REVIEW 16 cited by
AVHBench: A Cross-Modal Hallucination Benchmark for Audio-Visual Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Following the success of Large Language Models (LLMs), expanding their boundaries to new modalities represents a significant paradigm shift in multimodal understanding. Human perception is inherently multimodal, relying not only on text but also on auditory and visual cues for a complete understanding of the world. In recognition of this fact, audio-visual LLMs have recently emerged. Despite promising developments, the lack of dedicated benchmarks poses challenges for understanding and evaluating models. In this work, we show that audio-visual LLMs struggle to discern subtle relationships between audio and visual signals, leading to hallucinations and highlighting the need for reliable benchmarks. To address this, we introduce AVHBench, the first comprehensive benchmark specifically designed to evaluate the perception and comprehension capabilities of audio-visual LLMs. Our benchmark includes tests for assessing hallucinations, as well as the cross-modal matching and reasoning abilities of these models. Our results reveal that most existing audio-visual LLMs struggle with hallucinations caused by cross-interactions between modalities, due to their limited capacity to perceive complex multimodal signals and their relationships. Additionally, we demonstrate that simple training with our AVHBench improves robustness of audio-visual LLMs against hallucinations. Dataset: https://github.com/kaist-ami/AVHBench
Forward citations
Cited by 16 Pith papers
-
TraceAV-Bench: Benchmarking Multi-Hop Trajectory Reasoning over Long Audio-Visual Videos
TraceAV-Bench is the first benchmark for multi-hop trajectory reasoning over long audio-visual videos, showing top models reach only 51-68% accuracy with substantial room for improvement.
-
Do Audio-Visual Large Language Models Really See and Hear?
AVLLMs encode audio semantics in middle layers but suppress them in final text outputs when audio conflicts with vision, due to training that largely inherits from vision-language base models.
-
AVI-Bench: Toward Human-like Audio-Visual Intelligence of Omni-MLLMs
AVI-Bench is a cognitively inspired benchmark that evaluates Omni-MLLMs on joint audio-visual tasks and reveals substantial limitations in current models.
-
Chain of Modality: From Static Fusion to Dynamic Orchestration in Omni-MLLMs
Chain of Modality dynamically orchestrates multimodal input topologies and bifurcates cognitive execution to overcome static fusion biases in Omni-MLLMs.
-
Don't Let the Video Speak: Audio-Contrastive Preference Optimization for Audio-Visual Language Models
Audio-Contrastive Preference Optimization (ACPO) mitigates audio hallucination in AVLMs via output-contrastive and input-contrastive objectives that enforce faithful audio grounding.
-
XModBench: Benchmarking Cross-Modal Capabilities and Consistency in Omni-Language Models
XModBench is a tri-modal benchmark that systematically measures cross-modal consistency, modality disparities, and directional imbalances in omni-language models across five task families and all modality combinations.
-
VidHal: Benchmarking Temporal Hallucinations in Vision LLMs
VidHal is a new benchmark that evaluates VLLM temporal hallucinations through a caption ordering task on videos with varying hallucination levels.
-
Adaptive Perturbation Selection for Contrastive Audio Decoding
A learned per-example router over a 105-perturbation audio library improves contrastive decoding for audio-LLM hallucination, with task-dependent best distortions (e.g., reverse audio for temporal order).
-
Beyond Text-Dominance: Understanding Modality Preference of Omni-modal Large Language Models
Omni-modal LLMs exhibit visual preference that emerges in mid-to-late layers, enabling hallucination detection without task-specific training.
-
A Systematic Study of Cross-Modal Typographic Attacks on Audio-Visual Reasoning
Coordinated multi-modal typographic attacks on MLLMs achieve 83.43% success rate versus 34.93% for single-modality attacks.
-
Taming Text-to-Sounding Video Generation via Advanced Modality Condition and Interaction
Separating the text condition into a video caption and a visually grounded audio caption, and fusing the diffusion towers with dual cross-attention, gives the reported-best text-to-sounding-video quality and synchroni...
-
X$^3$-OPD: Distilling Reasoning into Large Audio-Language Models via On-Policy Alignment
X3-OPD improves audio-grounded reasoning by training the audio student on its own rollouts with token-level teacher feedback, using a three-tier paired text-audio corpus.
-
Adaptive Perturbation Selection for Contrastive Audio Decoding
Adaptive selection among a library of audio perturbations in contrastive decoding produces task-dependent accuracy gains, including +4.3% on an existence task via a hidden-state selector.
-
From Failure Taxonomy to Intervention: A Diagnostic Methodology for Industry-Scale AVLM in Video and Live-Streaming Platform Moderation
Presents a failure taxonomy and intervention-mapping methodology for industry-scale AVLM development in content moderation, applied to a global video platform system.
-
CogniRoute: Learning to Route Social Evidence in Omni-Modal Models
CogniRoute adds a cognitive schema and route-aware RL to an omni-modal MoE, reaching 59.38% accuracy on a new 118K-example social video QA benchmark and beating prior baselines by 15-27 points.
-
Multimodal Chain-of-Thought Reasoning: A Comprehensive Survey
The paper provides the first comprehensive survey of multimodal chain-of-thought reasoning, including foundational concepts, a taxonomy of methodologies, application analyses, challenges, and future directions.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.