Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 51 references

Using open road-sensor data from Luxembourg, the paper claims that cross-border car mobility between Germany and Luxembourg changed markedly during the pandemic, with weekday evening rush-hour traffic at the A1 border station dropping to ne

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Exploratory analysis of Luxembourg's openly published hourly traffic counts shows substantial COVID-era declines in car volume and changes in the timing and direction of cross-border travel with Germany.

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-05 challenge →

load-bearing objection A competent, honest exploratory analysis of Luxembourg open traffic data, but the headline pandemic attribution is undercut by the MyMove toll confound and a single-station cross-border analysis. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2509.05166 v2 pith:L4TMC7MV submitted 2025-09-05 cs.HC cs.CY

Transition of car-based human-mobility in the pandemic era: Data insight from a cross-border region in Europe

Sujit Kumar Sikder , Jyotirmaya Ijaradar , Hao Li , Hichem Omrani This is my paper
classification cs.HC cs.CY
keywords mobility transitionroad traffic countsopen dataCOVID-19 pandemiccross-border commutingLuxembourgspatio-temporal analysisexploratory data analysis
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to show that open, sensor-generated road traffic data can reveal a pandemic-era transition in car-based human mobility across a border. Using hourly counts from Luxembourg's national traffic observatory, it compares 2018 (pre-pandemic) with 2020 (pandemic) and finds substantially lower car volumes, especially during weekday rush hours at the German border, where evening traffic fell to roughly half its earlier level. The authors attribute this decline to lockdowns and remote work and present a five-part analytical framework—data quality, harmonization, distributional, directional cross-border, and case study—as a reusable pipeline. The study matters because only Luxembourg publishes open traffic counts in the region, so showing that those data can answer cross-border questions expands what can be learned without new data collection.

Core claim

The central discovery claim is that spatio-temporal changes in hourly car counts at Luxembourg's cross-border observation stations track a behavioural shift in car-based mobility between 2018 and 2020. At the A1 motorway crossing to Germany, weekday evening rush-hour traffic in 2020 reduced to nearly 50 percent of 2018 levels; morning rush-hour traffic also dropped, and directional analysis indicates that Sunday flows from Luxembourg to Germany remained strong, suggesting trip-purpose differences. The paper treats these patterns as evidence that pandemic restrictions and remote work reshaped cross-border commuting, and as a demonstration that one country's open traffic data can support cross

What carries the argument

The engine of the analysis is a harmonised rush-hour traffic series built from Luxembourg's open PCH sensor dataset (the national road-traffic count dataset): hourly counts are averaged over one selected week per month, filtered to cars and two-way or one-way flows, and compressed into morning (7–10 AM) and evening (4–7 PM) rush-hour aggregates. A 'directional cross-border dimension' focuses on one-way traffic at entry-point stations near motorways (A1 toward Germany) to proxy daily commuter flows, and the before/during comparison (2018 vs 2020) carries the argument that the drop is a mobility transition.

Load-bearing premise

The paper attributes the 2018-to-2020 traffic decline to pandemic factors, but Luxembourg introduced a new distance-based road toll on 1 February 2020, and the analysis never separates the toll's effect from COVID-19's effect; if the toll caused the drop, the mobility-transition interpretation collapses.

What would settle it

Using the same A1 station, compute monthly average weekday evening car counts for 2019 (pre-toll, pre-COVID), 2020, and 2021. If counts fall sharply in February 2020 and stay low after restrictions lift, while counts at a non-tolled border crossing (e.g., a Belgian or French entry station) recover, the toll, not the pandemic, explains the decline. Conversely, if declines align with lockdown months and rebound with reopenings across all border stations, the pandemic attribution is supported.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If correct, Luxembourg's open traffic data can support cross-border mobility analysis even though Germany publishes no comparable open counts, lowering the data barrier for border-region planning.
  • The observed 2020 reductions at the German border imply that large, rapid behavioural shifts in car-based commuting are possible under external shocks, informing scenarios for emission reductions and congestion management.
  • The directional patterns (strong Sunday Luxembourg→Germany flows, weekday Germany→Luxembourg commuting) imply that pandemic effects were not uniform but varied by trip purpose and direction.
  • The framework's rush-hour harmonization approach can be applied to other countries or sensor networks with missing-heavy data, enabling comparable before/during studies.
  • The results motivate linking traffic counts to air pollution and land-use models to locate emission hotspots, a step the paper explicitly leaves for future work.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: The paper's own mention of the MyMove distance-based toll from 1 February 2020 means the 2020 decline cannot be cleanly read as a pandemic effect; a before-after toll analysis using 2019 data would be needed to separate pricing response from lockdown effects.
  • Editorial inference: If the toll is a major driver, the 'transition' may be partly a persistent price-induced reduction in cross-border car commuting rather than a temporary pandemic shift, testable with 2021–2023 counts at the same station.
  • Editorial inference: The strong Sunday Luxembourg→Germany flows surviving into 2020 suggest cross-border recreation trips were less elastic than work trips; this could be tested by comparing weekend vs weekday counts during and after restrictions.
  • Editorial inference: Using one A1 station to represent Germany–Luxembourg commuter flows is a fragile proxy; triangulating with mobile-phone origin-destination data or additional border stations would strengthen or revise the conclusion.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents an exploratory analysis of Luxembourg's open road-traffic count data (PCH) for 2018 and 2020, aiming to characterize spatio-temporal transitions in car-based human mobility during the COVID-19 pandemic, with a focus on cross-border movements between Luxembourg and neighboring countries. The authors propose a five-dimension analytical framework (data quality, harmonization, distributional, directional cross-border, case study), apply a reproducible Python-based workflow, and report that car traffic volumes decreased in 2020 relative to 2018, with the weekday evening-hour traffic at the German-border A1 station 'reduced to nearly 50 percent' (Section 5.2). The paper attributes these changes primarily to pandemic-related restrictions and remote work, while acknowledging data missingness, a single-station focus for the directional analysis, and the February 2020 introduction of Luxembourg's MyMove distance-based road pricing.

Significance. The paper demonstrates a transparent, open-data-driven workflow for analyzing cross-border car mobility, with open code and a clear treatment of data harmonization. If the confounds are addressed, the study would be a useful example of using national IoT traffic-count observatories for behavioral mobility analysis in a cross-border setting. The absence of fitted parameters or causal machinery is a strength for reproducibility, but the central quantitative claim — that the observed 2020 decline reflects a pandemic-driven mobility transition — is currently vulnerable to the MyMove toll confound and to the lack of uncertainty quantification. The paper's contribution is therefore more methodological and descriptive than confirmatory at this stage.

major comments (4)
  1. [§5.2, §7] The MyMove distance-based road pricing introduced on 1 February 2020 is acknowledged but never controlled for. Since the analysis compares 2018 with 2020 and the toll applies to the same corridor and period, the observed 'nearly 50 percent' reduction in weekday evening-hour traffic at the A1 station cannot be attributed to COVID-19 restrictions without isolating the toll effect. This is load-bearing for the abstract and discussion claims about pandemic-driven mobility transition. Concrete remedy: use January 2020 (pre-toll, pre-COVID) as an additional baseline, or compare with a non-tolled control corridor, or quantitatively bound the toll-induced demand response using before/after discontinuities around 1 February 2020.
  2. [§5.2.1] The detailed directional analysis is restricted to a single observation station at the A1 German border after 'numerous missing observations' led to dropping other stations. Yet the paper uses this station to represent Germany–Luxembourg commuter flows and to draw directional conclusions (Section 5.2.2). No evidence is provided that this single station is representative of the full cross-border corridor. Please report station-level completeness metrics, compare the station's monthly pattern with any available aggregate border counts, and explicitly discuss how missing data at other stations could bias the directional findings.
  3. [§5.1.1, Step 2 in §4] The selection of 'representative weeks' per month based on 'best completeness' is post hoc and could systematically align with holidays, sensor outages, or atypical travel periods. This choice directly affects the quantitative comparisons in Figures 2 and 4 and the 'reduced to nearly 50 percent' claim. The paper does not state the selection rule, how many weeks/days contribute to each monthly aggregate, or the sensitivity of the results to alternative week selections. Please provide the selection criteria and a sensitivity analysis, or reframe the monthly comparisons as illustrative rather than quantitative evidence.
  4. [§6] The discussion admits 'limited statistically significant testing,' and indeed the paper provides no significance tests, confidence intervals, or error bars for any of the comparisons in Figures 2, 4, or 5. Statements such as 'traffic volume nearly doubled' (Section 5.2, Belgium border) and 'reduced to nearly 50 percent' (Section 5.2, German border) are presented without uncertainty. Given the acknowledged data-quality issues, the paper should either add uncertainty quantification (even simple bootstrap intervals) or consistently frame all findings as descriptive patterns that do not support causal inference.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§5.1] The text states '156 observation stations' while Table 2 reports 176 stations for 2018 and 178 for 2020. Please reconcile these numbers or explain the filtering.
  2. [§5.2] There are typos such as 'cross-broader' (should be 'cross-border'), 'F rench', and inconsistent capitalization in figure captions. Also, the reference to 'Cai et al. (2024)' in Section 2 has no corresponding entry in the reference list.
  3. [§4, Step 2] The sentence 'The final result was a harmonised dataset that allowed for robust and valid analytics' is too strong given the missing-data problems acknowledged elsewhere. Suggest softening to 'allowed for exploratory analytics'.
  4. [Abstract] The phrase 'The understanding the dynamic adaptive travel behaviours provide...' is grammatically incorrect; please revise. Also 'Luxemburg' in the affiliation should be 'Luxembourg'.
  5. [§8] The Data availability statement says 'Get open and free access to data, code, visualization and documentation in: DOI link' but the DOI is not shown. Please include the full DOI or URL.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the paper is an exploratory data report whose conclusions are read directly from open traffic counts, not derived from fitted parameters or self-citations.

full rationale

The paper makes no formal derivation, fits no parameters, and states no equations. Its central observation—that 2020 cross-border car traffic volumes at the selected A1 station fell relative to 2018, including a roughly 50% reduction in weekday evening rush hour volume—is a direct measurement from the published Luxembourg PCH dataset after explicit data harmonization (Section 4, Step 2; Section 5.2). There is no fitted input renamed as a prediction, no uniqueness theorem imported from prior work, and no ansatz smuggled in via citation. The only self-reference is the code/DOI of the reproducible pipeline [48], which is not load-bearing for any finding. The 'analytical framework' dimensions (Section 3) are retrospective labels for the steps actually performed; that is taxonomy, not circular reasoning. The paper honestly discloses the February 2020 MyMove distance-based toll in Sections 5.2 and 7 and notes it as a potential influence on the observed decrease; that is a threat to causal attribution of the decline to COVID-19, but a confound is not circularity. The empirical claims are therefore self-contained as an exploratory data report.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on traffic counts as a proxy for mobility, on the representativeness of one selected observation station, on post hoc week selection, and on the assumption that the only major change between 2018 and 2020 was the pandemic, despite the introduction of the MyMove road-pricing scheme in February 2020.

free parameters (3)
  • morning rush-hour window = 7-10 AM
    Hours chosen by hand as 'typical morning rush hours' (Section 5.2.2); changing this window changes the computed volumes.
  • evening rush-hour window = 4-7 PM
    Hours chosen by hand in Section 5.2.2; the choice affects the direction and magnitude of the reported percentage changes.
  • representative weeks per month = one week per month, selected for best completeness
    Post hoc selection of weeks with 'maximum completeness' (Step 2 and Figure A2); the choice affects monthly aggregates and the 2018-2020 comparison.
axioms (3)
  • domain assumption Traffic volume at the A1 German-border observation station is a valid proxy for daily car commuter flows between Germany and Luxembourg.
    Section 5.2.1 and Step 5 rely entirely on this station for inter-country traffic analysis; no independent validation such as surveys or cross-section counts is provided.
  • ad hoc to paper Weeks selected for best data completeness are representative of the month's traffic even though completeness may correlate with holidays or sensor outages.
    Step 2 and Figure A2; selection is based on missingness, which may bias monthly averages and the comparison between 2018 and 2020.
  • domain assumption The effect of the MyMove road-pricing scheme on traffic volumes is negligible relative to COVID-19 effects, or at least does not change the direction of the 2018-2020 comparison.
    Section 5.2 mentions the MyMove launch but the analysis does not model it; the discussion attributes changes to COVID-19 without separating the toll's effect.

reviewed 2026-08-05 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Transition of car-based human-mobility in the pandemic era: Data insight from a cross-border region in Europe." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/L4TMC7MV

@misc{pith2026250905166,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Transition of car-based human-mobility in the pandemic era: Data insight from a cross-border region in Europe},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/L4TMC7MV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.05166}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Many transport authorities are collecting and publishing almost real-time road traffic data to meet the growing trend of massive open data, a vital resource for foresight decision support systems considering deep data insights. We explored the spatio-temporal transitions in the cross-country road traffic volumes in the context of modelling behavioural transitions in car-based human mobility. This study reports on individual car-based daily travel behaviour detected, before (2018) and during the COVID pandemic (2020), between Germany and neighbouring countries. In the case of Luxembourg, the Bridges and Roads Authority has installed a large digital traffic observatory infrastructure through the adoption of sensor-based IoT technologies, like other European member states. Since 2016, they have provided high-performance data processing and published open data on the country's road traffic. The dataset contains an hourly traffic count for different vehicle types, daily for representative observation points, followed by a major road network. The original dataset contains significant missing entries, so comprehensive data harmonization was performed. We observed the decrease in traffic volumes during pandemic factors (e.g. lockdowns and remote work) period by following global trend of reduced personal mobility. The understanding the dynamic adaptive travel behaviours provide a potential opportunity to generate the actionable insight including temporal and spatial implications. This study demonstrates that the national open traffic data products can have adoption potential to address cross-border insights. In relevance to the net-zero carbon transition, further study should shed light on the interpolation and downscaling approaches at the comprehensive road-network level for identifying pollution hot spots, causal link to functional landuse patterns and calculation of spatial influence area.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Nature Sustainability2(9), 805–814 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41893-019-0352-9

    Sachs, J.D., Schmidt-Traub, G., Mazzucato, M., Messner, D., Nakicenovic, N., Rockstr¨ om, J.: Six transformations to achieve the sustainable develop- ment goals. Nature Sustainability2(9), 805–814 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41893-019-0352-9

    work page 2019

  2. [2]

    Sekadakis, M., Katrakazas, C., Michelaraki, E., Ziakopoulos, A., Yannis, G.: Covid-19 and driving behavior: Which were the most crucial influencing fac- tors? Data Science for Transportation5(3) (2023) https://doi.org/10.1007/ s42421-023-00078-7

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    IATSS Research31(1), 6–20 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1016/ s0386-1112(14)60179-5

    SHAHEEN, S.A., LIPMAN, T.E.: Reducing greenhouse emissions and fuel consumption. IATSS Research31(1), 6–20 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1016/ s0386-1112(14)60179-5

    work page 2007

  4. [4]

    Zuiderwijk, A., Hinnant, C.C.: Open data policy-making: A review of the state- of-the-art and an emerging research agenda: Introduction to a selection of open data policy-making papers from dg.o2018. Inf. Polity24, 117–129 (2019) https: //doi.org/10.3233/IP-190160 16

    work page doi:10.3233/ip-190160 2019

  5. [5]

    Palma, A., Vosough, S., Liao, F.: An overview of effects of covid-19 on mobility and lifestyle: 18 months since the outbreak. Transp. Res. Part Policy Pract.159, 372–397 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2022.03.024

    work page doi:10.1016/j.tra.2022.03.024 2022

  6. [6]

    Caselli, M., Fracasso, A., Scicchitano, S.: From the lockdown to the new normal: individual mobility and local labor market characteristics following the covid-19 pandemic in italy. J. Popul. Econ.35, 1517–1550 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1007/ s00148-022-00891-4

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    Clark, S., Alberti, C.: Covid-19 and adapting to the new normal: Lessons learned for peacebuilding. J. Peacebuilding Dev. (2021) https://doi.org/10.1177/ 15423166211052832

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Annals of the American Association of Geographers112(1), 286–305 (2022)

    Huang, X., Lu, J., Gao, S., Wang, S., Liu, Z., Wei, H.: Staying at home is a privilege: Evidence from fine-grained mobile phone location data in the united states during the covid-19 pandemic. Annals of the American Association of Geographers112(1), 286–305 (2022)

    work page 2022

  9. [9]

    Macharis, C., Tori, S., S´ ejournet, A., Keseru, I., Vanhaverbeke, L.: Can the covid- 19 crisis be a catalyst for transition to sustainable urban mobility? assessment of the medium- and longer-term impact of the covid-19 crisis on mobility in brussels. Front. Sustain.2, 725689 (2021) https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2021.725689

    work page arXiv 2021

  10. [10]

    Schmidt, K., Sieverding, T., Wallis, H., Matthies, E.: Covid-19 – a window of opportunity for the transition toward sustainable mobility? Transp. Res. Inter- discip. Perspect.10, 100374 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2021.100374

    arXiv 2021

  11. [11]

    Psyllidis, A., Gao, S., Hu, Y., Kim, E.-K., McKenzie, G., Purves, R., Yuan, M., Andris, C.: Points of interest (poi): a commentary on the state of the art, challenges, and prospects for the future. Comput. Urban Sci.2, 20 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1007/s43762-022-00047-w

    work page doi:10.1007/s43762-022-00047-w 2022

  12. [12]

    Zachlod, C., Samuel, O., Ochsner, A., Werthm¨ uller, S.: Analytics of social media data – state of characteristics and application. J. Bus. Res.144, 1064–1076 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.02.016

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.02.016 2022

  13. [13]

    Data Science for Transportation6(3) (2024) https://doi.org/10.1007/ s42421-024-00114-0

    Acosta-Sequeda, J., Mohammadi, M., Patipati, S., Mohammadian, A., Der- rible, S.: Estimating telecommuting rates in the usa using twitter sentiment analysis. Data Science for Transportation6(3) (2024) https://doi.org/10.1007/ s42421-024-00114-0

    work page 2024

  14. [14]

    London, ??? (2023)

    Connelly, R., Gayle, V., Playford, C.: Transparent and Reproducible Data Anal- ysis. London, ??? (2023). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526421036926480 . https: //doi.org/10.4135/9781526421036926480

    work page doi:10.4135/9781526421036926480 2023

  15. [15]

    Fern´ andez-Ard` evol, M., Rosales, A.: Quality assessment and biases in reused data. Am. Behav. Sci. (2022) https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642221144855 17

    work page doi:10.1177/00027642221144855 2022

  16. [16]

    Case Studies on Transport Policy17, 101267 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2024.101267

    Andani, I.G.A., Miharja, M., Rachmat, S., Desiana, R., Mangkoesoebroto, G.: Travel behaviour transformations in indonesia: Assessing the long-term impact of covid-19 on mobility patterns. Case Studies on Transport Policy17, 101267 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2024.101267

    arXiv 2024

  17. [17]

    Case Studies on Transport Policy17, 101217 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2024.101217

    Lodi, C., Marin, G., Polidori, P., Teobaldelli, D.: Students’ commuting habits to the university: Transportation choices during the covid-19 era. Case Studies on Transport Policy17, 101217 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2024.101217

    work page arXiv 2024

  18. [18]

    Shamshiripour, A., Rahimi, E., Shabanpour, R., Mohammadian, A.K.: How is covid-19 reshaping activity-travel behavior? evidence from a comprehensive survey in chicago. Transp. Res. Interdiscip. Perspect.7, 100216 (2020) https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2020.100216

    work page arXiv 2020

  19. [19]

    Abdullah, M., Dias, C., Muley, D., Shahin, M.: Exploring the impacts of covid-19 on travel behavior and mode preferences. Transp. Res. Interdiscip. Perspect.8, 100255 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2020.100255

    work page arXiv 2020

  20. [20]

    Shakibaei, S., Jong, G.C., Alpk¨ okin, P., Rashidi, T.H.: Impact of the covid-19 pandemic on travel behavior in istanbul: A panel data analysis. Sustain. Cities Soc.65, 102619 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102619

    arXiv 2021

  21. [21]

    Molloy, J., Schatzmann, T., Schoeman, B., Tchervenkov, C., Hintermann, B., Axhausen, K.W.: Observed impacts of the covid-19 first wave on travel behaviour in switzerland based on a large gps panel. Transp. Policy104, 43–51 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.01.009

    work page doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.01.009 2021

  22. [22]

    Case Studies on Transport Policy16, 101208 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2024.101208

    Mahmud, N., Ibrahim, K.B.M., Anik, M.A.H., Rashid Sheonty, S., Ahsanul Habib, M.: Examining travel mode preference for the covid-19 post- vaccination period: Insights from dhaka, bangladesh. Case Studies on Transport Policy16, 101208 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2024.101208

    work page arXiv 2024

  23. [23]

    Case Studies on Transport Policy17, 101245 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j

    Haseeb, A., Mitra, R.: Travel behaviour changes among post-secondary students after covid-19 pandemic – a case of greater toronto and hamilton area, canada. Case Studies on Transport Policy17, 101245 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j. cstp.2024.101245

    arXiv 2024

  24. [24]

    Haas, M., Faber, R., Hamersma, M.: How covid-19 and the dutch ‘intelligent lockdown’ change activities, work and travel behaviour: Evidence from longitudi- nal data in the netherlands. Transp. Res. Interdiscip. Perspect.6, 100150 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2020.100150

    work page arXiv 2020

  25. [25]

    Eisenmann, C., Nobis, C., Kolarova, V., Lenz, B., Winkler, C.: Transport mode use during the covid-19 lockdown period in germany: The car became more important, public transport lost ground. Transp. Policy103, 60–67 (2021) https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.01.012 18

    work page doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.01.012 2021

  26. [26]

    Case Stud

    Ecke, L., Magdolen, M., Chlond, B., Vortisch, P.: How the covid-19 pandemic changes daily commuting routines – insights from the german mobility panel. Case Stud. Transp. Policy10, 2175–2182 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp. 2022.10.001

    doi:10.1016/j.cstp 2022

  27. [27]

    Kellermann, R., Sivizaca Conde, D., R¨ oßler, D., Kliewer, N., Dienel, H.-L.: Mobil- ity in pandemic times: Exploring changes and long-term effects of covid-19 on urban mobility behavior. Transp. Res. Interdiscip. Perspect.15, 100668 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2022.100668

    work page arXiv 2022

  28. [28]

    Psycho- logical Methods2(2), 131–160 (1997) https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.2.2

    Behrens, J.T.: Principles and procedures of exploratory data analysis. Psycho- logical Methods2(2), 131–160 (1997) https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.2.2. 131

    work page doi:10.1037/1082-989x.2.2 1997

  29. [29]

    Ghosh, A., Nashaat, M., Miller, J., Quader, S., Marston, C.: A comprehensive review of tools for exploratory analysis of tabular industrial datasets. Vis. Inform. 2, 235–253 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visinf.2018.12.004

    work page doi:10.1016/j.visinf.2018.12.004 2018

  30. [30]

    Hullman, J., Gelman, A.: Designing for interactive exploratory data analy- sis requires theories of graphical inference. Harv. Data Sci. Rev. (2021) https: //doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.3ab8a587

    work page doi:10.1162/99608f92.3ab8a587 2021

  31. [31]

    In: 2019 IEEE International WIE Conference on Electrical and Computer Engi- neering (WIECON-ECE), pp

    Chaloli, A.R., Kumaraswamy, A.: A paradigmatic approach to exploratory data analysis utilising new york’s road traffic to derive coherent inferences. In: 2019 IEEE International WIE Conference on Electrical and Computer Engi- neering (WIECON-ECE), pp. 1–4. IEEE, Bangalore, India (2019). https:// doi.org/10.1109/WIECON-ECE48653.2019.9019989 . https://doi.o...

    arXiv 2019

  32. [32]

    In: Gelbukh, A., Reyes-Garcia, C.A

    Han, W., Wang, J., Shaw, S.-L.: Visual exploratory data analysis of traffic volume. In: Gelbukh, A., Reyes-Garcia, C.A. (eds.) MICAI 2006: Advances in Artificial Intelligence, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 695–703. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/11925231 66 . https://doi. org/10.1007/11925231 66

    work page doi:10.1007/11925231 2006

  33. [33]

    Transportation Research Procedia48, 3880–3895 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2020.08.033

    Soorya, V.B., Arkatkar, S.S., Vanajakshi, L.: Exploratory study on approaches for traffic count prediction; using toll-way traffic count. Transportation Research Procedia48, 3880–3895 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2020.08.033

    work page doi:10.1016/j.trpro.2020.08.033 2020

  34. [34]

    Electronics9, 1270 (2020) https://doi.org/10.3390/ electronics9081270

    Taboada, G.L., Han, L.: Exploratory data analysis and data envelopment anal- ysis of urban rail transit. Electronics9, 1270 (2020) https://doi.org/10.3390/ electronics9081270

    work page 2020

  35. [35]

    Cogent Eng.7, 1834659 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2020.1834659 19

    Makaba, T., Doorsamy, W., Paul, B.S.: Exploratory framework for analysing road traffic accident data with validation on gauteng province data. Cogent Eng.7, 1834659 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2020.1834659 19

    work page arXiv 2020

  36. [36]

    Sustainability14, 964 (2022) https://doi.org/10.3390/ su14020964

    Hungness, D., Bridgelall, R.: Exploratory spatial data analysis of traffic fore- casting: A case study. Sustainability14, 964 (2022) https://doi.org/10.3390/ su14020964

    work page 2022

  37. [37]

    Journal of Transportation Technologies13(01), 61–86 (2023) https: //doi.org/10.4236/jtts.2023.131004

    Hamza, S., Yahya, U., Kasule, A., Usama, K., Fahad, P., Ibrahim, K.: Char- acterizing peak-time traffic jam incidents in kampala using exploratory data analysis. Journal of Transportation Technologies13(01), 61–86 (2023) https: //doi.org/10.4236/jtts.2023.131004

    work page arXiv 2023

  38. [38]

    Case Studies on Transport Policy17, 101220 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2024.101220

    Jin, C.-J., Li, J., Wu, C., Li, D., Jiang, R.: The travel behaviors before and after lockdown: Case study on shanghai, 2022. Case Studies on Transport Policy17, 101220 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2024.101220

    work page arXiv 2022

  39. [39]

    exper- imental results for a port city waterfront

    Baccoli, R., Sollai, F., Medda, A., Piccolo, A., Fadda, P.: An adaptive nonlinear autoregressive ann model for high time resolution traffic noise predictions. exper- imental results for a port city waterfront. Building and Environment207, 108551 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108551

    work page arXiv 2022

  40. [40]

    Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering 29(1), 04014022 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000281

    Shamo, B., Asa, E., Membah, J.: Linear spatial interpolation and analysis of annual average daily traffic data. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering 29(1), 04014022 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000281

    work page arXiv 2015

  41. [41]

    Data Science for Transportation5(3) (2023) https://doi.org/10.1007/ s42421-023-00080-z

    Sun, W., Kobayashi, H., Nakao, S., Schm¨ ocker, J.-D.: On the relationship between crowdsourced sentiments and mobility trends during covid-19: A case study of kyoto. Data Science for Transportation5(3) (2023) https://doi.org/10.1007/ s42421-023-00080-z

    work page 2023

  42. [42]

    Big Data Research2(2), 53–58 (2015) https://doi.org/10

    Brunswicker, S., Bertino, E., Matei, S.: Big data for open digital innovation – a research roadmap. Big Data Research2(2), 53–58 (2015) https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.bdr.2015.01.008

    work page 2015

  43. [43]

    Big Data & Society3(1), 205395171663113 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716631130

    Kitchin, R., McArdle, G.: What makes big data, big data? exploring the onto- logical characteristics of 26 datasets. Big Data & Society3(1), 205395171663113 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716631130

    work page doi:10.1177/2053951716631130 2016

  44. [44]

    Saura, J.R., Ribeiro-Soriano, D., Palacios-Marqu´ es, D.: From user-generated data to data-driven innovation: A research agenda to understand user privacy in dig- ital markets. Int. J. Inf. Manag.60, 102331 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ijinfomgt.2021.102331

    arXiv 2021

  45. [45]

    In: Data Warehousing in the Age of Big Data, pp

    Krishnan, K.: Integration of big data and data warehousing. In: Data Warehousing in the Age of Big Data, pp. 199–217. Elsevier, ??? (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-405891-0.00010-6 . https://doi.org/10.1016/ B978-0-12-405891-0.00010-6

    work page doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-405891-0.00010-6 2013

  46. [46]

    Teh, H.Y., Kempa-Liehr, A.W., Wang, K.I.-K.: Sensor data quality: a systematic review. J. Big Data7, 11 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-020-0285-1 20

    doi:10.1186/s40537-020-0285-1 2020

  47. [47]

    Paper presented at the BITRE/IPA joint workshop, 26 May 2014, Sydney (2014)

    BITRE/IPA: Exploring New Sources of Traffic Data. Paper presented at the BITRE/IPA joint workshop, 26 May 2014, Sydney (2014). https://www.bitre. gov.au/sites/default/files/2019-12/NewDataSources-BackgroundPaper-April% 202014.pdf

    work page 2014

  48. [48]

    https://doi

    Ijaradar, J., Sikder, S.: LTDA: Luxembourg Traffic Data Analysis. https://doi. org/10.5281/zenodo.13383896 . https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13383896

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.13383896

  49. [49]

    Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems147(9), 05021005 (2021) https: //doi.org/10.1061/JTEPBS.0000558

    Glavi´ c, D., Mladenovi´ c, M.N., Milenkovi´ c, M., Todorova, M.M.: User perspectives on distance- and time-based road tolling schemes: European case study. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems147(9), 05021005 (2021) https: //doi.org/10.1061/JTEPBS.0000558

    work page doi:10.1061/jtepbs.0000558 2021

  50. [50]

    Annual review of environment and resources46(1), 377–415 (2021)

    Seto, K.C., Churkina, G., Hsu, A., Keller, M., Newman, P.W., Qin, B., Ramaswami, A.: From low-to net-zero carbon cities: The next global agenda. Annual review of environment and resources46(1), 377–415 (2021)

    work page 2021

  51. [51]

    during covid-19 pandemic

    Sinha, S., Chakraborty, M.: Causal analysis-based reduced order modeling of human mobility in the u.s. during covid-19 pandemic. Data Science for Transportation5(3) (2023) https://doi.org/10.1007/s42421-023-00081-y Appendix A Supplementary Images (a) Morning 7:00 AM 10:00 AM (b) Evening 16:00 PM to 19:00 PM Fig. A1: Calendar chart of traffic volume in 201...

    work page doi:10.1007/s42421-023-00081-y 2023

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 5, 2026.