Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 43 references

Exploring the interplay between small and large scales movements in a neotropical small mammal

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read For the marsupial Didelphis aurita, daily movement follows a truncated Lévy flight, but weekly displacement is already Brownian—and the crossover arises purely from aggregation, without ecological constraints.

desk verdict A genuinely interesting empirical crossover result with solid small-scale statistics, but the 'no ecological constraints' claim is undercut by the dispersal filter and a fitted step count, so it needs revision rather than rejection. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.13688 v1 pith:L3L3UL5W submitted 2025-01-23 q-bio.QM cond-mat.stat-mechphysics.data-an

E. Brigatti , B. Ríos-Uzeda , M. V. Vieira This is my paper · ORCID
classification q-bio.QMcond-mat.stat-mechphysics.data-an
keywords movementpatternsspatio-temporalscalesLévyflightBrownianmotionmarsupialsDidelphisauritatruncatedParetodistributionscaleofaggregation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

In this paper the authors ask whether the same animal's movement can look like a Lévy flight or like Brownian motion depending on how finely you slice its path. Daily step lengths of the marsupial Didelphis aurita follow a truncated Lévy distribution, while distances traveled in a week already match a Rayleigh distribution, the signature of ordinary diffusion. The authors show that this transition is a purely statistical effect of summing many small steps: a simulation using the daily step distribution reproduces the weekly spread without adding any ecological constraints such as home ranges or habitat boundaries. If correct, this means Lévy flights are of little use for describing dispersal in this species over practical periods, and normal diffusion is the appropriate approximation.

What carries the argument

The central object is the truncated Pareto (truncated Lévy) step-length distribution, f(ℓ) ∝ $ℓ^{{-μ}}$ on [a,b], with a = 0.8 m and b = 103.1 m; this finite-variance distribution is what guarantees a crossover to Gaussian/Rayleigh behavior once many steps are summed. The argument is carried by the summation of independent steps in a discrete random walk: the number n controls the shape of the resulting displacement distribution, and the authors track the crossover using two diagnostics—the tail index α (below 3 means heavy-tailed, above 3 means light-tailed) and the ratio R of log-likelihoods of the simulated displacements against a fitted Rayleigh distribution (near 1 means effectively Brownian). The key identity is the central-limit-theorem behavior r ∼ √n for large n, recovered in the simulations for n ≳ 100.

What would settle it

As an independent test, an animal would need to be tracked continuously for a week, counting every turning-point step and its length, so that the weekly displacement can be compared with a Rayleigh distribution generated by summing exactly that many observed steps. If the independently counted n yields a substantially different σ or a non-Rayleigh shape, the purely statistical crossover would not hold.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the truncated Lévy distribution fitted to the daily step lengths of Didelphis aurita—with exponent μ = 1.36 and cutoff b = 103.1 m—sums to a Brownian, Rayleigh-distributed displacement after roughly one week, and that this crossover is produced by aggregation alone. The weekly radio-tracking data give σ = 54 ± 4 m and are statistically indistinguishable from a Rayleigh distribution, with a tail index α > 3 for all tail subsets, ruling out a power-law upper tail. Simulating walks with the fitted daily step distribution, the authors find that for n ≈ 68 steps the simulated σ equals 54 m, exactly the empirical value, and the simulated histogram overlaps the field data. For n > 100 the simulated distribution is effectively Rayleigh, while for n < 40 it still shows heavy tails, documenting a smooth crossover from superdiffusive to normal diffusion as the number of aggregated steps grows. The authors conclude that no distinct ecological mechanisms at different spatio-temporal scales are needed to explain the two movement phases.

Load-bearing premise

The model assumes the weekly displacement equals the endpoint of a random walk with a fixed number n of independent daily steps, and n is fitted (n = 68) to match the observed weekly spread rather than measured directly from behavior.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For Didelphis aurita, dispersal distances within habitat fragments can be modeled as normal diffusion, with typical displacement growing as the square root of time, not as a faster superdiffusive process.
  • Short-term step data, collected over a single night, are sufficient to predict weekly displacement statistics without additional ecological parameters, provided the number of steps is known or estimated.
  • The crossover time is short because the daily step distribution has a sharp cutoff (b = 103.1 m); species with longer-tailed or weakly truncated step distributions would be expected to show Lévy-like dispersion over longer periods.
  • The scale-dependence of Lévy versus Brownian modes is an inherent statistical property of aggregation, so claims about a species being a 'Lévy walker' should be qualified by the temporal scale of the data.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The one-week crossover time is not an independent prediction: because n is fitted, the conclusion rests on the assumption that a week contains about 68 turning-point steps. A direct count of steps could shift the crossover time and still preserve the general mechanism.
  • The same aggregation mechanism may explain apparent Lévy/Brownian dichotomies in other taxa where only one scale has been measured; whenever step distributions have finite variance, a crossover should occur at some scale, and its timing is set by the tail exponent and the cutoff.
  • The paper's framing suggests home ranges may be a consequence of short-term step statistics rather than an external constraint, but this is not tested; a direct test would compare movement in environments with and without physical boundaries.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies movement of the marsupial Didelphis aurita at two temporal scales: daily step-length data from spool-and-line tracking and weekly displacement data from radio-tracking. The daily step-length distribution is best described by a truncated Pareto (truncated Levy) distribution with exponent μ = 1.36 and cutoff b = 103.1 m, selected by AIC over Pareto and exponential alternatives. The weekly displacement distribution is reported as consistent with a Rayleigh distribution (σ = 54 ± 4 m, KS p = 0.166), and a Hill tail index above 3 is taken as evidence against a heavy-tailed weekly distribution. The authors then simulate truncated-Pareto random walks with parameters from the small-scale fit, show that the displacement distribution converges to Rayleigh for a number of steps around 68, and that this number reproduces the empirical weekly σ exactly. They conclude that the crossover from Levy to Brownian behavior occurs after about one week as a purely statistical effect of aggregation, without ecological constraints.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper provides a clean and parsimonious mechanism for scale-dependent movement regimes: the same individual-level step distribution generates Levy-like small-scale movement but Brownian-like large-scale displacement, with a crossover time set by the truncation scale. The small-scale analysis is a strength: the AIC comparison strongly supports the truncated Pareto over alternatives on 2239 steps, and the projection-based segmentation is a principled way to define steps. The simulation framework is transparent and the match with the weekly σ is visually compelling. However, the broad claim of 'no ecological constraints' and the specific claim that one week corresponds to 68 steps are weakened by the filtering of the radio-tracking data and by the fact that n is fitted, not independently measured. The paper's value depends on resolving these two issues, because they directly affect the interpretation of the weekly Rayleigh result and the predictive nature of the crossover.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.2 and Section 5] The filtering described in Section 3.2 is an ecological constraint in itself: the authors keep only movements of individuals that did not leave their original forest fragment, explicitly disregarding animals that left for dispersal. This removes the longest displacements, which are exactly the events that could generate heavy tails in the weekly distribution. The Rayleigh fit (σ = 54 ± 4 m, KS p = 0.166) and the Hill-index claim α > 3 are computed on this filtered sample. The simulation in Section 4.3, by contrast, is an unbounded random walk with no fragment boundary or dispersal filter. Comparing an unbounded process to a conditioned sample does not test the claim that the Rayleigh behavior arises 'without the necessity of introducing ecological constraints' (abstract and Section 5). The authors must report the unfiltered weekly displacement distribution and repeat the Rayleigh fit and Hill-index estimation on it, or otherwise quantitatively show that the filter does not affect the conclusions.
  2. [Section 4.3] The 'prediction' of a one-week crossover is not independent: the number of steps n is selected so that the simulated σ equals the empirical σ exactly ('for a number of steps fixed to 68, σ_MLE = 54, exactly the same of the empirical case'). Because n is a free parameter fitted to the same dataset, the agreement does not validate the model's temporal extrapolation. To support the claim that one week corresponds to 68 steps, an independent estimate of the number of steps per week is needed, for example from turning-point rates or activity budgets collected in the same study system, or the claim should be explicitly demoted from a prediction to a consistency check.
  3. [Section 4.3 and Figure 4] The convergence to Rayleigh for n ≈ 68 is an expected consequence of the finite variance of the truncated Pareto distribution, not a distinctive signature of the specific parameters. The paper shows that a Rayleigh distribution becomes a good approximation for n greater than about 40, which is a general property of sums of independent finite-variance variables. The novel empirical content is therefore the estimated crossover time, and that content depends entirely on the fitted n. The manuscript should clarify that the simulation does not independently constrain the crossover time; it only demonstrates that if animals make about 68 steps per week, then the weekly displacement would be Rayleigh.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Figure 4] The tail index α and the likelihood ratio R are plotted without confidence intervals or bootstrap uncertainties; adding these would strengthen the visual claim of a crossover near n ≈ 68.
  2. [Section 4.3] The statistic R, defined as the ratio of log-likelihoods of simulated data and i.i.d. Rayleigh draws, is nonstandard; the paper should explain how its values should be interpreted and whether any threshold is meaningful.
  3. [Section 2 and Data Availability] The Data Availability section states that data will be archived 'if the paper is accepted'; for reproducibility, the data and code should be made available during review or in a permanent repository at submission.
  4. [References] Some reference entries are incomplete or combine multiple citations (e.g., [36]); please ensure each reference is complete and formatted consistently.
  5. [Throughout] There are occasional typographical inconsistencies, such as inconsistent spacing around accents and equations; a careful proofread would improve readability.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The 'one-week crossover' is partly fitted: the simulation step count n=68 is chosen to reproduce the empirical weekly σ, so the weekly Brownian result is not an independent prediction; the 'no ecological constraints' claim is also conditioned on a dispersal filter.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 4.3 (Results), Section 5 (Discussion); cf. Eq. (1) for σ_MLE]
    "Finally, we estimated the best n value which reproduces the P (r) of the field work dataset. This is determined by looking for the σM LEvalue which best approximates the one of the empirical data. For a number of steps fixed to 68, σM LE= 54, exactly the same of the empirical case. ... our analysis shows that the L´ evy truncated distribution which characterizes the daily movements of Didelphis aurita converges towards a Brownian model after only one week."

    The step count n is the only link between the daily step-length distribution and the weekly time scale, but n is not measured or independently estimated: it is selected so that the simulated σ_MLE equals the empirical weekly σ_MLE (54 m). The weekly data are therefore used twice, once as the target of the fit and once as the confirmation of the 'one-week' crossover. The equality σ=54 is forced by construction; the non-forced content is limited to the shape checks (R≈1, α>3) at the fitted n and to the known CLT/Mantegna–Stanley convergence of truncated Lévy flights, not to the crossover time itself.

full rationale

The daily-scale parameters (μ=1.36, a=0.8 m, b=103.1 m) are estimated from the spool-and-line data and serve as legitimate external input for the simulations, so the small-to-large scale calibration is not circular per se. The circular component is concentrated in Section 4.3: the number of steps n is fitted to reproduce the empirical weekly σ_MLE, so the statement that the truncated Lévy model 'converges towards a Brownian model after only one week' is a fitted result, not an independent prediction of the crossover time. The shape convergence is still informative because n=68 also yields a Rayleigh-like shape (α>3, R≈1), and the theoretical convergence of truncated Lévy flights to Gaussian behavior is established independent of this paper. A separate, non-circular validity problem is that the radio-tracking data were filtered to 'settled animals' that did not leave the fragment (Section 3.2), while Section 5 claims the two movement phases arise 'without the necessity of introducing ecological constraints'; the Rayleigh weekly distribution and the Hill α>3 may therefore reflect this conditioning rather than pure aggregation. No load-bearing self-citation chain is present: the cited prior work by the authors [18, 39] is not used to replace the central derivation, since the relevant parameters are re-estimated here. Overall, one headline 'prediction' reduces to a fit by construction, giving partial circularity and a score of 6.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new entities. The model depends on fitted parameters (μ, a, b from small-scale data, σ from large-scale data, and the fitted bridge parameter n). The key logical load is carried by the assumption that a weekly displacement equals a fixed number of independent daily steps, with that number fitted to match the target, plus the filtering of dispersing animals.

free parameters (5)
  • μ (truncated Pareto exponent) = 1.36 ± 0.02
    Fitted to the small-scale step-length distribution using MLE (Section 4.1).
  • a (lower bound of truncated Pareto) = 0.8 m
    Selected as the lower fit bound for the step-length distribution (Section 4.1).
  • b (upper bound of truncated Pareto) = 103.1 m
    Fitted as the upper truncation point of the step-length distribution (Section 4.1).
  • σ (Rayleigh scale) = 54 ± 4 m
    Fitted to the weekly displacement data via MLE (Section 4.2).
  • n (number of steps in a week) = 68
    Chosen to reproduce the empirical σ in the simulation (Section 4.3). This is the key fitted parameter that connects the two scales.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The projected step-length distribution preserves the power-law or exponential tail behavior of the original 2D path.
    The authors rely on this result from Sims et al. (2008, Ref [2]) to justify their projection-based segmentation, which is central to the small-scale analysis (Section 3.1).
  • domain assumption Movement steps are independent, identically distributed, and directions are isotropic.
    The simulations in Section 4.3 draw step lengths from the fitted truncated Pareto and use isotropic directions; the model assumes no autocorrelation or behavioral state changes across the week.
  • ad hoc to paper Weekly displacement equals the endpoint of a random walk with a fixed number of steps drawn from the daily step distribution.
    The bridging simulation in Section 4.3 uses this equivalence with n fitted to match the data, so the number of steps is not independently measured.
  • standard math Truncated Lévy flights converge to a Gaussian under the central limit theorem when enough steps are summed.
    This is the known theoretical result from Mantegna & Stanley (1994, Ref [19]), which the paper uses to interpret the crossover.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Exploring the interplay between small and large scales movements in a neotropical small mammal." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/L3L3UL5W

@misc{pith2026250113688,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Exploring the interplay between small and large scales movements in a neotropical small mammal},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/L3L3UL5W}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.13688}
}
read the original abstract

We record and analyze the movement patterns of the marsupial {\it Didelphis aurita} at different temporal scales. Animals trajectories are collected at a daily scale by using spool-and-line techniques, and with the help of radio-tracking devices animals traveled distances are estimated at intervals of weeks. Small-scale movements are well described by truncated L\'evy flight, while large-scale movements produce a distribution of distances which is compatible with a Brownian motion. A model of the movement behavior of these animals, based on a truncated L\'evy flight calibrated on the small scale data, converges towards a Brownian behavior after a short time interval of the order of one week. These results show that whether L\'evy flight or Brownian motion behaviors apply, will depend on the scale of aggregation of the animals paths. In this specific case, as the effect of the rude truncation present in the daily data generates a fast convergence towards Brownian behaviors, L\'evy flights become of scarce interest for describing the local dispersion properties of these animals, which result well approximated by a normal diffusion process and not a fast, anomalous one. Interestingly, we are able to describe two movement phases as the consequence of a statistical effect generated by aggregation, without the necessity of introducing ecological constraints or mechanisms operating at different spatio-temporal scales. This result is of general interest, as it can be a key element for describing movement phenomenology at distinct spatio-temporal scales across different taxa and in a variety of systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.13688 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Colored continuous curves represent some trajectories tracked at small scales with the spool-and-line technique. The black dashed straight line represents the mean distance travelled by an individual after one week, as estimated from the dataset obtained using radiotelemetry techniques. The typical animals size is comparable with the width of this line [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Log-binned data with the best estimated Pareto-truncated distribution (continuous lines) and exponential distribution (dashed line). Step-lengths are expressed in meters. Analyzed data consider steps coming from the projections onto the two axis (x and y) together. In fact, as expected, the two projections present indistinguishable behaviors [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Histogram of P(r) as obtained from the telemetry measurements, with the best estimated Rayleigh distribution (continuous line). The sample size is 43, which corresponds to the number of one-week distances measured, combining data from all individuals [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Top: Tail index α normalized by 3, and R, as measured from the different distributions Pn(r). Continuous lines are just a guide for the eyes. In the inboxes, the histograms represent the Pn(r) for n = 30, 70, 200, as obtained from the simulation of 200000 different wal…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The blue histogram represents the distances r generated by a simulation which uses a Pareto truncated distribution with the parameters calibrated from the empirical dataset when it implements walks of 68 steps. Data are obtained from 200000 different walks. The red his…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    L´ evy flight search patterns of wandering albatrosses

    Viswanathan GM, Afanasyev V, Buldyrev S V., Murphy EJ, Prince PA, Stanley HE. L´ evy flight search patterns of wandering albatrosses. Nature. 1996;381: 413-415

    work page 1996

  2. [2]

    Scaling laws of marine predator search behaviour

    Sims DW, Southall EJ, Humphries NE, Hays GC, Bradshaw CJA, Pitchford JW, et al. Scaling laws of marine predator search behaviour. Nature. 2008;451: 1098-1102

    work page 2008

  3. [3]

    Spatial foraging in free ranging bearded sakis: Traveling salesmen or L´ evy walkers? Am J Primatol

    Shaffer CA. Spatial foraging in free ranging bearded sakis: Traveling salesmen or L´ evy walkers? Am J Primatol. 2014;76: 472-484

    work page 2014

  4. [4]

    L´ evy walk patterns in the foraging movements of spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi)

    Ramos-Fern´ andez G, Mateos JL, Miramontes O, Cocho G, Larralde H, Ayala-Orozco B. L´ evy walk patterns in the foraging movements of spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi). Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2004;55: 223-230

    work page 2004

  5. [5]

    Scale-free dynamics in the movement patterns of jackals

    Atkinson RPD, Rhodes CJ, Macdonald DW, Anderson Atkinson RM, Rhodes RP, Anderson DW, et al. Scale-free dynamics in the movement patterns of jackals. OIKOS. 2002;98: 134-140

    work page 2002

  6. [6]

    Adaptive L´ evy walks in foraging fallow deer

    Focardi S, Montanaro P, Pecchioli E. Adaptive L´ evy walks in foraging fallow deer. PLoS One. 2009;4: e6587

    work page 2009

  7. [7]

    G. C. Hays, T. Bastian, T. K. Doyle, S. Fossette, A. C. Gleiss, M. B. Gravenor, V. J. Hobson, N. E. Humphries, M. K. S. Lilley, N. G. Pade, and D. W. Sims, High activity and L´ evy searches: jellyfish can search the water column like fish, Proc. R. Soc. B 2012; 279: 465

    work page 2012

  8. [8]

    Overturning conclusions of L´ evy flight movement patterns by fishing boats and foraging animals

    Edwards AM. Overturning conclusions of L´ evy flight movement patterns by fishing boats and foraging animals. Ecology. 2011;92: 1247-1257

    work page 2011

Show all 43 references
  1. [9]

    Shlesinger MF, West BJ and Klafter J, Phys. Rev. Lett. 1987; 58: 1100-1103; Shlesinger MF, Zaslavsky GM, and Klafter J. Strange kinetics Nature 1993; 363, 31-37; doi:10.1038/363031a0

    1987 doi

  2. [10]

    Optimizing the Encounter Rate in Biological Interactions: L´ evy versus Brownian Strategies

    Bartumeus F, Catalan J, Fulco U, Lyra M, Viswanathan G. Optimizing the Encounter Rate in Biological Interactions: L´ evy versus Brownian Strategies. Phys Rev Lett. 2002;89: 1-4

    2002

  3. [11]

    L´ evy flights and superdiffusion in the context of biological encounters and random searches

    Viswanathan GM, Raposo EP, da Luz MGE. L´ evy flights and superdiffusion in the context of biological encounters and random searches. Phys Life Rev. 2008;5: 133 - 150

    2008

  4. [12]

    Ralf Metzler and Joseph Klafter, The random walks guide to anomalous diffusion: A fractional dynamics approach, Phys. Rep. 339 (2000), 1-77

    2000

  5. [13]

    Lomholt, K

    M. Lomholt, K. Tal, R. Metzler, K. Joseph, L´ evy strategies in intermittent search processes are advantageous, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 2008;105: 11055-11059

    2008

  6. [14]

    Optimizing the success of random searches

    Viswanathan GM, Buldyrev S V, Havlin S, da Luz MGE, Raposo EP, Stanley HE. Optimizing the success of random searches. Nature. 1999;401: 911-914

    1999

  7. [15]

    Power-Law distributions in empirical data

    Clauset A, Shalizi C, Newman M. Power-Law distributions in empirical data. SIAM Rev. 2009;54: 661-703

    2009

  8. [16]

    Oliver, and Vincent A

    Alla Mashanova, Tom H. Oliver, and Vincent A. A. Jansen Evidence for intermittency and a 17 truncated power law from highly resolved aphid movement data J. R. Soc. Interface 7, 199 (2010)

    2010

  9. [17]

    Injong Rhee, Minsu Shin, Seongik Hong, Kyunghan Lee, Seong Joon Kim, and Song Chong, On the L´ evy-Walk Nature of Human Mobility, IEEE IEEE/ACM TRANSACTIONS ON NETWORKING, 19, 630 (2011)

    2011

  10. [18]

    and Vieira, M.V

    R ´ ıos-Uzeda, B., Brigatti, E. and Vieira, M.V. L´ evy like patterns in the small-scale movements of marsupials in an unfamiliar and risky environment. Sci Rep 9, 2737 (2019)

    2019

  11. [19]

    Mantegna and H

    Rosario N. Mantegna and H. Eugene Stanley, Stochastic Process with Ultraslow Convergence to a Gaussian: The Truncated L´ evy Flight, Phys. Rev. Lett. ,73, 2946 (1994)

    1994

  12. [20]

    C., Hidalgo, C

    Gonzalez, M. C., Hidalgo, C. A. and, Barabasi, L. Understanding individual human mobility patterns. Nature 453, 779-782 (2008)

    2008

  13. [21]

    Fryxell, Megan Hazell, Luca B¨ orger, Ben D

    John M. Fryxell, Megan Hazell, Luca B¨ orger, Ben D. Dalziel, Daniel T. Haydon, Juan M. Morales, Therese McIntosh, Rick C. Rosatte, Multiple movement modes by large herbivores at multiple spatiotemporal scales, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 19114-19119 (2008)

    2008

  14. [22]

    Torney, J

    Colin J. Torney, J. Grant C. Hopcraft, Thomas A. Morrison, Iain D. Couzin, Simon A. Levin, From single steps to mass migration: the problem of scale in the movement ecology of the Serengeti wildebeest, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373...

    2018

  15. [23]

    et al.Trajectory assessment of the vulnerable marsupial Dromiciops gliroides in the Patagonian temperate forest

    Kazimierski, L.D. et al.Trajectory assessment of the vulnerable marsupial Dromiciops gliroides in the Patagonian temperate forest. Mamm. Biol. 101, 715-727 (2021)

    2021

  16. [24]

    Climatic influences on leaf fall seasonality in the Atlantic Forest (Serra dos ´Org˜ aos National Park - RJ -Brazil)

    Finotti, R., Vieira, M.V., Freitas, S.R., Cobra, P., Rezende, N., Cerqueira, R., 2020. Climatic influences on leaf fall seasonality in the Atlantic Forest (Serra dos ´Org˜ aos National Park - RJ -Brazil). Oecologia Aust. 24, 406-419

    2020

  17. [25]

    Finotti, R., Kurtz, B.C., Cerqueira, R., Garay, I., 2012. Varia¸ c˜ ao na estrutura diam´ etrica, composi¸ c˜ ao flor ´ ıstica e caracter ´ ısticas sucessionais de fragmentos florestais da bacia do rio Guapia¸ cu (Guapimirim/Cachoeiras de Macacu, RJ, Brasil). Acta Bot. Brasili...

    2012

  18. [26]

    Support diameter, incline, and vertical movements of four didelphid marsupials in the Atlantic forest of Brazil

    Cunha A, Vieira MV. Support diameter, incline, and vertical movements of four didelphid marsupials in the Atlantic forest of Brazil. J Zool. 2002;258: 419-426

    2002

  19. [27]

    Perception of a fragmented landscape by neotropical marsupials: effects of body mass and environmental variables

    Forero-Medina G, Vieira MV. Perception of a fragmented landscape by neotropical marsupials: effects of body mass and environmental variables. J Trop Ecol. 2009;25: 53-63

    2009

  20. [28]

    Uzeda, B. R. 2017. Movement and dispersal of small mammals: predictive models based on biological traits, and L´ evy walks by marsupials in a landscape of fragmented Atlantic Forest. Unpubl. PhD dissertation, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 196p

    2017

  21. [29]

    Analysis of wildlife radio-tracking data

    White, G.C., Garrott, R.A., 1990. Analysis of wildlife radio-tracking data. Academic Press, San Diego

    1990

  22. [30]

    Parameter Estimation for the Truncated Pareto Distribution

    Aban IB, Meerschaert MM, Panorska AK. Parameter Estimation for the Truncated Pareto Distribution. J Am Stat Assoc. 2006;101: 270-277

    2006

  23. [31]

    Using likelihood to test for L´ evy flight search patterns and for general power-law distributions in nature

    Edwards AM. Using likelihood to test for L´ evy flight search patterns and for general power-law distributions in nature. J Anim Ecol. 2008;77: 1212-1222

    2008

  24. [32]

    A new approach for objective identification of turns 18 and steps in organism movement data relevant to random walk modelling

    Humphries NE, Weimerskirch H, Sims DW. A new approach for objective identification of turns 18 and steps in organism movement data relevant to random walk modelling. Methods Ecol Evol. 2013;4: 930-938

    2013

  25. [33]

    On estimating the exponent of power law frequency distributions

    White EP, Enquist BJ, Green JL. On estimating the exponent of power law frequency distributions. Ecology. 2008;89: 905-912

    2008

  26. [34]

    R., Burnham, K

    Anderson, D. R., Burnham, K. P. and Thompson, W. L. Null hypothesis testing: problems, prevalence and an alternative, J. Wildl. Manage. 2000; 64: 912-923

    2000

  27. [35]

    Hill, B. M. A simple general approach to inference about the tail of a distribution. Ann. Stat. 3, 1163-1174 (1975)

    1975

  28. [36]

    Van Houtan, Stuart L

    Kyle S. Van Houtan, Stuart L. Pimm, John M. Halley, Richard O. Bierregaard Jr, and Thomas E. Lovejoy, Dispersal of Amazonian birds in continuous and fragmented forest, Ecology Letters, 10, 219-229 (2007); V Schw¨ ammle, S M D Queir´ os, E Brigatti and T Tchumatchenko, Competit...

    2007

  29. [37]

    Getz, Eloy Revilla, Marcel Holyoak, Ronen Kadmon, David Saltz, and Peter E

    Ran Nathan, Wayne M. Getz, Eloy Revilla, Marcel Holyoak, Ronen Kadmon, David Saltz, and Peter E. Smouse, A movement ecology paradigm for unifying organismal movement research, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 19052-19059 (2008)

    2008

  30. [38]

    Effects of matrix heterogeneity on animal dispersal: From individual behavior to metapopulation-level parameters

    Revilla E, Wiegand T, Palomares F, Ferreras P, Delibes M. Effects of matrix heterogeneity on animal dispersal: From individual behavior to metapopulation-level parameters. Am Nat 164, E130 (2004)

    2004

  31. [39]

    Rocha, ´E.G., Brigatti, E., Niebuhr, B.B. et al. Dispersal movement through fragmented landscapes: the role of stepping stones and perceptual range. Landscape Ecol 36, 3249-3267 (2021)

    2021

  32. [40]

    Current status and future directions of L´ evy walk research

    Reynolds, A.M., 2018. Current status and future directions of L´ evy walk research. Biol. Open 7

    2018

  33. [41]

    Of scales and stationarity in animal movements

    Benhamou, S., 2014. Of scales and stationarity in animal movements. Ecol. Lett. 17, 261-272

    2014

  34. [42]

    Understanding movements of organisms: it’s time to abandon the L´ evy foraging hypothesis

    Pyke, G.H., 2015. Understanding movements of organisms: it’s time to abandon the L´ evy foraging hypothesis. Methods Ecol. Evol. 6, 1-16

    2015

  35. [43]

    Sikes, R. S. and the Animal Care and Use Committee of the American Society of Mammalogist. 2016 Guidelines of the American Society of Mammalogists for the use of wild mammals in research and education. J. Mammal. 97, 663-688 (2016). 19 Figure 1. Colored continuous curves repre...

    2016

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.