REVIEW 1 cited by
Understanding the nature of D_s(2317) and D_s(2460) through nonleptonic B Decays
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Understanding the nature of D_s(2317) and D_s(2460) through nonleptonic B Decays
read the original abstract
We consider the nonleptonic B decays $ B \to D^{(*)} D_s(2317)$ and $ B \to D^{(*)} D_s(2460)$, involving the newly discovered $D_s(2317)$ and the $D_s(2460)$ states. We find that experiments indicate disagreement with model calculations of their properties and/or breakdown of the factorization assumption for these decays . We point out that decays involving $B_s$ mesons where the $D_s$ resonances can be produced via the weak decay of the $b$ quark can provide further information about the nature of these newly discovered states. We also propose a model to calculate the two body nonleptonic decays $ B \to D^{(*)} D_s(2317)(D_s(2460))$, if the $D_s(2317)$ and $D_s(2460)$ are interpreted as $DK$ and $D^*K$ molecules.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
The $B^{+(0)} \to \bar D^{0(-)} D^{*}_{s0}(2317)^+$ decays and the molecular structure of $D^*_{s0}(2317)$
Using B→D D K data and a two-parameter model, the authors derive B→D D*_s0(2317) branching fractions that agree with experiment within errors, supporting a sizable DK molecular component of D*_s0(2317).
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.