Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Optimization methods for MR image reconstruction (long version)

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1903.03510 v2 pith:LCCKGAUY submitted 2019-03-08 eess.IV math.OC

Optimization methods for MR image reconstruction (long version)

classification eess.IV math.OC
keywords methodsalgorithmsoptimizationcompressedimagereconstructionsensingclinical
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The development of compressed sensing methods for magnetic resonance (MR) image reconstruction led to an explosion of research on models and optimization algorithms for MR imaging (MRI). Roughly 10 years after such methods first appeared in the MRI literature, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved certain compressed sensing methods for commercial use, making compressed sensing a clinical success story for MRI. This review paper summarizes several key models and optimization algorithms for MR image reconstruction, including both the type of methods that have FDA approval for clinical use, as well as more recent methods being considered in the research community that use data-adaptive regularizers. Many algorithms have been devised that exploit the structure of the system model and regularizers used in MRI; this paper strives to collect such algorithms in a single survey. Many of the ideas used in optimization methods for MRI are also useful for solving other inverse problems.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Imaging-101: Benchmarking LLM Coding Agents on Scientific Computational Imaging

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    A 57-task, expert-verified benchmark shows frontier LLM coding agents systematically fail on physical conventions, inverse-solver choice, and end-to-end imaging pipelines.