Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Recent Developments in Recommender Systems: A Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2306.12680 v1 pith:KZXYF5MX submitted 2023-06-22 cs.IR cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.IRcs.AIcs.LG
keywords systemsrecommenderfieldlatestsurveydevelopmenttrendsaddition
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this technical survey, we comprehensively summarize the latest advancements in the field of recommender systems. The objective of this study is to provide an overview of the current state-of-the-art in the field and highlight the latest trends in the development of recommender systems. The study starts with a comprehensive summary of the main taxonomy of recommender systems, including personalized and group recommender systems, and then delves into the category of knowledge-based recommender systems. In addition, the survey analyzes the robustness, data bias, and fairness issues in recommender systems, summarizing the evaluation metrics used to assess the performance of these systems. Finally, the study provides insights into the latest trends in the development of recommender systems and highlights the new directions for future research in the field.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Equity by Design? On the Trade-Offs in Fairness-Driven Recommendation in Heterogeneous Two-Sided Markets

    cs.GT 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The 'free fairness' result for producer constraints vanishes for multi-item recommendations; a CVaR group-fairness objective and business constraints can be added with moderate trade-offs.

  2. UniMLR: Modeling Implicit Class Significance for Multi-Label Ranking

    cs.LG 2025-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    UniMLR uses positive-positive label pairs and Gaussian significance scores to unify multi-label classification and ranking, evaluated on new Ranked MNIST datasets.

Pith tools