REVIEW 1 cited by
A Puzzle About General Covariance and Gauge
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
We consider two simple criteria for when a physical theory should be said to be "generally covariant", and we argue that these criteria are not met by Yang-Mills theory, even on geometric formulations of that theory. The reason, we show, is that the bundles encountered in Yang-Mills theory are not natural bundles; instead, they are gauge-natural. We then show how these observations relate to previous arguments about the significance of solder forms in assessing disanalogies between general relativity and Yang-Mills theory. We conclude by suggesting that general covariance is really about functoriality.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Nontrivial constitutive laws and unified structures in constrained BF theory
Changing the gravitational constitutive law in BF theory does not force any change in the internal gauge-theory constitutive law, because no canonical map connects the two sectors.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.