Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2302.08805 v1 pith:L2Y47NXQ submitted 2023-02-17 physics.comp-ph

Deep Ensembles vs. Committees for Uncertainty Estimation in Neural-Network Force Fields: Comparison and Application to Active Learning

classification physics.comp-ph
keywords forcefieldslearningactivecommitteesensemblesuncertaintydeep
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

A reliable uncertainty estimator is a key ingredient in the successful use of machine-learning force fields for predictive calculations. Important considerations are correlation with error, overhead during training and inference, and efficient workflows to systematically improve the force field. However, in the case of neural-network force fields, simple committees are often the only option considered due to their easy implementation. Here we present a generalization of the deep-ensemble design, based on multiheaded neural networks and a heteroscedastic loss, that can efficiently deal with uncertainties in both the energy and the forces. We compare uncertainty metrics based on deep ensembles, committees and bootstrap-aggregation ensembles using data for an ionic liquid and a perovskite surface. We demonstrate an adversarial approach to active learning to efficiently and progressively refine the force fields. That active learning workflow is realistically possible thanks to exceptionally fast training enabled by residual learning and a nonlinear learned optimizer.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.