pith. sign in

arxiv: 2603.29509 · v3 · pith:KZ37EHFKnew · submitted 2026-03-31 · ⚛️ physics.chem-ph · quant-ph

Quantum Sensing with Triplet Pair States: A Theoretical Study

Maria Grazia Concilio , Yiwen Wang , Siyuan Wang , Xueqian Kong This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 18:20 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.chem-ph quant-ph
keywords quantum sensingsinglet fissionpentacene dimertriplet pair statesquintet manifolddynamical decouplingnuclear spin detectionmolecular sensors
0
0 comments X

The pith

Pentacene dimers with entangled triplet pairs detect small nuclear spin groups more effectively than single molecules.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper models the use of triplet pair states formed by singlet fission in pentacene dimers as quantum sensors for nuclear spins at the nanoscale. Simulations using a Lindblad master equation track the quintet manifold under dynamical decoupling sequences such as spin echo and XY8, then compare results directly to the standard pentacene monomer. Both systems perform similarly for single isolated spins, yet the dimer shows a larger effective interaction area when sensing small collections of spins. Sensitivity improves at low magnetic fields and grows with the number of applied pulses. This establishes a baseline for using multi-excitonic high-spin states as tunable molecular probes.

Core claim

We model the quantum sensing efficacy of a spin-polarized quintet manifold in a photoexcited pentacene dimer generated via intramolecular singlet fission. Using a Lindblad master equation approach, we simulate the evolution of the triplet pair state under standard dynamical decoupling sequences, including spin echo, XY4, and XY8 and provide a direct performance comparison to the traditional pentacene monomer benchmark. While both architectures exhibit comparable sensitivity for isolated single-spin detection, our findings indicate that the dimer architecture provides a superior interaction cross-section for detecting small ensembles of nuclear spins. Analytical expressions derived for flores

What carries the argument

The spin-polarized quintet manifold arising from the entangled triplet pair in the pentacene dimer, which supports quantum manipulations via singlet fission and is tracked under dynamical decoupling to produce fluorescence modulation.

If this is right

  • Sensitivity reaches its best values in the low-magnetic-field regime.
  • Sensitivity increases as the number of pulses in the dynamical decoupling sequence grows.
  • The dimer and monomer yield comparable results when detecting a single isolated nuclear spin.
  • Analytical expressions for fluorescence modulation confirm the scaling of performance with pulse count.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Changing the molecular linker between the two pentacene units could adjust the quintet lifetime and sensing range for different target spins.
  • The same dimer architecture might be tested for detecting weak alternating-current magnetic fields beyond nuclear spins.
  • Combining the dimer sensor with surface deposition techniques could allow spatial mapping of small spin clusters on a chip.

Load-bearing premise

The Lindblad master equation accurately captures the coherent evolution and decoherence of the quintet manifold under the applied dynamical decoupling sequences without additional unmodeled relaxation channels.

What would settle it

An experiment that measures fluorescence modulation depth for a known small ensemble of nuclear spins in a pentacene dimer versus a monomer, using the same low-field XY8 sequence, would directly test whether the dimer cross-section is larger.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.29509 by Maria Grazia Concilio, Siyuan Wang, Xueqian Kong, Yiwen Wang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: A) Chemical structure of the pentacene dimer, composed of monomers a and b. B) The SF scheme, where the constants khv, kfis, kfus, kdiss, kphos and krec represent the rates of the laser excitation, fission, fusion, dissociation, phosphorescence and recombination respectively. μw represents the microwave irradiation, w0±1 and w+1-1 represent the longitudinal relaxation rates between the triplet sublevels. B… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (A) Spin-echo (SE), (B) XY4 and (C) XY8 pulse sequences. The light and dark green boxes represent the π/2 and π pulses respectively, τ is the inter-pulse delay. Spin systems and methodology: A pentacene dimer with structure shown in Figure 1A was considered as the model systems in this work. The SF process that generates polarized triplet pair states, shown in Figure 1B, was simulated using the Lindblad ma… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Evolution of the fluorescence as a function of the duration of the τ delay, using the XY8, XY4 and SE sequences, at B0 set equal to 1 T, 0.1 T and 0.01 T, for the pentacene dimer (A-C) and monomer (D-F). The grey dashed bar indicates the condition τ = 1/2𝜔𝑁. Simulations were performed using the parameters in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Molecular quantum sensors represent a promising frontier for the detection of nuclear magnetic resonance signals and alternating current magnetic fields at the nanoscale, potentially reaching single-proton sensitivity. Although the triplet states of molecular pentacene provide a viable sensing architecture, the triplet pair states produced by singlet fission of pentacene dimers could enable more flexible quantum manipulations through entanglement. In this work, we model the quantum sensing efficacy of a spin-polarized quintet manifold in a photoexcited pentacene dimer generated via intramolecular singlet fission. Using a Lindblad master equation approach, we simulate the evolution of the triplet pair state under standard dynamical decoupling sequences, including spin echo, XY4, and XY8 and provide a direct performance comparison to the traditional pentacene monomer benchmark. While both architectures exhibit comparable sensitivity for isolated single-spin detection, our findings indicate that the dimer architecture provides a superior interaction cross-section for detecting small ensembles of nuclear spins. Analytical expressions derived for fluorescence modulation demonstrate that sensitivity is optimized in the low-magnetic field regime and scales with the number of pulses in the sensing protocol. This study establishes a theoretical baseline for utilizing high-spin multi-excitonic states as chemically tunable, high-sensitivity quantum probes.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a theoretical study of quantum sensing using the quintet manifold of a photoexcited pentacene dimer formed via intramolecular singlet fission. It employs Lindblad master equation simulations to model the evolution of the triplet pair state under dynamical decoupling sequences (spin echo, XY4, XY8) and derives analytical expressions for fluorescence modulation. Direct numerical comparisons are made to a pentacene monomer triplet benchmark, with the central claim that the dimer architecture yields a superior interaction cross-section for detecting small ensembles of nuclear spins (N ≲ 10), while sensitivities are comparable for single-spin detection; sensitivity is reported to optimize in the low-magnetic-field regime and to scale with pulse number.

Significance. If the reported numerical advantage survives inclusion of additional decoherence channels, the work would establish a useful theoretical baseline for exploiting entangled high-spin multi-excitonic states as chemically tunable quantum sensors, particularly for small nuclear-spin ensembles where the dimer outperforms the monomer. The provision of analytical expressions for fluorescence modulation under standard decoupling sequences is a positive feature that could guide future experiments.

major comments (2)
  1. [Simulation Methods and Results] The headline claim of superior interaction cross-section for N ≲ 10 nuclear spins rests on Lindblad simulations whose only decoherence terms are the explicitly stated ones. The manuscript provides no indication that quintet-specific channels (spin-orbit relaxation, intermolecular dipolar broadening, or singlet-fission back-transfer) were included; if any such channel shortens the effective coherence time of the entangled quintet subspace more than the monomer triplet, the computed sensitivity advantage disappears, especially in the low-field regime where the analytical expressions are optimized.
  2. [Numerical Results] No error bars, validation against known analytic limits, or explicit parameter choices are reported for the fluorescence-modulation comparisons. Without these, it is impossible to assess whether the dimer advantage is robust or an artifact of the chosen Lindblad parameters and sequence timings.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract refers to 'standard dynamical decoupling sequences' without naming them; the main text should explicitly list the pulse timings and phases used for XY4 and XY8 to allow direct reproduction.
  2. [Theory] Notation for the quintet manifold states and the interaction Hamiltonian with the nuclear-spin ensemble could be clarified with a single summary table of operators and basis states.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate clarifications and additional details where feasible. Our responses focus on the substance of the concerns raised regarding the simulation assumptions and numerical reporting.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The headline claim of superior interaction cross-section for N ≲ 10 nuclear spins rests on Lindblad simulations whose only decoherence terms are the explicitly stated ones. The manuscript provides no indication that quintet-specific channels (spin-orbit relaxation, intermolecular dipolar broadening, or singlet-fission back-transfer) were included; if any such channel shortens the effective coherence time of the entangled quintet subspace more than the monomer triplet, the computed sensitivity advantage disappears, especially in the low-field regime where the analytical expressions are optimized.

    Authors: We agree that the simulations employ only the decoherence channels explicitly described in the Methods section (primarily relaxation and dephasing rates consistent with the dynamical decoupling protocols). Quintet-specific processes such as spin-orbit relaxation, intermolecular dipolar broadening, and singlet-fission back-transfer are not incorporated in the current model. This represents a limitation of the present theoretical baseline, as these channels could indeed reduce the effective coherence time of the quintet subspace more than in the monomer case, particularly at low fields. The reported advantage in interaction cross-section arises from the entangled multi-spin character of the quintet state, which provides additional coupling pathways to the nuclear spins. However, we acknowledge that a full quantitative assessment requires inclusion or bounding of these effects. In the revised manuscript, we have added a dedicated paragraph in the Discussion section that explicitly notes these omitted channels, provides order-of-magnitude estimates for their rates drawn from literature, and states that the dimer advantage is demonstrated under the modeled conditions while calling for experimental validation. revision: partial

  2. Referee: No error bars, validation against known analytic limits, or explicit parameter choices are reported for the fluorescence-modulation comparisons. Without these, it is impossible to assess whether the dimer advantage is robust or an artifact of the chosen Lindblad parameters and sequence timings.

    Authors: We accept this criticism. The original manuscript omitted error bars on the numerical fluorescence-modulation data, did not include explicit validation plots against analytic limits (e.g., the Hahn-echo limit or zero-pulse case), and did not tabulate all Lindblad rates and pulse timings in a single location. These omissions hinder reproducibility and robustness assessment. In the revised version, we have (i) added error bars derived from ensemble averaging over 1000 stochastic trajectories to all relevant figures, (ii) included a supplementary figure comparing numerical results to the closed-form analytic expressions for the low-field, few-pulse regime, and (iii) expanded the Methods section with a complete table of all simulation parameters, including decoherence rates, magnetic-field values, and sequence timings. These changes allow direct verification that the dimer advantage is not an artifact of the chosen parameters. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; simulations and comparisons are independent of fitted outputs

full rationale

The paper models the quintet manifold via the standard Lindblad master equation under XY4/XY8 and spin-echo sequences, then reports numerical fluorescence-modulation signals and analytical scaling expressions obtained from that evolution. These outputs are generated from the stated Hamiltonian and decoherence operators rather than being fitted to the target sensitivity metric and then relabeled as predictions. No load-bearing uniqueness theorem, self-citation chain, or ansatz is invoked to force the dimer advantage; the monomer benchmark is an external reference. The derivation chain therefore remains self-contained against the model assumptions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based solely on the abstract, the central claim rests on standard open-quantum-system assumptions and the validity of the Lindblad approach for this spin system; no free parameters or invented entities are explicitly introduced in the provided text.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Lindblad master equation accurately models the dynamics of the photoexcited quintet manifold under dynamical decoupling
    Invoked in the abstract description of the simulation method

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5747 in / 1328 out tokens · 47727 ms · 2026-05-19T18:20:30.208072+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    [15, 16] On the other hand, singlet–triplet pair states are expected to arise from the states ³(𝑇̂ 𝑇̂ )0,±1, in molecules where heavy atoms are present

    We did not take into account of the correlated singlet –triplet pair states, since they were not observed in the TREPR spectrum of the molecule under consideration. [15, 16] On the other hand, singlet–triplet pair states are expected to arise from the states ³(𝑇̂ 𝑇̂ )0,±1, in molecules where heavy atoms are present. [33] Simulations of ODMR experiments we...

    work page

  2. [2]

    [10, 13] therefore we focus only on the pentacene dimer

    ODMR: The ODMR of the pentacene monomer, was already discussed in ref. [10, 13] therefore we focus only on the pentacene dimer. The ODMR spectrum at 3.4 T of this system is composed of two dips in the PL, corresponding to the transitions ⁵(𝑇̂ 𝑇̂ )0→⁵(𝑇̂ 𝑇̂ )±1, see Figure 3A. Kinetics constants: 𝑘flu, 𝑘fis, 𝑘fus, 𝑘phos, 𝑘3, 𝑘−3, 𝑘diss, 𝑘rec and 𝑘hv, / s-1...

    work page

  3. [3]

    DD sequences: Numerical simulations show that both the pentacene and the pentacene dimer can be used to detect a single nuclear spin using the SE, XY4 and XY8 sequences. The presence of nuclear spin leads to dips in the fluorescence, corresponding to the state 𝑇̂0 and to the state ⁵(𝑇̂ 𝑇̂ )0 in the case of the pentacene monomer and dimer respectively, as ...

    work page

  4. [4]

    The AC field corresponds to a function 𝐵𝐴𝐶sin(2𝜋𝜔𝐴𝐶𝑡) applied during the DD sequences, where 𝐵𝐴𝐶 and 𝜔𝐴𝐶 are the power and the frequency of the AC field respectively

    Detection of an AC field with the pentacene monomer and dimer: The detection of AC field can be done at B0>1 T where the signal from the hyperfine interaction is not present . The AC field corresponds to a function 𝐵𝐴𝐶sin(2𝜋𝜔𝐴𝐶𝑡) applied during the DD sequences, where 𝐵𝐴𝐶 and 𝜔𝐴𝐶 are the power and the frequency of the AC field respectively. The AC field l...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Advanced Quantum Technologies, 2021

    Crawford, S.E., et al., Quantum Sensing for Energy Applications: Review and P erspective. Advanced Quantum Technologies, 2021. 4(8)

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    Reinhard, and P

    Degen, C.L., F. Reinhard, and P. Cappellaro, Quantum sensing. Reviews of Modern Physics,

    work page

  7. [7]

    Nature Protocols, 2019

    Bucher, D.B., et al., Quantum diamond spectrometer for nanoscale NMR and ESR spectroscopy. Nature Protocols, 2019. 14(9): p. 2707-2747

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    Briegel, and D.B

    Allert, R.D., K.D. Briegel, and D.B. Bucher, Advances in nano - and microscale NMR spectroscopy using diamond quantum sensors. Chemical Communications, 2022. 58(59): p. 8165-8181

    work page 2022

  9. [9]

    npj Quantum Mater, 2026

    Jixing Zhang, et al., Unraveling quantum dephasing of nitrogen-vacancy center ensembles in diamond. npj Quantum Mater, 2026

    work page 2026

  10. [10]

    Segawa and R

    Takuya F. Segawa and R. Igarashi, Nanoscale quantum sensing with Nitrogen-Vacancy centers in nanodiamonds – A magnetic resonance perspective . Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, 2023. 134–135: p. 20–38. 13

    work page 2023

  11. [11]

    Physical Review Letters, 2012

    Taminiau, T.H., et al., Detection and Control of Individual Nuclear Spins Using a Weakly Coupled Electron Spin. Physical Review Letters, 2012. 109(13)

    work page 2012

  12. [12]

    Physical Review Letters, 2012

    Kolkowitz, S., et al., Sensing Distant Nuclear Spins with a Single Electron Spin. Physical Review Letters, 2012. 109(13)

    work page 2012

  13. [13]

    Npj Quantum Information, 2017

    Rosskopf, T., et al., A quantum spectrum analyzer enhanced by a nuclear spin memory. Npj Quantum Information, 2017. 3

    work page 2017

  14. [15]

    Nano Lett., 2026

    Boning Li, et al., Robust AC Vector Sensing at Zero Magnetic Field with Pentacene. Nano Lett., 2026

    work page 2026

  15. [16]

    Physical Review Research, 2025

    Singh, H., et al., Room-temperature quantum sensing with photoexcited triplet electrons in organic crystals. Physical Review Research, 2025. 7(1)

    work page 2025

  16. [17]

    Journal of Physi cal Chemistry C, 2019

    Wu, H., et al., Unraveling the Room-Temperature Spin Dynamics of Photoexcited Pentacene in Its Lowest Triplet State at Zero Field. Journal of Physi cal Chemistry C, 2019. 123(39): p. 24275-24279

    work page 2019

  17. [18]

    Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 2025

    Concilio, M.G., et al., Triplet J-Driven DNP-A Proposal to Increase the Sensitivity of Solution- State NMR without Microwave. Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 2025. 129(17): p. 3886-3897

    work page 2025

  18. [19]

    Nature Communications, 2017

    Basel, B.S., et al., Unified model for singlet fission within a non-conjugated covalent pentacene dimer. Nature Communications, 2017. 8

    work page 2017

  19. [20]

    Chem, 2018

    Basel, B.S., et al., Evidence for Charge-Transfer Mediation in the Primary Events of Singlet Fission in a Weakly Coupled Pentacene Dimer. Chem, 2018. 4(5): p. 1092-1111

    work page 2018

  20. [21]

    Jiaming Wu, et al., Room-Temperature Long -Coherence Quintet Qudit for Quantum Information Processing in Organic Amorphous Solids. Adv. Quantum Technol., 2025. 8: p. e00369

    work page 2025

  21. [22]

    Bindra, et al., Elucidating Quintet-State Dynamics in Singlet Fission Oligomers and Polymers with Tetracene PendantsClick to copy article link

    Jasleen K. Bindra, et al., Elucidating Quintet-State Dynamics in Singlet Fission Oligomers and Polymers with Tetracene PendantsClick to copy article link. J. Am. Chem. Soc. , 2025. 147(29): p. 25672–25681

    work page 2025

  22. [23]

    Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2023

    MacDonald, T.S.C., et al., Anisotropic Multiexciton Quintet and Triplet Dynamics in Singlet Fission via Pulsed Electron Spin Resonance. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2023. 145(28): p. 15275-15283

    work page 2023

  23. [24]

    Applied Physics Letters, 2012

    Reusswig, P.D., et al., Enhanced external quantum efficiency in an organic photovoltaic cell via singlet fission exciton sensitizer. Applied Physics Letters, 2012. 101(11)

    work page 2012

  24. [25]

    Smyser, K.E. and J.D. Eaves, Singlet fission for quantum information and quantum computing: the parallel model. Scientific Reports, 2020. 10(1)

    work page 2020

  25. [26]

    Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2021

    Zhang, J., et al., Near-Unity Singlet Fission on a Quantum Dot Initiated by Resonant Energy Transfer. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2021. 143(42): p. 17388-17394

    work page 2021

  26. [27]

    Nano Letters, 2021

    Wang, G.Q., et al., Nanoscale V ector AC Magnetometry with a Single Nitrogen-Vacancy Center in Diamond. Nano Letters, 2021. 21(12): p. 5143-5150

    work page 2021

  27. [28]

    Computer Physics Communications, 2026

    Völker, L.A., et al., SimOS: A Python framework for simulations of optically addressable spins. Computer Physics Communications, 2026. 320

    work page 2026

  28. [29]

    Controlling Interchromophore Coupling in Diamantane- Linked Pentacene Dimers To Create a 'Binary' Pair

    Greissel, P.M., et al., Correction to "Controlling Interchromophore Coupling in Diamantane- Linked Pentacene Dimers To Create a 'Binary' Pair". Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2024. 146(38): p. 26586-26586

    work page 2024

  29. [30]

    Chemistry-a European Journal, 2018

    Kawano, K., et al., An Ethynylene-Bridged Pentacene Dimer: Two-Step Synthesis and Charge- Transport Properties. Chemistry-a European Journal, 2018. 24(56): p. 14916-14920

    work page 2018

  30. [31]

    Vanstrien, A.J. and J. Schmidt, An Electron-Paramagnetic-Res Study of the Triplet -State of Pentacene by Electron Spin -Echo Techniques and Laser Flash Excitation. Chemical Physics Letters, 1980. 70(3): p. 513-517

    work page 1980

  31. [32]

    Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 2020

    Avalos, C.E., et al., Enhanced Intersystem Crossing and Transient Electron Spin Polarization in a Photoexcited Pentacene-Trityl Radical. Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 2020. 124(29): p. 6068-6075

    work page 2020

  32. [33]

    Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2023

    Majumder, K., et a l., Controlling Intramolecular Singlet Fission Dynamics via Torsional Modulation of Through -Bond versus Through -Space Couplings. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2023. 145(38): p. 20883-20896. 14

    work page 2023

  33. [34]

    Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2022

    Jacobberger, R.M., et al., Using Molecular Design to Enhance the Coherence Time of Quintet Multiexcitons Generated by Singlet Fission in Single Crystals. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2022. 144(5): p. 2276-2283

    work page 2022

  34. [35]

    Journal of Magnetic Resonance, 2011

    Hogben, H.J., et al., Spinach - A software library for simulation of spin dynamics in large spin systems. Journal of Magnetic Resonance, 2011. 208(2): p. 179-194

    work page 2011

  35. [36]

    Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 2018

    Nagashima, H., et al., Singlet-Fission-Born Quintet State: Sublevel Selections and Trapping by Multiexciton Thermodynamics. Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 2018 . 9(19): p. 5855 - 5861

    work page 2018

  36. [37]

    Chemical Science, 2019

    Basel, B.S., et al., Influence of the heavy -atom effect on singlet fission: a study of platinum - bridged pentacene dimers. Chemical Science, 2019. 10(48): p. 11130-11140

    work page 2019

  37. [38]

    Scientific Reports, 2020

    Kuwahata, A., et al., Magnetometer with nitrogen -vacancy center in a bulk diamond for detecting magnetic nanoparticles in biomedical applications. Scientific Reports, 2020. 10(1)

    work page 2020

  38. [39]

    Chemical Physics Letters, 2013

    Eichhorn, T.R., et al., High proton spin polarization with DNP using the triplet state of pentacene-. Chemical Physics Letters, 2013. 555: p. 296-299

    work page 2013

  39. [40]

    Miyokawa, K. and Y . Kurashige, Electron spin-lattice relaxation in triplet-state oligoacenes: a first-principles-based approach. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2026. 28(2): p. 1230- 1240

    work page 2026

  40. [41]

    Journal of Chemical Physics, 2022

    Joshi, G., et al., Optical read out of singlet fission biexcitons in a heteroacene with photoluminescence detected magnetic resonance. Journal of Chemical Physics, 2022. 157(16). 15 Supplementary Information Quantum Sensing with Triplet Pair States: A Theoretical Study Maria Grazia Concilio1*, Yiwen Wang1, Siyuan Wang1, Xueqian Kong1* 1Institute of Transl...

    work page 2022

  41. [42]

    Journal of Chemical Physics, 2022

    Joshi, G., et al., Optical readout of singlet fission biexcitons in a heteroacene with photoluminescence detected magnetic resonance. Journal of Chemical Physics, 2022. 157(16)

    work page 2022

  42. [43]

    Journal of Chemical Physics, 1978

    Vega, S., Fictitious Spin 1 -2 Operator Formalism for Multiple Quantum Nmr. Journal of Chemical Physics, 1978. 68(12): p. 5518-5527

    work page 1978

  43. [44]

    & Wokaun,, Principles of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance in One and Two Dimensions

    Ernst, R.R., Bodenhausen, G. & Wokaun,, Principles of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance in One and Two Dimensions. p.610 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987)

    work page 1987

  44. [45]

    Physical Review Letters, 2024

    Mena, A., et al., Room-Temperature Optically Detected Coherent Control of Molecular Spins. Physical Review Letters, 2024. 133(12)

    work page 2024

  45. [46]

    Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2019

    Wu, H., et al., Unraveling the Room-Temperature Spin Dynamics of Photoexcited Pentacene in Its Lowest Triplet State at Zero Field. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2019. 123(39): p. 24275-24279

    work page 2019