Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 53 references

Magnetic skyrmion dislocations split yet stay perfectly elastic

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 23:53 UTC pith:LEY7JOOO

load-bearing objection Core-split dislocation in a magnetic skyrmion lattice is a real, novel result; the Volterra 'perfect' agreement needs quantitative backup before the headline claim is sellable. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2511.03504 v1 pith:LEY7JOOO submitted 2025-11-05 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Topological transition and emergent elasticity of dislocation in skyrmion lattice: Beyond Kittel's magnetic-polar analogy

Kohta Kasai , Akihiro Uematsu , Tatsuki Kawakane , Yu Wang , Tao Xu , Chang Liu , Susumu Minami , Takahiro Shimada This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords skyrmion latticedislocationVolterra elasticitytopological transitionhalf-skyrmionphase-field simulationDzyaloshinskii-Moriya interactionMnSi
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Using phase-field simulations of MnSi thin films, this paper shows that a dislocation in a magnetic skyrmion lattice can do something atomic dislocations cannot: the sevenfold skyrmion at the core stretches to 180% of its length and splits into two half-skyrmions linked by a stripe phase, reconstructing the core and shifting it by one lattice unit. Despite this drastic topological change, the long-range strain field around the dislocation matches Volterra's elasticity theory exactly, down to the 1/r decay. The paper identifies the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction as the driver of the deformation, since it lowers total free energy despite raising exchange energy. The result is a coexistence of topological core-reconstruction and classical elastic response, and a clear mechanical divergence from polar skyrmion lattices, where such deformations break elasticity. This extends the long-standing magnetic–electric (Kittel) duality to show that when the systems enter the collective quasiparticle regime, their mechanics separate.

Core claim

The central discovery is that the dislocation core in a magnetic skyrmion lattice undergoes a topological transition while the lattice's far-field elasticity remains classical. In the simulations, the 7-fold skyrmion at the dislocation core elongates by up to 180% under low magnetic field, and its topological charge reorganizes: the single skyrmion becomes two half-skyrmions (merons) connected by a stripe-phase region. This effectively introduces an extra lattice point, shifts the dislocation core downward by one lattice unit, and converts the original 5-7 pair into a reconstructed 5-7 pair. Yet when the lattice strain is computed against a perfect hexagonal reference, the distribution aroun

What carries the argument

The argument rests on phase-field simulations coupling the time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau equation for magnetization to mechanical equilibrium and Maxwell equations, with material parameters for MnSi. The topological analysis uses the Pontryagin charge density q = m·(∂m/∂x1 × ∂m/∂x2), whose integral is the skyrmion number, to show how the 7-fold skyrmion splits into two half-skyrmions. Lattice strain is defined relative to a perfect hexagonal skyrmion lattice, and compared with the analytic prediction of Volterra's elasticity theory, which gives a 1/r decay of strain away from the dislocation core. Energy decomposition into exchange and DMI terms reveals the competing contributions that driv

Load-bearing premise

The simulations presuppose that the phase-field free-energy functional and the MnSi material parameters (exchange, DMI, anisotropy, kinetic coefficient) placed in the Supplemental Material faithfully represent real skyrmion energetics, and that the initial skyrmion spacing taken from prior literature is correct; if the model parameters are inaccurate, the 180% elongation, the half-skyrmion splitting, and the energy balance could be artifacts rather than physical predictions.

What would settle it

An experimental strain-field measurement around a dislocation in a magnetic skyrmion lattice at low field—using geometric phase analysis of Lorentz TEM images—that deviates from Volterra's 1/r decay, or a phase-field calculation with a different but still realistic MnSi parameter set that fails to produce the 180% elongation and the split into two half-skyrmions, would cast doubt on the central claim.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Magnetic skyrmion lattices retain classical dislocation elasticity even when individual skyrmions are highly deformable and cores reconstruct topologically.
  • The core-splitting into half-skyrmions changes the local lattice topology and dislocation core position, but does not alter the long-range strain field.
  • The DMI–exchange energy balance determines whether deformation of the 7-fold skyrmion is energetically favorable, giving a mechanism tunable by magnetic field and temperature.
  • The magnetic–polar analogy, embodied in Kittel's law for domains, does not extend to the mechanics of skyrmion lattices: polar skyrmions break elasticity while magnetic skyrmions preserve it.
  • These findings support applying standard dislocation theory to skyrmion-lattice plasticity, melting, and grain-boundary processes even when quasiparticle deformation is large.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference: If magnetic skyrmion lattices preserve Volterra elasticity everywhere except the immediate core, then dislocation-mediated plasticity in these lattices—including the KTHNY melting scenario—can be modeled with classical elastic interactions, while pinning and core dynamics may require the half-skyrmion structure.
  • Inference: The contrast with polar skyrmions suggests a criterion: lattice elasticity survives when quasiparticles can change their shape but not their size/area easily; testing this by comparing skyrmion materials with different size adaptivity could generalize the result.
  • Inference: A direct experimental test could use Lorentz transmission electron microscopy with geometric phase analysis at low field to check whether the strain field around a dislocation decays as 1/r even where core splitting is visible; deviation would falsify the claim.
  • Inference: The core-splitting implies that dislocations in magnetic skyrmion lattices may carry an internal degree of freedom (the two half-skyrmions), potentially enabling unusual responses to external fields or currents that purely atomic dislocations cannot exhibit.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript uses phase-field TDGL simulations of a MnSi thin film to study an edge dislocation in a triangular skyrmion lattice. It reports a field-dependent core structure: at low magnetic field the 7-fold skyrmion elongates by 180%, undergoes a topological transition into two half-skyrmions connected by a stripe phase, and undergoes a local lattice-point reconstruction that shifts the dislocation core. Despite this, the authors claim that the long-range lattice strain around magnetic skyrmion dislocations obeys Volterra's elasticity theory quantitatively, unlike polar skyrmion lattices where elasticity breaks down. An energy decomposition attributes the deformation to a gain in DMI energy that overcompensates the exchange-energy cost. The paper concludes that magnetic skyrmion lattices retain robust elastic behavior, revealing a fundamental divergence from polar skyrmion lattices, beyond Kittel's magnetic-polar analogy.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the result is significant: it demonstrates coexistence of a topologically reconstructed, highly deformable dislocation core with a robust Volterra far-field, and identifies a concrete mechanical distinction between magnetic and polar skyrmion lattices. The work provides direct visual evidence of the topological transition via Pontryagin charge density and gives a plausible energy mechanism for the deformation. It also connects to prior experimental observations of skyrmion distortion near lattice defects. Strengths include the use of an external benchmark (Volterra theory) rather than a circular self-comparison, and the explicit comparison with prior polar-skyrmion simulations. However, the load-bearing claim of "perfect" Volterra agreement in Fig. 4(c) is supported only qualitatively; no residual metric, error bar, or fitting procedure is given. The model fidelity and the handling of skyrmion-center assignment after the topological transition also need clarification before the main claim can be fully accepted.

major comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 4(c), 'Strain field' paragraph] The central claim rests on Fig. 4(c), but no quantitative agreement measure is provided. The manuscript does not specify: (i) which strain component is plotted; (ii) whether the Volterra curve is the analytic edge-dislocation strain for the actual magnetic skyrmion Burgers vector and independently determined elastic constants, or a fitted curve; (iii) whether multiple independent runs were averaged and what the run-to-run spread is; (iv) why the particular centerline is representative. Without residuals, R^2, confidence intervals, or a measure of deviation, "perfectly consistent" is not established. Please add a quantitative metric and describe the exact fitting and line-selection procedure.
  2. [Fig. 2(e) and Fig. 4(b): strain from skyrmion centers] The strain measure is defined from skyrmion centers, but the low-field topological transition creates an additional lattice point and shifts the dislocation core. If the reconstructed lattice (red lines in Fig. 2(e)) is used for strain analysis, the near-field strain and the distance-from-core assignment change; if the original lattice is used, the split skyrmion must be mapped to a single center. The text does not state which choice is made. Please clarify the center-assignment rule and demonstrate that the long-range Volterra conclusion is insensitive to this ambiguity, e.g., by comparing both center definitions.
  3. [Methods, Eqs. (1)-(3)] All simulation results depend on the free-energy functional F and its material parameters, but the explicit functional form and parameter values are placed only in the Supplemental Material. This makes the reported 180% elongation, half-skyrmion splitting, and energy balance (Delta F_exchange = +6.29e-20 J, Delta F_DMI = -8.26e-20 J) impossible to scrutinize from the main text. Please provide the free-energy functional and a parameter table in the main text or a numbered supplementary equation, and show that the model reproduces the MnSi skyrmion stability range at the H and T used, ideally by comparing with experimental phase boundaries.
  4. [Fig. 4(c), atomic-crystal benchmark] The atomic-crystal curve in Fig. 4(c) is used as a second benchmark, but no information is given about how it was generated, what interatomic potential was used, or whether it is a simulation result or an analytic solution. At minimum, state the model and boundary conditions for this reference curve; otherwise the comparison between magnetic skyrmion, atomic, and polar-skyrmion strain fields cannot be interpreted quantitatively.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract and 'Strain field' paragraph] The words "perfectly" and "sharp contrast" are stronger than the evidence presented. Suggest softening to "quantitatively consistent within simulation accuracy" and "clear deviation".
  2. [Introduction] Kittel's magnetic-polar analogy is invoked in the title and abstract but only connected to the results in the final paragraph. Add a sentence in the Introduction explaining the conventional Kittel-law analogy and why skyrmion lattices are expected to go beyond it.
  3. [Comparison with ref. 45] The comparison with polar skyrmion dislocations relies on the authors' prior work (ref. 45). Please state explicitly whether identical simulation geometry, strain definition, and analysis pipeline were used for both systems, so the reader can judge the comparability of the two results.
  4. [Energy analysis paragraph] The equation Delta F_i = (F_i,after - F_i,before)/N_core should define the reference state 'before' (is it the 100-step snapshot?) and N_core more precisely. Also clarify why the DMI anisotropy energy and elastic energy terms are omitted from Fig. 5(a-1).
  5. [Figure 3] The H-T diagram marks the unstable skyrmion region in black. State how the stability boundary was determined, e.g., by whether a skyrmion lattice forms during the TDGL evolution, and indicate the experimental skyrmion phase boundaries for MnSi if known.
  6. [Data availability] The statement that data are available 'upon reasonable request' would be strengthened by depositing the phase-field code, parameter files, and processed datasets in a repository, particularly since the free-energy functional itself is in the Supplemental Material.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the Volterra strain comparison is an external benchmark, not constructed from the fitted inputs.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that magnetic skyrmion dislocations, despite a core-split topological transition, have long-range strain fields consistent with Volterra's elasticity theory. This is a simulation-based result compared against an independent classical benchmark, not a quantity reconstructed from the model's own fitted parameters. The initial skyrmion spacing a(H,T) is taken from prior literature (ref 33), but it is an external input used to set the lattice geometry, not a parameter fitted to the Volterra curve. The polar-skyrmion contrast is cited from ref 45, a prior self-cited paper by overlapping authors, but the magnetic-skyrmion strain behavior is computed here from the phase-field simulation and the comparison does not reduce to that citation: the magnetic result stands on its own simulated strain fields. The initial condition of 'a triangular lattice with ideal dislocations' supplies the Burgers-circuit topology, but the subsequent relaxation produces nontrivial core reconstruction, core shift, half-skyrmion formation, and energy changes, so the long-range Volterra agreement is not imposed by construction. The strain measure is a standard atomistic estimator (Stukowski) applied to skyrmion centers, and the Volterra curve is presented as an external theoretical solution rather than a fit to the data. The absence of residuals or confidence intervals is a validation/reporting weakness, not circularity. Therefore no specific equation or fitted parameter is shown to be equivalent to the claimed prediction by definition.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

No newly invented physical entities are introduced; the half-skyrmion/meron states are known objects used to characterize the deformed skyrmion. The central claim depends mainly on the fiducial choices of material parameters and the definition of lattice strain, which are taken from prior literature or standard theory.

free parameters (2)
  • MnSi phase-field model parameters (exchange stiffness, DMI coefficient, anisotropy, kinetic coefficient L) = Not stated in main text; provided in Supplemental Material
    The TDGL simulation uses a free-energy functional whose coefficients are chosen to represent MnSi. The 180% elongation and the ΔF_exchange/ΔF_DMI balance depend on these values; no sensitivity analysis is shown.
  • Initial skyrmion lattice spacing a(H,T) = From ref 33 as function of field and temperature
    The initial triangular skyrmion lattice spacing is taken from prior literature, not computed in this paper. This spacing fixes the reference lattice for the strain analysis and the dislocation geometry.
axioms (4)
  • standard math Volterra elasticity theory provides the correct benchmark for the dislocation strain field
    Used in Figure 4(c) as the reference curve; the comparison assumes the simulated lattice strain is the same type of strain appearing in the continuum Volterra solution.
  • domain assumption The coupled TDGL, mechanical equilibrium, and Maxwell equations describe equilibrium skyrmion configurations in MnSi
    Methods Eqs. (1)-(3) are invoked to evolve the magnetization; this assumes a continuum coarse-grained free energy can capture the skyrmion lattice and dislocation energetics.
  • standard math Pontryagin charge density q = m·(∂m/∂x1 × ∂m/∂x2) identifies half-skyrmion/meron splitting
    The topological transition is inferred from sign changes in the Pontryagin density in Figure 2(c-2); the interpretation of two half-skyrmions connected by a stripe region relies on this standard measure.
  • domain assumption Lattice strain measured relative to a perfect hexagonal skyrmion lattice is a faithful measure of elastic strain
    The strain analysis in Figure 4 uses a reference hexagonal lattice; the method assumes skyrmion centers correspond to lattice points, and the paper itself notes that the topological split introduces an additional lattice point, which is a local perturbation to this mapping.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 9099 in / 8172 out tokens · 73123 ms · 2026-08-03T23:53:32.238795+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Magnetic and polar skyrmions exhibit topologically protected quasiparticle behavior, including emergent fields, deformation, and the formation of a densely packed skyrmion lattice, beyond conventional domain configurations described by Kittel's law. Analogous to atomic crystals, lattice defects, especially dislocations and their associated strain fields, are crucial for understanding the lattice behavior of skyrmions; however, their features and roles remain insufficiently understood. Here, we show that magnetic skyrmion dislocations develop a core-split structure due to a significant skyrmion elongation up to 180% of their original length, reaching a topological transition from a single skyrmion to two half-skyrmions. Despite such a distinct structure, the long-range strain fields around the dislocation perfectly obey conventional Volterra's elasticity theory, in contrast to polar skyrmion lattices, where skyrmion deformations cause a breakdown of the elasticity theory. Furthermore, an energetic analysis shows that Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction drives the large skyrmion deformation of the dislocation core. Our findings not only clarify the coexistence of topological core-reconstruction and a robust long-range elastic field of dislocations in magnetic skyrmion lattices, but also reveal that magnetic and electric domains, long regarded as dual and analogous, exhibit fundamental differences when extended into the regime of collective topological quasiparticles.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Mühlbauer, S. et al. Skyrmion Lattice in a Chiral Magnet. Science 323, 915–919 (2009)

    2009

  2. [2]

    Yu, X. Z. et al. Real-space observation of a two -dimensional skyrmion crystal. Nature 465, 901–904 (2010)

    2010

  3. [3]

    & Zhou, Y

    Zhang, X., Ezawa, M. & Zhou, Y. Magnetic skyrmion logic gates: conversion, duplication and merging of skyrmions. Sci Rep 5, 9400 (2015)

    2015

  4. [4]

    Yokouchi, T. et al. Pattern recognition with neuromorphic computing using magnetic field – induced dynamics of skyrmions. Sci. Adv. 8, eabq5652 (2022)

    2022

  5. [5]

    Neubauer, A. et al. Topological Hall Effect in the A Phase of MnSi. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 186602 (2009)

    2009

  6. [7]

    Kurumaji, T. et al. Skyrmion lattice with a giant topological Hall effect in a frustrated triangular-lattice magnet. Science 365, 914–918 (2019)

    2019

  7. [8]

    & Sampaio, J

    Fert, A., Cros, V. & Sampaio, J. Skyrmions on the track. Nature Nanotech 8, 152–156 (2013). 15

    2013

  8. [9]

    & Zhao, W

    Zhang, H., Zhu, D., Kang, W., Zhang, Y. & Zhao, W. Stochastic Computing Implemented by Skyrmionic Logic Devices. Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 054049 (2020)

    2020

  9. [10]

    Prychynenko, D. et al. Magnetic Skyrmion as a Nonlinear Resistive Element: A Potential Building Block for Reservoir Computing. Phys. Rev. Applied 9, 014034 (2018)

    2018

  10. [11]

    Ge, H. et al. Observation of Acoustic Skyrmions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 144502 (2021)

    2021

  11. [12]

    Hu, P. et al. Observation of localized acoustic skyrmions. Applied Physics Letters 122, 022201 (2023)

    2023

  12. [13]

    Shen, Y. et al. Optical skyrmions and other topological quasiparticles of light. Nat. Photon. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-023-01325-7 (2023) doi:10.1038/s41566-023-01325-7

    doi:10.1038/s41566-023-01325-7 2023

  13. [14]

    Das, S. et al. Observation of room-temperature polar skyrmions. Nature 568, 368–372 (2019)

    2019

  14. [15]

    Das, S. et al. Local negative permittivity and topological phase transition in polar skyrmions. Nat. Mater. 20, 194–201 (2021)

    2021

  15. [16]

    Theory of the Structure of Ferromagnetic Domains in Films and Small Particles

    Kittel, C. Theory of the Structure of Ferromagnetic Domains in Films and Small Particles. Phys. Rev. 70, 965–971 (1946)

    1946

  16. [17]

    & Scott, J

    Catalan, G., Seidel, J., Ramesh, R. & Scott, J. F. Domain wall nanoelectronics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 119–156 (2012)

    2012

  17. [18]

    Gong, F.-H. et al. Absence of critical thickness for polar skyrmions with breaking the Kittel’s law. Nat Commun 14, 3376 (2023)

    2023

  18. [19]

    & Íñiguez -González, J

    Aramberri, H. & Íñiguez -González, J. Brownian Electric Bubble Quasiparticles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, (2024)

    2024

  19. [20]

    Yu, X. et al. Aggregation and collapse dynamics of skyrmions in a non -equilibrium state. Nature Phys 14, 832–836 (2018). 16

    2018

  20. [21]

    Zhang, H. et al. Room-temperature skyrmion lattice in a layered magnet (Fe 0.5Co0.5)5GeTe2. Sci. Adv. 8, eabm7103 (2022)

    2022

  21. [22]

    Timm, C., Girvin, S. M. & Fertig, H. A. Skyrmion lattice melting in the quantum Hall system. Phys. Rev. B 58, 10634–10647 (1998)

    1998

  22. [23]

    Shibata, K. et al. Large anisotropic deformation of skyrmions in strained crystal. Nature Nanotech 10, 589–592 (2015)

    2015

  23. [24]

    Kézsmárki, I. et al. Néel-type skyrmion lattice with confined orientation in the polar magnetic semiconductor GaV4S8. Nature Mater 14, 1116–1122 (2015)

    2015

  24. [25]

    Pöllath, S. et al. Dynamical Defects in Rotating Magnetic Skyrmion Lattices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 207205 (2017)

    2017

  25. [26]

    Everschor, K. et al. Rotating skyrmion lattices by spin torques and field or temperature gradients. Phys. Rev. B 86, 054432 (2012)

    2012

  26. [27]

    Huang, P. et al. Melting of a skyrmion lattice to a skyrmion liquid via a hexatic phase. Nat. Nanotechnol. 15, 761–767 (2020)

    2020

  27. [28]

    & Wang, B

    Hu, Y., Lan, X. & Wang, B. Nonlinear emergent elasticity and structural transitions of a skyrmion crystal under uniaxial distortion. Phys. Rev. B 99, 214412 (2019)

    2019

  28. [29]

    Denneulin, T., Kovács, A., Boltje, R., Kiselev, N. S. & Dunin -Borkowski, R. E. Geometric phase analysis of magnetic skyrmion lattices in Lorentz transmission electron microscopy images. Sci Rep 14, (2024)

    2024

  29. [30]

    Jin, S. et al. Local manipulation of skyrmion lattice in Fe3GaTe2 at room temperature. Journal of Materiomics 11, 100865 (2025)

    2025

  30. [31]

    Gruber, R. et al. Imaging Topological Defect Dynamics Mediating 2D Skyrmion Lattice Melting. 17

  31. [32]

    Azhar, M., Kravchuk, V. P. & Garst, M. Screw Dislocations in Chiral Magnets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 157204 (2022)

    2022

  32. [33]

    & Shimada, T

    Wang, Y., Manabe, R., Kasai, K., Xu, T. & Shimada, T. Stability and deformation of a vacancy defect in skyrmion crystal under external magnetic and temperature fields. Acta Materialia 281, 120381 (2024)

    2024

  33. [34]

    Matsumoto, T. et al. Direct observation of Σ7 domain boundary core structure in magnetic skyrmion lattice. Sci. Adv. 2, e1501280 (2016)

    2016

  34. [35]

    Schönenberger, T. et al. Direct Visualisation of Skyrmion Lattice Defect Alignment at Grain Boundaries. Nanoscale Res Lett 17, 20 (2022)

    2022

  35. [36]

    & Mori, S

    Nakajima, H., Kotani, A., Mochizuki, M., Harada, K. & Mori, S. Formation process of skyrmion lattice domain boundaries: The role of grain boundaries. Applied Physics Letters 111, 192401 (2017)

    2017

  36. [37]

    Matsumoto, T. et al. Jointed magnetic skyrmion lattices at a small -angle grain boundary directly visualized by advanced electron microscopy. Sci Rep 6, 35880 (2016)

    2016

  37. [38]

    Theory of plastic deformation: - properties of low energy dislocation structures

    Kuhlmann-Wilsdorf, D. Theory of plastic deformation: - properties of low energy dislocation structures. Materials Science and Engineering: A 113, 1–41 (1989)

    1989

  38. [39]

    A., Raabe, D

    Fan, H., Wang, Q., El -Awady, J. A., Raabe, D. & Zaiser, M. Strain rate dependency of dislocation plasticity. Nat Commun 12, 1845 (2021)

    2021

  39. [40]

    A., Soriano, J

    Garanin, D. A., Soriano, J. F. & Chudnovsky, E. M. Melting and freezing of a skyrmion lattice. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 36, 475802 (2024)

    2024

  40. [41]

    & Nicolao, L

    Mendoza-Coto, A., Mattiello, V., Cenci, R., Defenu, N. & Nicolao, L. Melting of the two - dimensional solid phase in the Gaussian core model. Phys. Rev. B 109, (2024). 18

    2024

  41. [42]

    & Krauth, W

    Nishikawa, Y., Hukushima, K. & Krauth, W. Solid -liquid transition of skyrmions in a two - dimensional chiral magnet. Phys. Rev. B 99, 064435 (2019)

    2019

  42. [43]

    https://pubs -acs-org.kyoto- u.idm.oclc.org/doi/10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b04280

    Magnetic Skyrmion Formation at Lattice Defects and Grain Boundaries Studied by Quantitative Off -Axis Electron Holography | Nano Letters. https://pubs -acs-org.kyoto- u.idm.oclc.org/doi/10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b04280

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b04280

  43. [44]

    Sur l’équilibre des corps élastiques multiplement connexes

    Volterra, V. Sur l’équilibre des corps élastiques multiplement connexes. Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup. 24, 401–517 (1907)

    1907

  44. [45]

    & Shimada, T

    Kasai, K., Xu, T., Minami, S. & Shimada, T. Breakdown of Volterra’s Elasticity Theory of Dislocations in Polar Skyrmion Lattices. Nano Lett. 24, 13247–13254 (2024)

    2024

  45. [46]

    Leonov, A. O. & Bogdanov, A. N. Crossover of skyrmion and helical modulations in noncentrosymmetric ferromagnets. New J. Phys. 20, 043017 (2018)

    2018

  46. [47]

    & Tokura, Y

    Nagaosa, N. & Tokura, Y. Topological properties and dynamics of magnetic skyrmions. Nature Nanotech 8, 899–911 (2013)

    2013

  47. [48]

    Zhu, Z. et al. Control of half-skyrmion movement for possible applications in memory, logic, and neuromorphic computing prototype devices. Applied Physics Reviews 11, 021421 (2024)

    2024

  48. [49]

    Compact merons and skyrmions in thin chiral magnetic films

    Ezawa, M. Compact merons and skyrmions in thin chiral magnetic films. Phys. Rev. B 83, 100408 (2011)

    2011

  49. [50]

    Brearton, R. et al. Deriving the skyrmion Hall angle from skyrmion lattice dynamics. Nat Commun 12, 2723 (2021)

    2021

  50. [51]

    Computational Analysis Methods in Atomistic Modeling of Crystals

    Stukowski, A. Computational Analysis Methods in Atomistic Modeling of Crystals. JOM 66, 399–407 (2014)

    2014

  51. [52]

    Tereshchenko, A. A. et al. Emergent elasticity and wavelike to particle -like crossover in a magnetic chiral soliton lattice. Phys. Rev. B 110, (2024). 19

    2024

  52. [53]

    P., Kwon, H

    Kang, S. P., Kwon, H. Y. & Won, C. Elastic moduli and Poisson’s ratio of 2 -dimensional magnetic skyrmion lattice. Journal of Applied Physics 121, 203902 (2017)

    2017

  53. [54]

    & Shimada, T

    Kasai, K., Miyata, S., Minami, S. & Shimada, T. Grain boundary stabilization in polar skyrmion lattices via quasiparticle-based mechanism. Phys. Rev. B 112, 125421 (2025). 20 Figure 1. (a) Overview of skyrmion lattice including a skyrmion dislocation. The black area represents the out-of-plane magnetic moment, and the colored area s represent the in-plane...

    2025