Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Characterizing the Decision Boundary of Deep Neural Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1912.11460 v3 pith:LHLZ2VJQ submitted 2019-12-24 cs.LG cs.CVstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.CVstat.ML
keywords deepdecisionneuralboundarydeepdignearnetworknetworks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Deep neural networks and in particular, deep neural classifiers have become an integral part of many modern applications. Despite their practical success, we still have limited knowledge of how they work and the demand for such an understanding is evergrowing. In this regard, one crucial aspect of deep neural network classifiers that can help us deepen our knowledge about their decision-making behavior is to investigate their decision boundaries. Nevertheless, this is contingent upon having access to samples populating the areas near the decision boundary. To achieve this, we propose a novel approach we call Deep Decision boundary Instance Generation (DeepDIG). DeepDIG utilizes a method based on adversarial example generation as an effective way of generating samples near the decision boundary of any deep neural network model. Then, we introduce a set of important principled characteristics that take advantage of the generated instances near the decision boundary to provide multifaceted understandings of deep neural networks. We have performed extensive experiments on multiple representative datasets across various deep neural network models and characterized their decision boundaries. The code is publicly available at https://github.com/hamidkarimi/DeepDIG/.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Dataset Ownership Verification in Contrastive Pre-trained Models

    cs.LG 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The authors define a contrastive relationship gap and use a one-tailed T-test to detect whether a suspect encoder was pre-trained on a target dataset.

Pith tools