Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Cosmological constraints on R²-corrected Appleby-Battye model

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.06392 v3 pith:LK3CDV3F submitted 2023-05-10 astro-ph.CO gr-qc

Cosmological constraints on $R^2$-corrected Appleby-Battye model

classification astro-ph.CO gr-qc
keywords modeldatacosmiccosmologicalparametersigmaanalysesconstraints
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
abstract

Nowadays, efforts are being devoted to the study of alternative cosmological scenarios in which modifications of General Relativity have been proposed to explain the late cosmic acceleration without assuming the existence of dark energy. In this scenario, we investigate the $R^2$-AB model, which consists of an $f(R)$ model with only one extra free parameter, $b$, in addition to the 6 of the flat-$\Lambda$CDM. Regarding this model, it was already shown that a positive value for $b$ is required for the model to be consistent with Solar System tests, moreover, the condition for the existence of a de~Sitter state requires $b \ge 1.6$. To impose observational constraints on the $R^2$-AB model we consider three datasets: 31 $H(z)$ measurements from Cosmic Chronometers (CC), 20 $[{f\sigma}_{8}](z)$ measurements from Redshift-Space Distortion (RSD), and the most recent type Ia Supernovae (SNe Ia) sample from Pantheon+. Next, we perform two different analyses: we have considered only SNe Ia data and the combined likelihood SNe+CC+RSD. The first one has provided $b=2.28^{+6.52}_{-0.55}$, while the second one $b=2.18^{+5.41}_{-0.55}$. In the first case it was necessary to set the absolute magnitude $M_B = -19.253$ from SH0ES collaboration, while in the second we did a marginalization over the Hubble constant $H_0$ in the normalized growth function. We have also observed that the $H_0-M_B$ degeneracy was broken by adding CC data to the SNe data. Additionally, we perform illustrative analyses that compare this $f(R)$ model with the flat-$\Lambda$CDM model, considering several values of the parameter $b$, for diverse cosmological functions like the Hubble function $H(z)$, the equation of state $w_{\rm eff}(z)$, the parametrized growth rate of cosmic structures $[f\sigma_8](z)$, and $\sigma_8(z)$. We conclude that the model fits well the data, but the parameter $b$ was not unambiguously constrained.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Testing Scale-Dependent Suppression of Structure Growth in the Linear Regime

    astro-ph.CO 2026-08 conditional novelty 5.0

    A combined fit of galaxy-growth, supernova, and CMB data finds at most a weak 2.2σ hint for scale-dependent suppression of structure growth, with an inconclusive Bayes factor.

  2. Constraints on Dark Energy and Modified Gravity Models from Fast Radio Bursts and Late-Time Geometric Probes

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Combining 104 FRBs with CC, SNe, and BAO data yields 10-43% tighter constraints on Omega_b, H0, and dark energy parameters in LambdaCDM, wCDM, CPL, and three f(R) models, with modest preference for extensions over LambdaCDM.