Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Evaluating Various Tokenizers for Arabic Text Classification

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2106.07540 v2 pith:LIBB27GC submitted 2021-06-14 cs.CL cs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.LG
keywords tokenizationclassificationtextgivenalgorithmsevaluatingsizetechniques
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The first step in any NLP pipeline is to split the text into individual tokens. The most obvious and straightforward approach is to use words as tokens. However, given a large text corpus, representing all the words is not efficient in terms of vocabulary size. In the literature, many tokenization algorithms have emerged to tackle this problem by creating subwords which in turn limits the vocabulary size in a given text corpus. Most tokenization techniques are language-agnostic i.e they don't incorporate the linguistic features of a given language. Not to mention the difficulty of evaluating such techniques in practice. In this paper, we introduce three new tokenization algorithms for Arabic and compare them to three other baselines using unsupervised evaluations. In addition to that, we compare all the six algorithms by evaluating them on three supervised classification tasks which are sentiment analysis, news classification and poetry classification using six publicly available datasets. Our experiments show that none of the tokenization technique is the best choice overall and that the performance of a given tokenization algorithm depends on the size of the dataset, type of the task, and the amount of morphology that exists in the dataset. However, some tokenization techniques are better overall as compared to others on various text classification tasks.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Evaluating Tokenizer Performance of Large Language Models Across Official Indian Languages

    cs.CL 2024-11 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A single-sentence evaluation claims SUTRA's tokenizer is most token-efficient across 14 of India's 22 official languages, based on one example text per language.

Pith tools