Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Machine Learning Allows Calibration Models to Predict Trace Element Concentration in Soil with Generalized LIBS Spectra

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1906.08597 v1 pith:LFBGAB4L submitted 2019-02-13 physics.chem-ph cs.LGphysics.ins-detphysics.plasm-ph

classification physics.chem-phcs.LGphysics.ins-detphysics.plasm-ph
keywords modelcalibrationbeensoildevelopedeffectlibsallows
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Calibration models have been developed for determination of trace elements, silver for instance, in soil using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS). The major concern is the matrix effect. Although it affects the accuracy of LIBS measurements in a general way, the effect appears accentuated for soil because of large variation of chemical and physical properties among different soils. The purpose is to reduce its influence in such way an accurate and soil-independent calibration model can be constructed. At the same time, the developed model should efficiently reduce experimental fluctuations affecting measurement precision. A univariate model first reveals obvious influence of matrix effect and important experimental fluctuation. A multivariate model has been then developed. A key point is the introduction of generalized spectrum where variables representing the soil type are explicitly included. Machine learning has been used to develop the model. After a necessary pretreatment where a feature selection process reduces the dimension of raw spectrum accordingly to the number of available spectra, the data have been fed in to a back-propagation neuronal networks (BPNN) to train and validate the model. The resulted soilindependent calibration model allows average relative error of calibration (REC) and average relative error of prediction (REP) within the range of 5-6%.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools