REVIEW 2 cited by
Knowledge Editing through Chain-of-Thought
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Knowledge Editing is a technique that updates large language models (LLMs) with new information to maintain their world knowledge. This approach avoids the need to rebuild the model from scratch, thereby addressing the high costs associated with frequent retraining. Among these, the in-context editing paradigm stands out for its effectiveness in integrating new knowledge while preserving the model's original capabilities. Despite its potential, existing in-context knowledge editing methods are often task-specific, focusing primarily on multi-hop QA tasks using structured knowledge triples. Moreover, their reliance on few-shot prompting for task decomposition makes them unstable and less effective in generalizing across diverse tasks. In response to these limitations, we propose EditCoT, a novel knowledge editing framework that flexibly and efficiently updates LLMs across various tasks without retraining. EditCoT works by generating a chain-of-thought (CoT) for a given input and then iteratively refining this CoT process using a CoT editor based on updated knowledge. We evaluate EditCoT across a diverse range of benchmarks, covering multiple languages and tasks. The results demonstrate that our approach achieves state-of-the-art performance while offering superior generalization, effectiveness, and stability compared to existing methods, marking a significant advancement in the field of knowledge updating. The code and data of EditCoT are available at: https://github.com/bebr2/EditCoT .
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Mitigating Context-Memory Conflicts in LLMs through Dynamic Cognitive Reconciliation Decoding
DCRD uses attention-map analysis to detect context-memory conflicts in LLMs and conditionally applies either greedy or fidelity-based dynamic decoding, achieving SOTA results on QA tasks across four models and six datasets.
-
Robust Knowledge Editing via Explicit Reasoning Chains for Distractor-Resilient Multi-Hop QA
Teaching an LLM to emit a fixed four-stage reasoning chain during fine-tuning makes single-pass multi-hop knowledge editing robust to distractor facts.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.