Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 46 references

In vivo measurements of fascia lata effective mechanics combined to a memory fiber recruitment viscoelastic modeling approach

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-06-28 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A ramp-relaxation experiment paired with a fiber-recruitment model measures the effective viscoelastic mechanics of the fascia lata in vivo.

desk verdict New in-vivo ramp-relaxation protocol plus fiber-recruitment model for fascia lata effective mechanics is worth referee time but the artifact isolation needs explicit bounds. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.03353 v1 pith:KZW6FKPI submitted 2026-06-02 cond-mat.soft physics.bio-ph

Franck Germain , Thomas Gibaud This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.softphysics.bio-ph
keywords fascialataviscoelasticmodelinginvivomechanicsfiberrecruitmentramp-relaxationsofttissueeffectiveproperties
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper presents a framework for measuring the effective viscoelastic properties of the fascia lata in living people through controlled ramp-relaxation experiments combined with a model of fiber recruitment and dual-timescale relaxation. This setup captures the nonlinear stiffening as the tissue elongates and the two-phase decay of force during holding, all with a small number of interpretable parameters. The measurements prove reproducible across trials, with parameters varying by less than 10 percent. The work treats the fascia lata as part of a coupled musculoskeletal system rather than an isolated material. Readers might care because the fascia transmits force in the body, so quantifying its behavior in vivo opens paths to studying changes from exercise, injury recovery, or aging.

What carries the argument

The constitutive model integrating fiber recruitment and dual-timescale viscoelastic relaxation, which describes the macroscopic response emerging from collagen alignment, matrix viscoelasticity, and fluid flow in the hierarchical hydrated composite.

What would settle it

If additional in vivo ramp-relaxation trials on multiple subjects yield parameter values varying by more than 10 percent or if the model fails to simultaneously fit the nonlinear stiffening and dual force decay curves.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the combination of in vivo ramp-relaxation experiments on the human fascia lata with a constitutive model integrating fiber recruitment and dual-timescale viscoelastic relaxation captures both the nonlinear stiffening during elongation and the dual decay of force during relaxation. This effective model uses a minimal set of physically interpretable parameters and demonstrates good reproducibility with parameter variability within 10 percent. It characterizes the mechanical response of the fascia lata complex including its coupling to the hip-thigh musculoskeletal system under controlled loading conditions.

Load-bearing premise

Controlled ramp-relaxation experiments in vivo on the fascia lata isolate its effective mechanical response without dominant interference from subject motion, probe placement, or surrounding tissues.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The fascia lata behaves as a hierarchical, hydrated composite whose macroscopic mechanical response emerges from coupled effects of collagen alignment, matrix viscoelasticity, and fluid flow.
  • Future in vivo investigations can use this quantitative foundation to study how training, rehabilitation, or aging influence fascial mechanical properties.
  • The model is effective, focusing on the response of the fascia lata complex rather than intrinsic local material properties.
  • Repeated trials confirm reproducibility with parameter variability within 10 percent.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This approach might extend to other soft tissues where isolating effective mechanics from coupled systems is challenging.
  • Correlating the dual relaxation timescales with specific physiological processes could guide targeted therapies for fascial disorders.
  • Longitudinal studies using this method could track individual changes in fascial properties over time.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper develops an in vivo experimental and modeling framework for the fascia lata, combining controlled ramp-relaxation tests with a constitutive model that integrates fiber recruitment and dual-timescale viscoelastic relaxation. It presents this as an effective model (including hip-thigh coupling) rather than an intrinsic material description. The central claims are that the model reproduces nonlinear stiffening during elongation and dual force decay during relaxation using a minimal set of physically interpretable parameters, that repeated trials show parameter variability within 10%, and that the results support a hierarchical hydrated composite view of fascia lata mechanics.

Significance. If the experimental isolation holds and the fits are robustly documented, the work would provide a useful quantitative platform for in vivo characterization of fascial viscoelasticity, filling a gap where prior methods capture only elastic or viscous aspects separately. The explicit framing as an effective model (rather than intrinsic) is a conceptual strength, as is the emphasis on reproducibility and the link to hierarchical structure. Such a framework could support future studies on training, rehabilitation, and aging effects on fascial properties.

major comments (2)
  1. [Experimental protocol] Experimental protocol description: the central claim that fitted parameters are physically interpretable for the fascia lata complex requires that measured forces are not dominated by artifacts from subject motion, probe placement, or adjacent tissues. The manuscript supplies no quantitative bound, control experiment, or sensitivity analysis on residual artifact contributions to the observed force decay; without this, the 10% reproducibility metric and parameter interpretability cannot be assessed.
  2. [Results] Results section (reproducibility claim): the statement of 'parameter variability within 10%' is presented without accompanying data tables, error bars, individual trial fits, or statistical details on how variability was computed across repeated trials. This is load-bearing for the reproducibility assertion that underpins the effective-model validation.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Introduction] The abstract and introduction would benefit from a brief comparison table or explicit statement of how the dual-timescale model differs from prior single-relaxation or purely elastic fascia models in the literature.
  2. [Modeling approach] Notation for the fiber-recruitment and dual-timescale terms should be defined at first use with a clear mapping to the minimal parameter set.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments on our in vivo fascia lata study. We respond point-by-point to the major comments below and outline revisions to improve documentation and transparency.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Experimental protocol] Experimental protocol description: the central claim that fitted parameters are physically interpretable for the fascia lata complex requires that measured forces are not dominated by artifacts from subject motion, probe placement, or adjacent tissues. The manuscript supplies no quantitative bound, control experiment, or sensitivity analysis on residual artifact contributions to the observed force decay; without this, the 10% reproducibility metric and parameter interpretability cannot be assessed.

    Authors: We agree that bounding potential artifacts is necessary to support parameter interpretability in the effective model. The current manuscript does not contain a dedicated quantitative sensitivity analysis or control experiments addressing residual contributions from motion or probe placement. In the revision we will add a new subsection that uses the observed trial-to-trial consistency and the dual-timescale model to derive upper bounds on artifact-driven force decay, thereby clarifying the extent to which the measured relaxation reflects fascial mechanics. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results] Results section (reproducibility claim): the statement of 'parameter variability within 10%' is presented without accompanying data tables, error bars, individual trial fits, or statistical details on how variability was computed across repeated trials. This is load-bearing for the reproducibility assertion that underpins the effective-model validation.

    Authors: We accept that the reproducibility statement requires supporting data. The revised Results section will include a table of fitted parameters for every individual trial, the computed mean and standard deviation, coefficients of variation (confirming values under 10%), and a description of the variability metric. Error bars will also be added to the mean force–elongation and relaxation curves. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity detected; derivation self-contained

full rationale

The abstract and description present an experimental protocol (controlled ramp-relaxation on fascia lata) combined with a constitutive model (fiber recruitment plus dual-timescale relaxation) that fits observed nonlinear stiffening and force decay. No equations, fitting procedures, or self-citations are shown that would make any reported quantity (e.g., parameters or reproducibility) equivalent to its inputs by construction. The model is explicitly labeled 'effective' and the reproducibility metric is stated as an empirical outcome of repeated trials, not a definitional or fitted-input result. The derivation chain therefore remains independent of the target claims.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the domain assumption that the fascia lata can be treated as an effective hierarchical hydrated composite and that the chosen constitutive form (fiber recruitment plus dual-timescale relaxation) is adequate to describe the observed macroscopic response.

free parameters (1)
  • minimal set of physically interpretable parameters
    The model is stated to use a minimal set of parameters whose numerical values are obtained by fitting to the ramp-relaxation data.
assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption fascia lata behaves as a hierarchical, hydrated composite whose macroscopic mechanical response emerges from the coupled effects of collagen alignment, matrix viscoelasticity, and fluid flow
    Explicitly stated in the final sentence of the abstract as the interpretation supported by the results.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of In vivo measurements of fascia lata effective mechanics combined to a memory fiber recruitment viscoelastic modeling approach." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KZW6FKPI

@misc{pith2026260603353,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: In vivo measurements of fascia lata effective mechanics combined to a memory fiber recruitment viscoelastic modeling approach},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KZW6FKPI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.03353}
}
read the original abstract

The fascia lata plays a central role in force transmission and body mechanics, yet its in vivo mechanical behavior remains poorly characterized. Existing approaches -- shear wave elastography and direct force measurements alike -- share a fundamental limitation: none simultaneously captures both the elastic and viscous components of fascial mechanics within a single experiment. The primary aim of this study is therefore to develop an experimental and modeling framework that enables the reproducible measurement of the effective viscoelastic properties of the fascia lata in vivo. To this end, we combine controlled ramp-relaxation experiments on the human fascia lata with a constitutive model that integrates fiber recruitment and dual-timescale viscoelastic relaxation. We emphasize that this is an effective model: rather than describing intrinsic local material properties, it characterizes the mechanical response of the fascia lata complex including its coupling to the hip-thigh musculoskeletal system under controlled loading conditions. The model captures both the nonlinear stiffening during elongation and the dual decay of force during relaxation, using a minimal set of physically interpretable parameters. Repeated trials demonstrate good reproducibility, with parameter variability within 10%. Our results support the view that fascia lata behaves as a hierarchical, hydrated composite whose macroscopic mechanical response emerges from the coupled effects of collagen alignment, matrix viscoelasticity, and fluid flow. This work provides a quantitative foundation for future in vivo investigations into how training, rehabilitation, or aging influence the evolution of fascial mechanical properties.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.03353 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Proper stabilization of the skeletal structure is [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Experimental Setup. (a) Image of the setup. The pelvis is immobilized to ensure the hip articular center (HAC) remains [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Experimental setup characteristics. (a) Calibration [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Rope calibration: (a) extension and (b) relaxation. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Sketch of the fiber–recruitment–viscoelastic approach [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Stretching–relaxation experiment. (a) Stretching ex [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Fascia lata experiment: right leg (first three panels) and left leg (fourth panel). (a–c) Stretching phase: force [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Optimisation of the recruitment distribution pa [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Fascia lata fit parameters as function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Representative sensitivity and uniqueness of the fit [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Relative error of the fit parameters obtained from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_10.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references

  1. [1]

    Otsuka, T

    S. Otsuka, T. Yakura, Y. Ohmichi, M. Ohmichi, M. Naito, T. Nakano, and Y. Kawakami, Site specificity of mechanical and structural properties of human fas- cia lata and their gender differences: a cadaveric study, Journal of Biomechanics77, 69 (2018)

    2018

  2. [2]

    Otsuka, K

    S. Otsuka, K. Koizumi, N. Fujii, and et al., Mechani- cal anisotropy of the fascia lata: implications for human movement, Journal of Biomechanics102, 109332 (2020)

    2020

  3. [3]

    C. M. Eng, D. E. Lieberman, A. A. Biewener, and L. Dorfmann, The role of fascia in locomotor mechan- ics of the thigh, Journal of Experimental Biology218, 149 (2015)

    2015

  4. [4]

    A. M. Merican and A. A. Amis, Iliotibial band tension af- fects patellofemoral and tibiofemoral kinematics, Journal of biomechanics42, 1539 (2009)

    2009

  5. [5]

    C. M. Eng, F. Q. Pancheri, D. E. Lieberman, A. A. Biewener, and L. Dorfmann, Directional differences in the biaxial material properties of fascia lata and the im- plications for fascia function, Annals of biomedical engi- neering42, 1224 (2014)

    2014

  6. [6]

    Bonaldi, G

    C. Bonaldi, G. Serrao, P. Cosmacini, and et al., Mechani- cal characterization of human fascia lata: multiaxial test- ing and constitutive modeling, Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials141, 105829 (2023)

    2023

  7. [7]

    Germain and L

    F. Germain and L. Regis, M´ ecanismes probables des ´ etirements statiques en kin´ esith´ erapie: ´ etude des apon´ evroses ant´ erieures de la cuisse, Kin´ esith´ erapie, la Revue16, 3 (2016)

    2016

  8. [8]

    Germain, E

    F. Germain, E. Lemarchand, and R. Perrin, Sensory reg- ulation and mechanical effects of sustained high inten- sity stretching of the anterior compartment of the thigh, Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies24, 18 (2020)

    2020

Show all 46 references
  1. [9]

    Warneke, T

    K. Warneke, T. Rabitsch, P. Dobert, and J. Wilke, The effects of static and dynamic stretching on deep fascia stiffness: a randomized, controlled cross-over study, Eu- ropean Journal of Applied Physiology124, 2809 (2024)

    2024

  2. [10]

    Bonaldi, C

    L. Bonaldi, C. G. Fontanella, C. Stecco, and A. Berardo, Design, implementation and effectiveness of human fas- cia lata biomechanics for tissue engineering, Journal of Biomechanics176, 112369 (2024)

    2024

  3. [11]

    Stecco, P

    C. Stecco, P. G. Pavan, A. Porzionato, V. Mac- chi, L. Lancerotto, E. L. Carniel, A. N. Natali, and R. De Caro, Mechanics of crural fascia: from anatomy to constitutive modelling, Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy 31, 523 (2009)

    2009

  4. [12]

    F. Q. Pancheri, C. M. Eng, D. E. Lieberman, A. A. Biewener, and L. Dorfmann, A constitutive description of the anisotropic response of the fascia lata, Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials30, 306 (2014)

    2014

  5. [13]

    Szotek, J

    S. Szotek, J. Dawidowicz, and K. Maksymowicz, Mechan- ical behaviour and structural characterization of human fascia lata, Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics26 (2024)

    2024

  6. [14]

    H. R. C. Screen, D. L. Bader, D. A. Lee, and J. C. Shel- ton, Local strain measurement within tendon, Strain47, 467 (2011)

    2011

  7. [15]

    Gupta and et al., Viscoelastic properties of tendon fascicles, Acta Biomaterialia5, 2251 (2009)

    H. Gupta and et al., Viscoelastic properties of tendon fascicles, Acta Biomaterialia5, 2251 (2009)

    2009

  8. [16]

    M¨ unster, L

    S. M¨ unster, L. M. Jawerth, B. A. Leslie, and et al., Strain history dependence of the nonlinear stress response of fibrin and collagen networks, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences110, 12197 (2013)

    2013

  9. [17]

    S. Nam, K. H. Hu, M. J. Butte, and O. Chaud- huri, Strain-enhanced stress relaxation impacts nonlinear elasticity in collagen gels, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences113, 5492 (2016)

    2016

  10. [18]

    Lanir, A microstructure model for the rheology of mammalian tendon, Journal Name (1980)

    Y. Lanir, A microstructure model for the rheology of mammalian tendon, Journal Name (1980)

    1980

  11. [19]

    Ganghoffer, C

    J. Ganghoffer, C. Laurent, G. Maurice, R. Rahouadj, and X. Wang, Nonlinear viscous behavior of the tendon’s fas- cicles from the homogenization of viscoelastic collagen fibers, European Journal of Mechanics-A/Solids59, 265 16 (2016)

    2016

  12. [20]

    A. D. Freed and K. Rajagopal, A viscoelastic model for describing the response of biological fibers, Acta Mechan- ica227, 3367 (2016)

    2016

  13. [21]

    Romero, A

    F. Romero, A. Pastor, J. Lopez, and P. Romero, A recruitment-based rheological model for mechanical be- havior of soft tissues, Biorheology35, 17 (1998)

    1998

  14. [22]

    Raz and Y

    E. Raz and Y. Lanir, Recruitment viscoelasticity of the tendon, Journal of biomechanical engineering131(2009)

    2009

  15. [23]

    Bevan, N

    T. Bevan, N. Merabet, J. Hornsby, P. N. Watton, and M. S. Thompson, A biomechanical model for fibril re- cruitment: evaluation in tendons and arteries, Journal of biomechanics74, 192 (2018)

    2018

  16. [24]

    Umehara, T

    J. Umehara, T. Ikezoe, S. Nishishita, M. Nakamura, H. Umegaki, T. Kobayashi, K. Fujita, and N. Ichi- hashi, Effect of hip and knee position on tensor fasciae latae elongation during stretching: an ultrasonic shear wave elastography study, Clinical Biomechanics30, 1056 (2015)

    2015

  17. [25]

    Nakamura, S

    M. Nakamura, S. Sato, Y. Murakami, R. Kiyono, K. Ya- hata, F. Sanuki, R. Yoshida, T. Fukaya, and K. Takeuchi, The comparison of different stretching intensities on the range of motion and muscle stiffness of the quadriceps muscles, Frontiers in physiology11, 628870 (2021)

    2021

  18. [26]

    Kranjc, M

    S. Kranjc, M. Fink, M. Nakamura, and ˇZ. Kozinc, Acute effects of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilita- tion stretching on rectus femoris muscle stiffness: a dose-response shear-wave elastography study, Frontiers in Physiology15, 1496825 (2025)

    2025

  19. [27]

    Germain, A

    F. Germain, A. Mayet, and R. Perrin, What mechani- cal and proprioceptive structures are involved in quadri- ceps stretching? why is it important for patella travel?, Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies40, 2001 (2024)

    2001

  20. [28]

    Germain and R

    F. Germain and R. Perrin, Stretch tolerance and elastic passive reaction of the quadriceps femoris seem to depend more on the fascia profundis taut surfaces than on the underlying stretched muscle, Journal of Anatomy243, 1059 (2023)

    2023

  21. [29]

    Kirilova, Time-dependent properties of human umbil- ical fascia, Connective tissue research53, 21 (2012)

    M. Kirilova, Time-dependent properties of human umbil- ical fascia, Connective tissue research53, 21 (2012)

    2012

  22. [30]

    Ristaniemi, D

    A. Ristaniemi, D. Regmi, D. Mondal, J. Torniainen, P. Tanska, L. Stenroth, M. A. Finnil¨ a, J. T¨ oyr¨ as, and R. K. Korhonen, Structure, composition and fibril- reinforced poroviscoelastic properties of bovine knee lig- aments and patellar tendon, Journal of the Royal Society...

    2021

  23. [31]

    Z. L. Shen, H. Kahn, R. Ballarini, and S. J. Eppell, Vis- coelastic properties of isolated collagen fibrils, Biophysi- cal journal100, 3008 (2011)

    2011

  24. [32]

    O. G. Andriotis, M. Nalbach, and P. J. Thurner, Mechan- ics of isolated individual collagen fibrils, Acta biomateri- alia163, 35 (2023)

    2023

  25. [33]

    R. C. Aster, B. Borchers, and C. H. Thurber,Parame- ter Estimation and Inverse Problems, 2nd ed. (Academic Press, San Diego, USA, 2012)

    2012

  26. [34]

    Saltelli, S

    A. Saltelli, S. Tarantola, F. Campolongo, M. Ratto,et al., Sensitivity analysis in practice: a guide to assessing sci- entific models, Vol. 1 (Wiley Online Library, 2004)

    2004

  27. [35]

    Ljung,System Identification: Theory for the User, 2nd ed

    L. Ljung,System Identification: Theory for the User, 2nd ed. (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, 1999)

    1999

  28. [36]

    Nocedal and S

    J. Nocedal and S. J. Wright,Numerical Optimization, 2nd ed. (Springer, New York, USA, 2006)

    2006

  29. [37]

    Horst and P

    R. Horst and P. M. Pardalos,Handbook of Global Opti- mization(Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 1995)

    1995

  30. [38]

    Stankiewicz, Fractional maxwell model of viscoelastic biological materials, BIO Web of Conferences10, 02032 (2018)

    A. Stankiewicz, Fractional maxwell model of viscoelastic biological materials, BIO Web of Conferences10, 02032 (2018)

    2018

  31. [39]

    Germain and T

    F. Germain and T. Gibaud, Fascia lata vis- coelastic model,https://github.com/tgibaud/ fascia-lata-viscoelastic-model(2026)

    2026

  32. [40]

    Bennett, A possible energy-saving role for the ma- jor fascia of the thigh in running quadrupedal mammals, Journal of Zoology219, 221 (1989)

    M. Bennett, A possible energy-saving role for the ma- jor fascia of the thigh in running quadrupedal mammals, Journal of Zoology219, 221 (1989)

    1989

  33. [41]

    Puxkandl, I

    R. Puxkandl, I. Zizak, O. Paris, J. Keckes, W. Tesch, S. Bernstorff, P. Purslow, and P. Fratzl, Viscoelastic properties of collagen: synchrotron radiation investiga- tions and structural model, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sci...

    2002

  34. [42]

    Otsuka, X

    S. Otsuka, X. Shan, K. Kurumisawa, S. Omura, T. Ya- magishi, M. Naito, and Y. Kawakami, Investigation of the association between human fascia lata thickness and its neighboring tissues’ morphology and function using b-mode ultrasonography, Journal of Anatomy239, 1114 (2021)

    2021

  35. [43]

    S. L. Duenwald and R. Vanderby, Viscoelastic relaxation behavior of tendon, Journal of Biomechanics43, 1427 (2010)

    2010

  36. [44]

    Fullerton and R

    A. Fullerton and R. Rahal, Collagen hydration and en- ergy dissipation, Biophysical Journal93, 1234 (2007)

    2007

  37. [45]

    Gras and et al., Viscoelastic modeling of human ster- nocleidomastoideus, Journal of Biomechanics46, 2211 (2013)

    L. Gras and et al., Viscoelastic modeling of human ster- nocleidomastoideus, Journal of Biomechanics46, 2211 (2013)

    2013

  38. [46]

    Matsuo and et al., Water dynamics in muscle fibers, Biophysical Chemistry213, 35 (2016)

    T. Matsuo and et al., Water dynamics in muscle fibers, Biophysical Chemistry213, 35 (2016)

    2016

Pith tools

Reviewed June 28, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.