Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Scratch Copilot Evaluation: Assessing AI-Assisted Creative Coding for Families

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.10417 v1 pith:LCGGKBYH submitted 2023-05-17 cs.HC cs.AI

Scratch Copilot Evaluation: Assessing AI-Assisted Creative Coding for Families

classification cs.HC cs.AI
keywords codingcreativeevaluationllmsfamiliesscratchfuturelanguage
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

How can AI enhance creative coding experiences for families? This study explores the potential of large language models (LLMs) in helping families with creative coding using Scratch. Based on our previous user study involving a prototype AI assistant, we devised three evaluation scenarios to determine if LLMs could help families comprehend game code, debug programs, and generate new ideas for future projects. We utilized 22 Scratch projects for each scenario and generated responses from LLMs with and without practice tasks, resulting in 120 creative coding support scenario datasets. In addition, the authors independently evaluated their precision, pedagogical value, and age-appropriate language. Our findings show that LLMs achieved an overall success rate of more than 80\% on the different tasks and evaluation criteria. This research offers valuable information on using LLMs for creative family coding and presents design guidelines for future AI-supported coding applications. Our evaluation framework, together with our labeled evaluation data, is publicly available.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. ViScratch: Using Large Language Models and Gameplay Videos for Automated Feedback in Scratch

    cs.SE 2025-09 conditional novelty 7.0

    A multimodal LLM system that diagnoses Scratch bugs from code plus gameplay video reported 100% repair success on ten curated tasks, far above text-only ChatGPT baselines.

  2. EmbeddedKittens: An Evaluation of Code Embeddings for Scratch

    cs.SE 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Structure-aware embeddings such as GGNN transfer to Scratch and can support sprite naming and, with weaker evidence, correctness and progress prediction.