Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 9 cited by

Post-adiabatic dynamics and waveform generation in self-force theory: an invariant pseudo-Hamiltonian framework

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that the complete first post-adiabatic (1PA) orbital dynamics of a self-forced binary can be written as a localized pseudo-Hamiltonian system on the six-dimensional phase space, with a conservative Hamiltonian embedded…

desk verdict Substantive 1PA pseudo-Hamiltonian formalism with a real gap: gauge-invariant actions rest on unsolved Eq. (278). read the letter →

arxiv 2507.08081 v1 pith:Q4AJ5H26 submitted 2025-07-10 gr-qc

Jack Lewis , Takafumi Kakehi , Adam Pound , Takahiro Tanaka This is my paper
classification gr-qc MSC 83C1083C2583C5770H0537J35
keywords self-forcetheorypost-adiabaticexpansionpseudo-Hamiltonianaction-anglevariablesgravitationalwaveformsextreme-mass-ratioinspiralsfirstlawofbinaryblackholemechanicsKerrholes
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the first post-adiabatic (1PA) gravitational-wave evolution of a compact binary can be written as a localized pseudo-Hamiltonian system on the six-dimensional phase space of the smaller body's orbit, rather than as a sequence of nonlocal-in-time force integrals. Within that dissipative system, the paper identifies an embedded ordinary Hamiltonian for the conservative sector, giving natural definitions of the conserved energy, angular momentum, and radial and polar actions. If this is right, 1PA waveform generation can be reformulated using gauge-invariant action-angle variables, avoiding direct calculation of the gauge-dependent self-force and streamlining the ingredients needed for extreme-mass-ratio inspiral templates. The paper also establishes that the on-shell value of that conservative Hamiltonian equals the binding energy historically obtained from the first law of binary black hole mechanics.

What carries the argument

The central object is a localized 6D pseudo-Hamiltonian obtained by reducing the 8D effective-metric Hamiltonian to the on-shell submanifold with $t$ as time, then applying a stationary-phase approximation to the retarded Green's-function integrals so that all nonlocal-in-time dependence collapses into a local two-point function on phase space. A split of the Green's function into symmetric ('conservative') and radiative ('dissipative') parts separates the dynamics, and a canonical generating function $W = W^{(0)} + \varepsilon W^{(1)}$ defines new momenta $p_i$ whose torus integrals $2\pi\tilde{J}_i = \oint p_j dx^j_p$ define the invariant actions. The machinery carries the argument by turning the gauge-dependent self-force problem into a Hamiltonian problem on invariant tori.

What would settle it

One could numerically search for a periodic solution $W^i_{(1)}$ of the overdetermined equation (278) on a generic inclined, eccentric Kerr torus using the actual 1PA pseudo-Hamiltonian; if no solution exists, the canonical momenta $p_i$ used in the torus-integral definition (261) do not exist and the paper's geometric interpretation of the actions fails. Equivalently, the integrability condition (270) can be tested directly from a mode expansion of the Green's function, and a single violation for any non-axisymmetric mode vector would falsify the claim that the averaging transformation is canonical.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the complete 1PA self-forced orbital dynamics admits a localized pseudo-Hamiltonian on the 6D phase space, with the equations of motion $d\tilde{\varphi}^i/dt = \partial H_{\mathrm{6D}}/\partial \tilde{J}_i$ and $d\tilde{J}_i/dt = \{\tilde{J}_i, H\}_\star$; the conservative part is governed by $H_{\mathrm{6D}} = \tilde{E} + \tfrac{\varepsilon}{2}\langle [H_{(1)}]\rangle$, while dissipation enters through the radiative (antisymmetric) part of the pseudo-Hamiltonian. The action variables $\tilde{J}_i$ are canonically conjugate to the angles in this Hamiltonian sector, are gauge invariant under spacetime diffeomorphisms, and reduce at fixed frequencies to the renormalized actions of Ref. [48]. The paper concludes that the on-shell Hamiltonian, $E(\Omega^i) = E^{(0)}(\Omega^i) + \tfrac{\mu}{2}(\langle z^{(1)}\rangle - \Omega^i \partial_{\Omega^i}\langle z^{(1)}\rangle)$, is exactly the first-law binding energy.

Load-bearing premise

Everything the paper says about conserved actions and their gauge invariance rests on the assumption that global momentum coordinates conjugate to the position coordinates exist on the six-dimensional phase space; the equation written for their first-order correction is overdetermined and is not solved or proved solvable.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • 1PA waveform models can be built from gauge-invariant actions and frequencies, sidestepping direct computation of the gauge-dependent regular self-force.
  • The first-law binding energy is identified as the on-shell value of the conservative 6D Hamiltonian, giving it a mechanical interpretation.
  • The action variables defined by torus integrals are invariant under spacetime diffeomorphisms, so waveform amplitudes expressed in these variables inherit that invariance.
  • The 1PA dissipative evolution is written as Poisson brackets of the actions with the radiative pseudo-Hamiltonian, setting up the machinery for 1PA flux-balance laws.
  • Two practical phase-space gauges, fixed constants of motion and fixed frequencies, are related by an explicit transformation, so the same waveform can be generated in either.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the first-law mechanical energy and the Bondi-mass energy are argued elsewhere to differ by a Schott term, the paper's identification sharpens why existing 1PA energy-balance models would need modification; this is an inference beyond the paper's own claims.
  • If the overdetermined equation (278) for the canonical momenta has no periodic solution, the torus-integral definition of the actions could still be useful as a gauge-invariant quantity defined through the first law, even though its canonical interpretation would fail.
  • The stationary-phase localization is expected to break at 2PA order when memory enters, so extending this framework would require a nonlocal pseudo-Hamiltonian or a separate memory sector.
  • The same formalism should transfer to scalar-charge or electromagnetic toy models in stationary integrable backgrounds, where the canonical-momentum existence question could be tested at low computational cost.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops a pseudo-Hamiltonian description of first post-adiabatic (1PA) self-forced orbital dynamics on the six-dimensional phase space of a small body around a Kerr black hole. The central construction localizes the nonlocal-in-time pseudo-Hamiltonian through averaging transformations and a stationary-phase approximation, yielding equations in action-angle-like variables: dφ^i/dt = ∂H6D/∂J_i and dJ_i/dt given by radiative terms. A conservative Hamiltonian H6D is embedded in the dissipative dynamics, and the paper claims its on-shell value equals the mechanical energy predicted by the first law of binary black hole mechanics. The paper also provides a gauge-invariance proof for the action variables and reformulates 1PA waveform generation in terms of these invariant actions, complementing the fixed-frequency formulation of Refs. [19,40]. The formal derivation is detailed and explicitly separates conserved and dissipative sectors, with technical material on the stationary-phase localization and on mass/spin evolution in appendices.

Significance. If fully established, the framework would be a significant advance for 1PA EMRI waveform modeling: it offers a gauge-invariant pathway to 1PA waveforms that does not require direct computation of the gauge-dependent self-force, and it clarifies the status of the first-law binding energy in the presence of dissipation. Strengths of the manuscript include a careful, internally consistent formal derivation from the self-consistent self-force formulation; explicit treatment of the second-order field equations and the primary black hole's evolution; a genuinely new stationary-phase localization of the pseudo-Hamiltonian to subleading order (Appendix C); and a derivation that contains no fitted parameters. The comparison with the first law is made after the construction of H6D, not injected as an input. The unresolved construction of canonical momenta, however, leaves load-bearing parts of the claimed canonical/geometric interpretation conditional.

major comments (3)
  1. [§V B 2, Eq. (278)] The construction of the canonical momenta pi is deferred: Eq. (278), which determines W^i_(1)=∂W^(1)/∂x^i_(0), is an overdetermined PDE whose solvability is neither proven nor checked. This is load-bearing because Eq. (261) expresses the action J_i as ∮ p_j dx^j and the gauge-invariance proof in §V C, Eq. (289), integrates p_j around C_i; both require the existence of globally defined, periodic canonical momenta on the torus. The paper itself notes in §V B 1 that the analogous transformation in the pseudo-Hamiltonian system fails an integrability condition, Eq. (270), so one cannot simply assume the inverse problem is solvable. Without either solving Eq. (278) or proving the existence of a periodic solution, the canonical action-angle interpretation of J_i and the claimed gauge invariance are not established.
  2. [§IV B, Eqs. (183)-(185)] The localization and the subsequent Fourier solutions for J_i^(1) and φ_i^(1) divide by frequency combinations ω_k and ω_k−ω'_k', respectively. These vanish on resonances and at mode degeneracies, so the derivation as presented applies only to non-resonant tori. Resonances are generic in Kerr eccentric/inclined inspirals and are important for 1PA waveform accuracy; the paper does not provide a resonant or critical-surface treatment. Footnote 10 acknowledges critical surfaces only in the context of the fixed-frequency expansion of §V D, not in the localization itself. This limits the generality of the central claim that the 1PA dynamics is localized in invariant action-angle variables.
  3. [§V D, Eqs. (293)-(297) and Footnote 10] The identification of the on-shell Hamiltonian with the first-law energy is derived through a fixed-frequency expansion that requires the Jacobian ∂Ω^i_(0)/∂J_j to be invertible. At isofrequency and other critical surfaces the map between actions and frequencies degenerates, so the first-law comparison is not defined there. The paper acknowledges this in Footnote 10, but the abstract and introduction state the first-law identification without this qualification. Since this identification is a headline byproduct, the statement should be qualified wherever it is advertised.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§IV D] The text below Eq. (226) contains a typo: 'symetric' should be 'symmetric'.
  2. [§III C and §V C] The symbol Pi is used both for orbital parameters (E,Lz,K) and for the new canonical momenta in §V C; even with the explicit caveat, this double use is confusing and should be disambiguated.
  3. [§I, Eq. (1)] The notation ε:=1 as a formal counting parameter is unusual; a brief clarification that ε is a bookkeeping parameter and not a physical smallness parameter would help readers outside the two-timescale literature.
  4. [§VIII] The conclusion says the paper 'unified the pseudo-Hamiltonian formalism of Ref. [48]', but Ref. [48] is a Hamiltonian, not pseudo-Hamiltonian, formulation; the wording should be adjusted to avoid mischaracterizing the prior work.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the first-law energy identification is derived from the pseudo-Hamiltonian, not fitted; the unsolved canonical-momentum equation (278) is an incompleteness, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is self-contained rather than circular. The conservative Hamiltonian H6D = ˚E + (1/2)ε⟨[H1]⟩ is constructed from the symmetric part of the regular Green's function, and the split into conservative and dissipative sectors, Eqs. (209)-(210), is derived from the pseudo-Hamiltonian equations after the gauge condition (205), not assumed. The first-law identification at Eq. (297) is made after the derivation: the frequency-expansion shift (295) is chosen to eliminate the first-order frequency correction, yielding E(Ω) = E0 + (μ/2)(⟨z1⟩ - Ω_i ∂⟨z1⟩/∂Ω_i), and the paper then notes that this matches the known first-law formula [80]. No fitted parameter is promoted to a prediction, and Eqs. (296)-(297) are not used as inputs to the derivation. Self-citations to [40,48-50] are either auxiliary consistency checks (e.g., Appendix E) or independent results from prior work (the multiscale expansion, flux-balance methods, and the earlier Hamiltonian construction), and the paper does not invoke a uniqueness theorem from its own authors to force a choice. The main caveat is that the canonical momenta p_i are not actually constructed: Sec. V.B.2 states, 'Actually solving that equation is beyond the scope of this paper', referring to Eq. (278), which underpins the torus-integral formula (261), the derivation of the canonical actions, and the gauge-invariance proof (289). That is an explicit incompleteness and a correctness risk, but it is not a circular reduction: the paper does not define the actions in terms of the conclusion they are used to establish, and the gauge-invariance argument is a standard action-integral identity conditional on the existence of p_i. I therefore find no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The paper introduces no fitted constants; ε is the physical mass ratio. The main burdens are background-integrability (standard), the multiscale ansatz plus stationary phase (stated, partially justified in Apps. B and C), and the unproved existence of canonical momenta. No new physical entities are posited; the only invented object is the mathematical canonical momentum.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Kerr (or stationary, axisymmetric, vacuum with integrable geodesic motion) background admits global action-angle coordinates.
    Used throughout Secs. II-IV; without integrability the 6D torus structure, frequencies Ω^(0)i and actions J_i do not exist.
  • domain assumption The Detweiler-Whiting singular/regular split and the second-order puncture scheme give the physical regular field h^R.
    Sec. II A 3; standard self-force input, assumed without proof, underpins H(1) and H(2).
  • ad hoc to paper The multiscale ansatz: metric and orbital motion are triperiodic in phases with slowly varying actions, and the stationary phase approximation localizes the nonlocal-in-time dynamics.
    Sec. II B.3 calls the multiscale expansion an internally consistent ansatz; Sec. IV B and App. C invoke the stationary phase approximation to eliminate time integrals.
  • domain assumption Trajectories avoid orbital resonances and critical surfaces, so ξ''_{k'} ≠ 0 and ∂Ω^(0)i/∂J_j is invertible.
    Needed for the 2D stationary phase (App. C) and for the fixed-frequency gauge (footnote 10); no treatment of these degenerate cases is given.
  • ad hoc to paper Global canonical momenta p_i satisfying Eq. (278) exist.
    Sec. V B leaves W^i_(1) unsolved, but the gauge-invariance proof of J_i and the torus integral (261) depend on these momenta.
invented entities (1)
  • Canonical momenta p_i = õp_i + ε δp_i
    purpose: Provide coordinates conjugate to x^i_p in the embedded conservative Hamiltonian H6D; used to prove gauge invariance of the action variables.
    Introduced in Sec. V B, never constructed; Eq. (278) is left unsolved, so their existence is a postulate, not a derived result.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Post-adiabatic dynamics and waveform generation in self-force theory: an invariant pseudo-Hamiltonian framework." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/Q4AJ5H26

@misc{pith2026250708081,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Post-adiabatic dynamics and waveform generation in self-force theory: an invariant pseudo-Hamiltonian framework},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/Q4AJ5H26}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.08081}
}
read the original abstract

Gravitational waveform modeling in self-force theory has reached a mature stage in recent years, with fast and accurate models emerging at both adiabatic (0PA) and first post-adiabatic (1PA) orders in a multiscale expansion. Here, we provide a gauge-invariant 1PA waveform-generation framework that involves no direct calculation of the (gauge-dependent) self-force. To achieve this, we recast the multiscale framework in a pseudo-Hamiltonian form, working on the six-dimensional phase space intrinsic to the multiscale expansion. We characterize the gauge freedom on phase space and show how a localization procedure avoids nonlocal-in time effects in the 1PA dynamics. We find a conservative Hamiltonian structure can be naturally embedded into the complete, dissipative 1PA pseudo-Hamiltonian dynamics, giving rise to natural definitions of the conserved energy, angular momentum, and radial and polar actions. As a byproduct, we clarify that the on-shell value of the conservative Hamiltonian is equal to the mechanical energy historically predicted by the first law of binary black hole mechanics.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 9 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Constants of motion and fundamental frequencies for elliptic orbits at fourth post-Newtonian order

    gr-qc 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 8.0 of 10

    Derives the 4PN conservative map between constants of motion and fundamental frequencies for eccentric orbits, resummed over eccentricity and validated against circular-orbit and self-force results.

  2. Quadrupolar tidal effects destroy the integrability of black hole geodesics: analytic proof and numerical evidence of chaos

    gr-qc 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    Leading-order tidally induced quadrupoles destroy Kerr geodesic integrability: no polynomial deformation of the Carter constant is conserved for generic Love couplings and Kerr spin.

  3. Quadrupole and quadratic-in-spin effects in quasicircular, spinning, asymmetric binaries

    gr-qc 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Calculates energy fluxes with quadratic-in-spin and quadrupole effects for small-mass-ratio spinning binaries in self-force theory, providing numerical data and sixth-order PN expansions.

  4. Symplectic mechanics of relativistic spinning compact bodies. III. quadratic-in-spin integrability in Type-D Einstein spacetimes: persistence and breakdown

    gr-qc 2026-01 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Quadratic-in-spin MPTD dynamics in type-D Einstein spacetimes with Killing–Yano symmetry admits five commuting first integrals—hence Liouville–Arnold integrability—only when the spin-induced quadrupole deformability p...

  5. The Bondi--Sachs gauge, BMS frames, and memory in black hole perturbation theory

    gr-qc 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Introduces a gauge transformation framework for BMS frames in multiscale black hole perturbation theory on Kerr that incorporates memory effects and avoids infrared divergences.

  6. Self-force calculations with numerical relativity methods

    gr-qc 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new numerical relativity-inspired method achieves exponential convergence for scalar self-force calculations in Kerr spacetime on circular equatorial orbits up to near-extremal spins and the ISCO.

  7. Secular evolution of orbital parameters for general bound orbits in Kerr spacetime

    gr-qc 2026-03 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Analytic formulas for the orbit-averaged gravitational-wave fluxes of energy, angular momentum, and Carter constant for generic bound Kerr orbits are extended to 6PN order and O(e^16) in eccentricity, with numerical T...

  8. Post-adiabatic self-force waveforms: slowly spinning primary and precessing secondary

    gr-qc 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Extended 1PA self-force waveforms for slowly spinning primary and precessing secondary, with re-summed 1PAT1R variant showing improved accuracy against NR for q ≳ 5 and |χ1| ≲ 0.1.

  9. Dynamics of Relativistic Binaries in Structured and Stochastic Environments: A Lagrange-Fourier-Hansen Framework

    gr-qc 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    A new framework projects perturbations onto resonant frequencies via Hansen coefficients to produce efficient coupled ODEs for orbital elements in GW-driven relativistic binaries, demonstrated on tidal fields and accr...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

152 extracted references · 10 canonical work pages · cited by 9 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    They are given explicitly by Eq

    0PA “fluxes” Dh ∂ ˚Hrad (1) /∂˚φi iE , which can be com- puted from solutions to the first-order Teukolsky equation. They are given explicitly by Eq. (3) of Ref. [49]

  2. [2]

    Methods of calculat- ing this for equatorial orbits are standard [124, 132], and results are reported for generic, inclined orbits in Ref

    The averaged redshift ⟨z(1)⟩. Methods of calculat- ing this for equatorial orbits are standard [124, 132], and results are reported for generic, inclined orbits in Ref. [134]

  3. [3]

    FC” to indicate the “fixed constants of motion

    Canonical actions in terms of canonical momenta With the momenta pi now (in principle) in hand, we expect that ˚Ji is related to pi by the torus integral (261). This is easily confirmed using the generating function and the trivial fact that the action variables can be written as ˚Ji = 1 2π I Ci ˚Jjd˚φj. (281) 28 We appeal to Eqs. (272) and (273), which i...

  4. [4]

    (184), (189), and (235)

    The linear transformations ˚φi (1) and ˚J (1) i , given by Eqs. (184), (189), and (235). These explicitly en- ter the 1PA dissipative terms through the Poisson bracket { ˚J (1) i , ˚H(1)} and the quantity K defined in Eq. (310). They also enter implicity through the field equations (86), since ˚T (2) µν involves terms of the form ˚J (1) i ∂ ˚Ji ˚T (1) µν ...

  5. [5]

    renormalized

    The 2SF dissipative term ∂˚φi ˚H(2) . In the 1PA evolution, this is the only term that requires solving the second-order field equation (86). We envision ultimately replacing it—or replacing the sum of all terms in Eq. (320)—with asymptotic fluxes, as at 0PA. This replacement can be pursued by extend- ing the methods from Refs. [49, 51]. 32 VIII. CONCLUSI...

  6. [6]

    LISA Consortium Waveform Working Group and Ni- ayesh Afshordi, Waveform Modelling for the Laser In- terferometer Space Antenna, (2023), 2311.01300

    arXiv 2023

  7. [7]

    Blanchet, Post-Newtonian Theory for Gravitational Waves, Living Rev

    L. Blanchet, Post-Newtonian Theory for Gravitational Waves, Living Rev. Rel. 17, 2 (2014), arXiv:1310.1528 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2014

  8. [8]

    T. W. Baumgarte and S. L. Shapiro, Numerical Rel- ativity: Solving Einstein ’s Equations on the Computer (Cambridge University Press, 2010)

    2010

Show all 152 references
  1. [9]

    Varma, S

    V. Varma, S. E. Field, M. A. Scheel, J. Blackman, D. Gerosa, L. C. Stein, L. E. Kidder, and H. P. Pfeiffer, Surrogate models for precessing binary black hole sim- ulations with unequal masses, Phys. Rev. Research. 1, 033015 (2019), arXiv:1905.09300 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  2. [10]

    J. E. Thompson, E. Hamilton, L. London, S. Ghosh, P. Kolitsidou, C. Hoy, and M. Hannam, PhenomXO4a: a phenomenological gravitational-wave model for pre- cessing black-hole binaries with higher multipoles and asymmetries, Phys. Rev. D 109, 063012 (2024), arXiv:2312.10025 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Nagar, A

    A. Nagar, A. Bonino, and P. Rettegno, Effective one- body multipolar waveform model for spin-aligned, qua- sicircular, eccentric, hyperbolic black hole binaries, Phys. Rev. D 103, 104021 (2021), arXiv:2101.08624 [gr- qc]

    2021 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Ramos-Buades, A

    A. Ramos-Buades, A. Buonanno, H. Estell´ es, M. Khalil, D. P. Mihaylov, S. Ossokine, L. Pompili, and M. Shiferaw, Next generation of accurate and ef- ficient multipolar precessing-spin effective-one-body waveforms for binary black holes, Phys. Rev. D 108, 124037 (2023), arXiv:...

    2023 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Dhani, S

    A. Dhani, S. V¨ olkel, A. Buonanno, H. Estelles, J. Gair, H. P. Pfeiffer, L. Pompili, and A. Toubiana, System- atic Biases in Estimating the Properties of Black Holes Due to Inaccurate Gravitational-Wave Models, (2024), arXiv:2404.05811 [gr-qc]

    2024

  6. [14]

    P¨ urrer and C.-J

    M. P¨ urrer and C.-J. Haster, Gravitational waveform ac- curacy requirements for future ground-based detectors, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 023151 (2020), arXiv:1912.10055 [gr- qc]

    2020 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Hu and J

    Q. Hu and J. Veitch, Assessing the model waveform ac- curacy of gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. D106, 044042 (2022), arXiv:2205.08448 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Hu and J

    Q. Hu and J. Veitch, Accumulating Errors in Tests of General Relativity with Gravitational Waves: Overlap- ping Signals and Inaccurate Waveforms, Astrophys. J. 945, 103 (2023), arXiv:2210.04769 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  9. [17]

    A. Jan, D. Ferguson, J. Lange, D. Shoemaker, and A. Zimmerman, Accuracy limitations of existing numer- ical relativity waveforms on the data analysis of current and future ground-based detectors, Phys. Rev. D 110, 024023 (2024), arXiv:2312.10241 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  10. [18]

    C. B. Owen, C.-J. Haster, S. Perkins, N. J. Cornish, and N. Yunes, Waveform accuracy and systematic un- certainties in current gravitational wave observations, Phys. Rev. D 108, 044018 (2023), arXiv:2301.11941 [gr- qc]

    2023 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Kapil, L

    V. Kapil, L. Reali, R. Cotesta, and E. Berti, Systematic bias from waveform modeling for binary black hole pop- ulations in next-generation gravitational wave detectors, Phys. Rev. D 109, 104043 (2024), arXiv:2404.00090 [gr- qc]

    2024 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Isoyama, R

    S. Isoyama, R. Fujita, A. J. K. Chua, H. Nakano, A. Pound, and N. Sago, Adiabatic Waveforms from Extreme-Mass-Ratio Inspirals: An Analytical Approach, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 231101 (2022), arXiv:2111.05288 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Dhesi, H

    M. Dhesi, H. R. R¨ uter, A. Pound, L. Barack, and H. P. Pfeiffer, Worldtube excision method for intermediate- mass-ratio inspirals: Scalar-field toy model, Phys. Rev. D 104, 124002 (2021), arXiv:2109.03531 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Colpi et al., LISA Definition Study Report, (2024), arXiv:2402.07571 [astro-ph.CO]

    M. Colpi et al., LISA Definition Study Report, (2024), arXiv:2402.07571 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Barack and A

    L. Barack and A. Pound, Self-force and radiation reac- tion in general relativity, Rept. Prog. Phys. 82, 016904 (2019), arXiv:1805.10385 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Pound and B

    A. Pound and B. Wardell, Black hole perturbation theory and gravitational self-force 10.1007/978-981-15- 4702-7 38-1 (2021), arXiv:2101.04592 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  17. [25]

    A. J. K. Chua, M. L. Katz, N. Warburton, and S. A. Hughes, Rapid generation of fully relativis- tic extreme-mass-ratio-inspiral waveform templates for LISA data analysis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 051102 (2021), arXiv:2008.06071 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  18. [26]

    M. L. Katz, A. J. K. Chua, L. Speri, N. Warbur- ton, and S. A. Hughes, Fast extreme-mass-ratio-inspiral waveforms: New tools for millihertz gravitational- wave data analysis, Phys. Rev. D 104, 064047 (2021), 40 arXiv:2104.04582 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Wardell, A

    B. Wardell, A. Pound, N. Warburton, J. Miller, L. Durkan, and A. Le Tiec, Gravitational Wave- forms for Compact Binaries from Second-Order Self- Force Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 241402 (2023), arXiv:2112.12265 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Speri, M

    L. Speri, M. L. Katz, A. J. K. Chua, S. A. Hughes, N. Warburton, J. E. Thompson, C. E. A. Chapman- Bird, and J. R. Gair, Fast and Fourier: Extreme Mass Ratio Inspiral Waveforms in the Frequency Domain 10.3389/fams.2023.1266739 (2023), arXiv:2307.12585 [gr-qc]

    2023

  21. [29]

    Burke, G

    O. Burke, G. A. Piovano, N. Warburton, P. Lynch, L. Speri, C. Kavanagh, B. Wardell, A. Pound, L. Durkan, and J. Miller, Assessing the importance of first postadiabatic terms for small-mass-ratio binaries, Phys. Rev. D 109, 124048 (2024), arXiv:2310.08927 [gr- qc]

    2024 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Nasipak, Adiabatic gravitational waveform model for compact objects undergoing quasicircular inspirals into rotating massive black holes, Phys

    Z. Nasipak, Adiabatic gravitational waveform model for compact objects undergoing quasicircular inspirals into rotating massive black holes, Phys. Rev. D 109, 044020 (2024), arXiv:2310.19706 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Khalvati, A

    H. Khalvati, A. Santini, F. Duque, L. Speri, J. Gair, H. Yang, and R. Brito, Impact of relativistic waveforms in LISA’s science objectives with extreme-mass-ratio in- spirals, (2024), arXiv:2410.17310 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  24. [32]

    N. E. M. Rifat, S. E. Field, G. Khanna, and V. Varma, Surrogate model for gravitational wave signals from comparable and large-mass-ratio black hole binaries, Phys. Rev. D 101, 081502 (2020), arXiv:1910.10473 [gr- qc]

    2020 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Islam, S

    T. Islam, S. E. Field, S. A. Hughes, G. Khanna, V. Varma, M. Giesler, M. A. Scheel, L. E. Kidder, and H. P. Pfeiffer, Surrogate model for gravitational wave signals from nonspinning, comparable-to large- mass-ratio black hole binaries built on black hole pertur- bation theory ...

    2022 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Buonanno and T

    A. Buonanno and T. Damour, Effective one-body ap- proach to general relativistic two-body dynamics, Phys. Rev. D 59, 084006 (1999), arXiv:gr-qc/9811091

    1999 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Damour and A

    T. Damour and A. Nagar, Faithful effective-one-body waveforms of small-mass-ratio coalescing black-hole bi- naries, Phys. Rev. D76, 064028 (2007), arXiv:0705.2519 [gr-qc]

    2007 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Taracchini, A

    A. Taracchini, A. Buonanno, G. Khanna, and S. A. Hughes, Small mass plunging into a Kerr black hole: Anatomy of the inspiral-merger-ringdown waveforms, Phys. Rev. D 90, 084025 (2014), arXiv:1404.1819 [gr- qc]

    2014 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Damour, Gravitational Self Force in a Schwarzschild Background and the Effective One Body Formalism, Phys

    T. Damour, Gravitational Self Force in a Schwarzschild Background and the Effective One Body Formalism, Phys. Rev. D 81, 024017 (2010), arXiv:0910.5533 [gr- qc]

    2010 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Akcay, L

    S. Akcay, L. Barack, T. Damour, and N. Sago, Gravi- tational self-force and the effective-one-body formalism between the innermost stable circular orbit and the light ring, Phys. Rev. D 86, 104041 (2012), arXiv:1209.0964 [gr-qc]

    2012 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Antonelli, M

    A. Antonelli, M. van de Meent, A. Buonanno, J. Stein- hoff, and J. Vines, Quasicircular inspirals and plunges from nonspinning effective-one-body Hamiltonians with gravitational self-force information, Phys. Rev. D 101, 024024 (2020), arXiv:1907.11597 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  32. [40]

    van de Meent, A

    M. van de Meent, A. Buonanno, D. P. Mihaylov, S. Ossokine, L. Pompili, N. Warburton, A. Pound, B. Wardell, L. Durkan, and J. Miller, Enhancing the SEOBNRv5 effective-one-body waveform model with second-order gravitational self-force fluxes, Phys. Rev. D 108, 124038 (2023), arX...

    2023 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Nagar and S

    A. Nagar and S. Albanesi, Toward a gravitational self-force-informed effective-one-body waveform model for nonprecessing, eccentric, large-mass-ratio inspirals, Phys. Rev. D 106, 064049 (2022), arXiv:2207.14002 [gr- qc]

    2022 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Hinderer and E

    T. Hinderer and E. E. Flanagan, Two timescale analysis of extreme mass ratio inspirals in Kerr. I. Orbital Mo- tion, Phys. Rev. D 78, 064028 (2008), arXiv:0805.3337 [gr-qc]

    2008 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Miller and A

    J. Miller and A. Pound, Two-timescale evolution of extreme-mass-ratio inspirals: waveform genera- tion scheme for quasicircular orbits in Schwarzschild spacetime, Phys. Rev. D 103, 064048 (2021), arXiv:2006.11263 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Miller, B

    J. Miller, B. Leather, A. Pound, and N. Warburton, Worldtube puncture scheme for first- and second-order self-force calculations in the Fourier domain, Phys. Rev. D 109, 104010 (2024), arXiv:2401.00455 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Mathews and A

    J. Mathews and A. Pound, Post-adiabatic waveform- generation framework for asymmetric precessing bina- ries, (2025), arXiv:2501.01413 [gr-qc]

    2025

  38. [46]

    Wei, J.-d

    Y.-X. Wei, J.-d. Zhang, and J. Mei, Second-Order Self- Force for Eccentric Extreme-Mass Ratio Inspirals on Schwarzschild Spacetime, (2025), arXiv:2504.09640 [gr- qc]

    2025

  39. [47]

    Skoupy, G

    V. Skoupy, G. Lukes-Gerakopoulos, L. V. Drummond, and S. A. Hughes, Asymptotic gravitational-wave fluxes from a spinning test body on generic orbits around a Kerr black hole, Phys. Rev. D 108, 044041 (2023), arXiv:2303.16798 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  40. [48]

    L. V. Drummond, P. Lynch, A. G. Hanselman, D. R. Becker, and S. A. Hughes, Extreme mass-ratio inspi- ral and waveforms for a spinning body into a Kerr black hole via osculating geodesics and near-identity transformations, Phys. Rev. D 109, 064030 (2024), arXiv:2310.08438 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  41. [49]

    G. A. Piovano, C. Pantelidou, J. Mac Uilliam, and V. Witzany, Spinning particles near Kerr black holes: Orbits and gravitational-wave fluxes through the Hamilton-Jacobi formalism, (2024), arXiv:2410.05769 [gr-qc]

    2024

  42. [50]

    Fujita and M

    R. Fujita and M. Shibata, Extreme mass ratio inspirals on the equatorial plane in the adiabatic order, Phys. Rev. D 102, 064005 (2020), arXiv:2008.13554 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  43. [51]

    S. A. Hughes, N. Warburton, G. Khanna, A. J. K. Chua, and M. L. Katz, Adiabatic waveforms for extreme mass- ratio inspirals via multivoice decomposition in time and frequency, Phys. Rev. D 103, 104014 (2021), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 107, 089901 (2023)], arXiv:2102.02713 [gr- qc]

    2021 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Mathews, A

    J. Mathews, A. Pound, B. Warburton, and B. Wardell, Post-adiabatic self-force waveforms: slowly spinning pri- mary and precessing secondary (in preparation)

  45. [53]

    Fujita, S

    R. Fujita, S. Isoyama, A. Le Tiec, H. Nakano, N. Sago, and T. Tanaka, Hamiltonian Formulation of the Conser- vative Self-Force Dynamics in the Kerr Geometry, Class. Quant. Grav. 34, 134001 (2017), arXiv:1612.02504 [gr- 41 qc]

    2017 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Flux-balance formulae

    S. Isoyama, R. Fujita, H. Nakano, N. Sago, and T. Tanaka, “Flux-balance formulae” for extreme mass-ratio inspirals, PTEP 2019, 013E01 (2019), arXiv:1809.11118 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  47. [55]

    F. M. Blanco and E. E. Flanagan, Particle Motion under the Conservative Piece of the Self-Force is Hamiltonian, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 051201 (2023), arXiv:2205.01667 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  48. [56]

    A. M. Grant, Flux-balance laws for spinning bod- ies under the gravitational self-force, (2024), arXiv:2406.10343 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Mino, Perturbative approach to an orbital evolution around a supermassive black hole, Phys

    Y. Mino, Perturbative approach to an orbital evolution around a supermassive black hole, Phys. Rev. D 67, 084027 (2003), arXiv:gr-qc/0302075

    2003 arXiv

  50. [58]

    N. Sago, T. Tanaka, W. Hikida, K. Ganz, and H. Nakano, The Adiabatic evolution of orbital parame- ters in the Kerr spacetime, Prog. Theor. Phys. 115, 873 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0511151

    2006 arXiv

  51. [59]

    D. V. Gal’tsov, Radiation reaction in the Kerr gravita- tional field, J. Phys. A 15, 3737 (1982)

    1982

  52. [60]

    Akcay, S

    S. Akcay, S. R. Dolan, C. Kavanagh, J. Moxon, N. War- burton, and B. Wardell, Dissipation in extreme-mass ratio binaries with a spinning secondary, Phys. Rev. D 102, 064013 (2020), arXiv:1912.09461 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Merlin, A

    C. Merlin, A. Ori, L. Barack, A. Pound, and M. van de Meent, Completion of metric reconstruction for a parti- cle orbiting a Kerr black hole, Phys. Rev. D 94, 104066 (2016), arXiv:1609.01227 [gr-qc]

    2016 arXiv

  54. [62]

    van de Meent, Gravitational self-force on generic bound geodesics in Kerr spacetime, Phys

    M. van de Meent, Gravitational self-force on generic bound geodesics in Kerr spacetime, Phys. Rev. D 97, 104033 (2018), arXiv:1711.09607 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Toomani, P

    V. Toomani, P. Zimmerman, A. Spiers, S. Hollands, A. Pound, and S. R. Green, New metric reconstruction scheme for gravitational self-force calculations, Class. Quant. Grav. 39, 015019 (2022), arXiv:2108.04273 [gr- qc]

    2022 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Wardell, C

    B. Wardell, C. Kavanagh, and S. R. Dolan, Sourced met- ric perturbations of Kerr spacetime in Lorenz gauge, (2024), arXiv:2406.12510 [gr-qc]

    2024

  57. [65]

    Barack, Gravitational self force in extreme mass- ratio inspirals, Class

    L. Barack, Gravitational self force in extreme mass- ratio inspirals, Class. Quant. Grav. 26, 213001 (2009), arXiv:0908.1664 [gr-qc]

    2009 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Spiers, A

    A. Spiers, A. Pound, and J. Moxon, Second-order Teukolsky formalism in Kerr spacetime: Formulation and nonlinear source, Phys. Rev. D 108, 064002 (2023), arXiv:2305.19332 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Van De Meent and N

    M. Van De Meent and N. Warburton, Fast Self- forced Inspirals, Class. Quant. Grav. 35, 144003 (2018), arXiv:1802.05281 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Lynch, M

    P. Lynch, M. van de Meent, and N. Warburton, Eccen- tric self-forced inspirals into a rotating black hole, Class. Quant. Grav. 39, 145004 (2022), arXiv:2112.05651 [gr- qc]

    2022 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Lynch, M

    P. Lynch, M. van de Meent, and N. Warburton, Self- forced inspirals with spin-orbit precession, Phys. Rev. D 109, 084072 (2024), arXiv:2305.10533 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Poisson, A

    E. Poisson, A. Pound, and I. Vega, The Motion of point particles in curved spacetime, Living Rev. Rel. 14, 7 (2011), arXiv:1102.0529 [gr-qc]

    2011 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Damour, P

    T. Damour, P. Jaranowski, and G. Sch¨ afer, Nonlocal-in- time action for the fourth post-Newtonian conservative dynamics of two-body systems, Phys. Rev. D89, 064058 (2014), arXiv:1401.4548 [gr-qc]

    2014 arXiv

  64. [72]

    C. R. Galley, A. K. Leibovich, R. A. Porto, and A. Ross, Tail effect in gravitational radiation reaction: Time nonlocality and renormalization group evolution, Phys. Rev. D 93, 124010 (2016), arXiv:1511.07379 [gr-qc]

    2016 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Damour, P

    T. Damour, P. Jaranowski, and G. Sch¨ afer, Conserva- tive dynamics of two-body systems at the fourth post- Newtonian approximation of general relativity, Phys. Rev. D 93, 084014 (2016), arXiv:1601.01283 [gr-qc]

    2016 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Bernard, L

    L. Bernard, L. Blanchet, A. Boh´ e, G. Faye, and S. Marsat, Energy and periastron advance of com- pact binaries on circular orbits at the fourth post- Newtonian order, Phys. Rev. D 95, 044026 (2017), arXiv:1610.07934 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Bernard, L

    L. Bernard, L. Blanchet, G. Faye, and T. Marchand, Center-of-Mass Equations of Motion and Conserved In- tegrals of Compact Binary Systems at the Fourth Post- Newtonian Order, Phys. Rev. D 97, 044037 (2018), arXiv:1711.00283 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Blanchet and A

    L. Blanchet and A. Le Tiec, First Law of Compact Bi- nary Mechanics with Gravitational-Wave Tails, Class. Quant. Grav. 34, 164001 (2017), arXiv:1702.06839 [gr- qc]

    2017 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Le Tiec, L

    A. Le Tiec, L. Blanchet, and B. F. Whiting, The First Law of Binary Black Hole Mechanics in General Rel- ativity and Post-Newtonian Theory, Phys. Rev. D 85, 064039 (2012), arXiv:1111.5378 [gr-qc]

    2012 arXiv

  70. [78]

    S. E. Gralla and A. Le Tiec, Thermodynamics of a Black Hole with Moon, Phys. Rev. D 88, 044021 (2013), arXiv:1210.8444 [gr-qc]

    2013 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Blanchet, A

    L. Blanchet, A. Buonanno, and A. Le Tiec, First law of mechanics for black hole binaries with spins, Phys. Rev. D 87, 024030 (2013), arXiv:1211.1060 [gr-qc]

    2013 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Le Tiec, A Note on Celestial Mechanics in Kerr Spacetime, Class

    A. Le Tiec, A Note on Celestial Mechanics in Kerr Spacetime, Class. Quant. Grav. 31, 097001 (2014), arXiv:1311.3836 [gr-qc]

    2014 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Le Tiec, First Law of Mechanics for Compact Bi- naries on Eccentric Orbits, Phys

    A. Le Tiec, First Law of Mechanics for Compact Bi- naries on Eccentric Orbits, Phys. Rev. D 92, 084021 (2015), arXiv:1506.05648 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Ramond and A

    P. Ramond and A. Le Tiec, First law of mechanics for spinning compact binaries: Dipolar order, Phys. Rev. D 106, 044057 (2022), arXiv:2202.09345 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Gonzo, J

    R. Gonzo, J. Lewis, and A. Pound, The first law of binary black hole scattering, (2024), arXiv:2409.03437 [gr-qc]

    2024

  76. [84]

    Le Tiec, E

    A. Le Tiec, E. Barausse, and A. Buonanno, Gravita- tional Self-Force Correction to the Binding Energy of Compact Binary Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 131103 (2012), arXiv:1111.5609 [gr-qc]

    2012 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Isoyama, L

    S. Isoyama, L. Barack, S. R. Dolan, A. Le Tiec, H. Nakano, A. G. Shah, T. Tanaka, and N. Warburton, Gravitational Self-Force Correction to the Innermost Stable Circular Equatorial Orbit of a Kerr Black Hole, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 161101 (2014), arXiv:1404.6133 [gr-qc]

    2014 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Bini and T

    D. Bini and T. Damour, Analytical determination of the two-body gravitational interaction potential at the fourth post-Newtonian approximation, Phys. Rev. D 87, 121501 (2013), arXiv:1305.4884 [gr-qc]

    2013 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Damour, A

    T. Damour, A. Nagar, and S. Bernuzzi, Improved effective-one-body description of coalescing nonspinning black-hole binaries and its numerical-relativity comple- tion, Phys. Rev. D 87, 084035 (2013), arXiv:1212.4357 [gr-qc]

    2013 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Albertini, A

    A. Albertini, A. Nagar, A. Pound, N. Warburton, 42 B. Wardell, L. Durkan, and J. Miller, Comparing second-order gravitational self-force, numerical rela- tivity, and effective one body waveforms from inspi- ralling, quasicircular, and nonspinning black hole bina- ries, Phys. R...

    2022 arXiv

  81. [89]

    Pound, B

    A. Pound, B. Wardell, N. Warburton, and J. Miller, Second-Order Self-Force Calculation of Gravitational Binding Energy in Compact Binaries, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 021101 (2020), arXiv:1908.07419 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  82. [90]

    M¨ adler and J

    T. M¨ adler and J. Winicour, Bondi-Sachs Formalism, Scholarpedia 11, 33528 (2016), arXiv:1609.01731 [gr- qc]

    2016 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Trestini, The Schott term in the binding energy for compact binaries on circular orbits at fourth post- Newtonian order, (2025), arXiv:2504.13245 [gr-qc]

    D. Trestini, The Schott term in the binding energy for compact binaries on circular orbits at fourth post- Newtonian order, (2025), arXiv:2504.13245 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  84. [92]

    A. M. Grant, A. L. Tiec, and A. Pound, Energy bal- ance and the first law of binary black hole mechanics, in preparation

  85. [93]

    Pound, Self-consistent gravitational self-force, Phys

    A. Pound, Self-consistent gravitational self-force, Phys. Rev. D 81, 024023 (2010), arXiv:0907.5197 [gr-qc]

    2010 arXiv

  86. [94]

    Pound, Motion of small objects in curved spacetimes: An introduction to gravitational self-force, Fund

    A. Pound, Motion of small objects in curved spacetimes: An introduction to gravitational self-force, Fund. Theor. Phys. 179, 399 (2015), arXiv:1506.06245 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  87. [95]

    S. D. Upton and A. Pound, Second-order gravitational self-force in a highly regular gauge, Phys. Rev. D 103, 124016 (2021), arXiv:2101.11409 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  88. [96]

    S. L. Detweiler and B. F. Whiting, Selfforce via a Green’s function decomposition, Phys. Rev. D 67, 024025 (2003), arXiv:gr-qc/0202086

    2003 arXiv

  89. [97]

    Pound, Second-order gravitational self-force, Phys

    A. Pound, Second-order gravitational self-force, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 051101 (2012), arXiv:1201.5089 [gr-qc]

    2012 arXiv

  90. [98]

    A. I. Harte, Mechanics of extended masses in gen- eral relativity, Class. Quant. Grav. 29, 055012 (2012), arXiv:1103.0543 [gr-qc]

    2012 arXiv

  91. [99]

    Pound, Nonlinear gravitational self-force: second- order equation of motion, Phys

    A. Pound, Nonlinear gravitational self-force: second- order equation of motion, Phys. Rev. D 95, 104056 (2017), arXiv:1703.02836 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  92. [100]

    Pound, Nonlinear gravitational self-force

    A. Pound, Nonlinear gravitational self-force. I. Field outside a small body, Phys. Rev. D 86, 084019 (2012), arXiv:1206.6538 [gr-qc]

    2012 arXiv

  93. [101]

    Detweiler, Gravitational radiation reaction and sec- ond order perturbation theory, Phys

    S. Detweiler, Gravitational radiation reaction and sec- ond order perturbation theory, Phys. Rev. D85, 044048 (2012), arXiv:1107.2098 [gr-qc]

    2012 arXiv

  94. [102]

    A. C. d Silva, Lectures on Symplectic Geometry (Springer, 2008)

    2008

  95. [103]

    Ashtekar and B

    A. Ashtekar and B. Krishnan, Isolated and dynamical horizons and their applications, Living Rev. Rel. 7, 10 (2004), arXiv:gr-qc/0407042

    2004 arXiv

  96. [104]

    Ashtekar, N

    A. Ashtekar, N. Khera, M. Kolanowski, and J. Lewandowski, Charges and fluxes on (per- turbed) non-expanding horizons, JHEP 02, 066, arXiv:2112.05608 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  97. [105]

    R. H. Price and K. S. Thorne, Membrane Viewpoint on Black Holes: Properties and Evolution of the Stretched Horizon, Phys. Rev. D 33, 915 (1986)

    1986

  98. [106]

    Pound and J

    A. Pound and J. Miller, Practical, covariant puncture for second-order self-force calculations, Phys. Rev. D89, 104020 (2014), arXiv:1403.1843 [gr-qc]

    2014 arXiv

  99. [107]

    S. E. Gralla, Second Order Gravitational Self Force, Phys. Rev. D 85, 124011 (2012), arXiv:1203.3189 [gr- qc]

    2012 arXiv

  100. [108]

    Warburton, A

    N. Warburton, A. Pound, B. Wardell, J. Miller, and L. Durkan, Gravitational-Wave Energy Flux for Com- pact Binaries through Second Order in the Mass Ratio, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 151102 (2021), arXiv:2107.01298 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  101. [109]

    R. M. Wald, General Relativity (Chicago Univ. Pr., Chicago, USA, 1984)

    1984

  102. [110]

    Harmark, Stationary and axisymmetric solutions of higher-dimensional general relativity, Phys

    T. Harmark, Stationary and axisymmetric solutions of higher-dimensional general relativity, Phys. Rev. D 70, 124002 (2004), arXiv:hep-th/0408141

    2004 arXiv

  103. [111]

    Pound, C

    A. Pound, C. Merlin, and L. Barack, Gravitational self- force from radiation-gauge metric perturbations, Phys. Rev. D 89, 024009 (2014), arXiv:1310.1513 [gr-qc]

    2014 arXiv

  104. [112]

    A. G. Shah and A. Pound, Linear-in-mass-ratio contribution to spin precession and tidal invari- ants in Schwarzschild spacetime at very high post- Newtonian order, Phys. Rev. D 91, 124022 (2015), arXiv:1503.02414 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  105. [113]

    Pound, Gauge and motion in perturbation theory, Phys

    A. Pound, Gauge and motion in perturbation theory, Phys. Rev. D 92, 044021 (2015), arXiv:1506.02894 [gr- qc]

    2015 arXiv

  106. [114]

    J. E. Thompson, B. Wardell, and B. F. Whiting, Gravi- tational Self-Force Regularization in the Regge-Wheeler and Easy Gauges, Phys. Rev. D 99, 124046 (2019), arXiv:1811.04432 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  107. [115]

    Casals, S

    M. Casals, S. Hollands, A. Pound, and V. Toomani, Spin-2 Green’s functions on Kerr in radiation gauge, Class. Quant. Grav. 41, 215010 (2024), arXiv:2402.15468 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  108. [116]

    T. S. Keidl, A. G. Shah, J. L. Friedman, D.-H. Kim, and L. R. Price, Gravitational Self-force in a Radia- tion Gauge, Phys. Rev. D 82, 124012 (2010), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 90, 109902 (2014)], arXiv:1004.2276 [gr-qc]

    2010 arXiv

  109. [117]

    A. G. Shah, J. L. Friedman, and T. S. Keidl, EMRI corrections to the angular velocity and redshift factor of a mass in circular orbit about a Kerr black hole, Phys. Rev. D 86, 084059 (2012), arXiv:1207.5595 [gr-qc]

    2012 arXiv

  110. [118]

    Diener, I

    P. Diener, I. Vega, B. Wardell, and S. Detweiler, Self-consistent orbital evolution of a particle around a Schwarzschild black hole, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 191102 (2012), arXiv:1112.4821 [gr-qc]

    2012 arXiv

  111. [119]

    N. A. Wittek, A. Pound, H. P. Pfeiffer, and L. Barack, Worldtube excision method for intermediate-mass- ratio inspirals: Self-consistent evolution in a scalar- charge model, Phys. Rev. D 110, 084023 (2024), arXiv:2403.08864 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  112. [120]

    N. A. Wittek, L. Barack, H. P. Pfeiffer, A. Pound, N. Deppe, L. E. Kidder, A. Macedo, K. C. Nelli, W. Throwe, and N. L. Vu, Relieving scale disparity in binary black hole simulations, (2024), arXiv:2410.22290 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  113. [121]

    Cunningham, C

    K. Cunningham, C. Kavanagh, A. Pound, D. Tres- tini, N. Warburton, and J. Neef, Gravitational mem- ory: new results from post-Newtonian and self-force theory, Classical and Quantum Gravity (in press), arXiv:2410.23950 [gr-qc]

  114. [122]

    Pound and E

    A. Pound and E. Poisson, Osculating orbits in Schwarzschild spacetime, with an application to ex- treme mass-ratio inspirals, Phys. Rev. D 77, 044013 (2008), arXiv:0708.3033 [gr-qc]

    2008 arXiv

  115. [123]

    Warburton, L

    N. Warburton, L. Barack, and N. Sago, Isofrequency pairing of geodesic orbits in Kerr geometry, Phys. Rev. D 87, 084012 (2013), arXiv:1301.3918 [gr-qc]

    2013 arXiv

  116. [124]

    J. R. Gair, E. E. Flanagan, S. Drasco, T. Hinderer, and S. Babak, Forced motion near black holes, Phys. Rev. D 83, 044037 (2011), arXiv:1012.5111 [gr-qc]. 43

    2011 arXiv

  117. [125]

    F. M. Blanco, Local Hamiltonian dynamics from nonlo- cal action principles and applications to binary systems in general relativity, Phys. Rev. D 110, 024061 (2024), arXiv:2406.00106 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  118. [126]

    Kakehi and T

    T. Kakehi and T. Tanaka, Extending the Hamiltonian formulation of particle motion in perturbed Kerr space- time to various time parametrizations, Phys. Rev. D 110, 124031 (2024), arXiv:2410.22858 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  119. [127]

    Schmidt, Celestial mechanics in Kerr space- time, Class

    W. Schmidt, Celestial mechanics in Kerr space- time, Class. Quant. Grav. 19, 2743 (2002), arXiv:gr- qc/0202090

    2002

  120. [128]

    Witzany, V

    V. Witzany, V. Skoup´ y, L. C. Stein, and S. Tanay, Ac- tions of spinning compact binaries: Spinning particle in Kerr matched to dynamics at 1.5 post-Newtonian order, Phys. Rev. D 111, 044032 (2025), arXiv:2411.09742 [gr- qc]

    2025 arXiv

  121. [129]

    Barack and N

    L. Barack and N. Sago, Beyond the geodesic approxima- tion: conservative effects of the gravitational self-force in eccentric orbits around a Schwarzschild black hole, Phys. Rev. D 83, 084023 (2011), arXiv:1101.3331 [gr- qc]

    2011 arXiv

  122. [130]

    Barack and O

    L. Barack and O. Long, Self-force correction to the deflection angle in black-hole scattering: A scalar charge toy model, Phys. Rev. D 106, 104031 (2022), arXiv:2209.03740 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  123. [131]

    L. V. Drummond and S. A. Hughes, Precisely comput- ing bound orbits of spinning bodies around black holes. II. Generic orbits, Phys. Rev. D 105, 124041 (2022), arXiv:2201.13335 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  124. [132]

    Drasco and S

    S. Drasco and S. A. Hughes, Rotating black hole orbit functionals in the frequency domain, Phys. Rev. D 69, 044015 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0308479

    2004 arXiv

  125. [133]

    Fujita and W

    R. Fujita and W. Hikida, Analytical solutions of bound timelike geodesic orbits in Kerr spacetime, Class. Quant. Grav. 26, 135002 (2009), arXiv:0906.1420 [gr-qc]

    2009 arXiv

  126. [134]

    Lynch and O

    P. Lynch and O. Burke, A note on the conversion of orbital angles for extreme mass ratio inspirals, (2024), arXiv:2411.04955 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  127. [135]

    Wong, Asymptotic Approximations of Integrals (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 2001) https://epubs.siam.org/doi/pdf/10.1137/1.9780898719260

    R. Wong, Asymptotic Approximations of Integrals (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 2001) https://epubs.siam.org/doi/pdf/10.1137/1.9780898719260

    2001 doi

  128. [136]

    S. L. Detweiler, A Consequence of the gravitational self- force for circular orbits of the Schwarzschild geometry, Phys. Rev. D 77, 124026 (2008), arXiv:0804.3529 [gr- qc]

    2008 arXiv

  129. [137]

    Akcay, A

    S. Akcay, A. Le Tiec, L. Barack, N. Sago, and N. Warburton, Comparison Between Self-Force and Post-Newtonian Dynamics: Beyond Circular Orbits, Phys. Rev. D 91, 124014 (2015), arXiv:1503.01374 [gr- qc]

    2015 arXiv

  130. [138]

    Nakahara, Geometry, Topology and Physics, 2nd ed

    M. Nakahara, Geometry, Topology and Physics, 2nd ed. (CRC Press, 2003)

    2003

  131. [139]

    Nasipak, Metric reconstruction and the Hamiltonian for eccentric, precessing binaries in the small-mass-ratio limit, in preparation

    Z. Nasipak, Metric reconstruction and the Hamiltonian for eccentric, precessing binaries in the small-mass-ratio limit, in preparation

  132. [140]

    Akcay, N

    S. Akcay, N. Warburton, and L. Barack, Frequency- domain algorithm for the Lorenz-gauge gravita- tional self-force, Phys. Rev. D 88, 104009 (2013), arXiv:1308.5223 [gr-qc]

    2013 arXiv

  133. [141]

    Osburn, E

    T. Osburn, E. Forseth, C. R. Evans, and S. Hopper, Lorenz gauge gravitational self-force calculations of ec- centric binaries using a frequency domain procedure, Phys. Rev. D 90, 104031 (2014), arXiv:1409.4419 [gr- qc]

    2014 arXiv

  134. [142]

    Drasco and S

    S. Drasco and S. A. Hughes, Gravitational wave snap- shots of generic extreme mass ratio inspirals, Phys. Rev. D 73, 024027 (2006), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 88, 109905 (2013), Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 90, 109905 (2014)], arXiv:gr-qc/0509101

    2006 arXiv

  135. [143]

    Drasco, E

    S. Drasco, E. E. Flanagan, and S. A. Hughes, Com- puting inspirals in Kerr in the adiabatic regime. I. The Scalar case, Class. Quant. Grav. 22, S801 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0505075

    2005 arXiv

  136. [144]

    Casals, B

    M. Casals, B. C. Nolan, A. C. Ottewill, and B. Wardell, Regularized calculation of the retarded Green function in a Schwarzschild spacetime, Phys. Rev. D100, 104037 (2019), arXiv:1910.02567 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  137. [145]

    Lynch, V

    P. Lynch, V. Witzany, M. van de Meent, and N. War- burton, Fast inspirals and the treatment of orbital resonances, Class. Quant. Grav. 41, 225002 (2024), arXiv:2405.21072 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  138. [146]

    Bonetto, A

    R. Bonetto, A. Pound, and Z. Sam, Deformed Schwarzschild horizons in second-order perturbation theory: Mass, geometry, and teleology, Phys. Rev. D 105, 024048 (2022), arXiv:2109.09514 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  139. [147]

    Barack, Late time dynamics of scalar perturbations outside black holes

    L. Barack, Late time dynamics of scalar perturbations outside black holes. 2. Schwarzschild geometry, Phys. Rev. D 59, 044017 (1999), arXiv:gr-qc/9811028

    1999 arXiv

  140. [148]

    Barack and A

    L. Barack and A. Ori, Late time decay of scalar pertur- bations outside rotating black holes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 4388 (1999), arXiv:gr-qc/9902082

    1999 arXiv

  141. [149]

    Barack, Late time decay of scalar, electromag- netic, and gravitational perturbations outside rotating black holes, Phys

    L. Barack, Late time decay of scalar, electromag- netic, and gravitational perturbations outside rotating black holes, Phys. Rev. D 61, 024026 (2000), arXiv:gr- qc/9908005

    2000

  142. [150]

    Barack and A

    L. Barack and A. Ori, Late time decay of gravitational and electromagnetic perturbations along the event horizon, Phys. Rev. D 60, 124005 (1999), arXiv:gr- qc/9907085

    1999

  143. [151]

    L. C. Evans, Partial Differential Equations (American Mathematical Society, 2010)

    2010

  144. [152]

    I. S. Gradshteyn and I. M. Ryzhik, Table of Integrals, Series, and Products , 7th ed. (Academic Press, 1943)

    1943

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.