REVIEW 2 cited by
Blue Monsters. Why are JWST super-early, massive galaxies so blue?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
The recent JWST tentative discovery of a population of super-early (redshift $z> 10$), relatively massive (stellar mass $M_* = 10^{8-9} M_{\odot}$) and evolved (metallicity $Z \approx 0.1 Z_{\odot}$) galaxies, which nevertheless show blue ($\beta \simeq -2.6$) spectra, and very small dust attenuation ($A_{\rm V} \leq 0.02$), challenges our interpretation of these systems. To solve the puzzle we propose two solutions in which dust is either (a) ejected by radiation pressure, or (b) segregated with respect to UV-emitting regions. We clarify the conditions for which the two scenarios apply, and show that they can be discriminated by ALMA observations, such as the recent non-detection of the $88\mu m$ dust continuum in GHZ2 ($z\simeq 12$) favouring dust ejection.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
SCRIPT in the Cosmic Dawn: Distinguishing Redshift-Evolving Galaxy Populations with 21-cm Fluctuations
The 21-cm power spectrum, not the sky-averaged signal alone, can distinguish a redshift-evolving galaxy population from a static one during the cosmic dawn.
-
Bright Galaxies at Cosmic Dawn: A Cloud-Scale Star Formation Model Unifying Variable SFE, IMFs, and Stochasticity
A cloud-based semi-analytic model shows that a top-heavy stellar initial mass function and a cloud-property-dependent star-formation efficiency, rather than cloud mass or density, most strongly shape the UV luminosity...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.