Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 minor 56 references

Stability of equal-charge STT-NED spacetimes is identical to STT-Maxwell; zero charge erases all NED traces.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-14 09:45 UTC pith:LLBV62I4

load-bearing objection Clean general V_eff for STT-NED monopole modes; the F=0 and zero-charge corollaries are immediate algebraic identities that legitimately inherit earlier Maxwell-STT stability maps.

arxiv 2607.10718 v1 pith:LLBV62I4 submitted 2026-07-12 gr-qc

Nonlinear electrodynamics and stability of spherically symmetric space-times in scalar-tensor gravity

Kirill A. Bronnikov , Rustam Ibadov , Feruza Y. Shaymanova , Najibullokhon M. Shukurullokhon This is my paper
classification gr-qc PACS 04.50.Kd04.40.Nr04.70.Bw11.10.Lm
keywords scalar-tensor gravitynonlinear electrodynamicsspherically symmetric perturbationseffective potentiallinear stabilityequal-charge dyonsBergmann-Wagoner-Nordtvedttrapped ghosts
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper derives a single master equation and effective potential that control the radial stability of static, spherically symmetric solutions in a broad family of scalar-tensor theories coupled to nonlinear electrodynamics. The authors show that whenever the nonlinear electrodynamics recovers Maxwell theory at weak fields, two concrete simplifications occur: solutions with equal electric and magnetic charges (so that the electromagnetic invariant vanishes) have exactly the same effective potential as their Maxwell counterparts, and the zero-charge limit of that potential loses every trace of the nonlinear theory, reducing to pure scalar-tensor vacuum dynamics. Consequently every previously established linear-stability result for Maxwell-scalar-tensor configurations carries over unchanged to this larger class, including the known stability islands for black holes and the charge-dependent stability of exceptional Brans-Dicke wormholes. The result matters because it lets existing catalogues of stable and unstable solutions be reused without recalculation whenever the electromagnetic sector is a Maxwell-like nonlinear theory.

Core claim

For any Bergmann-Wagoner-Nordtvedt scalar-tensor theory coupled to a nonlinear electrodynamics Lagrangian that possesses a Maxwell weak-field limit, the effective potential governing linear monopole perturbations of static spherically symmetric solutions with equal electric and magnetic charges is identical to the Maxwell-scalar-tensor potential; moreover the zero-charge limit of the potential contains no residual nonlinear-electrodynamics contribution.

What carries the argument

The effective potential V_eff that appears in the Schrödinger-like master equation for the radial scalar perturbation. It is obtained after gauge-fixing, reduction to a tortoise coordinate, and substitution of the general scalar-electromagnetic interaction L(\psi,F); when F=0 and the Maxwell limit holds, every nonlinear term vanishes and V_eff collapses to its Maxwell expression.

Load-bearing premise

Only linear radial (monopole) perturbations are examined, on the premise that they are the most dangerous; higher multipoles and nonlinear regimes are left untested.

What would settle it

Construct an explicit STT-NED solution with equal charges (or its zero-charge limit), compute the monopole effective potential from the general formula given in the paper, and check whether any nonlinear-electrodynamics term survives; if a nonzero residual appears, the central claim is false.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • All previously tabulated linear-stability conclusions for STT-Maxwell black holes, naked singularities and wormholes extend immediately to the equal-charge NED sector.
  • Zero-charge limits of any Maxwell-like NED-STT solution inherit the known vacuum STT perturbation dynamics without further calculation.
  • Stability islands previously identified for black holes remain islands when the Maxwell field is replaced by equal-charge nonlinear electrodynamics.
  • Exceptional Brans-Dicke wormholes keep their charge-dependent stability status under Maxwell-like NED.
  • Future numerical NED-STT solutions can be screened for linear monopole stability by direct substitution into the supplied general V_eff.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the zero-charge reduction is universal, any future regularization of a singular vacuum STT solution will automatically inherit the same monopole stability properties once charge is removed.
  • The result supplies a cheap diagnostic: if a candidate NED-STT black hole is unstable under monopole modes while its Maxwell counterpart is stable, the instability must arise from unequal charges or from a non-Maxwell weak-field limit.
  • The same master-equation technique can be reused without change for trapped-ghost scalars or arbitrary self-interaction potentials, opening a direct route to stability catalogues for those extensions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper derives a general effective potential V_eff for linear radial (monopole) perturbations of static, spherically symmetric solutions of Bergmann–Wagoner–Nordtvedt scalar-tensor theories coupled to nonlinear electrodynamics with Lagrangian L(ψ, F). Working in the Einstein frame, the authors linearize the field equations, adopt the gauge δβ ≡ 0, and reduce the dynamics to a Schrödinger-like master equation (Eqs. 30–35). They then specialize to NED with a Maxwell weak-field limit and show two clean algebraic identities: (i) when electric and magnetic charges are equal (F ≡ 0), every NED-dependent term in W(u) and hence in V_eff vanishes, so the monopole stability problem is identical to the previously analyzed STT–Maxwell case; (ii) the zero-charge limit of V_eff likewise contains no residual NED contribution and coincides with pure scalar-vacuum STT. The same conclusions are verified for the exceptional Brans–Dicke wormhole family.

Significance. If the identities hold, every existing linear-stability map for STT–Maxwell electrovacuum solutions (including the detailed parameter-space tables of the authors’ earlier work) transfers unchanged to the corresponding equal-charge STT–NED configurations, and the zero-charge limit is likewise settled. The derivation supplies a reusable, parameter-free master potential for arbitrary L(ψ, F), including trapped-ghost scalars and scalar potentials, thereby providing a practical tool for future analytic and numerical NED–STT studies. The result is modest in scope (linear monopoles only) but technically clean and immediately usable.

minor comments (4)
  1. The abstract and Introduction assert that monopole modes are “the most likely ones to cause an instability.” While this is the same working hypothesis used in the authors’ prior STT–Maxwell papers, a brief explicit caveat that higher multipoles and nonlinear regimes remain unexamined would strengthen the framing.
  2. Section 3, after Eq. (29): the coefficient P(u) can diverge when the denominator vanishes. A short remark on the physical domains where this occurs (or a statement that the backgrounds of interest avoid it) would be helpful.
  3. Notation: the same symbol L is used both for the NED Lagrangian and for its Einstein-frame counterpart; a typographic distinction (e.g., script L) would reduce occasional ambiguity when derivatives L_F, L_ψ, au etc. appear.
  4. A few minor typos remain (e.g., “Schr¨ odin-ger”, “Bergman” vs. “Bergmann” in the concluding remarks). Standard copy-editing will catch them.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the new V_eff derivation is independent; inheritance of prior stability maps is a logical consequence of an algebraic identity, not a re-use of fitted quantities.

specific steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Sec. 5, paragraphs on Maxwell-like solutions and exceptional Brans–Dicke wormholes; also Abstract and Sec. 6]
    "Thus the linear stability properties of Maxwell-like NED-STT solutions with F=0 under spherically symmetric perturbations entirely coincide with those of Maxwell-STT solutions analyzed in [39]. … The stability study in [44] showed that this solution is stable under spherically symmetric perturbations in the general asymmetric case and unstable if q=0. … we have proved that their stability properties are quite the same as of their Maxwell-STT counterparts."

    The paper’s application of the new V_eff identity relies on the authors’ own earlier numerical/analytic stability maps for the Maxwell-STT family and the exceptional BD wormhole. Those maps are not re-derived here; they are imported by citation. However, the load-bearing step is the algebraic reduction of V_eff itself (P=0, L=0, L_F=1), which is independent of the prior maps. The self-citation therefore supplies only the previously tabulated conclusions once the identity is shown; it does not force the identity. This is ordinary reuse of prior results, not circularity of the derivation.

full rationale

The paper derives a general master equation and effective potential V_eff (Eqs. 30–35) for monopole perturbations of static spherically symmetric solutions of the action (8) with arbitrary L(ψ,F). The derivation is self-contained: it starts from the field equations, chooses the δβ=0 gauge, solves for δF (Eq. 29), substitutes into the scalar perturbation equation, and reduces to a Schrödinger-like form. The central claims then follow by direct substitution. For F=0 (equal charges) one has L=0, L_F=1 and P=0, so every NED-dependent term in W(u) (Eq. 31) vanishes and V_eff collapses exactly to the Maxwell expression already studied in the authors’ prior work. Likewise, the zero-charge limit forces F=0, L=0, L_F=1 and P=0, recovering pure scalar vacuum. These are algebraic identities, not fits or redefinitions. The paper does cite its own earlier stability maps ([38,39,44]) for the Maxwell-STT and exceptional Brans–Dicke wormhole cases; once the identity is established, inheritance of those conclusions is a logical consequence rather than circular re-use. No free parameters are adjusted, no uniqueness theorem is imported to forbid alternatives, and no ansatz is smuggled via citation. The restriction to linear radial modes is stated up-front and matches the scope of the earlier papers; it does not create circularity. Score 1 reflects only the minor, non-load-bearing self-citation of prior stability tables.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard differential geometry and field theory plus a small set of domain assumptions customary in the STT/NED literature. No free parameters are fitted, and no new physical entities are postulated.

axioms (4)
  • domain assumption Linearized Einstein-frame field equations obtained from action (8) correctly describe the dynamics of small radial perturbations.
    Invoked throughout Sec. 3; standard in the literature but assumes the background is a valid solution and higher-order terms remain negligible.
  • domain assumption NED Lagrangians admit a Maxwell weak-field limit L(F) ~ F as F -> 0 (Taylor expansion (37)).
    Used in Sec. 4-5 to guarantee L_F=1 and L=0 when F=0; conventional but excludes non-Maxwellian NED.
  • ad hoc to paper Monopole (radial) perturbations are the most dangerous for stability; higher multipoles need not be examined for the present conclusions.
    Stated in the Introduction and Sec. 3; justified by experience but not proved for the NED-STT systems under study.
  • domain assumption Boundary conditions for stability are to be imposed in the Jordan frame while the master equation is solved in the Einstein frame.
    Standard for BWN STT (Sec. 1-2); the conformal factor is time-independent so the equations themselves are frame-independent.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 20438 in / 2531 out tokens · 29835 ms · 2026-07-14T09:45:29.918224+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We study linear perturbations of static, spherically symmetric solutions of scalar-tensor theories (STT) of gravity from the Bergmann-Wagoner-Nordtvedt class, sourced by nonlinear electrodynamics (NED). We obtain a general expression for the effective potential $V_{\rm eff}$ governing the perturbation dynamics for theories with arbitrary scalar-electromagnetic interaction of the form $L(\psi, F)$, where $\psi$ is a scalar field and $F = F_{\mu\nu} F^{\mu\nu}$ the electromagnetic invariant. This consideration includes, in particular, arbitrary scalar self-interaction potentials and scalar fields that can be phantom in some regions of space-time (the so-called trapped ghosts). Only radial (monopole) perturbations are considered here as the most likely ones to cause an instability. It is shown, in particular, that if NED has a correct Maxwell weak field limit, the zero charge limit of $V_{\rm eff}$ does not contain any trace of NED, and the perturbation dynamics is the same as for vacuum STT solutions. The previously obtained stability results for STT-Maxwell solutions are shown to be extended without change to STT-NED solutions with equal electric and magnetic charges, implying $F =0$.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 32 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Born and L

    M. Born and L. Infeld, Foundations of the new field theory, Proc. Roy. Soc. A144, 425 (1934)

    1934

  2. [2]

    Heisenberg and H

    W. Heisenberg and H. Euler, Consequences of Dirac’s theory of positrons, Z. Phys.98(11-12), 714–732 (1936);, arXiv: physics/0605038

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1936

  3. [3]

    Pellicer and R

    R. Pellicer and R. J. Torrence, Nonlinear electrodynamics and general relativity, J. Math. Phys.10, 1718 (1969)

    1969

  4. [4]

    Bronnikov, Regular magnetic black holes and monopoles from nonlinear electrodynamics, Phys

    K.A. Bronnikov, Regular magnetic black holes and monopoles from nonlinear electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 63, 044005 (2001); arXiv: gr-qc/0006014. 12

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  5. [5]

    Fan and X

    Z.-Y. Fan and X. Wang, Construction of regular black holes in general relativity, Phys. Rev. D94,124027 (2016)

    2016

  6. [6]

    Fradkin and A.A

    E.S. Fradkin and A.A. Tseytlin, Non-linear electrodynamics from quantized strings, Phys. Lett. B163(1-4), 123-130 (1985)

    1985

  7. [7]

    Sorokin, Introductory notes on non-linear electrodynamics and its applications, Fortsch

    D.P. Sorokin, Introductory notes on non-linear electrodynamics and its applications, Fortsch. Phys.70, 2200092 (2022); arXiv: 2112.12118

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  8. [8]

    Brans and R.H

    C. Brans and R.H. Dicke, Mach’s principle and a relativistic theory of gravitation, Phys. Rev.124925 (1961)

    1961

  9. [9]

    Bergmann, Comments on the scalar-tensor theory, Int

    P.G. Bergmann, Comments on the scalar-tensor theory, Int. J. Theor. Phys.1, 25 (1968)

    1968

  10. [10]

    Wagoner, Scalar-tensor theory and gravitational waves, Phys

    R. Wagoner, Scalar-tensor theory and gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. D1, 3209 (1970)

    1970

  11. [11]

    Nordtvedt, Post-Newtonian metric for a general class of scalar-tensor gravitational theories and observational consequences, Astroph

    K. Nordtvedt, Post-Newtonian metric for a general class of scalar-tensor gravitational theories and observational consequences, Astroph. J.161, 1059 (1970)

    1970

  12. [12]

    Horndeski, Second-order scalar-tensor field equations in a four-dimensional space, Int

    G.W. Horndeski, Second-order scalar-tensor field equations in a four-dimensional space, Int. J. Theor. Phys.10, 363-384 (1974)

    1974

  13. [13]

    Gleyzes, D

    J. Gleyzes, D. Langlois, F. Piazza, F. Vernizzi, Healthy theories beyond Horndeski, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 211101 (2015); arXiv: 1404.6495

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  14. [14]

    Quiros, Selected topics in scalar-tensor theories and beyond, Int

    I. Quiros, Selected topics in scalar-tensor theories and beyond, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D28, 1930012 (2019); arXiv: 1901.08690

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  15. [15]

    Penney, Generalization of the Reissner-Nordstr¨ om solution to the Einstein field equations, Phys

    R. Penney, Generalization of the Reissner-Nordstr¨ om solution to the Einstein field equations, Phys. Rev.182, 1383–1384 (1969)

    1969

  16. [16]

    Bronnikov, Scalar-tensor theory and scalar charge, Acta Phys

    K.A. Bronnikov, Scalar-tensor theory and scalar charge, Acta Phys. Pol. B4, 251 (1973)

    1973

  17. [17]

    Fahim, Spherical inhomogeneous solutions of Einstein and scalar- tensor gravity: a map of the land, Phys

    Valerio Faraoni, Andrea Giusti, Bardia H. Fahim, Spherical inhomogeneous solutions of Einstein and scalar- tensor gravity: a map of the land, Phys. Rep.925, 1–58 (2021); arXiv: 2101.00266

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  18. [18]

    Bronnikov, G.N

    K.A. Bronnikov, G.N. Shikin. On interacting fields in general relativity. Russ. Phys. J.20, 1138–1143 (1977)

    1977

  19. [19]

    Gibbons and K

    G.W. Gibbons and K. Maeda, Black holes and membranes in higher dimensional theories with dilaton fields, Nucl. Phys. B 298, 741 (1988)

    1988

  20. [20]

    Garfinkle, G.T

    D. Garfinkle, G.T. Horowitz, and A. Strominger, Charged black holes in string theory, Phys. Rev. D 43, 3140 (1991); Erratum: Phys. Rev. D 45, 3888 (1992)

    1991

  21. [21]

    Ivashchuk, V.N

    V.D. Ivashchuk, V.N. Melnikov, Exact solutions in multidimensional gravity with antisymmetric forms, Class. Quantum Grav.18, R87-R152 (2001); arXiv: hep-th/0110274

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  22. [22]

    Bronnikov, V.N

    K.A. Bronnikov, V.N. Melnikov. Black holes in multidimensional gravity: existence and stability. Ann. Phys. (N.Y.)239, 40–56 (1995)

    1995

  23. [23]

    Bronnikov, V.N

    K.A. Bronnikov, V.N. Melnikov, P-brane black holes as stability islands. Nucl. Phys. B584, 434–458 (2000); arXiv: hep-th/0002200

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  24. [24]

    Bronnikov and A.V

    K.A. Bronnikov and A.V. Khodunov. Scalar field and gravitational instability, Gen. Rel. Grav.11, 13 (1979)

    1979

  25. [25]

    Gerard Clement, Dmitri Gal’tsov, Solitons and black holes in Einstein-Born-Infeld dilaton theory, Phys. Rev. D 62,124013 (2000); hep-th/0007228

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  26. [26]

    Takashi Tamaki, Takashi Torii, Gravitating BIon and BIon black hole with dilaton, Phys. Rev. D62, 061501 (2000); arXiv: gr-qc/0004071

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  27. [27]

    Stefanov, Stoytcho S

    Ivan Zh. Stefanov, Stoytcho S. Yazadjiev, Michail D. Todorov, Scalar-tensor black holes coupled to Born-Infeld nonlinear electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. D75, 084036 (2007); arXiv: 0704.3784

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  28. [28]

    Stefanov, Stoytcho S

    Ivan Zh. Stefanov, Stoytcho S. Yazadjiev, Michail D. Todorov Phases of 4D scalar-tensor black holes coupled to Born-Infeld nonlinear electrodynamics Mod. Phys. Lett. A23, 2915-2931 (2008); arXiv: 0708.4141

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  29. [29]

    Stefanov, Stoytcho S

    Ivan Zh. Stefanov, Stoytcho S. Yazadjiev, Daniela A. Georgieva, Michail D. Todorov, Born-Infeld black holes coupled to a massive scalar field, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D20, 2471-2496 (2011); arXiv: 0909.0196

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  30. [30]

    Sheykhi, N

    A. Sheykhi, N. Riazi, M. H. Mahzoon, Asymptotically nonflat Einstein-Born-Infeld-dilaton black holes with Liouville-type potential, Phys. Rev. D74, 044025 (2006); arXiv: hep-th/0605043

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  31. [31]

    Bronnikov and Rahul Kumar Walia, Field sources for Simpson-Visser spacetimes, Phys

    K.A. Bronnikov and Rahul Kumar Walia, Field sources for Simpson-Visser spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D105, 044039 (2022); arXiv: 2112.13198

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  32. [32]

    Bronnikov, On black bounces, wormholes and partly phantom scalar fields, Phys

    K.A. Bronnikov, On black bounces, wormholes and partly phantom scalar fields, Phys. Rev. D106, 064029 (2022); arXiv: 2206.09227

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  33. [33]

    Bronnikov, Regular black holes as an alternative to black bounce, Phys

    K.A. Bronnikov, Regular black holes as an alternative to black bounce, Phys. Rev. D110(2), 024021 (2024); arXiv: 2404.14816. 13

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  34. [34]

    Bolokhov, K.A

    S.V. Bolokhov, K.A. Bronnikov, M.V. Skvortsova, A regular center instead of a black bounce, Grav. Cosmol. 30, (3), 265–278 (2024); arXiv: 2405.09124

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  35. [35]

    Stefanov, Stoytcho S

    Ivan Zh. Stefanov, Stoytcho S. Yazadjiev, Michail D. Todorov, Stability of charged scalar-tensor black holes coupled to Born-Infeld nonlinear electrodynamics, Class. Quantum Grav.26, 015006 (2009)

    2009

  36. [36]

    Kimihiro Nomura, Daisuke Yoshida, Jiro Soda, Stability of magnetic black holes in general nonlinear electrody- namics, Phys. Rev. D101, 124026 (2020); arXiv: 2004.07560

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  37. [37]

    Antonio De Felice, Shinji Tsujikawa, Nonsingular black holes and spherically symmetric objects in nonlinear electrodynamics with a scalar field, Phys. Rev. D 111, 064051 (2025); arXiv: 2412.04754

    arXiv 2025

  38. [38]

    Bronnikov, S.V

    K.A. Bronnikov, S.V. Bolokhov, M.V. Skvortsova, K. Badalov, R. Ibadov, On the stability of spherically sym- metric space-times in scalar-tensor gravity, Grav. Cosmol.29(4), 374-386 (2023); arXiv: 2309.01794

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  39. [39]

    Bronnikov, S.V

    K.A. Bronnikov, S.V. Bolokhov, M.V. Skvortsova, R. Ibadov, F.Y. Shaymanova, On the stability of electrovac- uum space-times in scalar-tensor gravity, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 1027 (2024); arXiv: 2407.12144

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  40. [40]

    Barker, General scalar-tensor theory of gravity with constant G, Astrophys

    B.M. Barker, General scalar-tensor theory of gravity with constant G, Astrophys. J.219, 5 (1978)

    1978

  41. [41]

    Schwinger,Particles, Sources and Fields(Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, Vol

    J. Schwinger,Particles, Sources and Fields(Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, Vol. 1, 1970)

    1970

  42. [42]

    Russo and Paul K

    Jorge G. Russo and Paul K. Townsend, Black holes and causal nonlinear electrodynamics, arXiv: 2601.07789

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  43. [43]

    Bronnikov, S.V

    K.A. Bronnikov, S.V. Bolokhov, G.S. Nurbakova, B. Tynyshbay, On gravitating dyonic configurations in non- linear electrodynamics, Grav. Cosmol.32, 376 (2026); arXiv: 2604.23741

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  44. [44]

    Bronnikov, S.V

    K.A. Bronnikov, S.V. Bolokhov, M.V. Skvortsova, R. Ibadov, F.Y. Shaymanova, On the stability of exceptional Brans-Dicke wormholes, Eur. Phys. J. C85, 1063 (2025); arXiv: 2507.17045

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  45. [45]

    Bronnikov and S.V

    K.A. Bronnikov and S.V. Sushkov, Trapped ghosts: a new class of wormholes, Class. Quantum Grav.27, 095022 (2010); arXiv: 1001.3511

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  46. [46]

    K. A. Bronnikov. Trapped ghosts as sources for wormholes and regular black holes. The stability problem. In: Wormholes, Warp Drives and Energy Conditions(Ed. F.S.N. Lobo, Springer, 2017), p. 137-160

    2017

  47. [47]

    Bronnikov

    K.A. Bronnikov. Scalar fields as sources for wormholes and regular black holes, Particles2018, 1, 5; arXiv: 1802.00098

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  48. [48]

    Gonzalez, F.S

    J.A. Gonzalez, F.S. Guzman, and O. Sarbach, Class. Quantum Grav.26,, 015010 (2009); Arxiv: 0806.0608

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  49. [49]

    Bronnikov, J.C

    K.A. Bronnikov, J.C. Fabris, and A. Zhidenko, On the stability of scalar-vacuum space-times, Eur. Phys. J. C 71, 1791 (2011)

    2011

  50. [50]

    Bronnikov, R.A

    K.A. Bronnikov, R.A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Instabilities of wormholes and regular black holes supported by a phantom scalar field, Phys. Rev. D86, 024028 (2012); arXiv: 1205.2224

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  51. [51]

    Ishibashi and H

    A. Ishibashi and H. Kodama, Stability of higher-dimensional Schwarzschild black holes, Prog. Theor. Phys.110, 901–919 (2003); hep-th/0305185

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  52. [52]

    Bronnikov and S.V

    K.A. Bronnikov and S.V. Grinyok, Conformal continuations and wormhole instability in scalar-tensor gravity, Grav. Cosmol.10, 237 (2004); gr-qc/0411063

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  53. [53]

    Bronnikov and S.V

    K.A. Bronnikov and S.V. Grinyok, Electrically charged and neutral wormhole instability in scalar-tensor gravity, Grav. Cosmol.11, 75 (2005); gr-qc/0509062

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  54. [54]

    Bronnikov, Scalar-tensor gravity and conformal continuations, J

    K.A. Bronnikov, Scalar-tensor gravity and conformal continuations, J. Math. Phys.43, 6096 (2002); gr- qc/0204001

    arXiv 2002

  55. [55]

    Bronnikov, C.P

    K.A. Bronnikov, C.P. Constantinidis, R.L. Evangelista and J.C. Fabris, Electrically charged cold black holes in scalar-tensor theories, Int. J. Mod. Phys.D 8, 481–505 (1999)

    1999

  56. [56]

    William Bruckman, Generation of electro and magneto static solutions of the scalar-tensor theories of gravity, arXiv: gr-qc/9407003

    Pith/arXiv arXiv