REVIEW 4 cited by
MultiChartQA: Benchmarking Vision-Language Models on Multi-Chart Problems
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have demonstrated impressive abilities across various tasks, including visual question answering and chart comprehension, yet existing benchmarks for chart-related tasks fall short in capturing the complexity of real-world multi-chart scenarios. Current benchmarks primarily focus on single-chart tasks, neglecting the multi-hop reasoning required to extract and integrate information from multiple charts, which is essential in practical applications. To fill this gap, we introduce MultiChartQA, a benchmark that evaluates MLLMs' capabilities in four key areas: direct question answering, parallel question answering, comparative reasoning, and sequential reasoning. Our evaluation of a wide range of MLLMs reveals significant performance gaps compared to humans. These results highlight the challenges in multi-chart comprehension and the potential of MultiChartQA to drive advancements in this field. Our code and data are available at https://github.com/Zivenzhu/Multi-chart-QA
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
DashboardQA: Benchmarking Multimodal Agents for Question Answering on Interactive Dashboards
DashboardQA is a new benchmark of 405 question-answer pairs over 112 interactive dashboards; the strongest tested GUI agent reaches only 38.69% accuracy.
-
ChartGen: Scaling Chart Understanding Via Code-Guided Synthetic Chart Generation
A fully automated pipeline generates a 222.5K-pair synthetic chart dataset with 27 chart types and 11 plotting libraries, and a GPT-4o-judged benchmark shows current open-weights VLMs still underperform on chart-to-co...
-
MageBench: Bridging Large Multimodal Models to Agents
MageBench introduces a 483-scenario benchmark showing current large multimodal models are far weaker than humans at agent tasks requiring continuous visual feedback and planning.
-
Reinforced MLLM: A Survey on RL-Based Reasoning in Multimodal Large Language Models
A structured survey of reinforcement-learning-based reasoning methods for multimodal large language models, including a taxonomy, reward design review, benchmark tables, and open challenges.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.