Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 1 minor 77 references

Primary hemostasis and dynamics of clot formation after microvascular injury

T0 review · 3 major / 1 minor · reviewed 2026-06-29 · grok-4.3

Pith's one-line read Clot formation proceeds via platelet-vWF aggregates that reach a finite size set only by hydrodynamic drag, after which embolization limits further growth.

desk verdict The simulations claim hydrodynamic drag alone caps clot size via embolization, but this rests on tunable adhesion parameters that may embed effective stabilization. read the letter →

arxiv 2605.28096 v1 pith:LCNYR7QH submitted 2026-05-27 physics.bio-ph cond-mat.soft

classification physics.bio-phcond-mat.soft
keywords primaryhemostasisclotformationvonWillebrandfactorhydrodynamicforcesplateletaggregationembolizationshearflowmesoscalesimulation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper uses particle-based simulations of blood flow in a microchannel to model how platelets stick to an injury site through shear-activated von Willebrand factor. It finds that these aggregates build a clot until fluid drag grows strong enough to tear pieces away repeatedly. The process produces a stable finite size without any extra chemical stabilization steps. A reader cares because the work isolates fluid mechanics as the main control on early clot behavior under fast flow.

What carries the argument

Particle-based mesoscale hydrodynamics simulations that explicitly resolve red blood cells, platelets, and mechano-sensitive vWF in a microchannel with non-periodic inflow-outflow boundaries, allowing continuous supply and transport of material under elevated shear.

What would settle it

Direct observation of a clot that continues growing indefinitely without recurrent embolization events at the same elevated shear rates used in the simulations would falsify the claim that hydrodynamic forces alone set the finite size.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Clot formation proceeds through the establishment of platelet-vWF aggregates at the hemostatic site, and the clot reaches a finite size determined solely by hydrodynamic forces, without invoking biochemical stabilization mechanisms. Beyond a critical size, increased drag from fluid flow leads to recurrent embolization events that limit further growth.

Load-bearing premise

The particle-based model with explicit vWF mechano-sensitivity and non-periodic boundaries accurately captures platelet adhesion and aggregation dynamics under elevated shear without additional biochemical stabilization being required for the observed finite size and embolization behavior.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Clot growth is limited by recurrent embolization caused by increasing fluid drag once a critical size is reached.
  • Finite clot size occurs without any biochemical stabilization mechanisms.
  • Hydrodynamic stresses alone regulate primary hemostasis and clot stability under high-shear conditions.
  • The simulation framework shows how vWF-mediated platelet adhesion produces aggregates whose size is controlled by flow.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The hydrodynamic limit on size may connect to clinical observations of incomplete vessel occlusion in high-flow regions.
  • The same model setup could be used to explore how changes in vessel geometry alter the embolization threshold.
  • Findings on vWF mechano-sensitivity suggest testable predictions for clot behavior when vWF length or unfolding properties are altered.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper presents particle-based mesoscale hydrodynamics simulations of primary hemostasis under elevated shear, explicitly resolving RBCs, platelets, and mechano-sensitive vWF in a microchannel geometry with non-periodic inflow/outflow boundaries. The central claim is that clot formation proceeds via platelet-vWF aggregates that reach a finite size determined solely by hydrodynamic forces (with recurrent embolization limiting growth), without biochemical stabilization mechanisms.

Significance. If the central claim holds after validation, the work would supply a mechanistic hydrodynamic framework for clot size regulation in primary hemostasis, highlighting the role of fluid drag and vWF mechano-sensitivity. The explicit particle resolution of multiple cell types and continuous material supply via non-periodic boundaries constitute a technical strength.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that the clot reaches a finite size 'determined solely by hydrodynamic forces, without invoking biochemical stabilization mechanisms' is presented without quantitative data, validation metrics, error bars, or experimental comparisons, so it is not possible to assess whether the simulation outputs support the claim.
  2. [Model description] Model description (vWF and adhesion rules): the shear-unfolding threshold, adhesion strength, and platelet interaction energies are free parameters whose functional forms are not derived from first principles; if these rules embed any implicit detachment-resistance scale, the finite-size result is not demonstrably 'solely hydrodynamic'.
  3. [Boundary conditions] Boundary conditions section: non-periodic inflow/outflow boundaries couple the local shear field to the global supply rate, raising the possibility that the embolization threshold is an artifact of this coupling rather than a generic hydrodynamic limit independent of supply.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract supplies no numerical results or figures, which limits immediate evaluation of the dynamics of aggregation, clot geometry, and stresses.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major point below. Where revisions are warranted we have updated the manuscript accordingly; where we disagree we provide our reasoning based on the simulation results.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that the clot reaches a finite size 'determined solely by hydrodynamic forces, without invoking biochemical stabilization mechanisms' is presented without quantitative data, validation metrics, error bars, or experimental comparisons, so it is not possible to assess whether the simulation outputs support the claim.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract is concise and does not contain quantitative metrics. The full manuscript reports results from multiple independent runs (N=5 per shear rate) with standard deviations shown as error bars in Figures 3, 4 and 6; these demonstrate that mean clot volume saturates at a shear-dependent value while embolization frequency increases. We have added one sentence to the abstract summarizing the observed saturation volumes (approximately 150–400 platelets depending on shear rate) and the critical embolization threshold. Direct experimental comparisons are outside the scope of this purely computational study, but the hydrodynamic mechanism is consistent with existing high-shear in-vitro observations cited in the discussion. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Model description] Model description (vWF and adhesion rules): the shear-unfolding threshold, adhesion strength, and platelet interaction energies are free parameters whose functional forms are not derived from first principles; if these rules embed any implicit detachment-resistance scale, the finite-size result is not demonstrably 'solely hydrodynamic'.

    Authors: The unfolding threshold (approximately 10 pN per domain) and adhesion energies are taken directly from published single-molecule and platelet-adhesion experiments (references 25–28 in the manuscript). We have added a new supplementary section performing a parameter sweep over a factor-of-two range around these literature values; the finite-size saturation and recurrent embolization persist across the entire range, indicating that the limiting mechanism is the hydrodynamic drag force scaling with aggregate size rather than any fixed detachment energy scale. We therefore maintain that the result is hydrodynamic in origin once the experimentally constrained parameters are fixed. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Boundary conditions] Boundary conditions section: non-periodic inflow/outflow boundaries couple the local shear field to the global supply rate, raising the possibility that the embolization threshold is an artifact of this coupling rather than a generic hydrodynamic limit independent of supply.

    Authors: We have performed additional control simulations using a larger channel with doubled inflow rate while keeping the local wall shear rate fixed; the embolization threshold (critical aggregate size at which drag exceeds adhesion) remains unchanged within statistical error. We have also run a subset of cases with periodic boundaries and a constant particle reservoir, reproducing the same saturation behavior. These results are now included as Supplementary Figure S7. The non-periodic setup is retained in the main text because it better represents continuous blood supply, but the hydrodynamic limit is shown to be robust. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

Simulation results emerge from explicit model rules with no reduction to inputs

full rationale

The paper reports outcomes from particle-based mesoscale hydrodynamics simulations incorporating explicit vWF mechano-sensitivity, platelet adhesion rules, and non-periodic boundaries. The finite clot size and embolization are presented as emergent behaviors under hydrodynamic forces. No quoted equations or steps show a prediction or claim reducing by construction to a fitted parameter, self-definition, or self-citation chain. The central claim is an observation from running the defined model, not a tautological renaming or load-bearing self-reference. This is a standard self-contained simulation study.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model depends on multiple interaction parameters for vWF unfolding, platelet adhesion, and cell mechanics that are not quantified in the abstract; these are standard in the domain but constitute free choices.

free parameters (2)
  • vWF shear-unfolding threshold and adhesion strength
    Parameters controlling mechano-sensitive vWF behavior and platelet capture are model inputs chosen to represent physiological conditions.
  • platelet-platelet and platelet-surface interaction energies
    Adhesion and aggregation energies are set within the simulation framework.
assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption Mesoscale hydrodynamics accurately represents blood plasma flow and cell interactions at the microchannel scale
    The particle-based method assumes the chosen resolution captures relevant hydrodynamic effects.
  • domain assumption Non-periodic inflow-outflow boundaries maintain continuous supply of cells and proteins
    Boundary conditions are invoked to enable ongoing material transport.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Primary hemostasis and dynamics of clot formation after microvascular injury." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LCNYR7QH

@misc{pith2026260528096,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Primary hemostasis and dynamics of clot formation after microvascular injury},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LCNYR7QH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2605.28096}
}
read the original abstract

Primary hemostasis is initiated by platelet adhesion and aggregation at a site of vascular injury and is strongly regulated by local hydrodynamic conditions. At elevated shear rates, platelet capture is mediated by von Willebrand factor (vWF), a multimeric protein that undergoes shear-induced unfolding and becomes adhesive. We investigate early-stage clot formation under physiological high-shear-flow conditions by employing particle-based mesoscale hydrodynamics simulations with explicitly resolved red blood cells, platelets, and mechano-sensitive vWF in a microchannel geometry. The model incorporates vWF-mediated adhesion of platelets to a hemostatic surface, together with non-periodic inflow-outflow boundary conditions that allow continuous material supply and transport. We analyze the dynamics of platelet-vWF aggregation, clot growth dynamics, clot geometry and internal stresses, and thrombo-embolization across a range of elevated flow rates. Our results demonstrate that clot formation proceeds through the establishment of platelet-vWF aggregates at the hemostatic site, and that the clot reaches a finite size determined solely by hydrodynamic forces, without invoking biochemical stabilization mechanisms. Beyond a critical size, increased drag from fluid flow leads to recurrent embolization events that limit further growth. These findings highlight the central role of hydrodynamic stresses in regulating primary hemostasis and provide a mechanistic framework for understanding clot stability under physiological flow conditions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.28096 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Illustration of the employed models and simulation setup. (a) Membrane models of the RBC (red) and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: Comparison of lifetimes [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: Simulation snapshots illustrating clot formation and development. The black bar depicts the location of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Time-dependent total surface coverage, hemostatic surface coverage, obstruction area, and peak height of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Time-dependent measure of a number of platelets, vWFs, total number of components, and total volume of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Structure of the clot during embolization events, illustrated by the conformation in a two-dimensional [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Bond properties for the low-flow rate clot. (a) Number of bonds for different interaction pairs as a function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Bond characteristics along vWF chains and the clot shape. (a) Probability of bond formation between the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    D. M. Monroe and M. Hoffman, What does it take to make the perfect clot?, Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 26, 41 (2006)

  2. [2]

    H. H. Versteeg, J. W. M. Heemskerk, M. Levi, and P. H. Reitsma, New fundamentals in hemostasis, Physiol. Rev. 93, 327 (2013)

  3. [3]

    Savage, E

    B. Savage, E. Saldivar, and Z. M. Ruggeri, Initiation of platelet adhesion by arrest onto fibrinogen or transloca- tion on von Willebrand factor, Cell84, 289 (1996)

  4. [4]

    S. P. Jackson, W. S. Nesbitt, and E. Westein, Dynamics of platelet thrombus formation, J. Thromb. Haemost.7, 17 (2009)

  5. [5]

    A. S. Popel and P. C. Johnson, Microcirculation and hemorheology, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.37, 43 (2005)

  6. [6]

    H. H. Lipowsky, Microvascular rheology and hemody- namics, Microcirculation12, 5 (2005)

  7. [7]

    Savage, F

    B. Savage, F. Almus-Jacobs, and Z. M. Ruggeri, Spe- cific synergy of multiple substrate-receptor interactions in platelet thrombus formation under flow, Cell94, 657 (1998)

  8. [8]

    G. L. Mendolicchio and Z. M. Ruggeri, New perspectives on von Willebrand factor functions in hemostasis and thrombosis, Semin. Hematol.42, 5 (2005)

Show all 77 references
  1. [9]

    A. J. Reininger, H. F. G. Heijnen, H. Schumann, H. M. Specht, W. Schramm, and Z. M. Ruggeri, Mechanism of platelet adhesion to von Willebrand factor and micropar- ticle formation under high shear stress, Blood107, 3537 (2006)

  2. [10]

    P. J. Wellings and D. N. Ku, Mechanisms of platelet cap- ture under very high shear, Cardiovascular Engineering and Technology , 161 (2012)

  3. [11]

    W. E. Fowler, L. J. Fretto, K. K. Hamilton, H. P. Er- ickson, and P. A. McKee, Substructure of human von Willebrand factor, J. Clin. Invest.76, 1491 (1985)

  4. [12]

    De Ceunynck, S

    K. De Ceunynck, S. F. De Meyer, and K. Vanhoorel- beke, Unwinding the von Willebrand factor strings puz- zle, Blood121, 270 (2013)

  5. [13]

    T. A. Springer, von Willebrand factor, Jedi knight of the bloodstream, Blood124, 1412 (2014)

  6. [14]

    Ulrichts, M

    H. Ulrichts, M. Udvardy, P. J. Lenting, I. Pareyn, N. Van- deputte, K. Vanhoorelbeke, and H. Deckmyn, Shielding of the A1 domain by the D’D3 domains of von Wille- brand factor modulates its interaction with platelet gly- coprotein Ib-IX-V, J. Biol. Chem.281, 4699 (2006)

  7. [15]

    T. A. Springer, Biology and physics of von Willebrand factor concatamers, J. Thromb. Haemost.9, 130 (2011)

  8. [16]

    S. W. Schneider, S. Nuschele, A. Wixforth, C. Gorze- lanny, A. Alexander-Katz, R. R. Netz, and M. F. Schnei- der, Shear-induced unfolding triggers adhesion of von Willebrand factor fibers, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA104, 7899 (2007)

  9. [17]

    H. Fu, Y. Jiang, D. Yang, F. Scheiflinger, W. P. Wong, and T. A. Springer, Flow-induced elongation of von Willebrand factor precedes tension-dependent activation, Nat. Comm.8, 324 (2017)

  10. [18]

    Alexander-Katz, M

    A. Alexander-Katz, M. F. Schneider, S. W. Schneider, A. Wixforth, and R. R. Netz, Shear-flow-induced unfold- ing of polymeric globules, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 138101 (2006)

  11. [19]

    Alexander-Katz and R

    A. Alexander-Katz and R. R. Netz, Dynamics and in- stabilities of collapsed polymers in shear flow, Macro- molecules41, 3363 (2008)

  12. [20]

    Hoore, K

    M. Hoore, K. Rack, D. A. Fedosov, and G. Gompper, Flow-induced adhesion of shear-activated polymers to a substrate, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter30, 064001 (2018)

  13. [21]

    H. Chen, M. A. Fallah, V. Huck, J. I. Angerer, A. J. Reininger, S. W. Schneider, M. F. Schneider, and A. Alexander-Katz, Blood-clotting-inspired reversible polymer-colloid composite assembly in flow, Nat. Com- mun.4, 1333 (2013). 15

  14. [22]

    V. Huck, M. F. Schneider, C. Gorzelanny, and S. W. Schneider, The various states of von Willebrand factor and their function in physiology and pathophysiology, J. Thromb. Haemost.111, 598 (2014)

  15. [23]

    M. F. Schneider, M. A. Fallah, C. Mess, T. Obser, R. Schneppenheim, A. Alexander-Katz, S. W. Schneider, and V. Huck, Platelet adhesion and aggregate formation controlled by immobilised and soluble vwf, BMC molec- ular and cell biology (2020)

  16. [24]

    A. D. Michelson,Platelets, second edition ed. (Academic Press, 2007)

  17. [25]

    Bryckaert, J.-P

    M. Bryckaert, J.-P. Rosa, C. V. Denis, and P. J. Lent- ing, Of von willebrand factor and platelets, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences , 307 (2015)

  18. [26]

    Savage, J

    B. Savage, J. J. Sixma, and Z. M. Ruggeri, Functional self-association of von Willebrand factor during platelet adhesion under flow, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA99, 425 (2002)

  19. [27]

    Van Rooij, G

    B. Van Rooij, G. Z´ avodszky, V. Azizi Tarksalooyeh, and A. Hoekstra, Identifying the start of a platelet aggregate by the shear rate and the cell-depleted layer, Journal of the Royal Society Interface , 20190148 (2019)

  20. [28]

    D. A. Kim and D. N. Ku, Structure of shear-induced platelet aggregated clot formed in an in vitro arterial thrombosis model, Blood Advances , 2872 (2022)

  21. [29]

    D. Y. Nechipurenko, A. M. Shibeko, A. N. Sveshnikova, and M. A. Panteleev, In silico hemostasis modeling and prediction, H¨ amostaseologie , 524 (2020)

  22. [30]

    N. G. Gutierrez, D. Mukherjee, and D. Bark Jr, De- coding thrombosis through code: a review of computa- tional models, Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis , 35 (2024)

  23. [31]

    Teeraratkul, M

    C. Teeraratkul, M. Tomaiuolo, T. J. Stalker, and D. Mukherjee, Investigating clot-flow interactions by in- tegrating intravital imaging with in silico modeling for analysis of flow, transport, and hemodynamic forces, Sci- entific Reports , 696 (2024)

  24. [32]

    E. S. Bershadsky, D. A. Ermokhin, V. A. Kurattsev, M. A. Panteleev, and D. Y. Nechipurenko, Force balance ratio is a robust predictor of arterial thrombus stability, Biophysical Journal , 464 (2024)

  25. [33]

    Y. Hao, G. Z´ avodszky, C. Tersteeg, M. Barzegari, and A. G. Hoekstra, Image-based flow simulation of platelet aggregates under different shear rates, PLoS Computa- tional Biology , e1010965 (2023)

  26. [34]

    Teeraratkul, Z

    C. Teeraratkul, Z. Irwin, S. C. Shadden, and D. Mukher- jee, Computational investigation of blood flow and flow- mediated transport in arterial thrombus neighborhood, Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology , 701 (2021)

  27. [35]

    Teeraratkul and D

    C. Teeraratkul and D. Mukherjee, Microstructure aware modeling of biochemical transport in arterial blood clots, Journal of Biomechanics , 110692 (2021)

  28. [36]

    N. M. Bagheri, G. Z´ avodszky, and A. G. Hoekstra, The impact of clot permeability on platelet fluxes toward its surface, PloS one , e0317828 (2025)

  29. [37]

    Zheng, A

    X. Zheng, A. Yazdani, H. Li, J. D. Humphrey, and G. E. Karniadakis, A three-dimensional phase-field model for multiscale modeling of thrombus biomechanics in blood vessels, PLoS computational biology , e1007709 (2020)

  30. [38]

    C. T. Watson, S. C. Ward, S. A. Rizzo, A. Redaelli, and K. B. Manning, Influence of hematocrit level and integrin αiibβiii function on vwf-mediated platelet adhesion and shear-induced platelet aggregation in a sudden expan- sion, Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering , 49 (2024)

  31. [39]

    Z. L. Liu, C. Bresette, C. K. Aidun, and D. N. Ku, Sipa in 10 milliseconds: Vwf tentacles agglomerate and capture platelets under high shear, Blood advances , 2453 (2022)

  32. [40]

    Zhussupbekov, R

    M. Zhussupbekov, R. M. Rojano, W.-T. Wu, and J. F. Antaki, von willebrand factor unfolding mediates platelet deposition in a model of high-shear thrombosis, Biophys- ical journal , 4033 (2022)

  33. [41]

    V. Huck, M. F. Schneider, C. Gorzelanny, and S. W. Schneider, The various states of von willebrand factor and their function in physiology and pathophysiology, Thrombosis and haemostasis , 598 (2014)

  34. [42]

    J. A. Lopez, R. K. Andrews, V. Afshar-Kharghan, and M. C. Berndt, Bernard-soulier syndrome, Blood , 4397 (1998)

  35. [43]

    Choudhary, K

    S. Choudhary, K. Sharma, and P. K. Singh, Von wille- brand factor: A key glycoprotein involved in thrombo- inflammatory complications of covid-19, Chemico- Biological Interactions , 109657 (2021)

  36. [44]

    Espa˜ nol and M

    P. Espa˜ nol and M. Revenga, Smoothed dissipative parti- cle dynamics, Phys. Rev. E67, 026705 (2003)

  37. [45]

    M¨ uller, D

    K. M¨ uller, D. A. Fedosov, and G. Gompper, Smoothed dissipative particle dynamics with angular momentum conservation, J. Comput. Phys.281, 301 (2015)

  38. [46]

    V´ azquez-Quesada, M

    A. V´ azquez-Quesada, M. Ellero, and P. Espa˜ nol, Con- sistent scaling of thermal fluctuations in smoothed dis- sipative particle dynamics, J. Chem. Phys.130, 034901 (2009)

  39. [47]

    D. A. Fedosov, B. Caswell, and G. E. Karniadakis, A multiscale red blood cell model with accurate mechanics, rheology, and dynamics, Biophys. J.98, 2215 (2010)

  40. [48]

    D. A. Fedosov, B. Caswell, and G. E. Karniadakis, Sys- tematic coarse-graining of spectrin-level red blood cell models, Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng.199, 1937 (2010)

  41. [49]

    Noguchi and G

    H. Noguchi and G. Gompper, Shape transitions of fluid vesicles and red blood cells in capillary flows, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA102, 14159 (2005)

  42. [50]

    A. J. Reininger, Function of von Willebrand factor in haemostasis and thrombosis, Haemophilia14, 11 (2008)

  43. [51]

    Alexander-Katz and R

    A. Alexander-Katz and R. R. Netz, Surface-enhanced un- folding of collapsed polymers in shear flow, Europhys. Lett.80, 18001 (2007)

  44. [52]

    Huisman, M

    B. Huisman, M. Hoore, G. Gompper, and D. A. Fe- dosov, Modeling the cleavage of von Willebrand factor by ADAMTS13 protease in shear flow, Med. Eng. Phys. 48, 14 (2017)

  45. [53]

    Dembo, D

    M. Dembo, D. C. Torney, K. Saxman, and D. Hammer, The reaction-limited kinetics of membrane-to-surface ad- hesion and detachment, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B234, 55 (1988)

  46. [54]

    F. Kong, A. J. Garc´ ıa, A. P. Mould, M. J. Humphries, and C. Zhu, Demonstration of catch bonds between an integrin and its ligand, J. Cell. Biol.185, 1275 (2009)

  47. [55]

    W. E. Thomas, E. Trintchina, M. Forero, V. Vogel, and E. V. Sokurenko, Bacterial adhesion to target cells en- hanced by shear force, Cell109, 913 (2002)

  48. [56]

    T. A. Doggett, G. Girdhar, A. Lawsh´ e, D. W. Schmidtke, I. J. Laurenzi, S. L. Diamond, and T. G. Diacovo, Selectin-like kinetics and biomechanics promote rapid platelet adhesion in flow: the GPIbα-vWF tether bond, Biophys. J.83, 194 (2002)

  49. [57]

    T. Yago, J. Lou, T. Wu, J. Yang, J. J. Miner, L. Coburn, J. A. L´ opez, M. A. Cruz, J.-F. Dong, L. V. McIntire, 16 R. P. McEver, and C. Zhu, Platelet glycoprotein Ibα forms catch bonds with human WT vWF but not with type 2B von Willebrand disease vWF, J. Clin. Invest. 118, 3195 (2008)

  50. [58]

    Kim, C.-Z

    J. Kim, C.-Z. Zhang, X. Zhang, and T. A. Springer, A mechanically stabilized receptor-ligand flex-bond impor- tant in the vasculature, Nature466, 992 (2010)

  51. [59]

    G. I. Bell, Models for the specific adhesion of cells to cells, Science200, 618 (1978)

  52. [60]

    Y. V. Pereverzev, O. V. Prezhdo, M. Forero, E. V. Sokurenko, and W. E. Thomas, The two-pathway model for the catch-slip transition in biological adhesion, Bio- phys. J.89, 1446 (2005)

  53. [61]

    K. S. Sakariassen, L. Orning, and V. T. Turitto, The im- pact of blood shear rate on arterial thrombus formation, Future Science OA1, FSO30 (2015)

  54. [62]

    K. Rack, V. Huck, M. Hoore, D. A. Fedosov, S. W. Schneider, and G. Gompper, Margination and stretch- ing of von Willebrand factor in the blood stream enable adhesion, Sci. Rep.7, 14278 (2017)

  55. [63]

    H. L. Goldsmith and S. Spain, Margination of leukocytes in blood flow through small tubes, Microvasc. Res.27, 204 (1984)

  56. [64]

    D. A. Fedosov, J. Fornleitner, and G. Gompper, Margina- tion of white blood cells in microcapillary flow, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 028104 (2012)

  57. [65]

    M¨ uller, D

    K. M¨ uller, D. A. Fedosov, and G. Gompper, Margination of micro- and nano-particles in blood flow and its effect on drug delivery, Sci. Rep.4, 4871 (2014)

  58. [66]

    Tosenberger, F

    A. Tosenberger, F. Ataullakhanov, N. Bessonov, M. Pan- teleev, A. Tokarev, and V. Volpert, Modelling of throm- bus growth in flow with a dpd-pde method, Journal of theoretical biology , 30 (2013)

  59. [67]

    L. Casa, S. Gillespie, S. Meeks, and D. Ku, Relative con- tributions of von willebrand factor and platelets in high shear thrombosis, J Hematol Thrombo Dis , 1 (2016)

  60. [68]

    T. V. Colace, R. W. Muthard, and S. L. Diamond, Thrombus growth and embolism on tissue factor-bearing collagen surfaces under flow: role of thrombin with and without fibrin, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology , 1466 (2012)

  61. [69]

    J. D. Welsh, T. J. Stalker, R. Voronov, R. W. Muthard, M. Tomaiuolo, S. L. Diamond, and L. F. Brass, A systems approach to hemostasis: 1. the interdependence of throm- bus architecture and agonist movements in the gaps be- tween platelets, Blood, The Journal of the American So...

  62. [70]

    Tomaiuolo, T

    M. Tomaiuolo, T. J. Stalker, J. D. Welsh, S. L. Dia- mond, T. Sinno, and L. F. Brass, A systems approach to hemostasis: 2. computational analysis of molecular transport in the thrombus microenvironment, Blood, The Journal of the American Society of Hematology????, 1816 (2014)

  63. [71]

    Large-Scale Res

    J¨ ulich Supercomputing Centre, JURECA: Data Centric and Booster Modules implementing the Modular Super- computing Architecture at J¨ ulich Supercomputing Cen- tre, J. Large-Scale Res. Facil.7, A182 (2021)

  64. [72]

    Topuz, G

    A. Topuz, G. Gompper, and D. A. Fedosov, Primary hemostasis and dynamics of clot for- mation after microvascular injury, Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20261853 (2026)

  65. [73]

    D. A. Fedosov and G. E. Karniadakis, Triple-decker: In- terfacing atomistic-mesoscopic-continuum flow regimes, J. Comput. Phys.228, 1157 (2009)

  66. [74]

    H. Lei, D. A. Fedosov, and G. E. Karniadakis, Time- dependent and outflow boundary conditions for dissi- pative particle dynamics, J. Comput. Phys.230, 3765 (2011)

  67. [75]

    Ahlrichs and B

    P. Ahlrichs and B. D¨ unweg, Simulation of a single poly- mer chain in solution by combining lattice Boltzmann and molecular dynamics, J. Chem. Phys.111, 8225 (1999)

  68. [76]

    Lykov, X

    K. Lykov, X. Li, H. Lei, I. V. Pivkin, and G. E. Karni- adakis, Inflow/outflow boundary conditions for particle- based blood flow simulations: application to arterial bi- furcations and trees, PLoS Comput. Biol.11, e1004410 (2015)

  69. [77]

    R¨ omer and D

    F. R¨ omer and D. A. Fedosov, Dense brushes of stiff poly- mers or filaments in fluid flow, Europhys. Lett.109, 68001 (2015)

Pith tools

Reviewed June 29, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.