REVIEW 6 cited by
Assessing the model waveform accuracy of gravitational waves
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
With the improvement in sensitivity of gravitational wave (GW) detectors and the increasing diversity of GW sources, there is a strong need for accurate GW waveform models for data analysis. While the current model accuracy assessments require waveforms generated by numerical relativity (NR) simulations as the "true waveforms", in this paper we propose an assessment approach that does not require NR simulations, which enables us to assess model accuracy everywhere in the parameter space. By measuring the difference between two waveform models, we derive a necessary condition for a pair of waveform models to both be accurate, for a particular set of parameters. We then apply this method to the parameter estimation samples of the Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalogs GWTC-3 and GWTC-2.1, and find that the waveform accuracy for high signal-to-noise ratio events in some cases fails our assessment criterion. Based on analysis of real events' posterior samples, we discuss the correlation between our quantified accuracy assessments and systematic errors in parameter estimation. We find waveform models that perform worse in our assessment are more likely to give inconsistent estimations. We also investigate waveform accuracy in different parameter regions, and find the accuracy degrades as the spin effects go up, the mass ratio deviates from one, or the orbital plane is near-aligned to the line of sight. Furthermore, we make predictions of waveform accuracy requirements for future detectors and find the accuracy of current waveform models should be improved by at least 3 orders of magnitude, which is consistent with previous works.
Forward citations
Cited by 6 Pith papers
-
High-Post-Newtonian-Order Dynamics Induced by Tail-of-Tail Interactions: The Non-Geodesic Terms
The authors compute tail-of-tail contributions to the effective-one-body Q potential through p_r^12 and derive new second-order self-force redshift predictions for eccentric binaries.
-
Post-adiabatic dynamics and waveform generation in self-force theory: an invariant pseudo-Hamiltonian framework
A pseudo-Hamiltonian reformulation of 1PA self-force dynamics yields local, invariant action-angle evolution equations and an embedded conservative Hamiltonian whose on-shell energy equals the first-law binding energy.
-
Hierarchical Subtraction with Neural Density Estimators as a General Solution to Overlapping Gravitational Wave Signals
The paper introduces an iterative, ensemble-based hierarchical subtraction scheme powered by neural density estimators that recovers overlapping gravitational wave signals accurately and fast.
-
Fast, accurate, and differentiable: a neural-network surrogate for NRSur7dq4 precessing binary black hole waveforms
A piecewise MLP surrogate emulates NRSur7dq4 over its full domain at NR-faithful accuracy with ~1 ms GPU latency and a fully differentiable JAX likelihood pipeline.
-
Inspiral tests of general relativity and waveform geometry
The power of ppE-style GR tests comes from waveform geometry: GR parameter biases absorb most of any smooth phase deviation, and SVD finds the few orthogonal directions that remain.
-
On the use and interpretation of signal-model indistinguishability measures for gravitational-wave astronomy
Using mismatch distances computed at best-fit parameters, per parameter, the paper predicts accurate bias SNRs for aligned-spin binary black hole measurements and derives waveform accuracy requirements for next-genera...
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.