The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2607.06357 · v1 · pith:LGWDM4CL · submitted 2026-07-07 · astro-ph.SR

White dwarfs within 13 pc: Insights from ultraviolet spectroscopy

Mairi W. O'Brien , Pier-Emmanuel Tremblay , Boris T. Gaensicke , Mark A. Hollands , Detlev Koester , Snehalata Sahu , Antoine Bedard , Andrew M. Buchan
show 4 more authors
Tim Cunningham John H. Debes J. J. Hermes Piotr M. Kowalski
This is my paper

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel 2026-07-08 08:21 UTCglm-5.2pith:LGWDM4CLrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification astro-ph.SR
keywords white dwarfsultraviolet spectroscopymodel atmosphereseffective temperatureplanetary debris accretionspectral energy distributionlocal stellar neighborhood
0
0 comments X

The pith

UV spectra expose a systematic flaw in white dwarf temperature models

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper analyzes Hubble Space Telescope ultraviolet spectroscopy of all 44 confirmed white dwarfs within 13 parsecs of the Sun, combining UV data with optical and infrared photometry to determine stellar parameters. The central finding is that for hydrogen-atmosphere white dwarfs cooler than 10,000 K, fitting the UV spectrum yields effective temperatures 2–6 percent higher than fitting optical and infrared photometry alone. This offset is not a statistical fluctuation or a calibration artifact; it persists after accounting for flux calibration uncertainties and after switching between 1D and 3D model atmospheres. The authors conclude that current white dwarf atmosphere models cannot self-consistently reproduce the full ultraviolet-to-infrared spectral energy distribution for these stars. The UV data also reveal photospheric metals in six white dwarfs where optical spectra show nothing, reclassify three helium-rich stars as metal-enriched based on UV magnesium detections, and find that 30 percent of the nearest white dwarfs show spectroscopic evidence of accreted planetary debris. The paper further documents that UV carbon line strengths in DQ white dwarfs are overpredicted by models by roughly a factor of thirty, requiring artificial suppression of oscillator strengths to match observations, and that UV fitting of DQs produces systematically low masses inconsistent with optical fits and microlensing measurements.

Core claim

The core discovery is a systematic, model-level discrepancy in cool hydrogen-atmosphere white dwarfs: incorporating UV spectra into the fit raises the derived effective temperature by 2–6 percent compared to optical/IR-only fits, and no existing atmosphere model can simultaneously match the UV and optical/infrared continuum. This is demonstrated on a complete, volume-limited sample of the 44 nearest white dwarfs, where the UV data also expose previously hidden metals, planetary debris signatures, and failures in carbon line modeling.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the hybrid spectrophotometric fit: flux-calibrated HST/STIS UV spectra are combined with Gaia, 2MASS, and WISE photometry and compared to model atmosphere grids. By running the fit twice—once with UV data included and once without—the authors isolate a wavelength-dependent systematic offset in the best-fit effective temperature, surface gravity, and mass. The discrepancy is attributed to inadequacies in UV opacity sources (Lyman-alpha broadening, collision-induced absorption, H3+ partition functions) rather than observational error.

If this is right

  • If the 2–6 percent temperature offset is real and systematic, derived masses, cooling ages, and space densities for the majority of nearby white dwarfs may need revision, affecting Galactic archaeology and stellar initial-to-final mass relations.
  • The overprediction of UV carbon line strengths by a factor of ~30 in DQ models indicates a fundamental gap in atomic data or line-broadening theory for dense helium plasmas, which biases DQ mass determinations low when UV data are included.
  • Six metal-polluted white dwarfs were identified solely through UV spectroscopy, meaning optical-only surveys underestimate the fraction of white dwarfs accreting planetary debris, currently measured at 30 percent for the local volume.
  • The 32 percent multiplicity fraction for nearby white dwarfs, combined with the difficulty of detecting close white dwarf companions at larger distances, suggests that binary fraction estimates from magnitude-limited surveys are systematically incomplete.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the UV-optical temperature offset stems from an opacity source that is temperature-dependent, it may change sign or magnitude at temperatures above 10,000 K; the paper notes a hint of such a reversal in the hottest DAs, which would further constrain the physical origin of the discrepancy.
  • The fact that both the H3+ partition function correction and the residual UV-optical discrepancy point to the same cool-temperature regime suggests that additional unmodeled molecular or pressure-dependent opacities in the UV remain to be identified; upcoming JWST near-IR spectroscopy of the same sample could test whether the discrepancy extends into the infrared.
  • The model-independent microlensing mass for WD 1142-645 (0.56 solar masses) being 2-sigma away from the UV-derived mass (0.47 solar masses) provides an external check that could be exploited more systematically: if more microlensing masses become available for DQ white dwarfs, they could directly quantify the UV model bias without relying on either UV or optical atmosphere fits.

Load-bearing premise

The analysis assumes that at least one of the two fitting regimes—UV-inclusive or optical/IR-only—reliably recovers the true stellar parameters, but the paper itself shows that both regimes have unresolved model issues: UV carbon lines require artificial weakening by a factor of ~30, UV-derived DQ masses conflict with microlensing measurements, and the optical/IR fits may suffer from unmodeled infrared opacities. The central temperature-offset claim is robust as a detection,

What would settle it

If the 2–6 percent UV-versus-optical temperature offset were an artifact of STIS flux calibration rather than a model deficiency, it would disappear when independently calibrated UV spectra (e.g., from a different instrument or epoch) are fitted with the same models. Conversely, if improved opacity calculations incorporating the H3+ correction and updated Lyman-alpha profiles eliminate the offset, the discrepancy would be resolved as a modeling gap rather than new physics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.06357 by Andrew M. Buchan, Antoine Bedard, Boris T. Gaensicke, Detlev Koester, J. J. Hermes, John H. Debes, Mairi W. O'Brien, Mark A. Hollands, Pier-Emmanuel Tremblay, Piotr M. Kowalski, Snehalata Sahu, Tim Cunningham.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: HR diagrams for the 13 pc white dwarf sample, separated by spectral type. Top: A Gaia HR diagram using the G, GBP and GRP bands. The grey points are white dwarfs within 40 pc (O’Brien et al. 2024). Bottom: A Gaia HR diagram with newly created NUVG230L photometric points. The NUVG230L colour was generated by convolving the STIS G230L spectra with the GALEX NUV filter. Only white dwarfs with G230L observatio… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Hybrid spectrophotometric fits of H-atmosphere white dwarfs in the 13 pc sample with flux-calibrated STIS G230L spectra. Flux is given in units of erg cm−2 s −1 Å −1 . The blue models are best fits to STIS spectra plus Gaia, 2MASS, and WISE photometry plus parallaxes, where available. The red models are the fits to just the Gaia, 2MASS, and WISE photometry plus parallaxes. All parameters in this figure are… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Photometric fits for the wide DA + DA system WD 0727+482 A+B. Reliable Gaia photometry is not available for these stars so archival 𝐵𝑉𝑅𝐼 optical photometry is used in the fit instead. The STIS spectra were not included in the fit but are plotted for completeness. 2024). An iterative fitting method was used: the optical and infrared photometry was fitted for 𝑇eff, and the STIS and COS spectra plus the X-sho… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Hybrid spectrophotometric fits of H-atmosphere white dwarfs in the 13 pc sample with high-resolution STIS spectra. Flux is given in units of erg cm−2 s −1 Å −1 . The blue models are best fits to STIS spectra plus Gaia, 2MASS, and WISE photometry, where available. The red models are the fits to just the Gaia, 2MASS, and WISE photometry. All parameters in this figure are from the fits to just optical/IR data… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Fit of the COS G130M and G160M spectra plus photometry of WD 1647+591, using Tremblay et al. (2013) models with additional H2 molecular lines. The blue model is the best fit to the COS spectrum. The red model is the fit to just the Gaia, 2MASS, and WISE photometry. The parameters in this figure are from the fit to the COS spectrum (blue models). The upper panel shows the full SED fit, and the lower panel i… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Fits of Balmer lines for white dwarfs in the 13 pc sample. Flux is given in units of erg cm−2 s −1 Å −1 . Balmer lines are offset vertically for visual clarity, with H 𝛼 at the bottom of each plot. red wing and Mg i line width, and also determined an upper limit on the calcium abundance using an optical spectrum (Giammichele et al. 2012). WD 1917+386: Similarly to WD 1132−325, no metals are visible in the … view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Combined fits of Balmer lines and photometry for the unresolved double-lined double white dwarf WD 0135−052 in the 13 pc sample. Flux is given in units of erg cm−2 s −1 Å −1 . Balmer lines are offset vertically for visual clarity, with H 𝛼 at the bottom of each plot. The STIS spectrum was not included in the fit but is shown on the plot. The orange and blue dashed models are the two individual models that … view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Fits to metal lines in H-atmosphere white dwarfs in the 13 pc sample. Flux is given in units of erg cm−2 s −1 Å −1 . The red models are the fits to the photospheric metal features, and the black portions are Gaussian fits to the interstellar lines. and 200 MG respectively (Bagnulo & Landstreet 2021). The strong magnetic fields cause the spectral features of both white dwarfs to become distorted and blended… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Hybrid spectrophotometric fits of white dwarfs in the 13 pc sample with He-rich atmospheres that fit best with He (+ H) models. Flux is given in units of erg cm−2 s −1 Å −1 . Left: hybrid fits to the full SED, where the red models are best fits to STIS spectra plus Gaia, 2MASS, and WISE photometry, where available. Right: optical spectra covering the H 𝛼 region, where the dashed lines indicate where an H … view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Hybrid spectrophotometric fits of DQ white dwarfs in the 13 pc sample with carbon absorption lines. Left: hybrid fits to the full SED. Right: fits to the optical Swan bands. Inset plots show the Mg ii 2800 Å doublet. The carbon lines in the UV have been adjusted to match the observations. MNRAS 000, 1–26 (2026) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Atmospheric carbon abundance as a function of temperature for DQ white dwarfs. The background sources shown in grey are from Blouin & Dufour (2019); Coutu et al. (2019); Tremblay et al. (2020); O’Brien et al. (2023, 2024). The filled black circles represent 13 pc carbon detections and the arrows represent upper limits on carbon found in the 13 pc DC white dwarfs. The green cross is our fit to the DQpec WD… view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Top: A hybrid spectrophotometric fit to the DBQA white dwarf WD 1917−077. Middle: The fit to COS and STIS spectra focusing on the region with carbon features. Bottom: The fit to the X-shooter spectrum cov￾ering H 𝛼 and the He ii 5876 Å line. In all plots, flux is given in units of erg cm−2 s −1 Å −1 . The model reproduces the depth of almost all carbon lines, except for C i 1432.1 Å and C i 1751.8 Å. thes… view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Hybrid spectrophotometric fits of DZ white dwarfs in the 13 pc sample with metal absorption lines. Left: hybrid fits to the full SED. Right: fits to the metal features. The STIS low-dispersion gratings, including G230L which is used in our hybrid fits, were found by Elms et al. (2024) to be flux cali￾brated to within 3 per cent. Elms et al. (2024) also found that Gaia photometry is typically uncertain by … view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Spectra and photometry of strongly magnetic white dwarfs with unconstrained spectral types in the 13 pc sample. Left: STIS Gaia XP spectra, plus Gaia, 2MASS and WISE photometry. Right: WHT ISIS optical spectra. 0.10 0.05 0.00 0.05 (Teff, x Teff, hybrid) / Teff, hybrid x = Photometric fit x = Balmer line fit 10000 9000 8000 7000 6000 5000 4000 Teff, hybrid (K) 0.2 0.0 log(g)x log(g)hybrid x = Photometric f… view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Comparisons of 𝑇eff (top panel) and log 𝑔 (bottom panel) for H￾atmosphere white dwarfs fitted with different methods. In blue is the difference between the photometric optical and IR fit, compared to the parameters de￾rived from the hybrid STIS G230L, optical photometry and IR photometry fit. Also shown in red is the comparison between the Balmer line fit param￾eters and the hybrid parameters. Faded point… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present a comprehensive multi-wavelength spectroscopic and photometric analysis of the 44 confirmed white dwarfs within 13 pc of the Sun. Combining flux-calibrated ultraviolet (UV) spectroscopy from the Hubble Space Telescope (STIS and COS) with ground-based optical spectroscopy, as well as photometry from Gaia, 2MASS, and WISE, we employ a hybrid fitting method to calculate atmospheric parameters. Each white dwarf was fitted with a bespoke model depending on its detailed atmospheric composition, aside from two strongly magnetic stars. We find a systematic discrepancy in H-atmosphere white dwarfs with Teff < 10,000 K, where fits incorporating UV spectra result in effective temperatures that are 2 - 6 per cent higher than those derived from optical and infrared photometry alone. We re-classify three He-rich white dwarfs as metal enriched following a magnesium detection in their near-UV spectra: WD 0435-088, WD 1132-325 and WD 1917+386. In total, we identify six stars in the sample for which metals were only detected in the UV. Overall we find that 30 per cent of the 13 pc white dwarfs show spectroscopic evidence of evolved planetary systems. Our analysis revealed no measurable difference between the hydrogen content of DQ and DC white dwarfs, although the upper limits of carbon in DCs are significantly below that of the DQ population. We find a multiplicity fraction of 32 per cent for the 13 pc white dwarfs.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 8 minor

Summary. This paper presents a comprehensive multi-wavelength spectroscopic and photometric analysis of the 44 confirmed white dwarfs within 13 pc of the Sun, combining HST/STIS and COS UV spectroscopy with ground-based optical spectroscopy and Gaia/2MASS/WISE photometry. The authors employ a hybrid fitting method to derive atmospheric parameters for each star, tailored to its spectral type. The key findings include: (1) a systematic 2–6% upward Teff offset for H-atmosphere WDs with Teff < 10,000 K when UV spectra are included in fits compared to optical/IR-only fits; (2) re-classification of three He-rich WDs as metal-enriched based on UV Mg detections; (3) a 30% metal-enrichment fraction and 32% multiplicity fraction; (4) no measurable difference in hydrogen content between DQ and DC WDs, but significantly lower carbon upper limits in DCs; and (5) identification of model deficiencies in reproducing UV carbon lines in DQs and the UV-to-IR SED of cool H-atmosphere WDs.

Significance. This is a valuable volume-limited study of the nearest white dwarfs, providing a uniform UV-to-IR analysis of a sample that is complete to 13 pc. The identification of a systematic Teff offset between UV-inclusive and optical-only fits is an important empirical result that directly tests white dwarf atmosphere models. The paper properly applies the recently identified H3+ partition function correction, validates results against independent mass measurements (microlensing for WD0426+588 and WD1142-645; astrometric for Sirius B and 40 Eri B), and is transparent about model failures (DQ UV carbon lines, low DQ masses from UV fitting). The new UV-only metal detections and the multiplicity fraction measurement add further value. The sample size is necessarily limited by the volume, but the data quality is high and the analysis is thorough.

major comments (3)
  1. §5.1, Monte Carlo test (Fig. 16 discussion): The central claim that the 2–6% Teff offset reflects model atmosphere deficiencies rather than observational systematics is not fully supported by the error analysis as designed. The Monte Carlo test perturbs the overall STIS flux level by up to 3% and Gaia magnitudes by 0.01 mag, but Teff determination from UV data depends primarily on the slope of the UV continuum across the G230L wavelength range (1570–3180 Å), not on the absolute flux level. A wavelength-dependent (i.e., slope) calibration error in STIS G230L would directly bias the derived Teff but would not be captured by the Monte Carlo test as designed, since the perturbations are applied uniformly across the spectrum. The paper does note mitigating evidence (the offset reverses sign at higher Teff where different gratings are used, and a similar offset exists between Balmer line andhy
  2. §3.2.2, DQ fitting and Table 8: The artificial reduction of C I gf values by a factor of ~30 to match UV observations is acknowledged transparently, but the resulting DQ parameters in Table 8 (masses as low as 0.357 M☉ for WD0208-510, 0.470 M☉ for WD1142-645) are inconsistent with both optical-only fits (Coutu et al. 2019) and the model-independent microlensing mass for WD1142-645 (0.56 ± 0.08 M☉; McGill et al. 2023). The paper states that 'including STIS UV data in DQ fitting might bias the solutions towards low Teff and masses' (§4.2.2), yet these parameters are presented in Table 8 without a flag indicating their likely unreliability. The authors should clarify which DQ parameters should be considered trustworthy and which are affected by the known UV model issues, particularly for readers who may use Table 8 without reading the full discussion.
  3. §5.1, Fig. 16: The claim of a 'systematic' 2–6% Teff offset is based on approximately 15 DA WDs with G230L data below 10,000 K (from Table 4, counting stars with both 'with UV' and 'without UV' entries). The paper does not provide a quantitative statistical test (e.g., a mean offset with uncertainty, or a significance level) for this offset. Given the small sample size and the acknowledged ~2% systematic offset between photometric and spectroscopic Teff solutions (§3.1), a more rigorous statistical characterization of the offset and its significance would strengthen the central claim.
minor comments (8)
  1. Table 2: The spectral type for WD1748+708 is listed as 'DXH' with composition '–', but the text (§4.3) discusses it as having a helium-rich or carbon-rich atmosphere. The dash in the composition column is ambiguous.
  2. §3.2.2: The DQpec Swan band shift parameter is described as a=0.1, but the text also mentions values of 1.6 (theoretical), 0.2 (empirical calibration from Kowalski 2010 and Blouin & Dufour 2019), and 0.1 (this work). It would help to briefly justify why 0.1 was chosen over 0.2 for this sample specifically.
  3. Fig. 2: The Gaia XP spectra are shown but not incorporated into the fits. While the reasoning is explained, it would be useful to add a brief note in the figure caption reminding the reader that XP spectra are for visual comparison only.
  4. Table 4: The footnote symbols (∗, ‡, §) indicating which photometry was used are defined, but it would be helpful to also indicate in the table or caption which stars have COS vs. STIS data, as this affects the wavelength coverage and fitting approach.
  5. §4.2.4, WD0046+051: The text mentions using 'quasi-static profiles described by Walkup (1982)' for Si II lines broadened by neutral helium. A brief explanation of what these profiles are and why they were needed (as opposed to the unified profiles used for other lines) would improve clarity.
  6. §5.4.2: The enrichment fraction of 30 ± 8% is compared to 45 ± 6% from Ould Rouis et al. (2024), and stated to be consistent at 1.5σ. It would be useful to explicitly state the expected direction of the offset if enrichment properties are age-independent (i.e., the 13 pc sample should have a higher fraction due to longer diffusion timescales), to help the reader evaluate the degeneracy discussion that follows.
  7. Table 11: The projected separation for G203-47 is listed as 0.05 au, which seems very small for a resolved system. Please verify this value.
  8. §5.6: The TESS variability results are presented without error bars on the rotation periods. Adding typical uncertainties would be useful for future comparisons.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for a careful and constructive report. The referee correctly identifies the paper's main contributions and its transparent treatment of model failures. We address each major comment below. In summary: (1) we agree that the Monte Carlo test does not capture wavelength-dependent calibration errors and will revise the text to make this limitation explicit; (2) we agree that Table 8 should flag DQ parameters affected by known UV model issues and will add such flags; and (3) we will add a quantitative statistical characterization of the Teff offset. One point—the suggestion that a slope calibration error in STIS G230L could fully explain the offset—we address with counter-arguments but acknowledge as a legitimate alternative hypothesis that should be discussed more thoroughly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: §5.1, Monte Carlo test (Fig. 16 discussion): The central claim that the 2–6% Teff offset reflects model atmosphere deficiencies rather than observational systematics is not fully supported by the error analysis as designed. The Monte Carlo test perturbs the overall STIS flux level by up to 3% and Gaia magnitudes by 0.01 mag, but Teff determination from UV data depends primarily on the slope of the UV continuum across the G230L wavelength range (1570–3180 Å), not on the absolute flux level. A wavelength-dependent (i.e., slope) calibration error in STIS G230L would directly bias the derived Teff but would not be captured by the Monte Carlo test as designed, since the perturbations are applied uniformly across the spectrum.

    Authors: The referee raises a valid point. Our Monte Carlo test was designed to assess the impact of known absolute flux calibration uncertainties (at the 1–3% level, as characterized by Elms et al. 2024) and Gaia photometric uncertainties, and we agree that it does not capture wavelength-dependent (slope) calibration errors within the G230L bandpass. We acknowledge that a slope error across the 1570–3180 Å range could in principle bias the derived Teff in a manner not captured by our test. We will revise the text to state this limitation explicitly. However, we maintain that the offset is more likely dominated by model deficiencies for the following reasons, which we will also make clearer in the revised text. First, the sign of the offset reverses at higher Teff where different gratings (E140M/E230M, COS) are used; a G230L-specific slope calibration error would not naturally produce this reversal. Second, a similar Teff offset exists between Balmer line fits and photometric fits (a well-known ~2% offset documented by Tremblay et al. 2019; Genest-Beaulieu & Bergeron 2019; and others), which is entirely independent of UV data and thus cannot be attributed to STIS calibration. Third, the STIS G230L flux calibration has been validated against CALSPEC standards at the 1–2% level across the full wavelength range (Bohlin et al. 2019; Elms et al. 2024), and a slope error large enough to produce a 2–6% Teff offset would likely have been detected in those calibration checks. We agree, however, that we cannot fully rule out a contribution from a residual wavelength-dependent calibration error, and we will revise the text to present this as an alternative hypothesis that our current test cannot exclude. revision: partial

  2. Referee: §3.2.2, DQ fitting and Table 8: The artificial reduction of C I gf values by a factor of ~30 to match UV observations is acknowledged transparently, but the resulting DQ parameters in Table 8 (masses as low as 0.357 M☉ for WD0208-510, 0.470 M☉ for WD1142-645) are inconsistent with both optical-only fits (Coutu et al. 2019) and the model-independent microlensing mass for WD1142-645 (0.56 ± 0.08 M☉; McGill et al. 2023). The paper states that 'including STIS UV data in DQ fitting might bias the solutions towards low Teff and masses' (§4.2.2), yet these parameters are presented in Table 8 without a flag indicating their likely unreliability.

    Authors: We agree with this comment. The DQ parameters derived from UV-inclusive fits are known to be biased low in mass, as we discuss in §4.2.2, but Table 8 does not currently flag this for readers who may use the table without reading the full discussion. We will add a column or footnote to Table 8 explicitly flagging the DQ parameters that are affected by known UV model issues (specifically WD0208-510, WD0435-088, WD1142-645, and WD2140+207, which have masses significantly below both optical-only fits and independent mass measurements). We will also add a note directing readers to §4.2.2 for discussion of the UV model issues affecting these parameters. For WD1142-645 specifically, we will note the 2σ tension with the microlensing mass from McGill et al. (2023). We will clarify that for DQ white dwarfs, the optical-only parameters from Coutu et al. (2019) should be preferred for applications requiring reliable masses, while the UV-inclusive parameters are presented to document the model discrepancies. revision: yes

  3. Referee: §5.1, Fig. 16: The claim of a 'systematic' 2–6% Teff offset is based on approximately 15 DA WDs with G230L data below 10,000 K. The paper does not provide a quantitative statistical test (e.g., a mean offset with uncertainty, or a significance level) for this offset. Given the small sample size and the acknowledged ~2% systematic offset between photometric and spectroscopic Teff solutions (§3.1), a more rigorous statistical characterization of the offset and its significance would strengthen the central claim.

    Authors: We agree that a quantitative statistical characterization would strengthen the claim and will add this to the revised manuscript. We will compute the mean and median Teff offset (ΔTeff/Teff = (Teff,hybrid − Teff,phot)/Teff,hybrid) for the DA white dwarfs with G230L data below 10,000 K, along with the standard error on the mean and a significance test (e.g., a one-sample t-test against zero offset). We will also quantify how this offset compares to the known ~2% photometric-spectroscopic Teff offset. We note that the known ~2% offset between photometric and spectroscopic (Balmer line) Teff solutions is a separate effect that is also visible in Fig. 16 (red points), and the UV-vs-photometric offset (blue points) is of comparable or larger magnitude but in the same direction. We will discuss the relationship between these two offsets explicitly. The small sample size is an inherent limitation of a volume-limited study, and we will state this clearly, but the uniformity of the data quality and analysis is a compensating strength. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity found; central claims are empirical measurements from independent fitting approaches

full rationale

This is an observational study where the central claims (Teff discrepancy, metal detections, multiplicity fraction) are empirical measurements that do not reduce to fitted parameters by construction. The key Teff discrepancy (§5.1, Fig. 16) arises from comparing two independent fitting approaches — UV-constrained vs optical/IR-constrained — applied to the same stars; neither fit is defined in terms of the other. The DQ gf-value adjustment (§3.2.2) is a transparent calibration step applied to line strengths, while the Teff/mass results come from continuum fitting, so the low DQ masses are not forced by the gf adjustment. The H+3 correction follows an external result (Kowalski 2026). Self-citations to O'Brien et al. (2024) provide sample definition context but are not load-bearing for the UV analysis or the Teff discrepancy finding. The Tremblay et al. (2013) and Koester (2010) models, while co-authored by paper authors, are standard externally-used codes. The Monte Carlo flux calibration test (§5.1) is a sensitivity analysis, not a prediction. The multiplicity (32%) and enrichment (30%) fractions are direct counts. No step in the derivation chain reduces to its inputs by definition or by self-citation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities, particles, forces, or dimensions are introduced. The paper is purely observational/analytical.

free parameters (4)
  • DQpec Swan band shift parameter a = 0.1
    Chosen empirically in Section 3.2.2; Kowalski (2010) derived a=1.6 from QM simulations, Blouin & Dufour (2019) used a=0.2, and the authors settled on a=0.1 by testing against their objects. No single value fits all DQpecs.
  • C I UV line gf values = artificially decreased by factor ~30
    Section 3.2.2: the authors 'artificially decreased the gf values in the models' to match observed UV C I line strengths at 1657, 1930, and 2478 Å, because updated unified line profiles did not resolve the discrepancy.
  • Teff, log g, log(C/He), log(H/He) per star = various (Tables 4, 7, 8, 9)
    Standard atmospheric parameters fitted to SEDs and spectral lines for each white dwarf. These are the expected outputs of the analysis, not ad hoc parameters.
  • Metal abundances (Ca, Mg, Fe, Si, etc.) per DAZ/DZ = various (Tables 6, 9)
    Fitted from line profiles in UV and optical spectra. Standard procedure for abundance analysis.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption The Tremblay et al. (2013, 2015a) 3D LTE model atmospheres correctly reproduce H-atmosphere WD spectra
    Used throughout Section 3.1 for all H-atmosphere fitting. The paper's own results show this assumption is imperfect (2-6% Teff discrepancy).
  • domain assumption The Koester (2010) atmosphere code correctly reproduces He-rich WD spectra
    Used throughout Section 3.2 for all He-atmosphere fitting. The paper acknowledges issues with C I UV lines and DQ masses.
  • domain assumption Mass-radius relations from Bédard et al. (2020) with thick (qH=10^-4) or thin (qH=10^-10) H-layers are appropriate
    Section 3.1 and 3.2.1: thick H-layer for DAs, thin H-layer for DCs. The choice affects derived masses.
  • domain assumption STIS G230L spectra are flux-calibrated to 1-3% accuracy
    Section 3 and 5.1: the authors test the impact of this calibration uncertainty and conclude it does not explain the Teff discrepancy, but the assumption underlies all hybrid fits.
  • domain assumption Interstellar lines can be reliably separated from photospheric lines using Si III 1265 Å as a discriminator
    Section 3: lines sharing the radial velocity of Si III 1265 Å (lower level 0.035 eV, ~400 K) are assumed photospheric. This is standard but relies on the ISM being cool enough to not populate these levels.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-glm · 50605 in / 3572 out tokens · 310678 ms · 2026-07-08T08:21:55.873065+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

300 extracted references · 300 canonical work pages · 221 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Measurements of three exo-planetesimal compositions: a planetary core, a chondritic body, and an icy Kuiper belt analogue

    Measurements of three exo-planetesimal compositions: a planetary core, a chondritic body, and an icy Kuiper belt analogue. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1034 , archivePrefix =. 2506.19931 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1034

  2. [2]

    and Haberland, Matt and Reddy, Tyler and Cournapeau, David and Burovski, Evgeni and Peterson, Pearu and Weckesser, Warren and Bright, Jonathan and

    Virtanen, Pauli and Gommers, Ralf and Oliphant, Travis E. and Haberland, Matt and Reddy, Tyler and Cournapeau, David and Burovski, Evgeni and Peterson, Pearu and Weckesser, Warren and Bright, Jonathan and. Nature Methods , year =

    work page

  3. [3]

    Astropy: A Community Python Package for Astronomy

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 , Eid =. arXiv , Author =:1307.6212 , Journal =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322068

  4. [4]

    The Astropy Project: Building an inclusive, open-science project and status of the v2.0 core package

    The Astropy Project: Building an Open-science Project and Status of the v2.0 Core Package. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f , archivePrefix =. 1801.02634 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f

  5. [5]

    M., Lim, P

    The Astropy Project: Sustaining and Growing a Community-oriented Open-source Project and the Latest Major Release (v5.0) of the Core Package. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74 , archivePrefix =. 2206.14220 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74

  6. [6]

    Discovery of Molecular Hydrogen in White Dwarf Atmospheres

    Discovery of Molecular Hydrogen in White Dwarf Atmospheres. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/766/2/L18 , archivePrefix =. 1302.6619 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/2041-8205/766/2/l18 2041

  7. [7]

    Canadian Journal of Physics , year = 1958, month = jan, volume =

    Pressure-Induced Infrared Absorption of Hydrogen and Hydrogen Foreign Gas Mixtures in the Range 15005000 Atmospheres. Canadian Journal of Physics , year = 1958, month = jan, volume =. doi:10.1139/p58-009 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1139/p58-009 1958

  8. [8]

    , keywords =

    High-temperature (1000-7000 K) collision-induced absorption of H''2 pairs computed from the first principles, with application to cool and dense stellar atmospheres. , keywords =. doi:10.1016/S0022-4073(00)00023-6 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1016/s0022-4073(00)00023-6

  9. [9]

    The Equation of State for Stellar Envelopes. I. an Occupation Probability Formalism for the Truncation of Internal Partition Functions. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/166600 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1086/166600

  10. [10]

    Physical Review , year = 1965, month = nov, volume =

    Theory of Resonance Broadening of Spectral Lines by Atom-Atom Impacts. Physical Review , year = 1965, month = nov, volume =. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.140.A1044 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.140.a1044 1965

  11. [11]

    New Insights into the Problem of the Surface Gravity Distribution of Cool DA White Dwarfs

    New Insights into the Problem of the Surface Gravity Distribution of Cool DA White Dwarfs. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/712/2/1345 , archivePrefix =. 1002.3585 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0004-637x/712/2/1345

  12. [12]

    The Galaxy Evolution Explorer: A Space Ultraviolet Survey Mission

    The Galaxy Evolution Explorer: A Space Ultraviolet Survey Mission. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/426387 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0411302 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/426387

  13. [13]

    The Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE): Mission Description and Initial On-orbit Performance

    The Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE): Mission Description and Initial On-orbit Performance. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-6256/140/6/1868 , archivePrefix =. 1008.0031 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0004-6256/140/6/1868

  14. [14]

    F., Cutri , R

    The Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS). , keywords =. doi:10.1086/498708 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1086/498708

  15. [15]

    American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts \#206 , year = 2005, series =

    The SkyMapper Telescope and Southern Sky Survey. American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts \#206 , year = 2005, series =

    work page 2005

  16. [16]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    The Pan-STARRS1 Surveys. arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    work page

  17. [17]

    , keywords =

    The 16th Data Release of the Sloan Digital Sky Surveys: First Release from the APOGEE-2 Southern Survey and Full Release of eBOSS Spectra. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab929e , archivePrefix =. 1912.02905 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab929e 1912

  18. [18]

    Overview of the DESI Milky Way Survey

    Overview of the DESI Milky Way Survey. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acb3c0 , archivePrefix =. 2208.08514 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acb3c0

  19. [19]

    Gaia Early Data Release 3: The Gaia Catalogue of Nearby Stars

    Gaia Early Data Release 3. The Gaia Catalogue of Nearby Stars. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039498 , archivePrefix =. 2012.02061 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039498 2012

  20. [20]

    Gaia Data Release 2: Observational Hertzsprung-Russell diagrams

    Gaia Data Release 2. Observational Hertzsprung-Russell diagrams. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201832843 , archivePrefix =. 1804.09378 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201832843

  21. [21]

    The Gaia mission

    The Gaia mission. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629272 , archivePrefix =. 1609.04153 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629272

  22. [22]

    Gaia Early Data Release 3: Summary of the contents and survey properties

    Gaia Early Data Release 3. Summary of the contents and survey properties. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039657 , archivePrefix =. 2012.01533 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039657 2012

  23. [23]

    A hot white dwarf merger remnant revealed by an ultraviolet detection of carbon

    A hot white dwarf merger remnant revealed by an ultraviolet detection of carbon. Nature Astronomy , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41550-025-02590-y , archivePrefix =. 2508.03811 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1038/s41550-025-02590-y

  24. [24]

    , keywords =

    IUE observation of strong UV absorption in the spectrum of the C2 white dwarf ion of LP 145-141. , keywords =

    work page

  25. [25]

    Two Extrasolar Asteroids with Low Volatile-Element Mass Fractions

    Two Extrasolar Asteroids with Low Volatile-element Mass Fractions. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/750/1/69 , archivePrefix =. 1203.2885 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0004-637x/750/1/69

  26. [26]

    Element abundances in cool white dwarfs. I. The DZA white dwarfs L 745-46A and Ross 640. , keywords =

    work page

  27. [27]

    , keywords =

    The chemical diversity of exo-terrestrial planetary debris around white dwarfs. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21201.x , archivePrefix =. 1205.0167 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21201.x 2012

  28. [28]

    Ultraviolet extinction correlation with 3D dust maps using white dwarfs

    Ultraviolet extinction correlation with 3D dust maps using white dwarfs. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stae2366 , archivePrefix =. 2410.10358 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/stae2366

  29. [29]

    The 100 pc White Dwarf Sample in the SDSS Footprint. II. A New Look at the Spectral Evolution of White Dwarfs. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad9bb3 , archivePrefix =. 2412.04611 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad9bb3

  30. [30]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    A Detailed Model Atmosphere Analysis of Cool White Dwarfs in DESI DR1. arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    work page

  31. [31]

    Gaia Data Release 3: Summary of the content and survey properties

    Gaia Data Release 3. Summary of the content and survey properties. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243940 , archivePrefix =. 2208.00211 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243940

  32. [32]

    Non-single stars (Gaia Collaboration, 2022)

    VizieR Online Data Catalog: Gaia DR3 Part 3. Non-single stars (Gaia Collaboration, 2022). VizieR Online Data Catalog , keywords =

    work page 2022

  33. [33]

    Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series , year = 2020, series =

    Integration and early testing of WEAVE: the next-generation spectroscopy facility for the William Herschel Telescope. Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series , year = 2020, series =. doi:10.1117/12.2561067 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1117/12.2561067 2020

  34. [34]

    4MOST: Project overview and information for the First Call for Proposals

    4MOST: Project overview and information for the First Call for Proposals. The Messenger , keywords =. doi:10.18727/0722-6691/5117 , archivePrefix =. 1903.02464 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.18727/0722-6691/5117 1903

  35. [35]

    4MOST Consortium Survey 3: Milky Way Disc and Bulge Low-Resolution Survey (4MIDABLE-LR)

    4MOST Consortium Survey 3: Milky Way Disc and Bulge Low-Resolution Survey (4MIDABLE-LR). The Messenger , keywords =. doi:10.18727/0722-6691/5122 , archivePrefix =. 1903.02469 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.18727/0722-6691/5122 1903

  36. [36]

    Instrumentation in Astronomy VIII , year = 1994, editor =

    HIRES: the high-resolution echelle spectrometer on the Keck 10-m Telescope. Instrumentation in Astronomy VIII , year = 1994, editor =. doi:10.1117/12.176725 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1117/12.176725 1994

  37. [37]

    The MagE Spectrograph

    The MagE spectrograph. Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy II , year = 2008, editor =. doi:10.1117/12.789972 , archivePrefix =. 0807.3774 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1117/12.789972 2008

  38. [38]

    , keywords =

    Infrared absorption by collisional H _ 2 -He complexes at temperatures up to 9000 K and frequencies from 0 to 20 000 cm ^ -1. , keywords =. doi:10.1063/1.3676405 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1063/1.3676405

  39. [39]

    Reviews of Modern Physics , year = 1982, month = oct, volume =

    The effect of neutral nonresonant collisions on atomic spectral lines. Reviews of Modern Physics , year = 1982, month = oct, volume =. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.54.1103 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.54.1103 1982

  40. [40]

    , keywords =

    Effect of the variation of electric-dipole moments on the shape of pressure-broadened atomic spectral lines. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.60.1021 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.60.1021

  41. [41]

    , keywords =

    Collisional effects in the far red wing of Lyman-. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200810294 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200810294

  42. [42]

    Line shapes of the magnesium resonance lines in cool DZ white dwarf atmospheres

    Line shapes of the magnesium resonance lines in cool DZ white dwarf atmospheres. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834067 , archivePrefix =. 1809.04531 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834067

  43. [43]

    The general catalogue of trigonometric [stellar] parallaxes

    work page

  44. [44]

    Evolutionary and pulsational properties of white dwarf stars

    Evolutionary and pulsational properties of white dwarf stars. , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s00159-010-0033-1 , archivePrefix =. 1007.2659 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/s00159-010-0033-1

  45. [45]

    New evolutionary sequences for extremely low mass white dwarfs: Homogeneous mass and age determinations, and asteroseismic prospects

    New evolutionary sequences for extremely low-mass white dwarfs. Homogeneous mass and age determinations and asteroseismic prospects. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321868 , archivePrefix =. 1307.1882 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321868

  46. [46]

    , year = 1972, month = jul, volume =

    New Mesaurements of Circular Polarization and an Ephemeris for the Variable White Dwarf G195-19. , year = 1972, month = jul, volume =. doi:10.1086/180990 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1086/180990 1972

  47. [47]

    , year = 1974, month = jun, volume =

    G240-72: a New Magnetic White Dwarf with Unusual Polarization. , year = 1974, month = jun, volume =. doi:10.1086/181508 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1086/181508 1974

  48. [48]

    , keywords =

    The magnetic fields of white dwarfs. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/190720 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1086/190720

  49. [49]

    A Python Script for Aligning the STIS Echelle Blaze Function

    work page

  50. [50]

    Searching for the weakest detectable magnetic fields in white dwarfs. Highly-sensitive measurements from first VLT and WHT surveys

    Searching for the weakest detectable magnetic fields in white dwarfs. Highly-sensitive measurements from first VLT and WHT surveys. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833235 , archivePrefix =. 1807.09649 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833235

  51. [51]

    Discovery of weak magnetic fields in four DZ white dwarfs in the local 20pc volume. Implications for the frequency of magnetic fields with cooling age

    Discovery of weak magnetic fields in four DZ white dwarfs in the local 20 pc volume. Implications for the frequency of magnetic fields with cooling age. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936068 , archivePrefix =. 1908.08418 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936068 1908

  52. [52]

    Discovery of six new strongly magnetic white dwarfs in the 20 pc local population

    Discovery of six new strongly magnetic white dwarfs in the 20 pc local population. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038565 , archivePrefix =. 2010.05795 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038565 2010

  53. [53]

    New insight into the magnetism of degenerate stars from the analysis of a volume limited sample of white dwarfs

    New insight into the magnetism of degenerate stars from the analysis of a volume-limited sample of white dwarfs. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2046 , archivePrefix =. 2106.11109 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2046

  54. [54]

    Multiple channels for the onset of magnetism in isolated white dwarfs

    Multiple Channels for the Onset of Magnetism in Isolated White Dwarfs. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac84d3 , archivePrefix =. 2208.02655 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac84d3 2041

  55. [55]

    , keywords =

    Discovery of Magnetically Guided Metal Accretion onto a Polluted White Dwarf. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad2619 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad2619 2041

  56. [56]

    Estimating distances from parallaxes

    Estimating Distances from Parallaxes. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/683116 , archivePrefix =. 1507.02105 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/683116

  57. [57]

    The Initial-Final Mass Relation for Hydrogen-Deficient White Dwarfs

    The Initial-Final Mass Relation for Hydrogen-deficient White Dwarfs. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac1423 , archivePrefix =. 2107.06373 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac1423

  58. [58]

    Verifying the White Dwarf Mass-Radius relation with Sirius B and other resolved Sirius-like systems

    work page

  59. [59]

    The CARMENES search for exoplanets around M dwarfs: Spectroscopic orbits of nine M-dwarf multiple systems, including two triples, two brown dwarf candidates, and one close M-dwarf-white dwarf binary

    The CARMENES search for exoplanets around M dwarfs. Spectroscopic orbits of nine M-dwarf multiple systems, including two triples, two brown dwarf candidates, and one close M-dwarf-white dwarf binary. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141031 , archivePrefix =. 2105.14770 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141031

  60. [60]

    Improved Constraints on the Initial-to-Final Mass Relation of White Dwarfs using Wide Binaries

    Improved Constraints on the Initial-to-final Mass Relation of White Dwarfs Using Wide Binaries. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac2f49 , archivePrefix =. 2102.07790 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac2f49

  61. [61]

    , keywords =

    RE J0317-853: the hottest known highly magnetic DA white dwarf. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/277.3.971 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/277.3.971

  62. [62]

    , keywords =

    Hubble Space Telescope spectroscopy of the Balmer lines in Sirius B ^ *. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09359.x , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0506600 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09359.x 2005

  63. [63]

    Polluted White Dwarfs: Mixing Regions and Diffusion Timescales

    Polluted White Dwarfs: Mixing Regions and Diffusion Timescales. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab0028 , archivePrefix =. 1812.09602 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab0028

  64. [64]

    Ab initio equations of state for hydrogen (H-REOS.3) and helium (He-REOS.3) and their implications for the interior of Brown Dwarfs

    Ab Initio Equations of State for Hydrogen (H-REOS.3) and Helium (He-REOS.3) and their Implications for the Interior of Brown Dwarfs. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/215/2/21 , archivePrefix =. 1411.4010 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0067-0049/215/2/21

  65. [65]

    Measurements of Physical Parameters of White Dwarfs: A Test of the Mass-Radius Relation

    Measurements of Physical Parameters of White Dwarfs: A Test of the Mass-Radius Relation. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa8bb6 , archivePrefix =. 1709.02324 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa8bb6

  66. [66]

    On the Spectral Evolution of Hot White Dwarf Stars. I. A Detailed Model Atmosphere Analysis of Hot White Dwarfs from SDSS DR12. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abafbe , archivePrefix =. 2008.07469 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abafbe 2008

  67. [67]

    On the Spectral Evolution of Hot White Dwarf Stars. II. Time-dependent Simulations of Element Transport in Evolving White Dwarfs with STELUM. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac4497 , archivePrefix =. 2112.09989 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac4497

  68. [68]

    On the Spectral Evolution of Hot White Dwarf Stars. III. The PG 1159-DO-DB-DQ Evolutionary Channel Revisited. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac609d , archivePrefix =. 2203.12045 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac609d

  69. [69]

    The spectral evolution of white dwarfs: where do we stand?

    The spectral evolution of white dwarfs: where do we stand?. , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s10509-024-04307-5 , archivePrefix =. 2405.01268 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/s10509-024-04307-5

  70. [70]

    , keywords =

    Spectroscopy of Hot Stars in the Galactic Halo. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/116060 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1086/116060

  71. [71]

    Unresolved stellar companions with Gaia DR2 astrometry

    Unresolved stellar companions with Gaia DR2 astrometry. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1522 , archivePrefix =. 2003.05467 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1522 2003

  72. [72]

    Highly sensitive search for magnetic fields in white dwarfs using broad-band circular polarimetry

    Highly sensitive search for magnetic fields in white dwarfs using broad-band circular polarimetry. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142173 , archivePrefix =. 2111.11174 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142173

  73. [73]

    Discovery of magnetic fields in five DC white dwarfs

    Discovery of magnetic fields in five DC white dwarfs. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202245149 , archivePrefix =. 2301.03959 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202245149

  74. [74]

    White Dwarfs: Advances in Observation and Theory , year = 1993, editor =

    Stark broadening in white dwarf atmospheres. White Dwarfs: Advances in Observation and Theory , year = 1993, editor =. doi:10.1007/978-94-011-2020-3_35 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1007/978-94-011-2020-3_35 1993

  75. [75]

    , keywords =

    A Spectroscopic Analysis of DAO and Hot DA White Dwarfs: The Implications of the Presence of Helium and the Nature of DAO Stars. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/174571 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1086/174571

  76. [76]

    , keywords =

    The Chemical Evolution of Cool White Dwarfs and the Age of the Local Galactic Disk. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/312955 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1086/312955

  77. [77]

    Photometric and Spectroscopic Analysis of Cool White Dwarfs with Trigonometric Parallax Measurements

    Photometric and Spectroscopic Analysis of Cool White Dwarfs with Trigonometric Parallax Measurements. , keywords =. 2001. doi:10.1086/320356 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0011286 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/320356 2001

  78. [78]

    A Comprehensive Spectroscopic Analysis of DB White Dwarfs

    A Comprehensive Spectroscopic Analysis of DB White Dwarfs. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/737/1/28 , archivePrefix =. 1105.5433 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0004-637x/737/1/28

  79. [79]

    On the Measurement of Fundamental Parameters of White Dwarfs in the Gaia Era

    On the Measurement of Fundamental Parameters of White Dwarfs in the Gaia Era. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab153a , archivePrefix =. 1904.02022 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab153a 1904

  80. [80]

    Hot Degenerates in the MCT Survey. III. A Sample of White Dwarf Stars in the Southern Hemisphere. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac22b1 , archivePrefix =. 2108.13520 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac22b1

Showing first 80 references.