Measurements of the Higgs boson production, fiducial and differential cross-sections in the four lepton decay channel using 164 fb$^{-1}$ of data collected at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13.6 TeV with the ATLAS detector

ATLAS Collaboration

arxiv: 2605.19016 · v1 · pith:LAE7EJNSnew · submitted 2026-05-18 · ✦ hep-ex

Measurements of the Higgs boson production, fiducial and differential cross-sections in the four lepton decay channel using 164 fb⁻¹ of data collected at sqrt{s} = 13.6 TeV with the ATLAS detector

ATLAS Collaboration This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 07:19 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ex

keywords Higgs bosonfour-lepton decayfiducial cross-sectiondifferential distributionsATLAS detectorStandard Modelsignal strengthproduction modes

0 comments

The pith

The ATLAS experiment measures the Higgs boson fiducial cross-section in the four-lepton channel to be 3.65 fb, in agreement with the Standard Model prediction of 3.68 fb.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper presents inclusive, differential and production-mode cross-section measurements of the Higgs boson in the decay channel to four leptons. It uses 164 fb^{-1} of proton-proton collision data recorded at 13.6 TeV with the ATLAS detector. The analysis extracts the fiducial cross-section and compares it directly to Standard Model calculations after correcting for detector effects and backgrounds. Differential distributions are also measured for key kinematic variables, along with cross-sections in exclusive production-mode regions. These results test whether the observed rates and shapes match theoretical expectations, with the overall signal strength found to be consistent with unity.

Core claim

The inclusive fiducial cross-section for the H → ZZ* → 4ℓ process is measured to be σ_fid = 3.65^{+0.35}_{-0.33} fb, in agreement with the Standard Model prediction of σ_fid^SM = 3.68 ± 0.17 fb. Differential cross-sections are measured as functions of kinematic observables of the Higgs boson and the four-lepton final state. Cross-sections for main production modes are extracted in exclusive phase-space regions and combined to yield an overall signal strength of μ = 0.99 ± 0.13. The measurements are interpreted in the κ framework, within the Standard Model Effective Field Theory, and for scenarios involving the Higgs self-coupling, with all results consistent with Standard Model expectations.

What carries the argument

Fiducial cross-section extraction in the H → ZZ* → 4ℓ channel, which defines a kinematic selection region to reduce model dependence while allowing direct comparison of observed event yields to theoretical predictions after efficiency corrections.

If this is right

The measured inclusive and differential cross-sections constrain possible modifications to Higgs boson couplings in the κ framework.
The results in exclusive production regions allow tests of gluon fusion, vector boson fusion and associated production modes separately.
Interpretations within the Standard Model Effective Field Theory set limits on Wilson coefficients for dimension-six operators affecting Higgs production.
Probing the Higgs self-coupling through these measurements provides indirect sensitivity to the shape of the Higgs potential.
Consistency across channels supports using these data in global combinations with other Higgs decay modes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Higher-luminosity datasets at the same energy could reduce uncertainties enough to test for small deviations predicted by specific beyond-Standard-Model scenarios.
The fiducial selection strategy developed here can be adapted to other rare Higgs or new-physics processes where background modeling is the dominant uncertainty.
Combining this four-lepton result with measurements in other final states would tighten constraints on the Higgs total width and coupling modifiers.

Load-bearing premise

The extraction of cross-sections from observed events assumes that Monte Carlo simulations accurately model detector response, background contributions from other processes, and the acceptance and efficiency for signal events across the selected kinematic regions.

What would settle it

A measured fiducial cross-section lying more than three standard deviations away from the Standard Model prediction after combining statistical and systematic uncertainties would falsify the reported agreement.

read the original abstract

Inclusive, differential and production-mode cross-section measurements of the Higgs boson are performed in the $H \to ZZ^{*} \to 4\ell$ decay channel. The analysis uses proton-proton collision data produced at the Large Hadron Collider at a centre-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s}=13.6$ TeV and recorded with the ATLAS detector, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 164 fb$^{-1}$. The inclusive fiducial cross-section for the $H \to ZZ^{*} \to 4\ell$ process is measured to be $\sigma_{\textrm{fid}} = 3.65^{+0.35}_{-0.33}~\textrm{fb}$, in agreement with the Standard Model prediction of $\sigma_{\textrm{fid}}^{\textrm{SM}} = 3.68 \pm 0.17~\textrm{fb}$. Differential cross-sections are measured as a function of key kinematic observables of the Higgs boson and the four-lepton final state. Cross-sections are measured for the main production-modes in several exclusive regions of the Higgs boson production phase space and combined to measure an overall Higgs boson signal strength, defined as the measured cross-section normalised to the SM prediction, of $\mu = 0.99 \pm 0.13$. The results are interpreted in terms of modifications of Higgs boson couplings using the $\kappa$ framework, within the Standard Model Effective Field Theory, and in scenarios probing the Higgs boson self-coupling. All the results are consistent with Standard Model expectations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This is a standard ATLAS update measuring the Higgs fiducial cross-section in the 4l channel with 164 fb^{-1} at 13.6 TeV, finding agreement with the SM at the expected precision level.

read the letter

Hi there, This ATLAS paper measures the Higgs boson fiducial and differential cross-sections in the H to ZZ* to 4l channel using 164 fb^{-1} of 13.6 TeV data. The main result is an inclusive fiducial cross-section of 3.65 +0.35 -0.33 fb, matching the SM prediction of 3.68 +-0.17 fb, with an overall signal strength of 0.99 +-0.13. What is new is the application of the established fiducial framework to the first sizable Run 3 dataset at the higher center-of-mass energy. They report differential cross-sections versus several kinematic variables for the Higgs and the four-lepton system, plus production-mode cross-sections in exclusive phase-space regions. The paper also includes interpretations in the kappa framework, SMEFT, and scenarios for the Higgs self-coupling. The work follows the usual ATLAS procedures for this channel, with data-driven methods for reducible backgrounds and a full set of systematic uncertainties propagated through the unfolding. The results are presented clearly with direct comparisons to theory. A soft spot is that the measurement remains statistics-limited in many differential bins, so the constraints on coupling modifications are still modest. The analysis depends on Monte Carlo modeling for acceptance and efficiency, which is a standard assumption here and appears to be validated with control regions, but any residual mismodeling would affect the extracted values. This paper is mainly useful for readers tracking the accumulating LHC Higgs dataset or preparing global fits. It is not methodologically novel, but it is a careful addition to the precision program. I would bring it to a reading group only if the focus is recent LHC Higgs results. I would not cite it in my own work in the next year unless doing a specific comparison to prior measurements. It deserves peer review because these results will feed into future combinations.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents measurements of inclusive fiducial, differential, and production-mode cross-sections for the Higgs boson in the H → ZZ* → 4ℓ channel using 164 fb^{-1} of ATLAS proton-proton collision data at √s = 13.6 TeV. The inclusive fiducial cross-section is reported as σ_fid = 3.65^{+0.35}_{-0.33} fb, in agreement with the SM prediction of 3.68 ± 0.17 fb. Differential cross-sections are measured versus kinematic observables, production-mode cross-sections are extracted in exclusive regions, and an overall signal strength μ = 0.99 ± 0.13 is obtained. Results are interpreted in the κ-framework, SMEFT, and Higgs self-coupling scenarios, with all findings consistent with Standard Model expectations.

Significance. If the results hold, this constitutes a precision update to Higgs boson property measurements with Run-3 data at increased luminosity and energy. The analysis employs established ATLAS procedures including data-driven methods for reducible backgrounds, dedicated systematic variations for MC modeling of acceptance and efficiency, and full uncertainty propagation, which strengthens the reliability of the reported agreement with SM predictions (σ_fid measurement vs. theory and μ = 0.99 ± 0.13).

minor comments (3)

Abstract: the SM prediction uncertainty is quoted symmetrically (±0.17 fb) while the measurement is asymmetric; the main text should explicitly state the composition of the theory uncertainty (PDF, scale, etc.) for direct comparison.
Section on differential measurements: ensure all unfolded distributions include both statistical and systematic uncertainty bands in the figures, and clarify the unfolding procedure and regularization choice in the corresponding methods subsection.
Production-mode results: the definition of the exclusive regions in the Higgs production phase space should be cross-referenced to a table or figure for reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive summary of our manuscript, for highlighting its significance as a precision update with Run-3 data, and for recommending minor revision. The referee's description of the analysis methods and results is accurate. No specific major comments were provided in the report, so we have no individual points to address point-by-point. We are pleased that the results are found to be consistent with Standard Model expectations and that the analysis procedures are viewed as strengthening the reliability of the measurements.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; direct data-driven measurement compared to independent SM prediction

full rationale

The paper performs a standard experimental measurement of inclusive, differential, and production-mode cross-sections in the H → ZZ* → 4ℓ channel using 164 fb⁻¹ of 13.6 TeV ATLAS data. Event selection, background estimation (including data-driven methods for reducible backgrounds), acceptance/efficiency corrections via MC, and unfolding are applied to observed collision data to extract σ_fid = 3.65^{+0.35}_{-0.33} fb and μ = 0.99 ± 0.13. These quantities are compared to independent theoretical SM predictions (σ_fid^SM = 3.68 ± 0.17 fb) that are not derived from or fitted to the present dataset. No step reduces by construction to a self-definition, a fitted parameter renamed as prediction, or a load-bearing self-citation chain; systematic uncertainties on MC modeling are propagated but do not alter the data-driven nature of the central results.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

As an experimental measurement paper, the work relies on standard high-energy physics modeling rather than introducing new free parameters, axioms, or entities beyond those in the Standard Model framework. Full details on any fitted nuisance parameters for systematics would appear in the complete manuscript.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Monte Carlo simulations and theoretical calculations accurately describe background processes and detector effects in the four-lepton final state.
This underpins the subtraction of backgrounds and correction for acceptance when converting observed events to cross-sections.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5827 in / 1257 out tokens · 42831 ms · 2026-05-20T07:19:59.524481+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

144 extracted references · 144 canonical work pages · 82 internal anchors

[1]

ATLAS Collaboration,Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B716(2012) 1, arXiv:1207.7214 [hep-ex]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[2]

CMS Collaboration, Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B716(2012) 30, arXiv:1207.7235 [hep-ex]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[3]

Englert and R

F. Englert and R. Brout,Broken Symmetry and the Mass of Gauge Vector Mesons, Phys. Rev. Lett.13(1964) 321

work page 1964
[4]

P. W. Higgs,Broken Symmetries and the Masses of Gauge Bosons, Phys. Rev. Lett.13(1964) 508

work page 1964
[5]

Guralnik, C

G. Guralnik, C. Hagen and T. Kibble,Global Conservation Laws and Massless Particles, Phys. Rev. Lett.13(1964) 585

work page 1964
[6]

ATLAS and CMS Collaborations,Combined Measurement of the Higgs Boson Mass in𝑝 𝑝 Collisions at√𝑠=7and8TeV with the ATLAS and CMS Experiments, Phys. Rev. Lett.114(2015) 191803, arXiv:1503.07589 [hep-ex]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[7]

ATLAS Collaboration,Fiducial and differential cross sections of Higgs boson production measured in the four-lepton decay channel in𝑝 𝑝collisions at√𝑠=8TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Lett. B738(2014) 234, arXiv:1408.3226 [hep-ex]. 41

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[8]

ATLAS Collaboration,Higgs boson production cross-section measurements and their EFT interpretation in the4ℓdecay channel at√𝑠=13TeV with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 957, arXiv:2004.03447 [hep-ex], Erratum: Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 29, Erratum: Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 398

work page arXiv 2020
[9]

ATLAS Collaboration,Measurements of the Higgs boson inclusive and differential fiducial cross sections in the4ℓdecay channel at√𝑠=13TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 942, arXiv:2004.03969 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2020
[10]

ATLAS Collaboration, Measurement of the total and differential Higgs boson production cross-sections at√𝑠=13TeV with the ATLAS detector by combining the𝐻→𝑍 𝑍∗ →4ℓand𝐻→𝛾𝛾decay channels, JHEP05(2023) 028, arXiv:2207.08615 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2023
[11]

CMS Collaboration,Measurement of differential and integrated fiducial cross sections for Higgs boson production in the four-lepton decay channel in𝑝 𝑝collisions at√𝑠=7and8TeV, JHEP04(2016) 005, arXiv:1512.08377 [hep-ex]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[12]

CMS Collaboration,Measurements of inclusive and differential cross sections for the Higgs boson production and decay to four-leptons in proton–proton collisions at√𝑠=13TeV, JHEP08(2023) 040, arXiv:2305.07532 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2023
[13]

CMS Collaboration,Measurements of production cross sections of the Higgs boson in the four-lepton final state in proton–proton collisions at√𝑠=13TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 488, arXiv:2103.04956 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2021
[14]

ATLAS Collaboration,Measurement of the Higgs boson mass in the𝐻→𝑍 𝑍∗ →4ℓdecay channel using139fb −1 of √𝑠=13TeV𝑝 𝑝 collisions recorded by the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B843(2023) 137880, arXiv:2207.00320 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2023
[15]

ATLAS Collaboration, Combined Measurement of the Higgs Boson Mass from the𝐻→𝛾𝛾 and 𝐻→𝑍 𝑍 ∗ →4ℓ Decay Channels with the ATLAS Detector Using√𝑠=7,8,and13TeV𝑝 𝑝Collision Data, Phys. Rev. Lett.131(2023) 251802, arXiv:2308.04775 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2023
[16]

CMS Collaboration,Measurement of the Higgs boson mass and width using the four-lepton final state in proton–proton collisions at√𝑠=13TeV, Phys. Rev. D111(2024) 092014, arXiv:2409.13663 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2024
[17]

ATLAS Collaboration,Test of CP-invariance of the Higgs boson in vector-boson fusion production and its decay into four leptons, JHEP05(2024) 105, arXiv:2304.09612 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2024
[18]

CMS Collaboration,Constraints on anomalous Higgs boson couplings to vector bosons and fermions in its production and decay using the four-lepton final state, Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 052004, arXiv:2104.12152 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2021
[19]

ATLAS Collaboration, Measurement of off-shell Higgs boson production in the𝐻∗ →𝑍 𝑍→4ℓdecay channel using a neural simulation-based inference technique in13TeV𝑝 𝑝collisions with the ATLAS detector, Rept. Prog. Phys.88(2025) 057803, arXiv:2412.01548 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2025
[20]

ATLAS Collaboration,Measurement of the𝐻→𝛾𝛾and𝐻→𝑍 𝑍 ∗ →4ℓcross-sections in𝑝 𝑝 collisions at√𝑠=13.6TeV with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) 78, arXiv:2306.11379 [hep-ex]. 42

work page arXiv 2024
[21]

CMS Collaboration,Measurements of Higgs boson production cross section in the four-lepton final state in proton–proton collisions at√𝑠=13.6TeV, JHEP05(2025) 079, arXiv:2501.14849 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2025
[22]

LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,Simplified template cross sections, url:http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/2138079

work page arXiv
[23]

Berger et al.,Simplified Template Cross Sections - Stage 1.1 and 1.2, SciPost Phys

N. Berger et al.,Simplified Template Cross Sections - Stage 1.1 and 1.2, SciPost Phys. Comm. Rep. (2026) 15, arXiv:1906.02754 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2026
[24]

Attention Is All You Need

A. Vaswani et al., ‘Attention Is All You Need’, 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2023, arXiv:1706.03762 [cs.CL]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023
[25]

ATLAS Collaboration,Transforming jet flavour tagging at ATLAS, Nature Commun.17(2026) 541, arXiv:2505.19689 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2026
[26]

ATLAS Collaboration, Tools for estimating fake/non-prompt lepton backgrounds with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, JINST18(2023) T11004, arXiv:2211.16178 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2023
[27]

ATLAS Collaboration,The ATLAS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider, JINST3(2008) S08003

work page 2008
[28]

ATLAS Collaboration,The ATLAS experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider: a description of the detector configuration for Run 3, JINST19(2024) P05063, arXiv:2305.16623 [physics.ins-det]

work page arXiv 2024
[29]

ATLAS Collaboration,The ATLAS trigger system for LHC Run 3 and trigger performance in 2022, JINST19(2024) P06029, arXiv:2401.06630 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2022
[30]

ATLAS Collaboration,Software and computing for Run 3 of the ATLAS experiment at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 234, arXiv:2404.06335 [hep-ex], Erratum: Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 907

work page arXiv 2025
[31]

ATLAS Collaboration,Preliminary luminosity calibration of the ATLAS13.6TeV data recorded in 2024 and combination with the 2022 and 2023 measurements, ATL-DAPR-PUB-2025-001, 2025, url:https://cds.cern.ch/record/2948582

work page arXiv 2024
[32]

ATLAS Collaboration, Luminosity determination in𝑝 𝑝collisions at√𝑠=13TeV using the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 982, arXiv:2212.09379 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2023
[33]

ATLAS Collaboration,Performance of the ATLAS muon triggers in Run 2, JINST15(2020) P09015, arXiv:2004.13447 [physics.ins-det]

work page arXiv 2020
[34]

ATLAS Collaboration,Performance of electron and photon triggers in ATLAS during LHC Run 2, Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 47, arXiv:1909.00761 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2020
[35]

A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX

S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari and E. Re,A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX, JHEP06(2010) 043, arXiv:1002.2581 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
[36]

A New Method for Combining NLO QCD with Shower Monte Carlo Algorithms

P. Nason,A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms, JHEP11(2004) 040, arXiv:hep-ph/0409146. 43

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004
[37]

Matching NLO QCD computations with Parton Shower simulations: the POWHEG method

S. Frixione, P. Nason and C. Oleari, Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the POWHEG method, JHEP11(2007) 070, arXiv:0709.2092 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007
[38]

MINLO: Multi-scale improved NLO

K. Hamilton, P. Nason and G. Zanderighi,MINLO: multi-scale improved NLO, JHEP10(2012) 155, arXiv:1206.3572 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[39]

J. M. Campbell et al.,NLO Higgs boson production plus one and two jets using the POWHEG BOX, MadGraph4 and MCFM, JHEP07(2012) 092, arXiv:1202.5475 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[40]

Merging H/W/Z + 0 and 1 jet at NLO with no merging scale: a path to parton shower + NNLO matching

K. Hamilton, P. Nason, C. Oleari and G. Zanderighi,Merging H/W/Z + 0 and 1 jet at NLO with no merging scale: a path to parton shower + NNLO matching, JHEP05(2013) 082, arXiv:1212.4504 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[41]

NNLOPS simulation of Higgs boson production

K. Hamilton, P. Nason, E. Re and G. Zanderighi,NNLOPS simulation of Higgs boson production, JHEP10(2013) 222, arXiv:1309.0017 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[42]

Finite quark-mass effects in the NNLOPS POWHEG+MiNLO Higgs generator

K. Hamilton, P. Nason and G. Zanderighi, Finite quark-mass effects in the NNLOPS POWHEG+MiNLO Higgs generator, JHEP05(2015) 140, arXiv:1501.04637 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[43]

An NNLO subtraction formalism in hadron collisions and its application to Higgs boson production at the LHC

S. Catani and M. Grazzini,Next-to-Next-to-Leading-Order Subtraction Formalism in Hadron Collisions and its Application to Higgs-Boson Production at the Large Hadron Collider, Phys. Rev. Lett.98(2007) 222002, arXiv:hep-ph/0703012

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007
[44]

J. Alwall et al.,The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations, JHEP07(2014) 079, arXiv:1405.0301 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[45]

R. D. Ball et al.,The PDF4LHC21 combination of global PDF fits for the LHC Run III, J. Phys. G49(2022) 080501, arXiv:2203.05506 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2022
[46]

ATLAS Collaboration,ATLAS Pythia 8 tunes to7TeV data, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2014-021, 2014, url:https://cds.cern.ch/record/1966419

work page arXiv 2014
[47]

NNPDF Collaboration, R. D. Ball et al.,Parton distributions with LHC data, Nucl. Phys. B867(2013) 244, arXiv:1207.1303 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[48]

Herwig 7.1 Release Note

J. Bellm et al.,Herwig 7.1 Release Note, (2017), arXiv:1705.06919 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[49]

A comprehensive guide to the physics and usage of PYTHIA 8.3

C. Bierlich et al.,A comprehensive guide to the physics and usage of PYTHIA 8.3, SciPost Phys. Codebases (2022) 8, arXiv:2203.11601 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022
[50]

Merging meets matching in MC@NLO

R. Frederix and S. Frixione,Merging meets matching in MC@NLO, JHEP12(2012) 061, arXiv:1209.6215 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[51]

D. J. Lange,The EvtGen particle decay simulation package, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A462(2001) 152

work page 2001
[52]

Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 4. Deciphering the Nature of the Higgs Sector

D. de Florian et al., Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 4. Deciphering the Nature of the Higgs Sector, (2017), arXiv:1610.07922 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[53]

Karlberg et al., Ad interim recommendations for the Higgs boson production cross sections at√𝑠=13.6TeV, 2024, arXiv:2402.09955 [hep-ph]

A. Karlberg et al., Ad interim recommendations for the Higgs boson production cross sections at√𝑠=13.6TeV, 2024, arXiv:2402.09955 [hep-ph]. 44

work page arXiv 2024
[54]

Two-loop light fermion contribution to Higgs production and decays

U. Aglietti, R. Bonciani, G. Degrassi and A. Vicini, Two-loop light fermion contribution to Higgs production and decays, Phys. Lett. B595(2004) 432, arXiv:hep-ph/0404071

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004
[55]

NLO Electroweak Corrections to Higgs Boson Production at Hadron Colliders

S. Actis, G. Passarino, C. Sturm and S. Uccirati, NLO electroweak corrections to Higgs boson production at hadron colliders, Phys. Lett. B670(2008) 12, arXiv:0809.1301 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008
[56]

NNLO Computational Techniques: the Cases H -> gamma gamma and H -> g g

S. Actis, G. Passarino, C. Sturm and S. Uccirati, NNLO computational techniques: The cases𝐻→𝛾𝛾 and 𝐻→𝑔𝑔 , Nucl. Phys. B811(2009) 182, arXiv:0809.3667 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009
[57]

Mixed QCD-electroweak corrections to Higgs boson production in gluon fusion

C. Anastasiou, R. Boughezal and F. Petriello, Mixed QCD-electroweak corrections to Higgs boson production in gluon fusion, JHEP04(2009) 003, arXiv:0811.3458 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009
[58]

A. Pak, M. Rogal and M. Steinhauser, Finite top quark mass effects in NNLO Higgs boson production at LHC, JHEP02(2010) 025, arXiv:0911.4662 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
[59]

R. V. Harlander and K. J. Ozeren, Top mass effects in Higgs production at next-to-next-to-leading order QCD: Virtual corrections, Phys. Lett. B679(2009) 467, arXiv:0907.2997 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009
[60]

R. V. Harlander and K. J. Ozeren, Finite top mass effects for hadronic Higgs production at next-to-next-to-leading order, JHEP11(2009) 088, arXiv:0909.3420 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009
[61]

R. V. Harlander, H. Mantler, S. Marzani and K. J. Ozeren, Higgs production in gluon fusion at next-to-next-to-leading order QCD for finite top mass, Eur. Phys. J. C66(2010) 359, arXiv:0912.2104 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
[62]

Higgs boson gluon-fusion production in N3LO QCD

C. Anastasiou, C. Duhr, F. Dulat, F. Herzog and B. Mistlberger, Higgs Boson Gluon-Fusion Production in QCD at Three Loops, Phys. Rev. Lett.114(2015) 212001, arXiv:1503.06056 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[63]

High precision determination of the gluon fusion Higgs boson cross-section at the LHC

C. Anastasiou et al., High precision determination of the gluon fusion Higgs boson cross-section at the LHC, JHEP05(2016) 058, arXiv:1602.00695 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[64]

iHixs 2 - Inclusive Higgs Cross Sections

F. Dulat, A. Lazopoulos and B. Mistlberger,iHixs 2 – Inclusive Higgs cross sections, Comput. Phys. Commun.233(2018) 243, arXiv:1802.00827 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[65]

Higher order corrections to mixed QCD-EW contributions to Higgs production in gluon fusion

M. Bonetti, K. Melnikov and L. Tancredi,Higher order corrections to mixed QCD-EW contributions to Higgs boson production in gluon fusion, Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 056017, arXiv:1801.10403 [hep-ph], Erratum: Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 099906(E)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[66]

Strong and electroweak corrections to the production of Higgs+2jets via weak interactions at the LHC

M. Ciccolini, A. Denner and S. Dittmaier,Strong and Electroweak Corrections to the Production of a Higgs Boson + 2 Jets via Weak Interactions at the Large Hadron Collider, Phys. Rev. Lett.99(2007) 161803, arXiv:0707.0381 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007
[67]

Electroweak and QCD corrections to Higgs production via vector-boson fusion at the LHC

M. Ciccolini, A. Denner and S. Dittmaier, Electroweak and QCD corrections to Higgs production via vector-boson fusion at the CERN LHC, Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 013002, arXiv:0710.4749 [hep-ph]. 45

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008
[68]

Higgs production via vector-boson fusion at NNLO in QCD

P. Bolzoni, F. Maltoni, S.-O. Moch and M. Zaro, Higgs Boson Production via Vector-Boson Fusion at Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order in QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett.105(2010) 011801, arXiv:1003.4451 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
[69]

M. L. Ciccolini, S. Dittmaier and M. Krämer, Electroweak radiative corrections to associated𝑊 𝐻and𝑍 𝐻production at hadron colliders, Phys. Rev. D68(2003) 073003, arXiv:hep-ph/0306234

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003
[70]

NNLO QCD corrections to the Higgs-strahlung processes at hadron colliders

O. Brein, A. Djouadi and R. Harlander, NNLO QCD corrections to the Higgs-strahlung processes at hadron colliders, Phys. Lett. B579(2004) 149, arXiv:hep-ph/0307206

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004
[71]

Top-Quark Mediated Effects in Hadronic Higgs-Strahlung

O. Brein, R. V. Harlander, M. Wiesemann and T. Zirke, Top-quark mediated effects in hadronic Higgs-Strahlung, Eur. Phys. J. C72(2012) 1868, arXiv:1111.0761 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[72]

Gluon-induced Higgs-strahlung at next-to-leading order QCD

L. Altenkamp, S. Dittmaier, R. V. Harlander, H. Rzehak and T. J. E. Zirke, Gluon-induced Higgs-strahlung at next-to-leading order QCD, JHEP02(2013) 078, arXiv:1211.5015 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[73]

HAWK 2.0: A Monte Carlo program for Higgs production in vector-boson fusion and Higgs strahlung at hadron colliders

A. Denner, S. Dittmaier, S. Kallweit and A. Mück,HAWK 2.0: A Monte Carlo program for Higgs production in vector-boson fusion and Higgs strahlung at hadron colliders, Comput. Phys. Commun.195(2015) 161, arXiv:1412.5390 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[74]

vh@nnlo - Higgs Strahlung at hadron colliders

O. Brein, R. V. Harlander and T. J. E. Zirke,vh@nnlo – Higgs Strahlung at hadron colliders, Comput. Phys. Commun.184(2013) 998, arXiv:1210.5347 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[75]

R. V. Harlander, A. Kulesza, V. Theeuwes and T. Zirke, Soft gluon resummation for gluon-induced Higgs Strahlung, JHEP11(2014) 082, arXiv:1410.0217 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[76]

R. V. Harlander, J. Klappert, S. Liebler and L. Simon, vh@nnlo-v2: new physics in Higgs Strahlung, JHEP05(2018) 089, arXiv:1802.04817 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2018
[77]

Resummation and Matching of $b$-quark Mass Effects in $b\bar{b}H$ Production

M. Bonvini, A. S. Papanastasiou and F. J. Tackmann, Resummation and matching of b-quark mass effects in𝑏𝑏𝐻production, JHEP11(2015) 196, arXiv:1508.03288 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[78]

Matched predictions for the $b\bar{b}H$ cross section at the 13 TeV LHC

M. Bonvini, A. S. Papanastasiou and F. J. Tackmann, Matched predictions for the𝑏¯𝑏𝐻cross section at the 13 TeV LHC, JHEP10(2016) 053, arXiv:1605.01733 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[79]

Higgs production in bottom-quark fusion in a matched scheme

S. Forte, D. Napoletano and M. Ubiali, Higgs production in bottom-quark fusion in a matched scheme, Phys. Lett. B751(2015) 331, arXiv:1508.01529 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[80]

Forte, D

S. Forte, D. Napoletano and M. Ubiali, Higgs production in bottom-quark fusion: matching beyond leading order, Phys. Lett. B763(2016) 190, arXiv:1607.00389 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2016

Showing first 80 references.

[1] [1]

ATLAS Collaboration,Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B716(2012) 1, arXiv:1207.7214 [hep-ex]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

[2] [2]

CMS Collaboration, Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B716(2012) 30, arXiv:1207.7235 [hep-ex]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

[3] [3]

Englert and R

F. Englert and R. Brout,Broken Symmetry and the Mass of Gauge Vector Mesons, Phys. Rev. Lett.13(1964) 321

work page 1964

[4] [4]

P. W. Higgs,Broken Symmetries and the Masses of Gauge Bosons, Phys. Rev. Lett.13(1964) 508

work page 1964

[5] [5]

Guralnik, C

G. Guralnik, C. Hagen and T. Kibble,Global Conservation Laws and Massless Particles, Phys. Rev. Lett.13(1964) 585

work page 1964

[6] [6]

ATLAS and CMS Collaborations,Combined Measurement of the Higgs Boson Mass in𝑝 𝑝 Collisions at√𝑠=7and8TeV with the ATLAS and CMS Experiments, Phys. Rev. Lett.114(2015) 191803, arXiv:1503.07589 [hep-ex]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

[7] [7]

ATLAS Collaboration,Fiducial and differential cross sections of Higgs boson production measured in the four-lepton decay channel in𝑝 𝑝collisions at√𝑠=8TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Lett. B738(2014) 234, arXiv:1408.3226 [hep-ex]. 41

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

[8] [8]

ATLAS Collaboration,Higgs boson production cross-section measurements and their EFT interpretation in the4ℓdecay channel at√𝑠=13TeV with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 957, arXiv:2004.03447 [hep-ex], Erratum: Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 29, Erratum: Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 398

work page arXiv 2020

[9] [9]

ATLAS Collaboration,Measurements of the Higgs boson inclusive and differential fiducial cross sections in the4ℓdecay channel at√𝑠=13TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 942, arXiv:2004.03969 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2020

[10] [10]

ATLAS Collaboration, Measurement of the total and differential Higgs boson production cross-sections at√𝑠=13TeV with the ATLAS detector by combining the𝐻→𝑍 𝑍∗ →4ℓand𝐻→𝛾𝛾decay channels, JHEP05(2023) 028, arXiv:2207.08615 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2023

[11] [11]

CMS Collaboration,Measurement of differential and integrated fiducial cross sections for Higgs boson production in the four-lepton decay channel in𝑝 𝑝collisions at√𝑠=7and8TeV, JHEP04(2016) 005, arXiv:1512.08377 [hep-ex]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

[12] [12]

CMS Collaboration,Measurements of inclusive and differential cross sections for the Higgs boson production and decay to four-leptons in proton–proton collisions at√𝑠=13TeV, JHEP08(2023) 040, arXiv:2305.07532 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2023

[13] [13]

CMS Collaboration,Measurements of production cross sections of the Higgs boson in the four-lepton final state in proton–proton collisions at√𝑠=13TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 488, arXiv:2103.04956 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2021

[14] [14]

ATLAS Collaboration,Measurement of the Higgs boson mass in the𝐻→𝑍 𝑍∗ →4ℓdecay channel using139fb −1 of √𝑠=13TeV𝑝 𝑝 collisions recorded by the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B843(2023) 137880, arXiv:2207.00320 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2023

[15] [15]

ATLAS Collaboration, Combined Measurement of the Higgs Boson Mass from the𝐻→𝛾𝛾 and 𝐻→𝑍 𝑍 ∗ →4ℓ Decay Channels with the ATLAS Detector Using√𝑠=7,8,and13TeV𝑝 𝑝Collision Data, Phys. Rev. Lett.131(2023) 251802, arXiv:2308.04775 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2023

[16] [16]

CMS Collaboration,Measurement of the Higgs boson mass and width using the four-lepton final state in proton–proton collisions at√𝑠=13TeV, Phys. Rev. D111(2024) 092014, arXiv:2409.13663 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2024

[17] [17]

ATLAS Collaboration,Test of CP-invariance of the Higgs boson in vector-boson fusion production and its decay into four leptons, JHEP05(2024) 105, arXiv:2304.09612 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2024

[18] [18]

CMS Collaboration,Constraints on anomalous Higgs boson couplings to vector bosons and fermions in its production and decay using the four-lepton final state, Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 052004, arXiv:2104.12152 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2021

[19] [19]

ATLAS Collaboration, Measurement of off-shell Higgs boson production in the𝐻∗ →𝑍 𝑍→4ℓdecay channel using a neural simulation-based inference technique in13TeV𝑝 𝑝collisions with the ATLAS detector, Rept. Prog. Phys.88(2025) 057803, arXiv:2412.01548 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2025

[20] [20]

ATLAS Collaboration,Measurement of the𝐻→𝛾𝛾and𝐻→𝑍 𝑍 ∗ →4ℓcross-sections in𝑝 𝑝 collisions at√𝑠=13.6TeV with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) 78, arXiv:2306.11379 [hep-ex]. 42

work page arXiv 2024

[21] [21]

CMS Collaboration,Measurements of Higgs boson production cross section in the four-lepton final state in proton–proton collisions at√𝑠=13.6TeV, JHEP05(2025) 079, arXiv:2501.14849 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2025

[22] [22]

LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group,Simplified template cross sections, url:http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/2138079

work page arXiv

[23] [23]

Berger et al.,Simplified Template Cross Sections - Stage 1.1 and 1.2, SciPost Phys

N. Berger et al.,Simplified Template Cross Sections - Stage 1.1 and 1.2, SciPost Phys. Comm. Rep. (2026) 15, arXiv:1906.02754 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2026

[24] [24]

Attention Is All You Need

A. Vaswani et al., ‘Attention Is All You Need’, 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2023, arXiv:1706.03762 [cs.CL]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

[25] [25]

ATLAS Collaboration,Transforming jet flavour tagging at ATLAS, Nature Commun.17(2026) 541, arXiv:2505.19689 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2026

[26] [26]

ATLAS Collaboration, Tools for estimating fake/non-prompt lepton backgrounds with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, JINST18(2023) T11004, arXiv:2211.16178 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2023

[27] [27]

ATLAS Collaboration,The ATLAS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider, JINST3(2008) S08003

work page 2008

[28] [28]

ATLAS Collaboration,The ATLAS experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider: a description of the detector configuration for Run 3, JINST19(2024) P05063, arXiv:2305.16623 [physics.ins-det]

work page arXiv 2024

[29] [29]

ATLAS Collaboration,The ATLAS trigger system for LHC Run 3 and trigger performance in 2022, JINST19(2024) P06029, arXiv:2401.06630 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2022

[30] [30]

ATLAS Collaboration,Software and computing for Run 3 of the ATLAS experiment at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 234, arXiv:2404.06335 [hep-ex], Erratum: Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 907

work page arXiv 2025

[31] [31]

ATLAS Collaboration,Preliminary luminosity calibration of the ATLAS13.6TeV data recorded in 2024 and combination with the 2022 and 2023 measurements, ATL-DAPR-PUB-2025-001, 2025, url:https://cds.cern.ch/record/2948582

work page arXiv 2024

[32] [32]

ATLAS Collaboration, Luminosity determination in𝑝 𝑝collisions at√𝑠=13TeV using the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 982, arXiv:2212.09379 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2023

[33] [33]

ATLAS Collaboration,Performance of the ATLAS muon triggers in Run 2, JINST15(2020) P09015, arXiv:2004.13447 [physics.ins-det]

work page arXiv 2020

[34] [34]

ATLAS Collaboration,Performance of electron and photon triggers in ATLAS during LHC Run 2, Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 47, arXiv:1909.00761 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2020

[35] [35]

A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX

S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari and E. Re,A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX, JHEP06(2010) 043, arXiv:1002.2581 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

[36] [36]

A New Method for Combining NLO QCD with Shower Monte Carlo Algorithms

P. Nason,A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms, JHEP11(2004) 040, arXiv:hep-ph/0409146. 43

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

[37] [37]

Matching NLO QCD computations with Parton Shower simulations: the POWHEG method

S. Frixione, P. Nason and C. Oleari, Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the POWHEG method, JHEP11(2007) 070, arXiv:0709.2092 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

[38] [38]

MINLO: Multi-scale improved NLO

K. Hamilton, P. Nason and G. Zanderighi,MINLO: multi-scale improved NLO, JHEP10(2012) 155, arXiv:1206.3572 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

[39] [39]

J. M. Campbell et al.,NLO Higgs boson production plus one and two jets using the POWHEG BOX, MadGraph4 and MCFM, JHEP07(2012) 092, arXiv:1202.5475 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

[40] [40]

Merging H/W/Z + 0 and 1 jet at NLO with no merging scale: a path to parton shower + NNLO matching

K. Hamilton, P. Nason, C. Oleari and G. Zanderighi,Merging H/W/Z + 0 and 1 jet at NLO with no merging scale: a path to parton shower + NNLO matching, JHEP05(2013) 082, arXiv:1212.4504 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

[41] [41]

NNLOPS simulation of Higgs boson production

K. Hamilton, P. Nason, E. Re and G. Zanderighi,NNLOPS simulation of Higgs boson production, JHEP10(2013) 222, arXiv:1309.0017 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

[42] [42]

Finite quark-mass effects in the NNLOPS POWHEG+MiNLO Higgs generator

K. Hamilton, P. Nason and G. Zanderighi, Finite quark-mass effects in the NNLOPS POWHEG+MiNLO Higgs generator, JHEP05(2015) 140, arXiv:1501.04637 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

[43] [43]

An NNLO subtraction formalism in hadron collisions and its application to Higgs boson production at the LHC

S. Catani and M. Grazzini,Next-to-Next-to-Leading-Order Subtraction Formalism in Hadron Collisions and its Application to Higgs-Boson Production at the Large Hadron Collider, Phys. Rev. Lett.98(2007) 222002, arXiv:hep-ph/0703012

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

[44] [44]

J. Alwall et al.,The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations, JHEP07(2014) 079, arXiv:1405.0301 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

[45] [45]

R. D. Ball et al.,The PDF4LHC21 combination of global PDF fits for the LHC Run III, J. Phys. G49(2022) 080501, arXiv:2203.05506 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2022

[46] [46]

ATLAS Collaboration,ATLAS Pythia 8 tunes to7TeV data, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2014-021, 2014, url:https://cds.cern.ch/record/1966419

work page arXiv 2014

[47] [47]

NNPDF Collaboration, R. D. Ball et al.,Parton distributions with LHC data, Nucl. Phys. B867(2013) 244, arXiv:1207.1303 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

[48] [48]

Herwig 7.1 Release Note

J. Bellm et al.,Herwig 7.1 Release Note, (2017), arXiv:1705.06919 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

[49] [49]

A comprehensive guide to the physics and usage of PYTHIA 8.3

C. Bierlich et al.,A comprehensive guide to the physics and usage of PYTHIA 8.3, SciPost Phys. Codebases (2022) 8, arXiv:2203.11601 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

[50] [50]

Merging meets matching in MC@NLO

R. Frederix and S. Frixione,Merging meets matching in MC@NLO, JHEP12(2012) 061, arXiv:1209.6215 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

[51] [51]

D. J. Lange,The EvtGen particle decay simulation package, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A462(2001) 152

work page 2001

[52] [52]

Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 4. Deciphering the Nature of the Higgs Sector

D. de Florian et al., Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 4. Deciphering the Nature of the Higgs Sector, (2017), arXiv:1610.07922 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

[53] [53]

Karlberg et al., Ad interim recommendations for the Higgs boson production cross sections at√𝑠=13.6TeV, 2024, arXiv:2402.09955 [hep-ph]

A. Karlberg et al., Ad interim recommendations for the Higgs boson production cross sections at√𝑠=13.6TeV, 2024, arXiv:2402.09955 [hep-ph]. 44

work page arXiv 2024

[54] [54]

Two-loop light fermion contribution to Higgs production and decays

U. Aglietti, R. Bonciani, G. Degrassi and A. Vicini, Two-loop light fermion contribution to Higgs production and decays, Phys. Lett. B595(2004) 432, arXiv:hep-ph/0404071

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

[55] [55]

NLO Electroweak Corrections to Higgs Boson Production at Hadron Colliders

S. Actis, G. Passarino, C. Sturm and S. Uccirati, NLO electroweak corrections to Higgs boson production at hadron colliders, Phys. Lett. B670(2008) 12, arXiv:0809.1301 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

[56] [56]

NNLO Computational Techniques: the Cases H -> gamma gamma and H -> g g

S. Actis, G. Passarino, C. Sturm and S. Uccirati, NNLO computational techniques: The cases𝐻→𝛾𝛾 and 𝐻→𝑔𝑔 , Nucl. Phys. B811(2009) 182, arXiv:0809.3667 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

[57] [57]

Mixed QCD-electroweak corrections to Higgs boson production in gluon fusion

C. Anastasiou, R. Boughezal and F. Petriello, Mixed QCD-electroweak corrections to Higgs boson production in gluon fusion, JHEP04(2009) 003, arXiv:0811.3458 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

[58] [58]

A. Pak, M. Rogal and M. Steinhauser, Finite top quark mass effects in NNLO Higgs boson production at LHC, JHEP02(2010) 025, arXiv:0911.4662 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

[59] [59]

R. V. Harlander and K. J. Ozeren, Top mass effects in Higgs production at next-to-next-to-leading order QCD: Virtual corrections, Phys. Lett. B679(2009) 467, arXiv:0907.2997 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

[60] [60]

R. V. Harlander and K. J. Ozeren, Finite top mass effects for hadronic Higgs production at next-to-next-to-leading order, JHEP11(2009) 088, arXiv:0909.3420 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

[61] [61]

R. V. Harlander, H. Mantler, S. Marzani and K. J. Ozeren, Higgs production in gluon fusion at next-to-next-to-leading order QCD for finite top mass, Eur. Phys. J. C66(2010) 359, arXiv:0912.2104 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

[62] [62]

Higgs boson gluon-fusion production in N3LO QCD

C. Anastasiou, C. Duhr, F. Dulat, F. Herzog and B. Mistlberger, Higgs Boson Gluon-Fusion Production in QCD at Three Loops, Phys. Rev. Lett.114(2015) 212001, arXiv:1503.06056 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

[63] [63]

High precision determination of the gluon fusion Higgs boson cross-section at the LHC

C. Anastasiou et al., High precision determination of the gluon fusion Higgs boson cross-section at the LHC, JHEP05(2016) 058, arXiv:1602.00695 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

[64] [64]

iHixs 2 - Inclusive Higgs Cross Sections

F. Dulat, A. Lazopoulos and B. Mistlberger,iHixs 2 – Inclusive Higgs cross sections, Comput. Phys. Commun.233(2018) 243, arXiv:1802.00827 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

[65] [65]

Higher order corrections to mixed QCD-EW contributions to Higgs production in gluon fusion

M. Bonetti, K. Melnikov and L. Tancredi,Higher order corrections to mixed QCD-EW contributions to Higgs boson production in gluon fusion, Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 056017, arXiv:1801.10403 [hep-ph], Erratum: Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 099906(E)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

[66] [66]

Strong and electroweak corrections to the production of Higgs+2jets via weak interactions at the LHC

M. Ciccolini, A. Denner and S. Dittmaier,Strong and Electroweak Corrections to the Production of a Higgs Boson + 2 Jets via Weak Interactions at the Large Hadron Collider, Phys. Rev. Lett.99(2007) 161803, arXiv:0707.0381 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

[67] [67]

Electroweak and QCD corrections to Higgs production via vector-boson fusion at the LHC

M. Ciccolini, A. Denner and S. Dittmaier, Electroweak and QCD corrections to Higgs production via vector-boson fusion at the CERN LHC, Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 013002, arXiv:0710.4749 [hep-ph]. 45

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

[68] [68]

Higgs production via vector-boson fusion at NNLO in QCD

P. Bolzoni, F. Maltoni, S.-O. Moch and M. Zaro, Higgs Boson Production via Vector-Boson Fusion at Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order in QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett.105(2010) 011801, arXiv:1003.4451 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

[69] [69]

M. L. Ciccolini, S. Dittmaier and M. Krämer, Electroweak radiative corrections to associated𝑊 𝐻and𝑍 𝐻production at hadron colliders, Phys. Rev. D68(2003) 073003, arXiv:hep-ph/0306234

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

[70] [70]

NNLO QCD corrections to the Higgs-strahlung processes at hadron colliders

O. Brein, A. Djouadi and R. Harlander, NNLO QCD corrections to the Higgs-strahlung processes at hadron colliders, Phys. Lett. B579(2004) 149, arXiv:hep-ph/0307206

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

[71] [71]

Top-Quark Mediated Effects in Hadronic Higgs-Strahlung

O. Brein, R. V. Harlander, M. Wiesemann and T. Zirke, Top-quark mediated effects in hadronic Higgs-Strahlung, Eur. Phys. J. C72(2012) 1868, arXiv:1111.0761 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

[72] [72]

Gluon-induced Higgs-strahlung at next-to-leading order QCD

L. Altenkamp, S. Dittmaier, R. V. Harlander, H. Rzehak and T. J. E. Zirke, Gluon-induced Higgs-strahlung at next-to-leading order QCD, JHEP02(2013) 078, arXiv:1211.5015 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

[73] [73]

HAWK 2.0: A Monte Carlo program for Higgs production in vector-boson fusion and Higgs strahlung at hadron colliders

A. Denner, S. Dittmaier, S. Kallweit and A. Mück,HAWK 2.0: A Monte Carlo program for Higgs production in vector-boson fusion and Higgs strahlung at hadron colliders, Comput. Phys. Commun.195(2015) 161, arXiv:1412.5390 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

[74] [74]

vh@nnlo - Higgs Strahlung at hadron colliders

O. Brein, R. V. Harlander and T. J. E. Zirke,vh@nnlo – Higgs Strahlung at hadron colliders, Comput. Phys. Commun.184(2013) 998, arXiv:1210.5347 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

[75] [75]

R. V. Harlander, A. Kulesza, V. Theeuwes and T. Zirke, Soft gluon resummation for gluon-induced Higgs Strahlung, JHEP11(2014) 082, arXiv:1410.0217 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

[76] [76]

R. V. Harlander, J. Klappert, S. Liebler and L. Simon, vh@nnlo-v2: new physics in Higgs Strahlung, JHEP05(2018) 089, arXiv:1802.04817 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2018

[77] [77]

Resummation and Matching of $b$-quark Mass Effects in $b\bar{b}H$ Production

M. Bonvini, A. S. Papanastasiou and F. J. Tackmann, Resummation and matching of b-quark mass effects in𝑏𝑏𝐻production, JHEP11(2015) 196, arXiv:1508.03288 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

[78] [78]

Matched predictions for the $b\bar{b}H$ cross section at the 13 TeV LHC

M. Bonvini, A. S. Papanastasiou and F. J. Tackmann, Matched predictions for the𝑏¯𝑏𝐻cross section at the 13 TeV LHC, JHEP10(2016) 053, arXiv:1605.01733 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

[79] [79]

Higgs production in bottom-quark fusion in a matched scheme

S. Forte, D. Napoletano and M. Ubiali, Higgs production in bottom-quark fusion in a matched scheme, Phys. Lett. B751(2015) 331, arXiv:1508.01529 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

[80] [80]

Forte, D

S. Forte, D. Napoletano and M. Ubiali, Higgs production in bottom-quark fusion: matching beyond leading order, Phys. Lett. B763(2016) 190, arXiv:1607.00389 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2016