Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Zero-Shot Robustification of Zero-Shot Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2309.04344 v2 pith:LDBIA6SL submitted 2023-09-08 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords zero-shotmodelspretrainedboostembeddingsperformanceroboshotaccuracy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Zero-shot inference is a powerful paradigm that enables the use of large pretrained models for downstream classification tasks without further training. However, these models are vulnerable to inherited biases that can impact their performance. The traditional solution is fine-tuning, but this undermines the key advantage of pretrained models, which is their ability to be used out-of-the-box. We propose RoboShot, a method that improves the robustness of pretrained model embeddings in a fully zero-shot fashion. First, we use language models (LMs) to obtain useful insights from task descriptions. These insights are embedded and used to remove harmful and boost useful components in embeddings -- without any supervision. Theoretically, we provide a simple and tractable model for biases in zero-shot embeddings and give a result characterizing under what conditions our approach can boost performance. Empirically, we evaluate RoboShot on nine image and NLP classification tasks and show an average improvement of 15.98% on worst group accuracy, with trivial decrease in overall accuracy over several zero-shot baselines. Additionally, we demonstrate that RoboShot is compatible with a variety of pretrained and language models and propose a way to further boost performance with a zero-shot adaptation variant.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Debiasing CLIP: Interpreting and Correcting Bias in Attention Heads

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Using wrong/correct hard-sample head comparisons, LTC finds spurious CLIP attention heads and corrects them to raise worst-group accuracy on biased benchmarks.

Pith tools