Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Hole-doped Fe2Se2Cl is predicted to be a d-wave altermagnet with spin splitting up to 620 meV.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 23:51 UTC pith:LDZWJNFU

load-bearing objection Hole-doped Fe2Se2Cl is a plausible new d-wave altermagnet with a huge band splitting, but the slab 'robustness' test doesn't compare magnetic orders and the small PBE energy differences need a cross-check. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.15197 v1 pith:LDZWJNFU submitted 2026-07-16 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Emergent d-wave altermagnetism in chlorine-adsorbed FeSe monolayer

Zi-Hao Ding , Ze-Feng Gao , Kai Liu , Peng-Jie Guo , Zhong-Yi Lu This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords altermagnetismFeSe monolayerchlorine adsorptioncheckerboard magnetic orderspin splittinghole dopingd-wave symmetrytwo-dimensional magnetism
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper predicts a concrete way to make monolayer FeSe — the simplest iron-based superconductor — become an altermagnet, a magnetic phase that has zero net magnetization but spin-split electronic bands in momentum space. By adsorbing chlorine on one side to form stoichiometric Fe2Se2Cl and adding 0.25 holes per iron via ionic gating, the checkerboard magnetic order becomes the ground state, and the asymmetric Cl layer breaks inversion symmetry. The result is a d-wave altermagnet with a giant spin splitting of up to 620 meV, which persists even when the monolayer is placed on top of nonmagnetic FeSe layers in a 10-layer slab. If correct, this gives a material platform that combines altermagnetism with the FeSe superconducting family, opening a route to study their interplay and potential triplet superconductivity.

Core claim

The central discovery is that the synergy between hole doping and single-side Cl adsorption stabilizes the checkerboard magnetic order in monolayer FeSe and turns it into an intrinsic d-wave altermagnet. In undoped Fe2Se2Cl the dimer order is lower in energy by about 24 meV/Fe, but hole doping reverses the hierarchy near 0.175 hole/Fe, so at 0.25 hole/Fe the checkerboard order lies 12.19 meV/Fe below the dimer. Because the Cl layer breaks out-of-plane inversion while preserving C4z rotation, the two spin sublattices of the checkerboard are connected by rotation/mirror operations, producing fully compensated magnetization with momentum-dependent spin splitting up to 620 meV near the Fermi lev

What carries the argument

The key machinery is the checkerboard magnetic order combined with the asymmetric ligand environment. Single-side Cl adsorption breaks spatial inversion symmetry while preserving C4z symmetry, so the two antiparallel Fe sublattices are related by spin-group operations {C2||C4z} and diagonal mirror reflections — the symmetry condition for altermagnetism. Hole doping stabilizes this checkerboard order against the competing dimer order, making the altermagnetic state the ground state. The spin splitting itself arises from the anisotropic crystal potential without spin-orbit coupling.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that density-functional total-energy differences at 0.25 hole/Fe correctly rank the checkerboard above the dimer order; if a more accurate treatment (or experiment) shows the dimer remains lower, the altermagnetic ground state is lost.

What would settle it

A hybrid-functional or DFT+U calculation that keeps the dimer order lower than the checkerboard at 0.25 hole/Fe would undermine the ground-state claim. Experimentally, angle-resolved photoemission on Cl-adsorbed, gate-doped FeSe monolayers that shows no spin-split bands near the Fermi level — or neutron scattering showing a different magnetic order — would refute the prediction.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

If this is right

  • Fe2Se2Cl becomes a stoichiometric, gate-tunable altermagnetic monolayer whose spin splitting (up to 620 meV) is far larger than typical exchange splittings in antiferromagnets.
  • The altermagnetic state is robust against hybridization with underlying nonmagnetic FeSe layers, so it can be realized experimentally in multilayer stacks rather than only free-standing monolayers.
  • Because FeSe is a superconductor in bulk and on substrates, Fe2Se2Cl offers a natural testbed for the interplay between altermagnetic order and superconductivity, possibly favoring equal-spin triplet pairing.
  • The d-wave pattern of the spin-resolved Fermi surface implies altermagnetic spin-splitter and spin-current responses usable in spintronic devices without stray magnetic fields.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the checkerboard-vs-dimer energy difference is sensitive to the exchange-correlation functional, the predicted doping window around 0.25 hole/Fe might shift; a hybrid-functional cross-check or experimental magnetic susceptibility measurement would tighten the prediction.
  • The same single-side adsorption strategy could be tried on other iron-based superconducting monolayers (e.g., FeSeX Janus layers) to search for even larger altermagnetic splittings or topological states.
  • Ionic gating in real devices often injects carriers non-uniformly; the prediction assumes rigid-band doping, so a testable extension is whether local Cl coverage variations or strain can also stabilize the checkerboard order at lower nominal doping.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a concrete route to realize d-wave altermagnetism in monolayer FeSe by single-side Cl adsorption, forming a stoichiometric Fe2Se2Cl monolayer with broken inversion symmetry. Using spin-group symmetry analysis and DFT-PBE total-energy comparisons of eight magnetic configurations, the authors find that undoped Fe2Se2Cl favors a dimer order, while hole doping stabilizes the checkerboard order; at 0.25 hole/Fe the checkerboard is lower by 12.19 meV/Fe. The computed band structure shows a spin splitting of up to 620 meV with a planar d-wave Fermi surface, and SOC produces Néel-vector-dependent Weyl anti-crossings. The authors argue that the altermagnetic state persists in bilayer, trilayer, and 10-layer slab models and is therefore robust in the bulk limit, making Fe2Se2Cl a platform for altermagnetism–superconductivity coexistence.

Significance. If the predicted ground-state ordering survives higher-level energetic checks, this is a significant contribution: it identifies a specific, experimentally feasible FeSe-derived monolayer with a symmetry-allowed d-wave altermagnetic state and a giant spin splitting, and it connects the altermagnetism field to the well-studied FeSe superconducting family. The work goes beyond a symmetry argument by comparing eight magnetic configurations, including phonon and molecular dynamics stability checks, and by explicitly reporting the doping-driven dimer-to-checkerboard transition. The symmetry-based classification and the SOC analysis are well grounded. The main risk is quantitative: the magnetic energy differences are computed with a single exchange-correlation functional and are small, and the thick-slab robustness claim is not backed by a ground-state search. These issues are load-bearing for the headline claims but appear addressable with additional calculations and more cautious wording.

major comments (3)
  1. [§II, Fig. 1(d) and Discussion] The central energetic claim — that hole doping reverses the dimer/checkerboard ordering and that checkerboard is 12.19 meV/Fe lower at 0.25 hole/Fe — rests entirely on PBE total energies. FeSe magnetism is known to be highly functional-sensitive, and the energy differences are small (the undoped gap is 24.186 meV/Fe; the doped gap is 12.19 meV/Fe). A PBE+U, SCAN, or hybrid-functional check at the representative doping is needed. Without it, the sign of the ordering energy is not sufficiently secured for a ground-state claim.
  2. [§II, Fig. 4 and the 10-layer slab paragraph] The 10-layer slab calculation is presented as evidence that the altermagnetic state is 'highly resilient' and persists in the 'bulk limit,' but it is not a ground-state test. The text states that the top Fe2Se2Cl layer was initialized in the checkerboard state and all underlying moments were set to zero; no total-energy comparison with dimer or other magnetic orders in the slab is reported. Given the small 12.19 meV/Fe monolayer energy gap, the slab result could well be a metastable self-consistent solution. This claim should be reworded as showing a robust local minimum, or the authors should compare at least dimer and checkerboard initializations in the slab.
  3. [§II, doping methodology; §II, '10-layer slab' caption] The method for simulating hole doping is not described in the main text (e.g., rigid-band shift, compensating background charge, explicit Cl vacancies), although the predicted phase transition at ~0.175 hole/Fe depends on it. Relatedly, the 10-layer stack is a Cl-terminated FeSe slab with nonmagnetic underlying FeSe layers, not a bulk Fe2Se2Cl crystal; calling it 'the true bulk limit' is misleading. Please state the doping model explicitly and rephrase the bulk-limit language.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and Introduction] Typos and formatting: 'outof-plane' should be 'out-of-plane'; 'd-wave' is hyphenated inconsistently; 'T c' has inconsistent spacing. Please also define the spin-group notation {C2||C4z} at first use.
  2. [Fig. 2 and main text] The 'spin splitting of up to 620 meV' should be defined precisely: is it the energy difference between spin-up and spin-down bands at the same k point, or the maximum spin-channel polarization along a chosen path? Also specify magnetic moments (μB/Fe) for the checkerboard state.
  3. [Computational methods] The main text refers to the Supplemental Material for methods but gives no k-point grid, plane-wave cutoff, or convergence criteria in the main text. At least one sentence summarizing the DFT settings would aid reproducibility.
  4. [Fig. 1(d) and Discussion] The text says the transition occurs at approximately 0.175 hole/Fe, but Fig. 1(d) appears to show discrete points. Please state whether the transition is interpolated and how many doping levels were actually computed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Central DFT derivation is self-contained; self-citations are background only; the 10-layer robustness check is underdetermined but not an equation-level circularity.

full rationale

The main derivation chain is not circular. The claim that hole-doped Fe2Se2Cl has a checkerboard altermagnetic ground state rests on explicit DFT total-energy comparisons among eight magnetic configurations (Fig. 1c,d; Fig. S4), where the checkerboard lies 12.19 meV/Fe below the dimer at 0.25 hole/Fe; this energy ordering is computed, not imposed. The identification of the checkerboard state as a d-wave altermagnet follows from spin-group symmetry analysis of that calculated state ({C2||C4z}, {C2||Md}, etc.), and the ~620 meV splitting is read off the resulting band structure rather than fitted. Self-citations ([11,13-16,20,24]) appear only in the introductory survey and are not load-bearing for these results. The paper's own Discussion cautions that 'observing altermagnetic spin splitting in a prescribed checkerboard configuration does not by itself establish that this configuration is the true magnetic ground state'; the 10-layer slab test indeed initializes the top layer with checkerboard order and reports no energy comparison with competing orders, so the 'robustness' claim is underdetermined. That is a correctness/evidence limitation, not a case of a prediction being equal to its input by construction, because the monolayer ground-state and spin-splitting results are independent of that initialization. Score 1 reflects the peripheral self-citations and the overbroad robustness wording, not a circular derivation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 6 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central prediction rests on standard DFT energetics plus a symmetry classification. The hand-chosen control parameters are the Cl coverage (1 ML) and the representative hole doping (0.25 hole/Fe). The main domain assumptions are the reliability of PBE for FeSe magnetic energy differences and the correspondence between rigid-band doping and experimental gating.

free parameters (2)
  • Hole doping level = 0.25 hole/Fe
    Chosen by hand as the representative doping point. The paper shows the dimer-to-checkerboard transition near 0.175 hole/Fe, and all headline results (12.19 meV/Fe stabilization, 620 meV splitting) are evaluated at 0.25 hole/Fe.
  • Cl coverage = 1 ML (full top-Se coverage)
    Selected after comparing 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, and 1 ML coverages. The Fe2Se2Cl stoichiometry and the resulting symmetry environment depend on this full-coverage choice.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption PBE-GGA+PAW+D3 total energies are accurate to a few meV/Fe for competing FeSe magnetic phases.
    The checkerboard-vs-dimer energy difference (Fig. 1c,d) is the decisive quantity; no Hubbard-U or hybrid-functional cross-check is reported, and FeSe magnetic energetics are known to be delicate.
  • standard math The spin-group symmetry classification of checkerboard Fe2Se2Cl as a d-wave altermagnet is correct.
    Uses the operations {C2||C4z}, {C2||Md}, {C2||Md⊥} in Section II; this is a standard symmetry classification and is not circular.
  • domain assumption Ionic-liquid gating delivers uniform hole doping without structural or chemical disruption of the Cl layer.
    The Discussion extrapolates from rigid doped-supercell calculations to gating experiments; no explicit model of the electric double layer or charge distribution is given.
  • domain assumption Eight magnetic configurations in a 2√2×2√2×1 supercell cover the relevant competing ground states.
    Longer-period or incommensurate magnetic orders are not examined. The same caveat the authors apply to refs [52,53] applies to their own supercell choice.
  • domain assumption Underlying FeSe layers remain nonmagnetic in multilayer slab models.
    In the slab calculations the lower layers are initialized with zero moments and converge to nonmagnetic states; this is a modeling choice tied to the experimental absence of static order in FeSe.
  • domain assumption Phonon spectrum and 300 K molecular dynamics imply a synthesizable monolayer.
    Dynamic stability of the idealized free-standing Cl-covered layer is used to argue experimental feasibility, but surface growth and adsorbate kinetics are not modeled.
invented entities (1)
  • Fe2Se2Cl monolayer (single-side Cl-terminated FeSe) independent evidence
    purpose: Material platform for d-wave altermagnetism with possible coexistence with FeSe superconductivity
    The paper predicts falsifiable handles: a phonon-stable 2D structure, checkerboard magnetic order, a ~620 meV spin splitting observable in ARPES, and a doping window around 0.25 hole/Fe. These are testable outside the paper.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 10620 in / 13072 out tokens · 110581 ms · 2026-08-01T23:51:23.237245+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Emergent d-wave altermagnetism in chlorine-adsorbed FeSe monolayer." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LDZWJNFU

@misc{pith2026260715197,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Emergent d-wave altermagnetism in chlorine-adsorbed FeSe monolayer},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LDZWJNFU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.15197}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

The recent emergence of altermagnetism has opened new frontiers in condensed matter physics, yet material platforms capable of hosting both intrinsic altermagnetic order and superconductivity remain exceedingly rare. Here, based on symmetry analysis and first-principles calculations, we propose a realistic route to engineer robust altermagnetism in monolayer FeSe, a prototypical iron-based superconductor. By designing a stoichiometric Fe2Se2Cl structure through single-side Cl adsorption and introducing gate-tunable hole doping, we achieve a highly stable altermagnetic ground state. Our calculations reveal a synergistic mechanism: hole doping firmly stabilizes the checkerboard magnetic order, while the asymmetric ligand environment intrinsically breaks the outof-plane spatial inversion symmetry. Consequently, this interplay induces a giant altermagnetic spin splitting of up to 620 meV. Crucially, we demonstrate that this altermagnetic state and its giant spin splitting are highly resilient, persisting even in a 10-layer slab model that accurately simulates the bulk limit. By introducing altermagnetism into the well-established FeSe-based superconducting family, our findings identify Fe2Se2Cl as a promising platform for spintronic applications and motivate future studies of the possible interplay between altermagnetism and superconductivity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.15197 by Kai Liu, Peng-Jie Guo, Ze-Feng Gao, Zhong-Yi Lu, Zi-Hao Ding.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Top and (b) side views of the monolayer Fe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) Phonon spectrum of monolayer Fe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Electronic band structure and (b) spin-resolved [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Altermagnetism from a Cu-Fe Lieb Lattice in FeSe/Cuprate Heterostructures

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    45°-twisted FeSe/cuprate stacks are predicted to realize altermagnetism via a Cu-Fe Lieb lattice and substrate-induced FeSe asymmetry, with DFT showing 15–25 meV spin splittings.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 9 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    School of Physics and Key Laboratory of Quantum State Construction and Manipulation (Ministry of Education), Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China and

  2. [2]

    Hefei National Laboratory, Hefei 230088, China (Dated: July 17, 2026) The recent emergence of altermagnetism has opened new frontiers in condensed matter physics, yet material platforms capable of hosting both intrinsic altermagnetic order and superconductiv- ity remain exceedingly rare. Here, based on symmetry analysis and first-principles calculations, ...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  3. [3]

    V. Leeb, A. Mook, L. ˇSmejkal, and J. Knolle, Sponta- neous formation of altermagnetism from orbital ordering, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 236701 (2024)

    2024

  4. [4]

    Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, L.ˇSmejkal, K

    R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, L.ˇSmejkal, K. V´ yborn´ y, Y. Ya- hagi, J. Sinova, T. Jungwirth, and J. ˇZelezn´ y, Effi- cient Electrical Spin Splitter Based on Nonrelativistic Collinear Antiferromagnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 127701 (2021)

    2021

  5. [5]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond conven- tional ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism: A phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal rotation symmetry, Phys. Rev. X12, 031042 (2022)

    2022

  6. [6]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Emerging re- search landscape of altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. X12, 040501 (2022)

    2022

  7. [7]

    H. Bai, L. Han, X. Y. Feng, Y. J. Zhou, R. X. Su, Q. Wang, L. Y. Liao, W. X. Zhu, X. Z. Chen, F. Pan, X. L. Fan, and C. Song, Observation of Spin Splitting Torque in a Collinear Antiferromagnet RuO2, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 197202 (2022)

    2022

  8. [8]

    Karube, T

    S. Karube, T. Tanaka, D. Sugawara, N. Kadoguchi, M. Kohda, and J. Nitta, Observation of Spin-Splitter Torque in Collinear Antiferromagnetic RuO2, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 137201 (2022)

    2022

  9. [9]

    H.-Y. Ma, M. Hu, N. Li, J. Liu, W. Yao, J.-F. Jia, and J. Liu, Multifunctional antiferromagnetic materials with giant piezomagnetism and noncollinear spin current, Nat. Commun.12, 2846 (2021)

    2021

  10. [10]

    A. Bose, N. J. Schreiber, R. Jain, D.-F. Shao, H. P. Nair, J. Sun, X. S. Zhang, D. A. Muller, E. Y. Tsymbal, D. G. Schlom, and D. C. Ralph, Tilted spin current generated by the collinear antiferromagnet ruthenium dioxide, Nat. Electron.5, 267 (2022)

    2022

  11. [11]

    Guo, Z.-X

    P.-J. Guo, Z.-X. Liu, and Z.-Y. Lu, Quantum anomalous hall effect in collinear antiferromagnetism, npj Comput. Mater.9, 70 (2023)

    2023

  12. [12]

    X. Zhou, W. Feng, R.-W. Zhang, L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, Y. Mokrousov, and Y. Yao, Crystal Thermal Transport in Altermagnetic RuO 2, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 056701 (2024)

    2024

  13. [13]

    ˇSmejkal, R

    L. ˇSmejkal, R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, T. Jungwirth, and J. Sinova, Crystal time-reversal symmetry breaking and spontaneous hall effect in collinear antiferromagnets, Sci. Adv.6, eaaz8809 (2020)

    2020

  14. [14]

    ˇSmejkal, A

    L. ˇSmejkal, A. H. MacDonald, J. Sinova, S. Nakat- suji, and T. Jungwirth, Anomalous hall antiferromagnets, Nat. Rev. Mater.7, 482 (2022)

    2022

  15. [15]

    C.-Y. Tan, P. Feng, Z.-F. Gao, F. Ma, P.-J. Guo, and Z.-Y. Lu, Stacking-induced type-II quantum spin hall in- sulators with high spin chern number in unconventional magnetism, Sci. Bull. (2026)

    2026

  16. [16]

    X. Liu, C. Tan, P.-J. Guo, Z.-Y. Lu, and Z.-X. Liu, Exci- tonic quantum anomalous hall effect in collinear magnets without spin-orbit coupling (2026), arXiv:2603.12280. 6

    arXiv 2026

  17. [17]

    Tan, Z.-F

    C.-Y. Tan, Z.-F. Gao, H.-C. Yang, Z.-X. Liu, K. Liu, P.- J. Guo, and Z.-Y. Lu, Crystal valley hall effect, Phys. Rev. B111, 094411 (2025)

    2025

  18. [18]

    Feng, C.-Y

    P. Feng, C.-Y. Tan, M. Gao, X.-W. Yan, Z.-X. Liu, P.-J. Guo, F. Ma, and Z.-Y. Lu, Type-II quantum spin hall insulator (2025), arXiv:2503.13397

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  19. [19]

    ˇSmejkal, Altermagnetic multiferroics and altermagne- toelectric effect (2024), arXiv:2411.19928

    L. ˇSmejkal, Altermagnetic multiferroics and altermagne- toelectric effect (2024), arXiv:2411.19928

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  20. [20]

    P.-J. Guo, Y. Gu, Z.-F. Gao, and Z.-Y. Lu, Altermagnetic ferroelectric LiFe2F6 and spin-triplet excitonic insulator phase (2023), arXiv:2312.13911

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  21. [21]

    X. Duan, J. Zhang, Z. Zhu, Y. Liu, Z. Zhang, I. ˇZuti´ c, and T. Zhou, Antiferroelectric altermagnets: Antiferro- electricity alters magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 106801 (2025)

    2025

  22. [22]

    M. Gu, Y. Liu, H. Zhu, K. Yananose, X. Chen, Y. Hu, A. Stroppa, and Q. Liu, Ferroelectric switchable alter- magnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 106802 (2025)

    2025

  23. [23]

    Candelora, M

    C. Candelora, M. Xu, S. Cheng, A. D. Vita, D. Ro- manin, C. Bigi, M. B. Petersen, A. LaFleur, M. Ca- landra, J. Miwa, Y. Hwang, Z. Wang, F. Mazzola, and I. Zeljkovic, Discovery of magnetic-field-tunable density waves in a layered altermagnet (2025), arXiv:2503.03716

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    Z.-H. Ding, L. Wang, Z.-F. Ouyang, J. Qiao, Z.-F. Gao, W. Ji, K. Liu, P.-J. Guo, and Z.-Y. Lu, Anoma- lous charge density wave in altermagnetism (2025), arXiv:2507.15429

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    Jiang, M

    B. Jiang, M. Hu, J. Bai, Z. Song, C. Mu, G. Qu, W. Li, W. Zhu, H. Pi, Z. Wei,et al., A metallic room- temperatured-wave altermagnet, Nat. Phys.21, 754 (2025)

    2025

  26. [26]

    C. Xu, S. Wu, G.-X. Zhi, G. Cao, J. Dai, C. Cao, X. Wang, and H.-Q. Lin, Altermagnetic ground state in distorted Kagome metal CsCr 3Sb5, Nat. Commun.16, 3114 (2025)

    2025

  27. [27]

    Brekke, A

    B. Brekke, A. Brataas, and A. Sudbø, Two-dimensional altermagnets: Superconductivity in a minimal micro- scopic model, Phys. Rev. B108, 224421 (2023)

    2023

  28. [28]

    Zhang, L.-H

    S.-B. Zhang, L.-H. Hu, and T. Neupert, Finite- momentum cooper pairing in proximitized altermagnets, Nature Communications15, 1801 (2024)

    2024

  29. [29]

    I. I. Mazin, Notes on altermagnetism and superconduc- tivity, AAPPS Bull.35, 18 (2025)

    2025

  30. [30]

    Zhu, Z.-Y

    D. Zhu, Z.-Y. Zhuang, Z. Wu, and Z. Yan, Topological superconductivity in two-dimensional altermagnetic met- als, Phys. Rev. B108, 184505 (2023)

    2023

  31. [31]

    L. V. Pupim and M. S. Scheurer, Adatom engineer- ing magnetic order in superconductors: Applications to altermagnetic superconductivity, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 146001 (2025)

    2025

  32. [32]

    X. Ma, S. Wu, Z. Li, L. Hu, J. Dai, and C. Cao, Possible spin triplet pairing due to altermagnetic spin fluctuation (2025), arXiv:2509.09959

    arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    H. O. Jeschke, M. Shimizu, and I. I. Mazin, CuAg(SO4)2: A doubly strongly correlated altermagnetic three- dimensional analog of the parent compounds of high-T c cuprates, Phys. Rev. B109, L220412 (2024)

    2024

  34. [34]

    Y.-M. Wu, Y. Wang, and R. M. Fernandes, Intra-unit-cell singlet pairing mediated by altermagnetic fluctuations, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 156001 (2025)

    2025

  35. [35]

    Medvedev, T

    S. Medvedev, T. McQueen, I. Troyan, T. Palasyuk, M. Eremets, R. Cava, S. Naghavi, F. Casper, V. Kseno- fontov, G. Wortmann,et al., Electronic and magnetic phase diagram ofβ-Fe 1.01Se with superconductivity at 36.7 K under pressure, Nat. Mater.8, 630 (2009)

    2009

  36. [36]

    B. Lei, J. H. Cui, Z. J. Xiang, C. Shang, N. Z. Wang, G. J. Ye, X. G. Luo, T. Wu, Z. Sun, and X. H. Chen, Evolution of High-Temperature Superconductivity from a Low-Tc Phase Tuned by Carrier Concentration in FeSe Thin Flakes, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 077002 (2016)

    2016

  37. [37]

    Z. Li, X. Ma, S. Wu, H.-Q. Yuan, J. Dai, and C. Cao, Layered ternary iron-selenides under pressure as candi- dates for coexisting altermagnetism and superconductiv- ity, Phys. Rev. B112, 214456 (2025)

    2025

  38. [38]

    Hsu, J.-Y

    F.-C. Hsu, J.-Y. Luo, K.-W. Yeh, T.-K. Chen, T.-W. Huang, P. M. Wu, Y.-C. Lee, Y.-L. Huang, Y.-Y. Chu, D.-C. Yan, and M.-K. Wu, Superconductivity in the PbO-type structureα-FeSe, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 14262 (2008)

    2008

  39. [39]

    S. Tan, Y. Zhang, M. Xia, Z. Ye, F. Chen, X. Xie, R. Peng, D. Xu, Q. Fan, H. Xu,et al., Interface- induced superconductivity and strain-dependent spin density waves in FeSe/SrTiO3 thin films, Nat. Mater.12, 634 (2013)

    2013

  40. [40]

    Mazin, R

    I. Mazin, R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, and L. ˇSmejkal, In- duced Monolayer Altermagnetism in MnP(S,Se) 3 and FeSe (2023), arXiv:2309.02355

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  41. [41]

    Qing-Yan, L

    W. Qing-Yan, L. Zhi, Z. Wen-Hao, Z. Zuo-Cheng, Z. Jin- Song, L. Wei, D. Hao, O. Yun-Bo, D. Peng, C. Kai, W. Jing, S. Can-Li, H. Ke, J. Jin-Feng, J. Shuai-Hua, W. Ya-Yu, W. Li-Li, C. Xi, M. Xu-Cun, and X. Qi-Kun, Interface-Induced High-Temperature Superconductivity in Single Unit-Cell FeSe Films on SrTiO 3, Chin. Phys. Lett.29, 037402 (2012)

    2012

  42. [42]

    S. He, J. He, W. Zhang, L. Zhao, D. Liu, X. Liu, D. Mou, Y.-B. Ou, Q.-Y. Wang, Z. Li,et al., Phase diagram and electronic indication of high-temperature superconduc- tivity at 65 K in single-layer FeSe films, Nat. Mater.12, 605 (2013)

    2013

  43. [43]

    Schmidbauer, A

    M. Schmidbauer, A. Kwasniewski, and J. Schwarzkopf, High-precision absolute lattice parameter determination of SrTiO3, DyScO3 and NdGaO3 single crystals, Struct. Sci.68, 8 (2012)

    2012

  44. [44]

    I. I. Mazin, K. Koepernik, M. D. Johannes, R. Gonz´ alez- Hern´ andez, and L.ˇSmejkal, Prediction of unconventional magnetism in doped FeSb2, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 118, e2108924118 (2021)

    2021

  45. [45]

    Wen-Hao, S

    Z. Wen-Hao, S. Yi, Z. Jin-Song, L. Fang-Sen, G. Ming- Hua, Z. Yan-Fei, Z. Hui-Min, P. Jun-Ping, X. Ying, W. Hui-Chao, F. Takeshi, H. Akihiko, L. Zhi, D. Hao, T. Chen-Jia, W. Meng, W. Qing-Yan, H. Ke, J. Shuai- Hua, C. Xi, W. Jun-Feng, X. Zheng-Cai, L. Liang, W. Ya- Yu, W. Jian, W. Li-Li, C. Ming-Wei, X. Qi-Kun, and M. Xu-Cun, Direct Observation of High-Te...

    2014

  46. [46]

    See supplemental material at http://link.aps.org/xxx, which includes a detailed description of computational methods as well as supplemental figures

  47. [47]

    X. Tang, T. Fan, C. Wang, and H. Zhang, Halogen Func- tionalization in the 2D Material Flatland: Strategies, Properties, and Applications, Small17, 2005640 (2021)

    2021

  48. [48]

    Daghero, F

    D. Daghero, F. Paolucci, A. Sola, M. Tortello, G. A. 7 Ummarino, M. Agosto, R. S. Gonnelli, J. R. Nair, and C. Gerbaldi, Large conductance modulation of gold thin films by huge charge injection via electrochemical gating, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 066807 (2012)

    2012

  49. [49]

    R. M. Roy, M. Povolotskiy, J. Kirschke, C. Prange, Y. Xia, V. Sundaramurthy, P. Puphal, M. Pinteric, M. van de Loo, A. Kreyssig, T. Zhang, A. E. B¨ ohmer, M. Dressel, and M. Wenzel, From Narrow-gap Semicon- ductor to Metallic Altermagnet: Optical Fingerprints of Co-Doped FeSb2 (2026), arXiv:2604.28105

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  50. [50]

    Kamysbayev, A

    V. Kamysbayev, A. S. Filatov, H. Hu, X. Rui, F. La- gunas, D. Wang, R. F. Klie, and D. V. Talapin, Co- valent surface modifications and superconductivity of two-dimensional metal carbide mxenes, Science369, 979 (2020)

    2020

  51. [51]

    H. Huan, Y. Xue, B. Zhao, H. Bao, L. Liu, and Z. Yang, Tunable Weyl half-semimetals in two-dimensional iron- based materialsMFeSe(M= Tl,In,Ga), Phys. Rev. B 106, 125404 (2022)

    2022

  52. [52]

    Z. Cui, Z. Zhu, B. Hao, X. Duan, X. Zhou, Y. Xie, H. Yang, B. Sa, R. Li, and T. Zhou, Surface functional- ization enables two-dimensional altermagnetism and gi- ant tunnel magnetoresistance (2026), arXiv:2607.03908

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  53. [53]

    Y. Qu, Y. Liao, Z. Wang, L. Liu, and G. Yao, Control- lable magnetic anisotropy and ferroelasticity in a super- conducting fese monolayer with surface fluorine adsorp- tion, Phys. Rev. B110, 165424 (2024)

    2024

  54. [54]

    Y. Li, J. Li, Y. Li, M. Ye, F. Zheng, Z. Zhang, J. Fu, W. Duan, and Y. Xu, High-temperature quan- tum anomalous hall insulators in lithium-decorated iron- based superconductor materials, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 086401 (2020)

    2020

  55. [55]

    P. E. Bl¨ ochl, Projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B50, 17953 (1994)

    1994

  56. [56]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  57. [57]

    Gonz´ alez-Garc ´ ıa, W

    A. Gonz´ alez-Garc ´ ıa, W. L´ opez-P´ erez, P. Pacheco, L. Ram ´ ırez-Montes, and R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, Coexis- tence ofd-wave altermagnetism and topological states in Janus FeSeX(X= S, Te) monolayers, Phys. Rev. Mater. 10, 044004 (2026)

    2026

  58. [58]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm¨ uller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B54, 11169 (1996)

    1996

  59. [59]

    Grimme, J

    S. Grimme, J. Antony, S. Ehrlich, and H. Krieg, A con- sistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 ele- ments H-Pu, J. Chem. Phys.132, 154104 (2010)

    2010

  60. [60]

    Pizzi, V

    G. Pizzi, V. Vitale, R. Arita, S. Bl¨ ugel, F. Freimuth, G. G´ eranton, M. Gibertini, D. Gresch, C. Johnson, T. Koretsune, J. Iba˜ nez-Azpiroz, H. Lee, J.-M. Lihm, D. Marchand, A. Marrazzo, Y. Mokrousov, J. I. Mustafa, Y. Nohara, Y. Nomura, L. Paulatto, S. Ponc´ e, T. Pon- weiser, J. Qiao, F. Th¨ ole, S. S. Tsirkin, M. Wierzbowska, N. Marzari, D. Vanderbi...

    2020

  61. [61]

    Togo, First-principles phonon calculations with phonopy and phono3py, J

    A. Togo, First-principles phonon calculations with phonopy and phono3py, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.92, 012001 (2023)

    2023

  62. [62]

    P. E. Bl¨ ochl, O. Jepsen, and O. K. Andersen, Improved tetrahedron method for brillouin-zone integrations, Phys. Rev. B49, 16223 (1994)

    1994

  63. [65]

    Momma and F

    K. Momma and F. Izumi,VESTA3for three-dimensional visualization of crystal, volumetric and morphology data, J. Appl. Crystallogr.44, 1272 (2011)

    2011

  64. [100]

    Similarly, the symmetry operations along the

    direction, the system preserves the symmetry opera- tions{E, Mx}+T {C2z, My}, whereTis the time-reversal operator. Similarly, the symmetry operations along the

  65. [110]

    The Fermi surfaces and their corresponding spin projec- tions along the [100] and [110] directions, as depicted in Figs

    direction are given by{E, M d}+T {C2z, Md⊥}. The Fermi surfaces and their corresponding spin projec- tions along the [100] and [110] directions, as depicted in Figs. 3(b) and 3(d), strictly obey the aforementioned symmetry constraints. a c b a c b (a) Fe Se Cl (d) Energy (eV) Energy (eV) Γ MY X Γ MY X (b) (c) (e) (f) FIG. 4. (a) Electronic band structure ...