Pith. sign in

REVIEW 29 cited by

Personalization of Large Language Models: A Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.00027 v3 pith:LM3TOY6R submitted 2024-10-29 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords llmspersonalizationpersonalizedapplicationsusagechallengesexistingfacets
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Personalization of Large Language Models (LLMs) has recently become increasingly important with a wide range of applications. Despite the importance and recent progress, most existing works on personalized LLMs have focused either entirely on (a) personalized text generation or (b) leveraging LLMs for personalization-related downstream applications, such as recommendation systems. In this work, we bridge the gap between these two separate main directions for the first time by introducing a taxonomy for personalized LLM usage and summarizing the key differences and challenges. We provide a formalization of the foundations of personalized LLMs that consolidates and expands notions of personalization of LLMs, defining and discussing novel facets of personalization, usage, and desiderata of personalized LLMs. We then unify the literature across these diverse fields and usage scenarios by proposing systematic taxonomies for the granularity of personalization, personalization techniques, datasets, evaluation methods, and applications of personalized LLMs. Finally, we highlight challenges and important open problems that remain to be addressed. By unifying and surveying recent research using the proposed taxonomies, we aim to provide a clear guide to the existing literature and different facets of personalization in LLMs, empowering both researchers and practitioners.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 29 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Pin Once, Swap Light: Subspace-Aligned Centroid-Residual Training for Efficient Ultra-LoRA Serving

    cs.LG 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    SALT shows that a subspace-aligned domain centroid plus a rank-1 or rank-2 user residual can recover or exceed high-rank LoRA accuracy while cutting the per-adapter swap footprint by up to 16x.

  2. Tailored untruths: How personalisation challenges LLM safeguards

    cs.CL 2025-10 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A 1.6-million-text study of eight LLMs in four languages finds that adding demographic personae to disinformation prompts raises jailbreak rates from 78% to 82%.

  3. PaperRouter-Agent: A Content-Grounded LLM Agent for Personalized Hierarchical Paper Routing

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5 of 10

    A training-free four-stage LLM agent that routes papers into personal folksonomy folders by inspecting member papers and metadata, lifting Recall@1 from 0.39 to 0.61 on real libraries.

  4. Auditing Alignment Controllability in LLMs via Political Axes

    cs.CY 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    On a 63,700-response Political Compass stress test of seven frontier LLMs, system-prompt framing dominates model identity, and steerability needs dispersion, symmetry, saturation, and refusal-floor metrics.

  5. Personalized Image Aesthetic Assessment via Preference-rich Sample Mining and Cohort Merging

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    PRAC mines preference-rich images and merges LoRA adapters from aesthetically similar users to achieve state-of-the-art personalized aesthetic rating prediction.

  6. FBLayout: Optimizing Memory Layout for Efficient LLM Finetuning on Mobile GPUs

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A tile-based memory layout for mobile GPUs that unifies forward and backward data access, eliminating most transpose/reshape overhead and speeding LLM fine-tuning 2.2–5.7× in the paper's measurements.

  7. Synthetic Interaction Data for Scalable Personalization in Large Language Models

    cs.LG 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    PersonaGym simulates noisy multi-turn user–assistant interactions to build PersonaAtlas, and PPOpt learns to rewrite user prompts from interaction history, improving judged personalization on synthetic benchmarks.

  8. No for Some, Yes for Others: Persona Prompts and Other Sources of False Refusal in Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A broad measurement study shows that false refusals in LLMs depend more on model and task choice than on sociodemographic personas, with newer models refusing far less.

  9. Adaptive Personalized Conversational Information Retrieval

    cs.IR 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Explicit per-turn personalization level detection plus per-level weighted fusion of personalized and non-personalized query rewrites improves retrieval on TREC iKAT 2023 and 2024.

  10. PREF: Reference-Free Evaluation of Personalised Text Generation in LLMs

    cs.CL 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    PREF is a reference-free, two-stage LLM judge that personalizes a quality rubric with a user profile and scores candidates against it, beating reminder-only baselines on the PrefEval implicit preference subset.

  11. Impact of Rankings and Personalized Recommendations in Marketplaces

    econ.TH 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In a stylized marketplace model, public rankings provide zero welfare gains under capacity constraints, while personalized recommendations yield welfare gains that grow with preference heterogeneity and heavy-tailed i...

  12. Position is Power: System Prompts as a Mechanism of Bias in Large Language Models (LLMs)

    cs.CY 2025-05 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    Placing demographic audience information in system prompts rather than user prompts shifts sentiment and ranking outputs across six commercial LLMs, but the design confounds position with instruction content.

  13. A Personalized Conversational Benchmark: Towards Simulating Personalized Conversations

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    PERSONACONVBENCH is a new Reddit-based benchmark showing that LLMs predict sentiment, community scores, and next replies better when given a user's multi-turn conversation history, and it releases public data and code.

  14. Advancing and Benchmarking Personalized Tool Invocation for LLMs

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Fine-tuning Qwen2.5-7B on PTool-synthesized data raises its PTBench overall score from 0.074 to 0.268, including on users not seen in training.

  15. Personalisation or Prejudice? Addressing Geographic Bias in Hate Speech Detection using Debias Tuning in Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Country and language personas degrade LLM hate speech detection F1 scores, and a custom reweighted fine-tuning loss reduces the degradation for Llama and Nemo, but less for Phi.

  16. tAIfa: Enhancing Team Effectiveness and Cohesion with AI-Generated Automated Feedback

    cs.HC 2025-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An LLM-powered Slack agent that generates automated team and individual feedback increased conversation duration and speaker turn frequency in a between-subjects study of 18 teams, with no significant effect on task p...

  17. Can Large Language Models Understand Preferences in Personalized Recommendation?

    cs.CL 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new grouped-ranking benchmark finds current LLMs score near chance on personalized preference ranking once user rating bias and item quality are controlled.

  18. Whose Boat Does it Float? Improving Personalization in Preference Tuning via Inferred User Personas

    cs.CL 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A two-stage pipeline, Persona Inference and Persona Tailoring, augments preference datasets with LLM-inferred user personas and trains models to tailor responses to them, improving personalization over standard DPO.

  19. High-Stakes Personalization: Rethinking LLM Customization for Individual Investor Decision-Making

    cs.CL 2026-04 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Individual investing exposes four structural limits of LLM personalization—evolving contradictory memory, long-horizon thesis drift, style-vs-signal conflict, and no ground-truth labels—requiring new architectures bey...

  20. Effects of Personality- and Opinion-Alignment in Human-AI Interaction

    cs.HC 2025-11 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    People rate AI chatbots as more trustworthy, competent, warm, and persuasive when the chatbots share their opinion, whereas matching the chatbot's personality to the user's has little or no effect.

  21. User Behavior Prediction as a Generic, Robust, Scalable, and Low-Cost Evaluation Strategy for Estimating Generalization in LLMs

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The authors introduce an entropy-based framework that uses user behavior prediction as a measure of LLM generalization, and find GPT-4o outperforms GPT-4o-mini and Llama-3.1 on movie and music recommendation tasks.

  22. Reasoning Meets Personalization: Unleashing the Potential of Large Reasoning Model for Personalized Generation

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Large reasoning models underperform general chat models on personalization tasks, but a structured template plus self-checking and self-referencing restores and improves performance.

  23. PrefReward: Learning User Preference Matrix for Personalized Text Generation

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    PrefReward selects the most style-aligned LLM output via a KL-divergence reward against an explicit user preference matrix, beating retrieval baselines on LongLaMP.

  24. Matching Game Preferences Through Dialogical Large Language Models: A Perspective

    cs.AI 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    This perspective paper proposes the D-LLM framework, which couples the authors' GRAPHYP knowledge graphs with LLMs to personalize AI responses and make reasoning traceable, but no empirical validation is presented.

  25. Personalized Image Generation from an Author Writing Style

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    LLM-generated text-to-image prompts derived from author style sheets produce images that ten raters judged as moderately faithful (4.08/5), but the evaluation has no control condition and the dataset link is a placeholder.

  26. PersonaBOT: Bringing Customer Personas to Life with LLMs and RAG

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A RAG chatbot augmented with synthetic personas generated from customer success stories raised its average accuracy rating from 5.88 to 6.42 at Volvo CE, with few-shot prompting producing more complete personas than c...

  27. Personalized Graph-Based Retrieval for Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-01 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    PGraphRAG adds neighbor-user reviews to LLM prompts and claims improved personalized generation, but its own ablations show the user's history contributes little beyond item context.

  28. From General to Specific: Tailoring Large Language Models for Personalized Healthcare

    cs.CL 2024-12 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A method constructs patient-specific hard prompts, refined only by word deletion with a BERTScore reward, to make proprietary LLMs output more personalized medical responses.

  29. Intelligent Interaction Strategies for Context-Aware Cognitive Augmentation

    cs.HC 2025-04 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A small qualitative study in an exhibition suggests that LLM cognitive augmentation should be context-aware, socially adaptive, and able to shift between real-time assistance and post-visit knowledge organization.

Pith tools