Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

CDEval: A Benchmark for Measuring the Cultural Dimensions of Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.16421 v3 pith:LM56HEJS submitted 2023-11-28 cs.CL cs.CY

classification cs.CLcs.CY
keywords culturaldimensionsllmscdevalalignmentbenchmarkmodelsacross
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

As the scaling of Large Language Models (LLMs) has dramatically enhanced their capabilities, there has been a growing focus on the alignment problem to ensure their responsible and ethical use. While existing alignment efforts predominantly concentrate on universal values such as the HHH principle, the aspect of culture, which is inherently pluralistic and diverse, has not received adequate attention. This work introduces a new benchmark, CDEval, aimed at evaluating the cultural dimensions of LLMs. CDEval is constructed by incorporating both GPT-4's automated generation and human verification, covering six cultural dimensions across seven domains. Our comprehensive experiments provide intriguing insights into the culture of mainstream LLMs, highlighting both consistencies and variations across different dimensions and domains. The findings underscore the importance of integrating cultural considerations in LLM development, particularly for applications in diverse cultural settings. Through CDEval, we aim to broaden the horizon of LLM alignment research by including cultural dimensions, thus providing a more holistic framework for the future development and evaluation of LLMs. This benchmark serves as a valuable resource for cultural studies in LLMs, paving the way for more culturally aware and sensitive models.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Symbolic or Numerical? Understanding Physics Problem Solving in Reasoning LLMs

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    DeepSeek-R1 achieves 75.9% zero-shot and 81.3% few-shot accuracy on filtered SciBench physics problems, far above general-purpose chat models, and correct answers tend to use symbolic derivation.

Pith tools