pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.28937 · v1 · pith:JGDBDWGOnew · submitted 2026-06-27 · 🌀 gr-qc

Quadrupole and quadratic-in-spin effects in quasicircular, spinning, asymmetric binaries

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 08:44 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc
keywords gravitational wavesself-forcefinite-size effectsKerr black holequadrupole momentsspin effectsasymmetric binariespost-Newtonian expansions
0
0 comments X

The pith

Energy fluxes for small-mass-ratio binaries include quadratic-in-spin and quadrupole contributions computed relativistically on Kerr backgrounds.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper calculates fully relativistic finite-size effects in energy fluxes during quasicircular inspirals of a small spinning companion into a Kerr black hole. These include quadratic-in-secondary-spin terms, spin-induced quadrupole terms, and tidally induced quadrupole terms. Calculations use a multiscale waveform-generation framework in self-force theory and derive an energy-balance law to support self-contained waveform models. Results appear both as numerical data sets on a Chebyshev grid and as analytical post-Newtonian expansions to sixth order relative to each leading term. The work targets improvements needed for next-generation gravitational-wave detectors handling asymmetric-mass systems.

Core claim

We calculate the energy fluxes including quadratic-in-secondary-spin terms, spin-induced quadrupole terms, and tidally induced quadrupole terms for quasicircular inspirals of a small companion into a Kerr black hole, formulated within the multiscale self-force framework together with a derived energy-balance law that enables construction of waveform models.

What carries the argument

Multiscale waveform-generation framework in self-force theory, used to compute the energy fluxes and derive the energy-balance law for asymmetric binaries.

If this is right

  • The fluxes enable development of self-contained waveform models for asymmetric binaries involving stars orbiting black holes.
  • Results can be used to improve other families of waveform models across all mass ratios.
  • Numerical data on the Chebyshev grid supports high-accuracy interpolation for waveform generation.
  • Analytical post-Newtonian expansions to sixth order provide benchmarks for other approximation methods.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • These fluxes could be combined with existing self-force results to model extreme-mass-ratio inspirals observable by future space-based detectors.
  • The same framework might be extended to include higher-order finite-size effects or non-quasicircular orbits with additional computational effort.
  • Validation against full numerical simulations at moderate mass ratios would test the range of applicability beyond the strict small-mass-ratio limit.

Load-bearing premise

The multiscale self-force framework accurately models quasicircular orbits and the energy-balance law holds for producing self-contained waveform models.

What would settle it

Direct comparison of the computed energy fluxes against independent numerical-relativity simulations of the same quasicircular spinning systems at small but finite mass ratio would show disagreement if the results are incorrect.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.28937 by Adam Pound, Josh Mathews, Misbah Shahzadi, Mostafizur Rahman.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Relative difference between numerical fluxes at infinity and our highest-order corresponding analytical PNSF expressions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Relative difference between numerical fluxes at the horizon and our highest-order corresponding analytical PNSF [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Comparison of the total numerical linear-in-spin flux [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Comparison of the total numerical quadratic-in-spin [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Comparison of the total numerical quadratic-in-spin [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Comparison of the total numerical magnetic tidal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Next-generation gravitational-wave detectors will require significant improvements in current theoretical waveform models, particularly in the case of asymmetric-mass binaries. Here we provide one such improvement by calculating fully relativistic finite-size effects for small mass ratios -- primarily, fluxes of energy -- including quadratic-in-secondary-spin terms, spin-induced quadrupole terms, and tidally induced quadrupole terms, for quasicircular inspirals of a small companion into a Kerr black hole. We formulate these calculations within a multiscale waveform-generation framework in self-force theory, which could be used, with an energy-balance law we derive, to develop self-contained waveform models for asymmetric binaries involving stars orbiting black holes. Our results could additionally be used to improve other families of waveform models across all mass ratios. We present results both as complete numerical data sets on a Chebyshev grid and as analytical post-Newtonian expansions (to sixth PN order relative to the leading term in each contribution to the flux).

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript calculates fully relativistic finite-size effects—primarily energy fluxes—for quasicircular inspirals of a small spinning companion into a Kerr black hole. It includes quadratic-in-secondary-spin terms, spin-induced quadrupole terms, and tidally induced quadrupole terms. Calculations are performed inside a multiscale waveform-generation framework from self-force theory; an energy-balance law is derived to support self-contained waveform models. Results are supplied both as complete numerical data sets on a Chebyshev grid and as analytical post-Newtonian expansions to sixth PN order relative to the leading term of each contribution.

Significance. If the central calculations hold, the work supplies concrete, usable data for improving extreme-mass-ratio-inspiral waveform models needed by next-generation detectors. The complete numerical data sets on a Chebyshev grid constitute a reproducible resource that can be directly ingested by other modeling efforts. The derivation of the energy-balance law and the dual numerical-plus-analytic presentation are additional strengths that increase the paper’s immediate utility across mass-ratio regimes.

major comments (1)
  1. [section deriving the energy-balance law and framework justification] The central claim that the computed fluxes can be turned into self-contained waveform models rests on the validity of the multiscale framework’s scale-separation and averaging assumptions once quadratic-in-spin and quadrupole contributions are retained, together with the correctness of the derived energy-balance law. The manuscript must demonstrate explicitly that no additional dissipative or conservative corrections arise at the stated orders; without such a demonstration the numerical data sets and PN expansions cannot be used for the advertised purpose.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract states that expansions reach “sixth PN order relative to the leading term in each contribution”; the main text should state the explicit leading-order scaling for the quadratic-spin, spin-induced quadrupole, and tidally induced quadrupole pieces so that readers can immediately verify the quoted PN orders.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for highlighting the importance of the energy-balance law and framework assumptions. We respond to the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [section deriving the energy-balance law and framework justification] The central claim that the computed fluxes can be turned into self-contained waveform models rests on the validity of the multiscale framework’s scale-separation and averaging assumptions once quadratic-in-spin and quadrupole contributions are retained, together with the correctness of the derived energy-balance law. The manuscript must demonstrate explicitly that no additional dissipative or conservative corrections arise at the stated orders; without such a demonstration the numerical data sets and PN expansions cannot be used for the advertised purpose.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit demonstration is required. In the section deriving the energy-balance law we show that the multiscale framework remains valid because all finite-size contributions (quadratic-in-spin, spin-induced quadrupole, and tidal quadrupole) enter perturbatively at O(ε) or higher in the mass ratio ε and do not generate new dissipative channels or conservative corrections at the orders retained in the fluxes. The averaging over the fast orbital timescale is justified by the same scale separation used in the linear-in-spin case, with the additional terms contributing only to the slow evolution of the orbital parameters. To make this demonstration fully explicit we will add a dedicated subsection that (i) lists every possible coupling at the relevant PN orders, (ii) verifies that none produce extra dissipative or conservative pieces, and (iii) confirms the energy-balance law closes without remainder terms. This revision will be included in the next version of the manuscript. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivations are independent within self-force theory

full rationale

The paper computes new finite-size flux contributions (quadratic-in-spin, spin-induced quadrupole, tidally induced quadrupole) inside the established multiscale self-force framework and derives an energy-balance law from the resulting fluxes. These steps produce explicit numerical data sets on a Chebyshev grid and sixth-order PN expansions that are not obtained by fitting parameters to the target outputs or by renaming prior results. No load-bearing premise reduces to a self-citation chain or to a definition that already encodes the claimed fluxes; the framework assumptions and balance law are standard inputs whose validity is external to the present calculations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available; no explicit free parameters, ad-hoc axioms, or invented entities are described. The work rests on standard general relativity and self-force theory.

axioms (1)
  • standard math General relativity and self-force theory for small mass ratios
    Framework invoked for the calculations of finite-size effects.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5697 in / 1194 out tokens · 35720 ms · 2026-06-30T08:44:16.277228+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

211 extracted references · 163 canonical work pages · 75 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    [70] to 2PA order, including all quadratic-in-χand spin- induced quadrupole effects

    extended the multiscale expansion of Refs. [70] to 2PA order, including all quadratic-in-χand spin- induced quadrupole effects. Like in Refs. [70], this expansion is formulated in a fixed-frequency gauge that simplifies many calculations

  2. [2]

    Though this is a 4PA term, it involves new physical deformability param- eters, making it qualitatively distinct from the 3PA and other 4PA terms we neglect

    incorporated the effects of a tidally induced quadrupole on the secondary. Though this is a 4PA term, it involves new physical deformability param- eters, making it qualitatively distinct from the 3PA and other 4PA terms we neglect. ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●●●● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●●●●● ● FIG. 6. Comparison of the total numerical electric tidal flux...

  3. [3]

    In practice this substantially simplifies waveform gen- eration as it circumvents the need for calculations of local forces

    derived a balance law relating the emitted gravitational-wave fluxes to the secondary’s loss of mechanical energy and angular momentum. In practice this substantially simplifies waveform gen- eration as it circumvents the need for calculations of local forces

  4. [4]

    analytically derived the fixed-frequency expansions of the conserved energy and angular momentum with a tidally induced quadrupole, completing the earlier calculations for the spin-induced quadrupole in Ref. [108]

  5. [5]

    numerically computed the energy fluxes (to infinity and through the primary’s horizon) proportional toχ2 and to each of the secondary’s quadrupole 24 ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●●●● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●●●●● ● FIG. 7. Comparison of the total numerical magnetic tidal flux correction,F tot σ2 , with the corresponding PN approxima- tions at6PN (leading or...

  6. [6]

    These expressions identically recover and extend the 4PN results in the literature

    analytically calculated the same fluxes in a weak- field (PNSF) expansion through 6PN order rela- tive to the leading order of each individual term in the total flux. These expressions identically recover and extend the 4PN results in the literature. We have made our analytical and numerical re- sults available in the Black Hole Perturbation Toolkit PostN...

  7. [7]

    Teukolsky source For a generic stress-energy tensor, the source term for the radial Teukolsky equation (102a) is given by [69] Jlmω= ∫ dtdθdϕ∆2ei(ωt−mϕ)(Jnn +Jmn +Jmm), (B1) where the integrands are constructed from projections of Tαβonto a complex null tetrad{lµ, nµ, mµ, mµ}: Jnn = [ f(0) nnTnn ] ,J mn =∂r [ f(1) mnTmn ] + [ f(0) mnTmn ] , Jmm =∂2 r [ f(...

  8. [8]

    Teukolsky amplitudes Finally, the amplitudesZH,∞ ℓmωm are given by the follow- ing relation: ZH,∞ ℓmωm =C H,∞ ℓmωm ∫ ∞ r+ drRup,in ℓmωJℓmωm ∆ 2 , =C H,∞ ℓmωm IH,∞ ℓmωm , (B24) where IH,∞ ℓmωm = ∫ ∞ r+ dr [ A0δr +A 1δ′ r +A 2δ′′ r +A 3δ(3) r +A 4δ(4) r ] Rup,in ℓmωm (B25) = 4∑ j=0 [ Ajδ(j) r ] Rup,in ℓmωm (r),(B26) with A0 = ˜J (0) nn + ˜J (0) mn + ˜J (0) ...

  9. [9]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Obser- vation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 061102 (2016), arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]

  10. [10]

    A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), GWTC-4.0: Updating the Gravitational-Wave Tran- sient Catalog with Observations from the First Part of the Fourth LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Observing Run, (2025), arXiv:2508.18082 [gr-qc]

  11. [11]

    GWTC-5.0: An Introduction to Version 5.0 of the Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog

    N. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KA- GRA), GWTC-5.0: An Introduction to Version 5.0 of the Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog, (2026), arXiv:2605.27223 [gr-qc]

  12. [12]

    B.P.Abbottet al.(LIGOScientific, Virgo),GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neu- tron Star Inspiral, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 161101 (2017), arXiv:1710.05832 [gr-qc]

  13. [13]

    Gravitational-wave constraints on the neutron-star-matter Equation of State

    E. Annala, T. Gorda, A. Kurkela, and A. Vuori- nen, Gravitational-wave constraints on the neutron- star-matter Equation of State, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 172703 (2018), arXiv:1711.02644 [astro-ph.HE]

  14. [14]

    A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo, KAGRA), GW241011 and GW241110: Exploring Binary Forma- tion and Fundamental Physics with Asymmetric, High- spin Black Hole Coalescences, Astrophys. J. Lett.993, L21 (2025), arXiv:2510.26931 [astro-ph.HE]

  15. [15]

    R. Das, N. V. Krishnendu, M. Saleem, C. K. Mishra, andK.G.Arun,TestingtheKerrhypothesisbeyondthe quadrupole with GW241011, (2026), arXiv:2604.09828 [gr-qc]

  16. [16]

    A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo, KAGRA), GW250114: Testing Hawking’s Area Law and the Kerr Nature of Black Holes, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 111403 (2025), arXiv:2509.08054 [gr-qc]

  17. [17]

    K. G. Arunet al.(LISA), New horizons for fundamen- tal physics with LISA, Living Rev. Rel.25, 4 (2022), arXiv:2205.01597 [gr-qc]

  18. [18]

    P. A. Seoaneet al.(LISA), Astrophysics with the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna, Living Rev. Rel.26, 2 (2023), arXiv:2203.06016 [gr-qc]

  19. [19]

    LISA Definition Study Report

    M. Colpiet al.(LISA), LISA Definition Study Report, (2024), arXiv:2402.07571 [astro-ph.CO]

  20. [20]

    The Science of the Einstein Telescope

    A. Abacet al.(ET), The Science of the Einstein Tele- scope, JCAP03, 081, arXiv:2503.12263 [gr-qc]

  21. [21]

    Pürrer and C.-J

    M. Pürrer and C.-J. Haster, Gravitational waveform ac- curacy requirements for future ground-based detectors, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 023151 (2020), arXiv:1912.10055 [gr- qc]

  22. [22]

    Hu and J

    Q. Hu and J. Veitch, Assessing the model waveform ac- curacy of gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. D106, 044042 (2022), arXiv:2205.08448 [gr-qc]

  23. [23]

    Waveform Modelling for the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna

    N. Afshordiet al.(LISA Consortium Waveform Work- ing Group), Waveform modelling for the Laser Interfer- ometer Space Antenna, Living Rev. Rel.28, 9 (2025), arXiv:2311.01300 [gr-qc]

  24. [24]

    Dhani, S

    A. Dhani, S. H. Völkel, A. Buonanno, H. Estelles, J. Gair, H. P. Pfeiffer, L. Pompili, and A. Toubiana, Systematic Biases in Estimating the Properties of Black Holes Due to Inaccurate Gravitational-Wave Models, Phys. Rev. X15, 031036 (2025), arXiv:2404.05811 [gr- qc]

  25. [25]

    R. S. Chandramouli, K. Prokup, E. Berti, and N. Yunes, Systematic biases due to waveform mismodeling in parametrized post-Einsteinian tests of general relativ- ity: The impact of neglecting spin precession and higher modes, Phys. Rev. D111, 044026 (2025), arXiv:2410.06254 [gr-qc]

  26. [26]

    Mahapatra, J

    P. Mahapatra, J. E. Thompson, E. Fauchon-Jones, and M. Hannam, The High-Mass-Ratio Challenge in Gravi- tationalWaveformModelling, (2026),arXiv:2603.26521 [gr-qc]

  27. [27]

    Cubic order spin effects in the dynamics and gravitational wave energy flux of compact object binaries

    S. Marsat, Cubic order spin effects in the dynam- ics and gravitational wave energy flux of compact ob- ject binaries, Class. Quant. Grav.32, 085008 (2015), 30 arXiv:1411.4118 [gr-qc]

  28. [28]

    A. Bohé, G. Faye, S. Marsat, and E. K. Porter, Quadratic-in-spin effects in the orbital dynamics and gravitational-wave energy flux of compact binaries at the 3PN order, Class. Quant. Grav.32, 195010 (2015), arXiv:1501.01529 [gr-qc]

  29. [29]

    Levi and J

    M. Levi and J. Steinhoff, Complete conservative dy- namics for inspiralling compact binaries with spins at the fourth post-Newtonian order, JCAP09, 029, arXiv:1607.04252 [gr-qc]

  30. [30]

    Gravitational waves from spinning binary black holes at the leading post-Newtonian orders at all orders in spin

    N. Siemonsen, J. Steinhoff, and J. Vines, Gravitational waves from spinning binary black holes at the leading post-Newtonian orders at all orders in spin, Phys. Rev. D97, 124046 (2018), arXiv:1712.08603 [gr-qc]

  31. [31]

    Testing the multipole structure of compact binaries using gravitational wave observations

    S. Kastha, A. Gupta, K. G. Arun, B. S. Sathyaprakash, and C. Van Den Broeck, Testing the multipole structure of compact binaries using gravitational wave observa- tions,Phys.Rev.D98,124033(2018),arXiv:1809.10465 [gr-qc]

  32. [32]

    Kastha, A

    S. Kastha, A. Gupta, K. G. Arun, B. S. Sathyaprakash, and C. Van Den Broeck, Testing the multipole struc- ture and conservative dynamics of compact binaries us- ing gravitational wave observations: The spinning case, Phys. Rev. D100, 044007 (2019), arXiv:1905.07277 [gr- qc]

  33. [33]

    Henry, G

    Q. Henry, G. Faye, and L. Blanchet, Tidal effects in the equations of motion of compact binary systems to next- to-next-to-leading post-Newtonian order, Phys. Rev. D 101, 064047 (2020), arXiv:1912.01920 [gr-qc]

  34. [34]

    Henry, G

    Q. Henry, G. Faye, and L. Blanchet, Tidal effects in the gravitational-wave phase evolution of compact bi- narysystemstonext-to-next-to-leadingpost-Newtonian order, Phys. Rev. D102, 044033 (2020), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 108, 089901 (2023), Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 111, 029901 (2025)], arXiv:2005.13367 [gr-qc]

  35. [35]

    G. Cho, R. A. Porto, and Z. Yang, Gravitational ra- diation from inspiralling compact objects: Spin effects to the fourth post-Newtonian order, Phys. Rev. D106, L101501 (2022), arXiv:2201.05138 [gr-qc]

  36. [36]

    Blanchet, G

    L. Blanchet, G. Faye, Q. Henry, F. Larrouturou, and D. Trestini, Gravitational-wave flux and quadrupole modes from quasicircular nonspinning compact binaries to the fourth post-Newtonian order, Phys. Rev. D108, 064041 (2023), arXiv:2304.11186 [gr-qc]

  37. [37]

    Blanchet, G

    L. Blanchet, G. Faye, Q. Henry, F. Larrouturou, and D. Trestini, Gravitational-Wave Phasing of Quasicircu- lar Compact Binary Systems to the Fourth-and-a-Half Post-Newtonian Order, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 121402 (2023), arXiv:2304.11185 [gr-qc]

  38. [38]

    M. K. Mandal, P. Mastrolia, R. Patil, and J. Steinhoff, Radiating Love: adiabatic tidal fluxes and modes up to next-to-next-to-leading post-Newtonian order, JHEP 05, 008, arXiv:2412.01706 [gr-qc]

  39. [39]

    D. Bini, T. Damour, and A. Geralico, Scattering of tidally interacting bodies in post-Minkowskian gravity, Phys. Rev. D101, 044039 (2020), arXiv:2001.00352 [gr- qc]

  40. [40]

    Cheung and M

    C. Cheung and M. P. Solon, Tidal Effects in the Post- Minkowskian Expansion, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 191601 (2020), arXiv:2006.06665 [hep-th]

  41. [41]

    Kälin, Z

    G. Kälin, Z. Liu, and R. A. Porto, Conservative Tidal Effects in Compact Binary Systems to Next-to-Leading Post-Minkowskian Order, Phys. Rev. D102, 124025 (2020), arXiv:2008.06047 [hep-th]

  42. [42]

    G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka, and B. Sauer, Tidal effects and renormalization at fourth post- Minkowskian order, Phys. Rev. D109, L041504 (2024), arXiv:2312.00719 [hep-th]

  43. [43]

    Modeling the dynamics of tidally-interacting binary neutron stars up to merger

    S. Bernuzzi, A. Nagar, T. Dietrich, and T. Damour, Modeling the Dynamics of Tidally Interacting Binary Neutron Stars up to the Merger, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 161103 (2015), arXiv:1412.4553 [gr-qc]

  44. [44]

    Dynamical Tides in General Relativity: Effective Action and Effective-One-Body Hamiltonian

    J. Steinhoff, T. Hinderer, A. Buonanno, and A. Tarac- chini, Dynamical Tides in General Relativity: Effec- tive Action and Effective-One-Body Hamiltonian, Phys. Rev. D94, 104028 (2016), arXiv:1608.01907 [gr-qc]

  45. [45]

    B. D. Lackey, M. Pürrer, A. Taracchini, and S. Marsat, Surrogate model for an aligned-spin effective one body waveform model of binary neutron star inspirals using Gaussian process regression, Phys. Rev. D100, 024002 (2019), arXiv:1812.08643 [gr-qc]

  46. [46]

    Nonlinear-in-spin effects in effective-one-body waveform models of spin-aligned, inspiralling, neutron star binaries

    A. Nagar, F. Messina, P. Rettegno, D. Bini, T. Damour, A. Geralico, S. Akcay, and S. Bernuzzi, Nonlinear-in- spin effects in effective-one-body waveform models of spin-aligned, inspiralling, neutron star binaries, Phys. Rev. D99, 044007 (2019), arXiv:1812.07923 [gr-qc]

  47. [47]

    J. E. Thompson, E. Fauchon-Jones, S. Khan, E. Ni- toglia, F. Pannarale, T. Dietrich, and M. Hannam, Modeling the gravitational wave signature of neutron star black hole coalescences, Phys. Rev. D101, 124059 (2020), arXiv:2002.08383 [gr-qc]

  48. [48]

    A. Abac, T. Dietrich, A. Buonanno, J. Steinhoff, and M. Ujevic, New and robust gravitational-waveform model for high-mass-ratio binary neutron star systems with dynamical tidal effects, Phys. Rev. D109, 024062 (2024), arXiv:2311.07456 [gr-qc]

  49. [49]

    Williams, P

    N. Williams, P. Schmidt, and G. Pratten, Phenomeno- logical model of gravitational self-force enhanced tides in inspiraling binary neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D110, 104013 (2024), arXiv:2407.08538 [gr-qc]

  50. [50]

    Haberland, A

    M. Haberland, A. Buonanno, and J. Steinhoff, Model- ing matter in seobnrv5thm: Generating fast and accu- rate effective-one-body waveforms for spin-aligned bi- nary neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D112, 084024 (2025), arXiv:2503.18934 [gr-qc]

  51. [51]

    Albanesi, R

    S. Albanesi, R. Gamba, S. Bernuzzi, J. Fontbuté, A. Gonzalez, and A. Nagar, Effective-one-body mod- eling for generic compact binaries with arbitrary orbits, Phys. Rev. D112, L121503 (2025), arXiv:2503.14580 [gr-qc]

  52. [52]

    High-order effective-one-body tidal interactions and gravitational scattering

    M. Schulze, S. Bernuzzi, P. Rettegno, J. Fontbuté, A. Placidi, and T. Damour, High-order effective-one- body tidal interactions and gravitational scattering, Phys. Rev. D113, 104027 (2026), arXiv:2603.22467 [gr- qc]

  53. [53]

    Accurate waveforms for generic planar-orbit binary black holes: The multipolar effective-one-body model SEOBNRv6EHM

    A. Gamboaet al., Accurate waveforms for generic planar-orbit binary black holes: The multipolar effective-one-body model SEOBNRv6EHM, (2026), arXiv:2605.28715 [gr-qc]

  54. [54]

    F. A. Ramis Vidal, A. Abac, M. Colleoni, T. Dietrich, P. Mourier, A. Gonzalez, I. Markin, and A. Puecher, Fast gravitational waveform models for quasi-circular coalescencesofneutronstar–blackholebinaries, (2026), arXiv:2606.04810 [gr-qc]

  55. [55]

    C. B. Owen, C.-J. Haster, S. Perkins, N. J. Cornish, and N. Yunes, Waveform accuracy and systematic un- certainties in current gravitational wave observations, Phys. Rev. D108, 044018 (2023), arXiv:2301.11941 [gr- 31 qc]

  56. [56]

    Estelléset al., A Detailed Analysis of GW190521 with Phenomenological Waveform Models, Astrophys

    H. Estelléset al., A Detailed Analysis of GW190521 with Phenomenological Waveform Models, Astrophys. J.924, 79 (2022), arXiv:2105.06360 [gr-qc]

  57. [57]

    Maggio, H

    E. Maggio, H. O. Silva, A. Buonanno, and A. Ghosh, Tests of general relativity in the nonlinear regime: A parametrized plunge-merger-ringdown gravitational waveform model, Phys. Rev. D108, 024043 (2023), arXiv:2212.09655 [gr-qc]

  58. [58]

    A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), GW231123: A Binary Black Hole Merger with Total Mass 190–265 M⊙, Astrophys. J. Lett.993, L25 (2025), arXiv:2507.08219 [astro-ph.HE]

  59. [59]

    van de Meent and H

    M. van de Meent and H. P. Pfeiffer, Intermediate mass- ratio black hole binaries: Applicability of small mass- ratio perturbation theory, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 181101 (2020), arXiv:2006.12036 [gr-qc]

  60. [60]

    K. Rink, R. Bachhar, T. Islam, N. E. M. Rifat, K. Gonzalez-Quesada, S. E. Field, G. Khanna, S. A. Hughes, and V. Varma, Gravitational wave surrogate model for spinning, intermediate mass ratio binaries based on perturbation theory and numerical relativity, Phys. Rev. D110, 124069 (2024), arXiv:2407.18319 [gr- qc]

  61. [61]

    Mitigating Systematic Errors in Parameter Estimation of Binary Black Hole Mergers in O1-O3 LIGO-Virgo Data

    S. Kumar, M. Melching, F. Ohme, H. Narola, T. Dooney, and C. Van Den Broeck, Mitigating System- atic Errors in Parameter Estimation of Binary Black Hole Mergers in O1-O3 LIGO-Virgo Data, (2026), arXiv:2604.21859 [astro-ph.HE]

  62. [62]

    Y. Mino, M. Sasaki, and T. Tanaka, Gravitational ra- diation reaction to a particle motion, Phys. Rev. D55, 3457 (1997), arXiv:gr-qc/9606018

  63. [63]

    The motion of point particles in curved spacetime

    E. Poisson, A. Pound, and I. Vega, The Motion of point particles in curved spacetime, Living Rev. Rel.14, 7 (2011), arXiv:1102.0529 [gr-qc]

  64. [64]

    Self-force and radiation reaction in general relativity

    L. Barack and A. Pound, Self-force and radiation reac- tion in general relativity, Rept. Prog. Phys.82, 016904 (2019), arXiv:1805.10385 [gr-qc]

  65. [65]

    Pound and B

    A. Pound and B. Wardell, Black Hole Perturbation The- ory and Gravitational Self-Force, inHandbook of Grav- itational Wave Astronomy(2022) p. 38, 2101.04592

  66. [66]

    Wardell, A

    B. Wardell, A. Pound, N. Warburton, J. Miller, L. Durkan, and A. Le Tiec, Gravitational Wave- forms for Compact Binaries from Second-Order Self- Force Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 241402 (2023), arXiv:2112.12265 [gr-qc]

  67. [67]

    Post-adiabatic self-force waveforms: slowly spinning primary and precessing secondary

    J. Mathews, B. Wardell, A. Pound, and N. Warbur- ton, Postadiabatic self-force waveforms: Slowly spin- ning primary and precessing secondary, Phys. Rev. D 113, 064034 (2026), arXiv:2510.16113 [gr-qc]

  68. [68]

    M. L. Katz, A. J. K. Chua, L. Speri, N. Warbur- ton, and S. A. Hughes, Fast extreme-mass-ratio-inspiral waveforms: New tools for millihertz gravitational- wave data analysis, Phys. Rev. D104, 064047 (2021), arXiv:2104.04582 [gr-qc]

  69. [69]

    Speri, M

    L. Speri, M. L. Katz, A. J. K. Chua, S. A. Hughes, N. Warburton, J. E. Thompson, C. E. A. Chapman- Bird, and J. R. Gair, Fast and Fourier: Extreme Mass Ratio Inspiral Waveforms in the Frequency Domain 10.3389/fams.2023.1266739 (2023), arXiv:2307.12585 [gr-qc]

  70. [70]

    Nasipak, Adiabatic gravitational waveform model for compact objects undergoing quasicircular inspirals into rotating massive black holes, Phys

    Z. Nasipak, Adiabatic gravitational waveform model for compact objects undergoing quasicircular inspirals into rotating massive black holes, Phys. Rev. D109, 044020 (2024), arXiv:2310.19706 [gr-qc]

  71. [71]

    C. E. A. Chapman-Birdet al., Efficient waveforms for asymmetric-mass eccentric equatorial inspirals into rapidly spinning black holes, Phys. Rev. D112, 104023 (2025), arXiv:2506.09470 [gr-qc]

  72. [72]

    Ruangsri, S

    U. Ruangsri, S. J. Vigeland, and S. A. Hughes, Gyro- scopes orbiting black holes: A frequency-domain ap- proach to precession and spin-curvature coupling for spinning bodies on generic Kerr orbits, Phys. Rev. D 94, 044008 (2016), arXiv:1512.00376 [gr-qc]

  73. [73]

    Harms, G

    E. Harms, G. Lukes-Gerakopoulos, S. Bernuzzi, and A. Nagar, Asymptotic gravitational wave fluxes from a spinning particle in circular equatorial orbits around a rotating black hole, Phys. Rev. D93, 044015 (2016), [Addendum: Phys.Rev.D 100, 129901 (2019)], arXiv:1510.05548 [gr-qc]

  74. [74]

    Evolution of small-mass-ratio binaries with a spinning secondary

    N. Warburton, T. Osburn, and C. R. Evans, Evolution of small-mass-ratio binaries with a spinning secondary, Phys. Rev. D96, 084057 (2017), arXiv:1708.03720 [gr- qc]

  75. [75]

    van de Meent, Analytic solutions for paral- lel transport along generic bound geodesics in Kerr spacetime, Class

    M. van de Meent, Analytic solutions for paral- lel transport along generic bound geodesics in Kerr spacetime, Class. Quant. Grav.37, 145007 (2020), arXiv:1906.05090 [gr-qc]

  76. [76]

    Witzany, Hamilton-Jacobi equation for spinning par- ticlesnearblackholes,Phys.Rev.D100,104030(2019), arXiv:1903.03651 [gr-qc]

    V. Witzany, Hamilton-Jacobi equation for spinning par- ticlesnearblackholes,Phys.Rev.D100,104030(2019), arXiv:1903.03651 [gr-qc]

  77. [77]

    G. A. Piovano, A. Maselli, and P. Pani, Extreme mass ratio inspirals with spinning secondary: a detailed study of equatorial circular motion, Phys. Rev. D102, 024041 (2020), arXiv:2004.02654 [gr-qc]

  78. [78]

    Mathews, A

    J. Mathews, A. Pound, and B. Wardell, Self-force cal- culations with a spinning secondary, Phys. Rev. D105, 084031 (2022), arXiv:2112.13069 [gr-qc]

  79. [79]

    Skoupý and G

    V. Skoupý and G. Lukes-Gerakopoulos, Adiabatic equa- torial inspirals of a spinning body into a Kerr black hole, Phys. Rev. D105, 084033 (2022), arXiv:2201.07044 [gr- qc]

  80. [80]

    L. V. Drummond and S. A. Hughes, Precisely comput- ing bound orbits of spinning bodies around black holes. II. Generic orbits, Phys. Rev. D105, 124041 (2022), arXiv:2201.13335 [gr-qc]

Showing first 80 references.