:text=Depression,related%20diseases%2C%20such%20as% 20colitis, 2024. Accessed: 2025

2024
[21]

Laura Kervezee, Anastasi Kosmadopoulos, and Diane B. Boivin. Metabolic and cardiovas - cular consequences of shift work: The role of circadian disruption and sleep disturbances. The European Journal of Neuroscience, 51(1):396–412, 2020. https://doi.org/10. 1111/ejn.14216

2020
[22]

Wallraff, Ursula Wild, Lorna Brown, Ben Bullock, Gurprit S

Aiste Steponenaite, Jonas P. Wallraff, Ursula Wild, Lorna Brown, Ben Bullock, Gurprit S. Lall, Sally Ferguson, Russell G. Foster, Jennifer Walsh, Greg Murray, Thomas C. Erren, and Philip Lewis. Daylight -saving time & health: A systematic review of beneficial & adverse effects...

2025
[23]

SleepCycle.com: Smart Alarm Clock and Sleep Tracker, 2025

Sleep Cycle. SleepCycle.com: Smart Alarm Clock and Sleep Tracker, 2025

2025
[24]

Khalsa, J

S. Khalsa, J. R. Hale, A. Goldstone, R. S. Wilson, S. D. Mayhew, M. Bagary, and A. P. Bagshaw. Habitual sleep durations and subjective sleep quality predict white matter differ - ences in the human brain. Neurobiology of Sleep and Circadian Rhythms, 3:17 –25, 2017. https://doi...

2017 doi
[25]

G. D. Potter, D. J. Skene, J. Arendt, J. E. Cade, P. J. Grant, and L. J. Hardie. Circadian rhythm and sleep disruption: Causes, metabolic consequences, and countermeasures. Endocrine Reviews, 37(6):584–608, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1210/er.2016-1083

2016 doi
[26]

Antle, Mohammad Moshirpour, Paige R

Michael C. Antle, Mohammad Moshirpour, Paige R. Blakely, Kayla Horsley, Caleb J. Charl - ton, and Victoria Hu. Longitudinal location influences preference for daylight saving time. Journal of Biological Rhythms, 37(3):343–348, 2022

2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Whose time is it anyway? a brief history of standardized time zones in the united states, November 2024

Jennifer Davis. Whose time is it anyway? a brief history of standardized time zones in the united states, November 2024. In Custodia Legis (Law Library of Congress Blog)

work page 2024

[2] [2]

The railroad’s important role in time zones

Union Pacific. The railroad’s important role in time zones. https://www.up.com/ news/service/tr031020-time-zones, n.d. https://www.up.com/news/ service/tr031020-time-zones

work page

[3] [3]

The history and use of time zones

Matt Rosenberg. The history and use of time zones. https://www.thoughtco.com/ what-are-time- zones-1435358, 2025. Accessed: 2025-06-20

work page 2025

[4] [4]

How can social jetlag affect health? Nature Reviews Endocrinology, 2023

Till Roenneberg. How can social jetlag affect health? Nature Reviews Endocrinology, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41574-023-00851-2

work page doi:10.1038/s41574-023-00851-2 2023

[5] [5]

A walk through time – early clocks

National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). A walk through time – early clocks. Web page, n.d. Available at https://www.nist.gov/pml/time-and-frequency-division/popular- links/walk- through-time/walk-through-time-early-clocks (Accessed: 2025-07-09)

work page 2025

[6] [6]

Gregory S. Aldrete. Daily Life in the Roman City: Rome, Pompeii and Ostia. Greenwood Publishing Group, 2004

work page 2004

[7] [7]

Benjamin franklin and daylight saving time

WebExhibits. Benjamin franklin and daylight saving time. https://www. webexhibits.org/daylightsaving/franklin.html, n.d. Accessed: 2025-07- 17

work page 2025

[8] [8]

7 interesting things about daylight saving time

Missouri Retired Teachers Association (MRTA). 7 interesting things about daylight saving time. Blog post, n.d. Available at https://www.mrta.org/index.php/legislative/blog/7- interesting-things- about-daylight-saving-time (Accessed: 2025-07-09)

work page 2025