Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Another Angle on Benchmarking Noncovalent Interactions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.12603 v4 pith:LMDB2JYS submitted 2024-10-16 physics.chem-ph

classification physics.chem-ph
keywords ccsddimersresultsccsdtcorrelationinteractionslargermethod
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

For noncovalent interactions (NCIs), the CCSD(T) coupled cluster method is widely regarded as the `gold standard'. With localized orbital approximations, benchmarks for ever larger NCI complexes are being published; yet tantalizing evidence from quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) results appears to indicate that as the system size grows, CCSD(T) overbinds NCIs by progressively larger amounts, particularly when $\pi$-stacking is involved. Alas, post-CCSD(T) methods like CCSDT(Q) are cost-prohibitive, which requires us to consider alternative means of estimating post-CCSD(T) contributions. In this work, we take a step back by considering the evolution of the correlation energy with respect to the number of subunits for such $\pi$-stacked sequences as acene dimers and alkadiene dimers. We show it to be almost perfectly linear, and propose the slope of the line as a probe for the behavior of a given electron correlation method. By comparison with rank-reduced CCSDT(Q) results for benzene and naphthalene dimers, we show that while CCSD(T) does slightly overbind, it does not at the level suggested by the QMC results.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Systematic discrepancies between reference methods for non-covalent interactions within the S66 dataset

    physics.chem-ph 2024-12 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Diffusion Monte Carlo interaction energies for the full S66 dataset reveal systematic deviations from CCSD(T) that correlate with the ratio of electrostatic to dispersion contributions.

  2. Post-CCSD(T) corrections in the S66 noncovalent interactions benchmark

    physics.chem-ph 2024-11 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    High-level CCSDT and CCSDT(Q) calculations on the S66 benchmark show that the error cancellation in CCSD(T) breaks down for pi-stacking complexes, which are overbound, and simple fitted formulas estimate the correctio...

Pith tools