Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Learning to Maximize Mutual Information for Dynamic Feature Selection

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2301.00557 v2 pith:KZ7SLIPX submitted 2023-01-02 cs.LG cs.ITmath.ITstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.ITmath.ITstat.ML
keywords featureapproachselectioninformationlearningdatadynamicfeatures
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Feature selection helps reduce data acquisition costs in ML, but the standard approach is to train models with static feature subsets. Here, we consider the dynamic feature selection (DFS) problem where a model sequentially queries features based on the presently available information. DFS is often addressed with reinforcement learning, but we explore a simpler approach of greedily selecting features based on their conditional mutual information. This method is theoretically appealing but requires oracle access to the data distribution, so we develop a learning approach based on amortized optimization. The proposed method is shown to recover the greedy policy when trained to optimality, and it outperforms numerous existing feature selection methods in our experiments, thus validating it as a simple but powerful approach for this problem.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. PRECISE-AS: Personalized Reinforcement Learning for Efficient Point-of-Care Echocardiography in Aortic Stenosis Diagnosis

    cs.CV 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    An RL-driven video acquisition policy for echocardiography keeps aortic stenosis classification at 80.6% balanced accuracy while acquiring only 47% of the videos on average.

Pith tools