REVIEW 2 cited by
The Typical Behavior of Bandit Algorithms
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We establish strong laws of large numbers and central limit theorems for the regret of two of the most popular bandit algorithms: Thompson sampling and UCB. Here, our characterizations of the regret distribution complement the characterizations of the tail of the regret distribution recently developed by Fan and Glynn (2021) (arXiv:2109.13595). The tail characterizations there are associated with atypical bandit behavior on trajectories where the optimal arm mean is under-estimated, leading to mis-identification of the optimal arm and large regret. In contrast, our SLLN's and CLT's here describe the typical behavior and fluctuation of regret on trajectories where the optimal arm mean is properly estimated. We find that Thompson sampling and UCB satisfy the same SLLN and CLT, with the asymptotics of both the SLLN and the (mean) centering sequence in the CLT matching the asymptotics of expected regret. Both the mean and variance in the CLT grow at $\log(T)$ rates with the time horizon $T$. Asymptotically as $T \to \infty$, the variability in the number of plays of each sub-optimal arm depends only on the rewards received for that arm, which indicates that each sub-optimal arm contributes independently to the overall CLT variance.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Optimism Stabilizes Thompson Sampling for Adaptive Inference
Optimistic modifications of Thompson sampling make each arm's pull count concentrate around a deterministic scale, yielding asymptotically valid Wald inference in K-armed Gaussian bandits with multiple optimal arms.
-
Precise Asymptotics and Refined Regret of Variance-Aware UCB
UCB-V's arm-pulling counts match the solution of a deterministic equation except at a critical variance-to-gap ratio where they oscillate, and the new regret bound depends on the optimal arm's variance.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.