Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Frustration, dynamics and catalysis

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Evolution tunes protein frustration to power enzyme catalysis

desk verdict A useful and honest narrative review of local frustration in enzyme catalysis; the 'near optimal values' evolutionary claim is overreach, but the synthesis is worth sending to a referee. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.00600 v2 pith:L2NS5Z6M submitted 2025-05-01 q-bio.BM cond-mat.softphysics.bio-ph

R. Gonzalo Parra , Diego U. Ferreiro This is my paper · ORCID
classification q-bio.BMcond-mat.softphysics.bio-ph
keywords localfrustrationproteindynamicsenzymecatalysisenergylandscapesconformationalsubstatesevolutiondesignconservation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review argues that local frustration—the minority of interactions in a folded protein whose energies are not optimized for stability—is not a flaw but a functional feature. It claims evolution adjusts protein sequences so that frustration sits at a near-optimal level: enough to create the rugged energy landscape whose conformational substates drive functionally important motions, but not so much that motions become noisy or so little that they freeze. Seen this way, enzyme catalysis depends on frustration patterns near active sites and in distal regions that couple dynamically to them, which is why active sites are consistently enriched in frustrated contacts. The payoff is a unifying explanation for why stability-optimized protein design often destroys activity, and a rationale for treating frustration as an evolutionary fingerprint of function.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the local frustration index, a coarse-grained measure that classifies each residue–residue contact as minimally frustrated, neutral, or highly frustrated by comparing the contact's native energy with the distribution of energies in structurally randomized decoys. This index is what lets the authors map frustration onto known enzymes and connect it to dynamics: frustrated patches mark functional regions, minimally frustrated contacts mark stability and foldability, and neutral contacts fill the rest. Its role in the argument is to translate energy-landscape theory into a per-residue observable that can be surveyed across enzyme families, mutated in silico, and compared with experimental measures of motion and catalysis.

What would settle it

Measure catalytic efficiency and microsecond-to-millisecond dynamics for a library of single-point mutants in and around predicted frustrated patches, and check whether changes in the frustration index predict changes in activity. If a mutation that leaves the index unchanged nonetheless abolishes catalysis, or one that raises frustration speeds catalysis in a system where the index predicts slowing, the proposed causal link between local frustration, dynamics, and catalytic power would fail.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the biologically relevant dynamics of enzymes is tuned by evolution through the modulation of local frustration patterns to near-optimal values. Frustration roughens an otherwise smooth folding funnel: highly frustrated contacts are concentrated at catalytic sites, surrounded by weakly frustrated shells, and these energetic signatures are more conserved across enzyme families than the underlying sequences. Too little frustration freezes the conformational substates that carry out the reaction cycle; too much diffuses the motion into biologically unimportant fluctuations; the functional sweet spot in between supports the functionally important motions that bind, align, and release substrates and products. The review assembles evidence from enzyme surveys, nano-rheology, molecular dynamics, redox-dependent loop switching, and protein design to show that perturbing frustration—even far from the active site—changes dynamics and activity in predictable directions.

Load-bearing premise

The whole synthesis rests on the assumption that the computer measure of frustration—comparing a protein's native contacts to randomized alternative structures—captures the physical conflicts that truly govern enzyme motion and catalysis under working conditions.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Active-site frustration is a conserved feature across enzyme classes, so any model that claims to capture the origins of catalysis should reproduce the enrichment of frustrated contacts at catalytic residues.
  • Engineering an enzyme for higher stability alone can silence it, because stability-optimizing substitutions remove the very frustrated interactions that enable conformational transitions; preserving conserved or frustrated residues should be part of design protocols.
  • Mutations far from the active site can change catalytic efficiency by altering long-range dynamical coupling through frustrated regions, expanding the search space for enzyme engineering and for understanding disease variants.
  • If product release is rate-limiting in multi-substrate enzymes, substrate-induced steric or electrostatic frustration can be a general mechanism to accelerate turnover, not a quirk of adenylate kinase.
  • Frustration conservation across protein families can be used to identify functionally essential residues, complementing sequence conservation in predicting sites where mutations will matter.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension: comparing orthologous enzymes from organisms adapted to different temperatures, one would predict that the optimal frustration level shifts so that conformational substates remain populated at the physiological temperature; thermophilic enzymes should show quantitatively different frustration patterns than mesophilic ones.
  • The review's logic implies that frustration-aware sequence design, rather than stability-aware design, should be used when generating novel biocatalysts; catalytically active designed proteins may need to be deliberately destabilized locally to recreate functional substates.
  • If the frustration index is validated against direct measurements of conformational entropy or millisecond dynamics across many mutants, it could become a practical predictive screen for the functional effects of distal mutations.
  • One open question the authors do not resolve: whether the frustration index derived from static structures or short simulations reports the same conflicts that operate along the full catalytic cycle, so linking frustration to time-resolved experimental observables would strengthen the synthesis.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This manuscript is a review article on the role of local frustration in protein dynamics and enzyme catalysis. The authors synthesize theory, computation, and experiment to argue that local frustration—residual energetic conflicts in folded proteins—creates ruggedness in energy landscapes that underlies functionally important motions (FIMs) and thereby tunes catalytic power. They discuss correlative surveys (Freiberger et al., Hou et al.), mutation studies (Weinreb et al., Ojeda-May, Stelzl et al.), steric/substrate-product frustration in adenylate kinase, redox modulation in nDsbD, and design implications from ProteinMPNN redesigns. The central claim, stated in the abstract, is that evolution tunes local frustration patterns to near optimal values to control biologically relevant dynamics. The manuscript contains no new experimental or computational data; it is a narrative synthesis with illustrative figures and a forward-looking design perspective.

Significance. If the central claim is correct, local frustration would constitute a quantifiable, evolutionarily selected feature that links sequence, dynamics, and catalysis, with practical implications for enzyme design and inhibitor development. The review's strength is its integration of independent lines of evidence—bioinformatic surveys, single-molecule/nano-rheology experiments, MD simulations, and protein design—into a coherent energy-landscape framework. The paper is clearly written and the figures are helpful. However, the strongest claim (evolutionary tuning to near-optimal values) is not directly supported by any study cited, and the operational measure of frustration (frustratometeR) is a coarse-grained proxy whose connection to the physical frustration that governs catalysis is not established within the manuscript. The review would be more convincing if it explicitly distinguished established findings from the authors' interpretive framework and if it offered concrete criteria for falsifying the optimization claim.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and Section 'Local frustration tunes enzymes' internal dynamics'] The abstract asserts that 'the biologically relevant dynamics is tuned by the evolution of protein sequences that modulate the local frustration patterns to near optimal values.' This is the paper's strongest and most novel claim, but no cited study tests it as an evolutionary optimization hypothesis. The evidence presented is correlational: Freiberger et al. show active-site enrichment in frustrated contacts, Hou et al. show stability-weakness shells, Weinreb et al. show mutations in strained regions affect flexibility and activity, and Burns et al. show temperature-sensitive loop contacts. None of these compares an activity or fitness landscape against a neutral phylogenetic null, and the manuscript itself concedes (in 'Local frustration tunes enzymes' internal dynamics') that 'there is no definitive way to determine and quantify the local frustration' and (in 'Design Implications and Future Perspectives') that 'we are still lacking a quantitative general mechanism.' As written, the phrase 'near optimal values' overstates the support. Please reframe it as an explicit, testable hypothesis or add a dedicated section discussing what evidence would be required (e.g., selection statistics on frustration indices, phylogenetic contrasts) and what the current literature does and does not show.
  2. [Figure 3 and case studies in 'Functionally important motions drive catalysis'] The review consistently treats the frustratometeR configurational frustration index (ref 18, Figure 3) as a direct measure of the physical frustration that governs functional dynamics. However, the index is computed from folding-decoy energetics, and the paper states that no definitive quantification of local frustration exists. The case studies of Guanylate Kinase, Shikimate Kinase, and nDsbD rely on this proxy to identify 'frustrated' regions, yet the manuscript does not validate that the decoy-based index reports the same conflicts that produce functional strain, viscoelasticity, or loop opening in vivo. This is load-bearing because the entire synthesis depends on equating a structural bioinformatics quantity with a dynamical mechanism. Please state the proxy's validation status explicitly, and, where possible, cross-check it against experimentally measured strain or flexibility (e.g., Weinreb et al.'s nano-rheology) in at least one system so that the reader can assess how much of the argument rests on the proxy.
  3. [Section 'Functionally important motions drive catalysis'] The manuscript moves from correlation to causation in its treatment of mutation studies. For example, the text says that mutations in high-strain regions 'can significantly dampen both protein flexibility and catalytic activity' (Weinreb et al.) and that in Shikimate Kinase increased local frustration 'correlated with experimentally observed reductions in catalytic efficiency.' These observations are consistent with a role for frustration, but they could also arise from off-target effects on global stability, folding cooperativity, or active-site geometry, and the cited papers may not control for all such alternatives. The review does not discuss which controls or comparisons in these studies justify the causal interpretation that local frustration itself tunes catalysis. Please temper the causal wording or, alternatively, explicitly identify the controls in the cited experiments that make the causal reading credible.
minor comments (4)
  1. [References] Several references are preprints or recently published items without full bibliographic details (e.g., ref 29 is a bioRxiv preprint from 2025; ref 26 is in press). Please confirm the journal's policy on citing preprints and mark them consistently.
  2. [Figure 2] The caption orders the right panels as 'top: sweet spot, middle: too much frustration, bottom: too little frustration,' and the main text repeats this ordering. This is internally consistent, but the visual distinction between 'too much' and 'too little' would be clearer if the figure included representative free-energy curves or population labels rather than only schematic cartoons.
  3. [Acknowledgements] The final sentence of the Acknowledgements draws attention to the erosion of Argentina's scientific tradition. This is a legitimate political statement, but it is not part of the scientific content; consider moving it to a cover letter or a separate statement to adhere to journal formatting conventions.
  4. [Throughout] The term 'local frustration' is used in two senses: as a structural descriptor (computed from protein structures) and as a dynamic mechanism (modulating conformational substates). The connection between these senses is implicit in the energy-landscape framework, but the transition is abrupt. Define the relationship explicitly at the first occurrence in 'Local frustration tunes enzymes' internal dynamics'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the synthesis is anchored in independent experiments; self-citations are contextual and not load-bearing.

full rationale

This is a review article, not a derivation chain: it assembles independent experimental and computational results rather than fitting parameters and then 'predicting' quantities derived from those same fits. The central synthesis, that local frustration modulates conformational substates and thereby catalytic dynamics, is supported by studies from outside the authors' group (Weinreb et al., Burns et al., Stelzl et al., Hou et al., Li et al.), whose measurements do not reduce to the frustratometeR index. The authors' own tools and citations are used to interpret and contextualize those data, but no claim is forced by construction: Figure 3 is illustrative, not a fitted prediction. The paper explicitly concedes its limits ('there is no definitive way to determine and quantify the local frustration' and 'we are still lacking a quantitative general mechanism'), which are evidentiary gaps rather than circular reductions. The 'near optimal values' statement is a synthesizing hypothesis based on correlations; it may be under-tested, but that is a correctness and evidence concern, not circularity. Accordingly, no circular step is exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The review rests on the energy landscape paradigm and the operational definition of local frustration. No free parameters or new entities are introduced; the conceptual weight is carried by the frustration index and the assumption that it maps onto functional dynamics.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Energy landscape theory, with minimal frustration and rough funnels, applies to natural proteins.
    The entire review is framed in terms of rough funnels and conformational substates, introduced in the Introduction via refs 7-10.
  • domain assumption The local frustration index computed by frustratometeR against decoy distributions captures the functionally relevant energetic conflicts.
    The analysis presented in Figure 3 and the case studies treat high frustration identified by this heuristic as the cause of functional dynamics; this is assumed, not demonstrated in the review.
  • domain assumption Enzyme cycles can be described by pseudochemical reaction coordinates and transition state theory with effective barriers.
    The authors invoke this to justify lumping conformational substates into effective free energy barriers (Figure 2).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Frustration, dynamics and catalysis." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/L2NS5Z6M

@misc{pith2026250500600,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Frustration, dynamics and catalysis},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/L2NS5Z6M}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.00600}
}
read the original abstract

The controlled dissipation of chemical potentials is the fundamental way cells make a living. Enzyme-mediated catalysis allows the various transformations to proceed at biologically relevant rates with remarkable precision and efficiency. Theory, experiments and computational studies coincide to show that local frustration is a useful concept to relate protein dynamics with catalytic power. Local frustration gives rise to the asperities of the energy landscapes that can harness the thermal fluctuations to guide the functional protein motions. We review here recent advances into these relationships from various fields of protein science. The biologically relevant dynamics is tuned by the evolution of protein sequences that modulate the local frustration patterns to near optimal values.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Inferring protein folding mechanisms from natural sequence diversity

    q-bio.BM 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Folding mechanisms of globular proteins can be inferred from evolutionary sequence alignments by mapping sequence-based energies onto an Ising chain of exon-defined folding elements.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Haldane, J.B.S. 1930. “Enzymes”. Longmans, Green, London, 1930

    work page 1930

  2. [2]

    Ligand binding and internal equilibria in proteins

    Weber G. Ligand binding and internal equilibria in proteins. Biochemistry. 1972;11: 864–878

    work page 1972

  3. [3]

    Conformational substates in proteins

    Frauenfelder H, Parak F, Young RD. Conformational substates in proteins. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem. 1988;17: 451–479

    work page 1988

  4. [4]

    A perspective on enzyme catalysis

    Benkovic SJ, Hammes-Schiffer S. A perspective on enzyme catalysis. Science. 2003;301: 1196–1202

    work page 2003

  5. [5]

    Protein states and proteinquakes

    Ansari A, Berendzen J, Bowne SF, Frauenfelder H, Iben IE, Sauke TB, et al. Protein states and proteinquakes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985;82: 5000–5004

    work page 1985

  6. [6]

    Function and dynamics of myoglobin

    Frauenfelder H. Function and dynamics of myoglobin. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1987;504: 151–167

    work page 1987

  7. [7]

    The energy landscapes and motions of proteins

    Frauenfelder H, Sligar SG, Wolynes PG. The energy landscapes and motions of proteins. Science. 1991;254: 1598–1603

    work page 1991

  8. [8]

    Evolution, energy landscapes and the paradoxes of protein folding

    Wolynes PG. Evolution, energy landscapes and the paradoxes of protein folding. Biochimie. 2015;119: 218–230

    work page 2015

Show all 41 references
  1. [9]

    Spin glasses and the statistical mechanics of protein folding

    Bryngelson JD, Wolynes PG. Spin glasses and the statistical mechanics of protein folding. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987;84: 7524–7528

    1987

  2. [10]

    Toward an outline of the topography of a realistic protein-folding funnel

    Onuchic JN, Wolynes PG, Luthey-Schulten Z, Socci ND. Toward an outline of the topography of a realistic protein-folding funnel. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92: 3626–3630

    1995

  3. [11]

    Frustration in biomolecules

    Ferreiro DU, Komives EA, Wolynes PG. Frustration in biomolecules. Q Rev Biophys. 2014;47: 285–363

    2014

  4. [12]

    Frustration in physiology and molecular medicine

    Parra RG, Komives EA, Wolynes PG, Ferreiro DU. Frustration in physiology and molecular medicine. Mol Aspects Med. 2025;103: 101362

    2025

  5. [13]

    Frustration, function and folding

    Ferreiro DU, Komives EA, Wolynes PG. Frustration, function and folding. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2018;48: 68–73

    2018

  6. [14]

    Structural biology

    Vendruscolo M, Dobson CM. Structural biology. Dynamic visions of enzymatic reactions. Science. 2006;313: 1586–1587

    2006

  7. [15]

    Evolution of enzyme function and the development of catalytic efficiency

    Albery WJ, Knowles JR. Evolution of enzyme function and the development of catalytic efficiency. Biochemistry. 1976;15: 5631–5640

    1976

  8. [16]

    The Moderately Efficient Enzyme: Futile Encounters and Enzyme Floppiness

    Bar-Even A, Milo R, Noor E, Tawfik DS. The Moderately Efficient Enzyme: Futile Encounters and Enzyme Floppiness. Biochemistry. 2015;54: 4969–4977

    2015

  9. [17]

    Localizing frustration in native proteins and protein assemblies

    Ferreiro DU, Hegler JA, Komives EA, Wolynes PG. Localizing frustration in native proteins and protein assemblies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104: 19819–19824

    2007

  10. [18]

    FrustratometeR: an R-package to compute local frustration in protein structures, point mutants and MD simulations

    Rausch AO, Freiberger MI, Leonetti CO, Luna DM, Radusky LG, Wolynes PG, et al. FrustratometeR: an R-package to compute local frustration in protein structures, point mutants and MD simulations. Bioinformatics. 2021;37: 3038–3040

    2021

  11. [19]

    Local frustration around enzyme active sites

    Freiberger MI, Guzovsky AB, Wolynes PG, Parra RG, Ferreiro DU. Local frustration around enzyme active sites. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019;116: 4037–4043

    2019

  12. [20]

    Local energetic frustration conservation in protein families and superfamilies

    Freiberger MI, Ruiz-Serra V, Pontes C, Romero-Durana M, Galaz-Davison P, Ramírez-Sarmiento CA, et al. Local energetic frustration conservation in protein families and superfamilies. Nat Commun. 2023;14: 8379. * This study introduces FrustraEvo, a method to map local frustratio...

    2023

  13. [21]

    Enzyme Stability-Activity Trade-Off: New Insights from Protein Stability Weaknesses and Evolutionary Conservation

    Hou Q, Rooman M, Pucci F. Enzyme Stability-Activity Trade-Off: New Insights from Protein Stability Weaknesses and Evolutionary Conservation. J Chem Theory Comput. 2023;19: 3664–3671. * This article presents a proteome-scale statistical analysis showing that catalytic residues ...

    2023

  14. [22]

    A relationship between protein stability and protein function

    Shoichet BK, Baase WA, Kuroki R, Matthews BW. A relationship between protein stability and protein function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92: 452–456

    1995

  15. [23]

    How protein stability and new functions trade off

    Tokuriki N, Stricher F, Serrano L, Tawfik DS. How protein stability and new functions trade off. PLoS Comput Biol. 2008;4: e1000002

    2008

  16. [24]

    D3DistalMutation: a Database to Explore the Effect of Distal Mutations on Enzyme Activity

    Wang X, Zhang X, Peng C, Shi Y, Li H, Xu Z, et al. D3DistalMutation: a Database to Explore the Effect of Distal Mutations on Enzyme Activity. J Chem Inf Model. 2021;61: 2499–2508

    2021

  17. [25]

    Correlated motions and residual frustration in thrombin

    Fuglestad B, Gasper PM, McCammon JA, Markwick PRL, Komives EA. Correlated motions and residual frustration in thrombin. J Phys Chem B. 2013;117: 12857–12863

    2013

  18. [26]

    Enzymes as viscoelastic catalytic machines

    Weinreb E, McBride JM, Siek M, Rougemont J, Renault R, Peleg Y, et al. Enzymes as viscoelastic catalytic machines. Nat Phys. 2025. doi:10.1038/s41567-025-02825-9 ** This work introduces a novel experimental framework using nano-rheology to directly measure viscoelastic propert...

    2025 doi

  19. [27]

    Nonlinear elasticity, proteinquakes, and the energy landscapes of functional transitions in proteins

    Miyashita O, Onuchic JN, Wolynes PG. Nonlinear elasticity, proteinquakes, and the energy landscapes of functional transitions in proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100: 12570–12575

    2003

  20. [28]

    On the role of frustration in the energy landscapes of allosteric proteins

    Ferreiro DU, Hegler JA, Komives EA, Wolynes PG. On the role of frustration in the energy landscapes of allosteric proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108: 3499–3503

    2011

  21. [29]

    Cracking Controls ATP Hydrolysis in the catalytic domain of a P-ATPase

    Placenti AM, Martinez-Gache SA, González-Lebrero RM, Wolynes PG, González Flecha L, Roman EA. Cracking Controls ATP Hydrolysis in the catalytic domain of a P-ATPase. bioRxiv. 2025. p. 2025.01.29.635504. doi:10.1101/2025.01.29.635504 *This preprint highlights a ‘cracking’ mecha...

    2025 doi

  22. [30]

    Overcoming the Bottleneck of the Enzymatic Cycle by Steric Frustration

    Li W, Wang J, Zhang J, Takada S, Wang W. Overcoming the Bottleneck of the Enzymatic Cycle by Steric Frustration. Phys Rev Lett. 2019;122: 238102

    2019

  23. [31]

    Role of substrate-product frustration on enzyme functional dynamics

    Kong J, Li J, Lu J, Li W, Wang W. Role of substrate-product frustration on enzyme functional dynamics. Phys Rev E. 2019;100: 052409

    2019

  24. [32]

    Enzyme millisecond conformational dynamics do not catalyze the chemical step

    Pisliakov AV, Cao J, Kamerlin SCL, Warshel A. Enzyme millisecond conformational dynamics do not catalyze the chemical step. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106: 17359–17364

    2009

  25. [33]

    Temperature-sensitive contacts in disordered loops tune enzyme I activity

    Burns D, Singh A, Venditti V, Potoyan DA. Temperature-sensitive contacts in disordered loops tune enzyme I activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022;119: e2210537119. ** This study uncovers how sequence-dependent frustration in disordered loops modulates enzyme dynamics and the...

    2022

  26. [34]

    Local frustration determines loop opening during the catalytic cycle of an oxidoreductase

    Stelzl LS, Mavridou DA, Saridakis E, Gonzalez D, Baldwin AJ, Ferguson SJ, et al. Local frustration determines loop opening during the catalytic cycle of an oxidoreductase. Elife. 2020;9. doi:10.7554/eLife.54661

    2020 doi

  27. [35]

    Frustration Dynamics and Electron-Transfer Reorganization Energies in Wild-Type and Mutant Azurins

    Chen X, Chen M, Wolynes PG, Wittung-Stafshede P, Gray HB. Frustration Dynamics and Electron-Transfer Reorganization Energies in Wild-Type and Mutant Azurins. J Am Chem Soc. 2022;144: 4178–4185

    2022

  28. [36]

    Exploring the dynamics of holo-Shikimate Kinase through molecular mechanics

    Ojeda-May P. Exploring the dynamics of holo-Shikimate Kinase through molecular mechanics. Biophysica. 2023;3: 463–475. * This work demonstrates how mutations near a frustrated residue propagate structural perturbations across the protein, connecting local frustration with glob...

    2023

  29. [37]

    Improving Protein Expression, Stability, and Function with ProteinMPNN

    Sumida KH, Núñez-Franco R, Kalvet I, Pellock SJ, Wicky BIM, Milles LF, et al. Improving Protein Expression, Stability, and Function with ProteinMPNN. J Am Chem Soc. 2024;146: 2054–2061. * This paper demonstrates how ProteinMPNN can be applied to natural proteins to enhance exp...

    2024

  30. [38]

    Robust deep learning-based protein sequence design using ProteinMPNN

    Dauparas J, Anishchenko I, Bennett N, Bai H, Ragotte RJ, Milles LF, et al. Robust deep learning-based protein sequence design using ProteinMPNN. Science. 2022;378: 49–56

    2022

  31. [39]

    Dynamical contributions to enzyme catalysis: critical tests of a popular hypothesis

    Olsson MHM, Parson WW, Warshel A. Dynamical contributions to enzyme catalysis: critical tests of a popular hypothesis. Chem Rev. 2006;106: 1737–1756

    2006

  32. [40]

    Predicting protein conformational motions using energetic frustration analysis and AlphaFold2

    Guan X, Tang Q-Y, Ren W, Chen M, Wang W, Wolynes PG, et al. Predicting protein conformational motions using energetic frustration analysis and AlphaFold2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024;121: e2410662121. ** This work integrates biophysical principles based on the Energy Landsc...

    2024

  33. [41]

    Structural dynamics shape the fitness window of alanine:glyoxylate aminotransferase

    Dindo M, Pascarelli S, Chiasserini D, Grottelli S, Costantini C, Uechi G-I, et al. Structural dynamics shape the fitness window of alanine:glyoxylate aminotransferase. Protein Sci. 2022;31: e4303

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.