Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 69 references

Complete Decomposition of Anomalous Diffusion in Variable Speed Generalized L\'evy Walks

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Variable-speed generalized Lévy walks have no upper bound on the Noah exponent L, overturning the previous L≤1 limit for Lévy-walk-type processes.

desk verdict Unbounded-L claim in VGLWs survives scrutiny; solid extension of the J/L/M decomposition to γ>1, worth refereeing despite a Joseph-exponent coverage gap and thin numerics. read the letter →

arxiv 2512.16073 v1 pith:LL6TORW5 submitted 2025-12-18 cond-mat.stat-mech physics.data-an

Abhijit Bera , Kevin E. Bassler This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.stat-mechphysics.data-an
keywords anomalousdiffusiongeneralizedLévywalksvariable-speedJosepheffectNoahMosesvelocitymomentsexponent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper analyzes anomalous diffusion in variable-speed generalized Lévy walks (VGLWs), a broad class of stochastic processes in which a walker makes steps of random duration drawn from a power-law distribution and moves with a speed that varies deterministically within each step. It decomposes the mean-square displacement into three independent contributions—the Joseph effect (long-range correlations), the Noah effect (heavy-tailed step-size fluctuations), and the Moses effect (statistical aging)—and maps the full parameter space into nine dynamical phases. Its central claim is that the Noah exponent L, which measures the strength of heavy-tailed fluctuations, is not bounded above by 1 as previously believed for Lévy-walk-type processes. Specifically, for γ>1 with γ<ν<γ/2+η, the paper derives L=γ/2, so L exceeds 1 whenever γ>2. A sympathetic reader would care because this overturns a standing limit and shows that anomalous diffusion in finite-mean-step-duration systems can be driven by far more extreme fluctuation statistics than earlier frameworks allowed.

What carries the argument

The central objects are the three constitutive exponents (Joseph J, Noah L, Moses M) defined through the scaling of the time-averaged mean-square displacement and the velocity moments. The argument is carried by the joint distribution p(t,τ,t′) of the age t′ within a step of intended duration τ at observation time t, derived from a Laplace-space renewal series. In the γ>1 regime, the renewal density is approximated by the constant (γ−1)/(γτ0), so the velocity moments acquire the powers t^{ν−γ} and t^{2ν−γ−1}. These powers, combined with the definitions ⟨|v|⟩∼t^{M−1/2} and ⟨v²⟩∼t^{2L+2M−2}, yield L=γ/2 in the region γ<ν<γ/2+η—the mechanism that makes L unbounded.

What would settle it

Compute ⟨|v|⟩ and ⟨v²⟩ numerically for parameters γ=3.2, ν=2.0, η=1.8 (a point in Region E where γ>2, γ<ν<γ/2+η) using importance-sampled step durations, and compare the measured time exponents to the analytical predictions M=ν−γ+1/2 and L=γ/2. A mismatch would refute the unbounded-Noah claim. An alternative check: evaluate the exact integrals in Eqs. (25)–(28) without the lower-limit truncation at τ0 to see whether t^{ν−γ} and t^{2ν−γ−1} remain the leading terms in the limit t→∞.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The authors extend the Joseph–Noah–Moses decomposition of anomalous diffusion to the entire parameter space of variable-speed generalized Lévy walks, including the previously unanalyzed regime γ>1 where the mean step duration is finite. Computing the first and second moments of the walker's speed from the joint step-age distribution, they find that in the region γ<ν<γ/2+η the velocity moments scale as ⟨|v|⟩∼t^{ν−γ} and ⟨v²⟩∼t^{2ν−γ−1}. Using the definitions ⟨|v|⟩∼t^{M−1/2} and ⟨v²⟩∼t^{2L+2M−2}, these scalings give M=ν−γ+1/2 and L=γ/2. Since γ/2 exceeds 1 whenever γ>2 and η>γ/2, the Noah exponent has no upper bound within this framework. The paper also shows that the Joseph exponent J is inde

Load-bearing premise

The unbounded-Noah claim rests on the asymptotic evaluation of the velocity moments for γ>1, which replaces the renewal density by its large-time constant and discards lower-limit contributions at the minimal step duration; if the small-time or finite-τ0 corrections changed the leading time dependence for ν just above γ, the L=γ/2 result—and with it the unboundedness—would fail.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For any γ>2, choosing η>γ/2 and γ<ν<γ/2+η gives L=γ/2, so the Noah exponent can be made arbitrarily large by increasing γ; the VGLW framework therefore admits regimes of anomalous diffusion with no precedent in earlier Lévy-walk-type models.
  • In the nine dynamical phases, the scaling relation H=J+L+M−1 holds throughout the scaling region, so measuring any three exponents determines the fourth; the paper's phase diagram gives the expected values for each region.
  • The Joseph exponent J is determined solely by γ and ν and is independent of η, so the within-step speed shape affects only the Noah and Moses exponents, not the correlation structure.
  • The non-scaling boundary 2ν=γ+2η separates the regime where an (H,J,L,M) description applies from one where velocity moments diverge; this boundary is the only place η changes the phase structure.
  • For γ>1 and ν<γ/2, all exponents equal 1/2 and diffusion is normal, so VGLWs interpolate continuously between normal diffusion and strongly anomalous regimes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the unbounded-L result survives scrutiny, earlier experimental and numerical studies that assumed L≤1 for Lévy-walk-type processes in the γ>1 regime may warrant re-analysis; single-particle tracking data with recorded velocities could be re-examined for velocity-moment exponents exceeding the old bound.
  • A natural next test is to simulate the velocity moments at a point deep inside Region E with γ>2 (e.g., γ=3, η=2, ν=2.5) and check whether the measured M and L match ν−γ+1/2 and γ/2, using the same importance-sampling scheme.
  • Since J is η-independent, one can probe the robustness of the decomposition by varying η while holding γ and ν fixed: the Joseph exponent should stay constant even as the velocity moments' time exponents change, providing a cross-check of the decomposition's internal consistency.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes Variable Speed Generalized Lévy Walks (VGLWs) and proposes a complete decomposition of their anomalous diffusion into Joseph (J), Noah (L), and Moses (M) exponents. The authors derive L and M from velocity moments in Section IV, take J from a TAMSD/velocity-correlation calculation in Section V, and combine these with the previously known Hurst exponent H of Ref. [47] to produce a full phase diagram (Section VII). The main claim is that in the γ>1 regime the Noah exponent becomes L=γ/2, which is unbounded above, contradicting the previously believed bound L≤1 for Lévy-walk-type models. A numerical simulation at one parameter point (γ=2.4, ν=4, η=3) is reported as confirming L≈1.2.

Significance. If correct, the unbounded Noah exponent is a substantial and interesting result: it shows that VGLWs occupy an anomalously diffusive landscape richer than that of constant-speed or generalized Lévy walks. The paper is also useful for its attempt to give a complete (J,L,M,H) phase diagram over the full three-parameter space. Strengths include the fully analytic, parameter-free derivation of L and M from the velocity moments, the explicit VCF calculation in Appendix C, and the numerical confirmation of L>1 at a nontrivial parameter point. However, as detailed below, the Joseph-exponent part of the phase diagram is not actually derived for the regimes in which it is used, and the Discussion misstates the domain of the main claim.

major comments (3)
  1. [§V, Eqs. (36)–(38)] The Joseph exponent is not derived for the regimes used in the phase diagram. Eq. (38) gives J=1 only for ν>γ/2+η, J=(1+2ν−γ)/2 for γ/2<ν<γ/2+1/2, and J=1/2 for ν<γ/2. The interval γ/2+1/2<ν<γ/2+η is omitted. Yet Regions D (γ<1) and E/F (γ>1) in Fig. 5 assign J=1 precisely in this interval. Appendix C treats only γ+1<2ν<γ+2, so the J=1 entries for, e.g., γ=2.4, ν=4, η=3 are not supported by the displayed derivation. Please extend the VCF/TAMSD calculation to the full interval ν<γ/2+η and correct Eq. (38).
  2. [§III.D, Eq. (10)] The scaling relation H=J+L+M−1 is asserted to 'extend naturally' to VGLWs without proof. This relation is load-bearing: it is used to justify the decomposition and to obtain H from J,L,M. The scaling Green–Kubo relation for the TAMSD, Eq. (29), is stated for VGLWs, but no derivation shows that the VCF in Appendix C satisfies the scaling form (30) with the required bounds in all regimes, nor that the resulting TAMSD exponent combines with L and M as in Eq. (10). Please provide a derivation or an explicit check of Eq. (10) in each phase.
  3. [§IX, non-scaling boundary and L>1 condition] The domain of the main result is misstated. The text says 'for ν > γ/2 + η/2, the system enters a non-scaling (infinite) regime' and 'in the range γ/2 + η/2 > ν > γ/2 + 1/2 with η > 1, the Noah exponent L can exceed unity.' This contradicts Section VII, where the non-scaling boundary is 2ν ≥ γ+2η, and the phase diagram, where Region E is γ<ν<γ/2+η and L=γ/2. Under the Discussion's condition the numerical point (γ=2.4, ν=4, η=3) would be non-scaling, which is not the case. The condition for L>1 should be stated as γ>2 and γ<ν<γ/2+η, with η>γ/2 ensuring the region exists.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Throughout] There are numerous typos and notation inconsistencies: 'Mosses effect' in Fig. 1, 'infite regime' in Fig. 3, 'numerical conformations' in Section VIII, and repeated use of 'n' instead of 'η' in exponents in Appendix B (e.g., '(n−1)γ' vs '(η−1)γ'). These should be corrected.
  2. [Eqs. (25)–(28)] The prefactors in Eqs. (25)–(28) appear to omit a factor of τ0^{γ−1} coming from ψ(τ) and the renewal density R(t−t′). The time scalings are unaffected, but the expressions as written are dimensionally inconsistent. Please verify and restore the missing factors.
  3. [§VIII] The numerical confirmation is performed at only one parameter point and validates L and M, but not J or the full scaling relation. A sentence acknowledging this limitation would be appropriate.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: L>1 is derived analytically from renewal-theory velocity moments, and numerical fits are verification, not inputs.

full rationale

I walked the derivation chain for the central claim (L=γ/2>1 in Region E). L is obtained from the velocity-moment integrals (Eqs. 19-28) using the renewal density p(t,τ,t′) whose Laplace inversion is carried out in Eqs. 17-18; no fitted parameter enters. The numerical section (Figs. 6-7) fits slopes to simulated moments but only as a check of those analytic exponents, and the fitted slopes are not fed back into the theory. H is imported from the independent MSD calculation [47] and J from the Green-Kubo/TAMSD route [13,55]; even if the asserted extension of Eq. (10) were unproven, it is not used to derive L. The self-citations [8,15] supply background and the previous L≤1 contrast, but do not carry the new derivation. I therefore find no step that reduces, by construction or by self-citation, to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the VGLW model definition (from prior work), the renewal-theory joint distribution, and two assertions: the scaling Green-Kubo relation and the TAMSD forms. No new entities are introduced. The unbounded-L result follows from allowing γ and η to take arbitrarily large values within the model, which is a property of the parameter domain rather than a fitted parameter.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The scaling Green-Kubo relation H=J+L+M−1 applies to VGLWs.
    Stated in §III.D without derivation; central to the decomposition but not to the L>1 claim.
  • domain assumption The TAMSD scaling forms Eqs. (36)-(37) are valid for VGLWs and determine J.
    Stated without derivation; used for J values; the intermediate ν regime is not covered.
  • standard math The renewal-theory joint distribution p(t,τ,t′) in Eq. (15) is exact for VGLWs.
    Standard renewal theory inversion; from refs [13,57].
  • domain assumption The MSD exponent H from [47] (Eqs. 43-44) is accepted.
    Prior result used as input; not re-derived.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Complete Decomposition of Anomalous Diffusion in Variable Speed Generalized L\'evy Walks." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LL6TORW5

@misc{pith2026251216073,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Complete Decomposition of Anomalous Diffusion in Variable Speed Generalized L\'evy Walks},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LL6TORW5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2512.16073}
}
abstract

Variable Speed Generalized L\'{e}vy Walks (VGLWs) are a class of spatio-temporally coupled stochastic processes that unify a broad range of previously studied models within a single parametrized framework. Their dynamics consist of discrete random steps, or flights, during which the walker's speed varies deterministically with both the elapsed time and the total duration of the flight. We investigate the anomalous diffusive behavior of VGLWs and analyze it through decomposition into the three fundamental constitutive effects that capture violations of the Central Limit Theorem (CLT): the Joseph effect, reflecting long-range increment correlations, the Noah effect, arising from heavy-tailed step-size distributions with infinite variance, and the Moses effect, associated with statistical aging and non-stationarity. Our results show that anomalous diffusion in VGLWs is typically generated by a nontrivial combination of all three effects, rather than being attributable to a single mechanism. Strikingly, we find that within the VGLW framework the Noah exponent $L$, which quantifies the strength of the Noah effect, is unbounded from above, revealing a richer and more extreme landscape of anomalous diffusion than in previously studied L\'{e}vy-walk-type models.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.16073 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Phase diagram of the Mosses effect for variable [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: Phase diagram of the Noah effect for variable [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: Phase diagram of the Joseph effect for variable [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Probability density function of time [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Numerical simulation results at parameters [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Velocity propagator [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [15]

    P. G. Meyer, V. Adlakha, H. Kantz, and K. E. Bassler, Anomalous diffusion and the moses effect in an aging deterministic model, New Journal of Physics20, 113033 (2018)

    2018

  2. [47]

    M. F. Shlesinger, B. West, and J. Klafter, L´ evy dynamics of enhanced diffusion: Application to turbulence, Physi- cal Review Letters58, 1100 (1987)

    1987

  3. [1]

    Laplace, Sur les approximations des formules qui sont fonctions de tres grands nombres et sur leur applica- tion aux probabilites, Œuvres Compl` etes12, 301 (1810)

    P.-S. Laplace, Sur les approximations des formules qui sont fonctions de tres grands nombres et sur leur applica- tion aux probabilites, Œuvres Compl` etes12, 301 (1810). 21

  4. [2]

    Special caseν=η For this case, the velocity is dependent only ont ′ or backward recurrence time vν,η =±ηct ′η−1 (B30) As the velocity is not explicitly dependent ofτ, the ve- locity att ′ would be same for all steps greater thant ′. Based on this, we can write the propagatorp(v, t, t′) for ν=η p(v, t, t′) =R(t−t ′)δ(|v| −ηct′η−1)θ(t−t ′) Z ∞ t′ ψ(t)dt (B3...

  5. [3]

    Fischer,A history of the central limit theorem: from classical to modern probability theory, Vol

    H. Fischer,A history of the central limit theorem: from classical to modern probability theory, Vol. 4 (Springer, 2011)

    2011

  6. [4]

    Brown,The Miscellaneous Botanical Works of Robert Brown: Vol

    R. Brown,The Miscellaneous Botanical Works of Robert Brown: Vol. I(BoD–Books on Demand, 2022)

    2022

  7. [5]

    Klafter, A

    J. Klafter, A. Blumen, and M. F. Shlesinger, Stochastic pathway to anomalous diffusion, Physical Review A35, 3081 (1987)

    1987

  8. [6]

    Akimoto and T

    T. Akimoto and T. Miyaguchi, Distributional ergodic- ity in stored-energy-driven l´ evy flights, Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics87, 062134 (2013)

    2013

Show all 69 references
  1. [7]

    Akimoto and T

    T. Akimoto and T. Miyaguchi, Phase diagram in stored- energy-driven l´ evy flight, Journal of Statistical Physics 157, 515 (2014)

    2014

  2. [8]

    Schulz-Baldes, Anomalous drude model, Physical Re- view Letters78, 2176 (1997)

    H. Schulz-Baldes, Anomalous drude model, Physical Re- view Letters78, 2176 (1997)

    1997

  3. [9]

    L. Chen, K. E. Bassler, J. L. McCauley, and G. H. Gu- naratne, Anomalous scaling of stochastic processes and the moses effect, Physical Review E95, 042141 (2017)

    2017

  4. [10]

    S. C. Lim and S. V. Muniandy, Self-similar gaussian pro- cesses for modeling anomalous diffusion, Physical Review E66, 021114 (2002)

    2002

  5. [11]

    J.-H. Jeon, A. V. Chechkin, and R. Metzler, Scaled brow- nian motion: a paradoxical process with a time depen- dent diffusivity for the description of anomalous diffusion, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics16, 15811 (2014)

    2014

  6. [12]

    Thiel and I

    F. Thiel and I. M. Sokolov, Scaled brownian motion as a mean-field model for continuous-time random walks, Physical Review E89, 012115 (2014)

    2014

  7. [13]

    Albers and G

    T. Albers and G. Radons, Exact results for the noner- godicity of d-dimensional generalized l´ evy walks, Physi- cal Review Letters120, 104501 (2018)

    2018

  8. [14]

    Albers and G

    T. Albers and G. Radons, Nonergodicity of d-dimensional generalized l´ evy walks and their relation to other space- time coupled models, Physical Review E105, 014113 (2022)

    2022

  9. [16]

    Aghion, P

    E. Aghion, P. G. Meyer, V. Adlakha, H. Kantz, and K. E. Bassler, Moses, noah and joseph effects in l´ evy walks, New Journal of Physics23, 023002 (2021)

    2021

  10. [17]

    O. Vilk, E. Aghion, T. Avgar, C. Beta, O. Nagel, A. Sabri, R. Sarfati, D. K. Schwartz, M. Weiss, D. Krapf, et al., Unravelling the origins of anomalous diffusion: from molecules to migrating storks, Physical Review Re- search4, 033055 (2022)

    2022

  11. [18]

    Trillot, N

    S. Trillot, N. Tarrat, N. Combe, P. Benzo, C. Bonafos, and M. Benoit, Evidence and origin of anomalous diffu- sion of ag+ ion in amorphous silica: a molecular dynam- ics study with neural network interatomic potentials, The Journal of Chemical Physics162(2025)

    2025

  12. [19]

    P. G. Meyer, M. Zamani, and H. Kantz, Return over vol- ume statistics and the moses effect in s&p 500 data, Phys- ica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications612, 128497 (2023)

    2023

  13. [20]

    N. R. Barraza, G. Pena, J. Gambini, and M. F. Carusela, A non-homogeneous, non-stationary and path-dependent markov anomalous diffusion model, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical58, 095001 (2025)

    2025

  14. [21]

    Zamani, E

    M. Zamani, E. Aghion, P. Pollner, T. Vicsek, and H. Kantz, Anomalous diffusion in the citation time series of scientific publications, Journal of Physics: Complexity 2, 035024 (2021)

    2021

  15. [22]

    Salek,Statistical analysis and modeling of the opening and closing auctions of financial markets, Ph.D

    M. Salek,Statistical analysis and modeling of the opening and closing auctions of financial markets, Ph.D. thesis, Universit´ e Paris-Saclay (2024)

    2024

  16. [23]

    Salek, D

    M. Salek, D. Challet, and I. Muni Toke, Equity auction dynamics: latent liquidity models with activity accelera- tion, Quantitative Finance24, 1381 (2024)

    2024

  17. [24]

    P. G. Meyer, E. Aghion, and H. Kantz, Decomposing the effect of anomalous diffusion enables direct calculation of the hurst exponent and model classification for single random paths, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical55, 274001 (2022)

    2022

  18. [25]

    Mu˜ noz-Gil, G

    G. Mu˜ noz-Gil, G. Volpe, M. A. Garcia-March, E. Aghion, A. Argun, C. B. Hong, T. Bland, S. Bo, J. A. Conejero, N. Firbas,et al., Objective comparison of methods to decode anomalous diffusion, Nature communications12, 6253 (2021)

    2021

  19. [26]

    Argun, G

    A. Argun, G. Volpe, and S. Bo, Classification, inference and segmentation of anomalous diffusion with recurrent neural networks, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical54, 294003 (2021)

    2021

  20. [27]

    Garibo-i Orts, A

    `O. Garibo-i Orts, A. Baeza-Bosca, M. A. Garcia-March, and J. A. Conejero, Efficient recurrent neural network methods for anomalously diffusing single particle short and noisy trajectories, Journal of Physics A: Mathemat- ical and Theoretical54, 504002 (2021)

    2021

  21. [28]

    Malinowski, M

    J. Malinowski, M. Kostrzewa, M. Balcerek, W. Tom- czuk, and J. Szwabi´ nski, Cinnamon: A hybrid approach to change point detection and parameter estimation in single-particle tracking data, Journal of Physics: Pho- tonics7, 035008 (2025)

    2025

  22. [29]

    H¨ ofling and T

    F. H¨ ofling and T. Franosch, Anomalous transport in the crowded world of biological cells, Reports on Progress in Physics76, 046602 (2013)

    2013

  23. [30]

    Metzler, J.-H

    R. Metzler, J.-H. Jeon, A. G. Cherstvy, and E. Barkai, Anomalous diffusion models and their properties: non- stationarity, non-ergodicity, and ageing at the centenary of single particle tracking, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics16, 24128 (2014)

    2014

  24. [31]

    R. Metzler, Brownian motion and beyond: first-passage, power spectrum, non-gaussianity, and anomalous diffu- sion, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Ex- periment2019, 114003 (2019)

    2019

  25. [32]

    F. A. Oliveira, R. M. Ferreira, L. C. Lapas, and M. H. Vainstein, Anomalous diffusion: A basic mechanism for the evolution of inhomogeneous systems, Frontiers in Physics7, 18 (2019)

    2019

  26. [33]

    Sabri, X

    A. Sabri, X. Xu, D. Krapf, and M. Weiss, Elucidating the origin of heterogeneous anomalous diffusion in the cytoplasm of mammalian cells, Physical Review Letters 125, 058101 (2020)

    2020

  27. [34]

    K. E. Bassler, J. L. McCauley, and G. H. Gunaratne, Nonstationary increments, scaling distributions, and variable diffusion processes in financial markets, Proceed- ings of the National Academy of Sciences104, 17287 (2007)

    2007

  28. [35]

    Seemann, J.-C

    L. Seemann, J.-C. Hua, J. L. McCauley, and G. H. Gu- naratne, Ensemble vs. time averages in financial time se- ries analysis, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications391, 6024 (2012)

    2012

  29. [36]

    Dechant and E

    A. Dechant and E. Lutz, Anomalous spatial diffusion and multifractality in optical lattices, Physical Review Let- 22 ters108, 230601 (2012)

    2012

  30. [37]

    Plakhotnik, M

    T. Plakhotnik, M. J. Fern´ ee, B. Littleton, H. Rubinsztein-Dunlop, C. Potzner, and P. Mulvaney, Anomalous power laws of spectral diffusion in quantum dots: A connection to luminescence intermittency, Physical Review Letters105, 167402 (2010)

    2010

  31. [38]

    Margolin and E

    G. Margolin and E. Barkai, Aging correlation functions for blinking nanocrystals, and other on–off stochastic processes, The Journal of Chemical Physics121, 1566 (2004)

    2004

  32. [39]

    E. W. Montroll and G. H. Weiss, Random walks on lat- tices. ii, Journal of Mathematical Physics6, 167 (1965)

    1965

  33. [40]

    M. F. Shlesinger, J. Klafter, and Y. Wong, Random walks with infinite spatial and temporal moments, Journal of Statistical Physics27, 499 (1982)

    1982

  34. [41]

    B. B. Mandelbrot, Fractal geometry in physics (1993)

    1993

  35. [42]

    M. F. Shlesinger, G. M. Zaslavsky, and J. Klafter, Strange kinetics, Nature363, 31 (1993)

    1993

  36. [43]

    Klafter, M

    J. Klafter, M. F. Shlesinger, and G. Zumofen, Beyond brownian motion, Physics Today49, 33 (1996)

    1996

  37. [44]

    Zaburdaev, S

    V. Zaburdaev, S. Denisov, and J. Klafter, L´ evy walks, Reviews of Modern Physics87, 483 (2015)

    2015

  38. [45]

    Zumofen, J

    G. Zumofen, J. Klafter, and A. Blumen, L´ evy walks and propagators in intermittent chaotic systems, Physical Re- view E47, 2183 (1993)

    1993

  39. [46]

    Zumofen and J

    G. Zumofen and J. Klafter, Scale-invariant motion in in- termittent chaotic systems, Physical Review E47, 851 (1993)

    1993

  40. [48]

    Bothe, F

    M. Bothe, F. Sagues, and I. M. Sokolov, Mean squared displacement in a generalized l´ evy walk model, Physical Review E100, 012117 (2019)

    2019

  41. [49]

    Benkadda and G

    S. Benkadda and G. M. Zaslavsky,Chaos, Kinetics and Nonlinear Dynamics in Fluids and Plasmas: Proceedings of a Workshop Held in Carry-Le Rouet, France, 16–21 June 1997, Vol. 511 (Springer Science & Business Media, 1998)

    1997

  42. [50]

    Vezzani, E

    A. Vezzani, E. Barkai, and R. Burioni, Rare events in generalized l´ evy walks and the big jump principle, Scien- tific Reports10, 2732 (2020)

    2020

  43. [51]

    Alexander, Comments on ‘noah, joseph, and opera- tional hydrology’ by benoit b

    G. Alexander, Comments on ‘noah, joseph, and opera- tional hydrology’ by benoit b. mandelbrot and james r. wallis, Water Resources Research5, 915 (1969)

    1969

  44. [52]

    Mandelbrot,Gaussian self-affinity and fractals: glob- ality, the earth, 1/f noise, and R/S(Springer Science & Business Media, 2002)

    B. Mandelbrot,Gaussian self-affinity and fractals: glob- ality, the earth, 1/f noise, and R/S(Springer Science & Business Media, 2002)

    2002

  45. [53]

    H. E. Hurst, Long-term storage capacity of reservoirs, Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers 116, 770 (1951)

    1951

  46. [54]

    Abry and D

    P. Abry and D. Veitch, Wavelet analysis of long-range- dependent traffic, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory44, 2 (1998)

    1998

  47. [55]

    C.-K. Peng, S. V. Buldyrev, S. Havlin, M. Simons, H. E. Stanley, and A. L. Goldberger, Mosaic organization of dna nucleotides, Physical Review E49, 1685 (1994)

    1994

  48. [56]

    Meyer, E

    P. Meyer, E. Barkai, and H. Kantz, Scale-invariant green- kubo relation for time-averaged diffusivity, Physical Re- view E96, 062122 (2017)

    2017

  49. [57]

    Dechant, E

    A. Dechant, E. Lutz, D. A. Kessler, and E. Barkai, Scal- ing green-kubo relation and application to three aging systems, Phys. Rev. X4, 011022 (2014)

    2014

  50. [58]

    Godreche and J

    C. Godreche and J. Luck, Statistics of the occupation time of renewal processes, Journal of Statistical Physics 104, 489 (2001)

    2001

  51. [59]

    Hu and J

    Y. Hu and J. Liu, Generalized two-state random walk model: Nontrivial anomalous diffusion, aging, and ergod- icity breaking, Physical Review E111, 014148 (2025)

    2025

  52. [60]

    See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/ sup- plemental/10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.104501

    doi

  53. [61]

    del Castillo-Negrete, Chaotic transport in zonal flows in analogous geophysical and plasma systems, Physics of Plasmas7, 1702 (2000)

    D. del Castillo-Negrete, Chaotic transport in zonal flows in analogous geophysical and plasma systems, Physics of Plasmas7, 1702 (2000)

    2000

  54. [62]

    del Castillo-Negrete, Asymmetric transport and non- gaussian statistics of passive scalars in vortices in shear, Physics of Fluids10, 576 (1998)

    D. del Castillo-Negrete, Asymmetric transport and non- gaussian statistics of passive scalars in vortices in shear, Physics of Fluids10, 576 (1998)

    1998

  55. [63]

    Zaburdaev, S

    V. Zaburdaev, S. Denisov, and P. H¨ anggi, Perturbation spreading in many-particle systems: a random walk ap- proach, Physical review letters106, 180601 (2011)

    2011

  56. [64]

    D. W. Sims, E. J. Southall, N. E. Humphries, G. C. Hays, C. J. Bradshaw, J. W. Pitchford, A. James, M. Z. Ahmed, A. S. Brierley, M. A. Hindell,et al., Scaling laws of ma- rine predator search behaviour, Nature451, 1098 (2008)

    2008

  57. [65]

    Berkowitz, I

    B. Berkowitz, I. Dror, S. K. Hansen, and H. Scher, Mea- surements and models of reactive transport in geological media, Reviews of Geophysics54, 930 (2016)

    2016

  58. [66]

    classical

    A. Cortis and B. Berkowitz, Anomalous transport in “classical” soil and sand columns, Soil Science Society of America Journal68, 1539 (2004)

    2004

  59. [67]

    Levy and B

    M. Levy and B. Berkowitz, Measurement and analysis of non-fickian dispersion in heterogeneous porous media, Journal of contaminant hydrology64, 203 (2003)

    2003

  60. [68]

    Bijeljic, P

    B. Bijeljic, P. Mostaghimi, and M. J. Blunt, Signature of non-fickian solute transport in complex heterogeneous porous media, Physical review letters107, 204502 (2011)

    2011

  61. [69]

    Akimoto, E

    T. Akimoto, E. Barkai, and G. Radons, Infinite invariant density in a semi-markov process with continuous state variables, Physical Review E101, 052112 (2020)

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.