Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Prompting as Probing: Using Language Models for Knowledge Base Construction

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2208.11057 v3 pith:L2FE6L5W submitted 2022-08-23 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords languagepromptingpropanswerbaseconstructionknowledgemodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Language Models (LMs) have proven to be useful in various downstream applications, such as summarisation, translation, question answering and text classification. LMs are becoming increasingly important tools in Artificial Intelligence, because of the vast quantity of information they can store. In this work, we present ProP (Prompting as Probing), which utilizes GPT-3, a large Language Model originally proposed by OpenAI in 2020, to perform the task of Knowledge Base Construction (KBC). ProP implements a multi-step approach that combines a variety of prompting techniques to achieve this. Our results show that manual prompt curation is essential, that the LM must be encouraged to give answer sets of variable lengths, in particular including empty answer sets, that true/false questions are a useful device to increase precision on suggestions generated by the LM, that the size of the LM is a crucial factor, and that a dictionary of entity aliases improves the LM score. Our evaluation study indicates that these proposed techniques can substantially enhance the quality of the final predictions: ProP won track 2 of the LM-KBC competition, outperforming the baseline by 36.4 percentage points. Our implementation is available on https://github.com/HEmile/iswc-challenge.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. InFact: Informativeness Alignment for Improved LLM Factuality

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    InFACT trains LLMs with hierarchical informativeness rewards plus abstention, improving factual precision on QA benchmarks while largely preserving recall.

  2. Pretrained LLMs Learn Multiple Types of Uncertainty

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    LLMs encode multiple dataset-specific linear directions in their hidden states that predict their own answer correctness, and these directions are nearly independent across benchmarks.

Pith tools