pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.04835 · v1 · pith:LNHMSX26new · submitted 2026-06-03 · 🪐 quant-ph · physics.atom-ph· physics.comp-ph

Reconciliation of effective Hamiltonians for intense light-matter interaction

Jakob Nicolai Bruhnke , Jan Marcus Dahlstr\"om This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 06:03 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph physics.atom-phphysics.comp-ph
keywords effective Hamiltoniansadiabatic eliminationquasi-degenerate perturbation theorylight-matter interactionFloquet theoryintense laser fieldsquantum opticsnon-orthogonal eigenvectors
0
0 comments X

The pith

Quasi-degenerate perturbation theory reconciles adiabatic elimination with high-intensity light-matter interactions via non-orthogonal eigenvectors.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that canonical approximations for essential-state effective Hamiltonians break down at high intensities. It shows that quasi-degenerate Rayleigh-Schrödinger perturbation theory supplies corrected effective Hamiltonians that remain accurate across low- and high-frequency regimes. Reconciliation occurs through a proposed quasi-degenerate extension of adiabatic elimination that stays valid even when detunings between essential states are non-negligible. The resulting non-orthogonal eigenvectors capture asymmetric coupling strengths of essential states to the non-essential manifold.

Core claim

Quasi-degenerate Rayleigh-Schrödinger perturbation theory applied to essential-state models produces effective Hamiltonians that agree closely with Floquet calculations at high intensities; the necessary corrections render the eigenvectors non-orthogonal, thereby accounting for the unequal coupling of different essential states to non-essential states.

What carries the argument

Quasi-degenerate Rayleigh-Schrödinger perturbation theory (QD-RSPT) applied to derive corrected effective Hamiltonians from adiabatic elimination.

If this is right

  • Effective Hamiltonians derived this way remain usable in regimes of intense driving where standard adiabatic elimination fails.
  • The method yields quantitative agreement with full Floquet calculations in both low- and high-frequency limits.
  • Non-orthogonality of the effective eigenvectors directly encodes asymmetric coupling to the eliminated states.
  • A quasi-degenerate version of adiabatic elimination can be written that is robust to finite detuning between essential states.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same quasi-degenerate corrections could be applied to other approximation schemes used in quantum optics to extend their range of validity.
  • Non-orthogonality may alter how expectation values or transition amplitudes are computed when the effective Hamiltonian is used for dynamics.
  • The approach opens the possibility of constructing effective models for novel strong-coupling phenomena that were previously inaccessible to essential-state descriptions.

Load-bearing premise

The perturbation series remains convergent at high intensities when the chosen detuning still permits a perturbative treatment of the essential states.

What would settle it

A numerical comparison showing that the QD-RSPT effective Hamiltonian produces time evolution or eigenvalues that deviate substantially from exact Floquet results at high intensity would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.04835 by Jakob Nicolai Bruhnke, Jan Marcus Dahlstr\"om.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Properties of the minimal model Hamiltonian [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Quasi-energies E − iΓ/2 of Rubidium in a monochromatic, linearly polarized IR field. The upper row shows the real part of the quasi-energies, E; the lower row shows the decay rate Γ. The black solid lines are exact calculations obtained from Floquet theory. In the left column, the exact quasi-energies are compared to the effective Hamiltonian from QD-RSPT in 7th order (red dotted), see Eq. (21). In the mid… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Quasi-energies E± −iΓ±/2 of Helium in a monochro￾matic, linearly polarized XUV field, resonant with the 1s 2 ↔ 1s3p transition. Panel (a) shows the real part of the quasi￾energies, E±, and panel (b) the decay rate Γ±. The black solid lines are exact calculations obtained from Floquet the￾ory. We compare the exact quasi-energies to the effective Hamiltonian from RSPT in 10th order (yellow dashed), see Eq. (… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Essential-state models are central for quantum control and technology in broad regimes of light-matter interaction. The canonical effective Hamiltonian is obtained equivalently from adiabatic elimination, the Markov approximation, and the pole approximation. These approximations are known to break down at high intensities, significantly limiting their applicability to moderate light-matter interaction. We show how this limitation can be addressed by applying quasi-degenerate Rayleigh-Schr\"odinger perturbation theory (QD-RSPT). We reconcile QD-RSPT with adiabatic elimination and propose a quasi-degenerate extension of adiabatic elimination that is robust when the detuning of the essential states is non-negligible. The accuracy of QD-RSPT is demonstrated in both the low- and high-frequency regime, showing excellent agreement with Floquet calculations at high intensities. The crucial corrections to adiabatic elimination make the eigenvectors of the effective Hamiltonian non-orthogonal. Physically, this allows us to account for the asymmetric strength with which different essential states couple to the non-essential states. We expect that our systematic approach to effective Hamiltonians from QD-RSPT will constitute a new state of the art in intense light-matter interaction and quantum optics with novel forms of strong coupling and quantum control phenomena being conceivable.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that canonical effective Hamiltonians derived from adiabatic elimination, Markov, and pole approximations break down at high intensities in light-matter interactions. It shows that quasi-degenerate Rayleigh-Schrödinger perturbation theory (QD-RSPT) reconciles with and extends adiabatic elimination via a quasi-degenerate variant, remaining robust for non-negligible detuning. The approach yields non-orthogonal eigenvectors that capture asymmetric coupling, with demonstrated excellent agreement to Floquet calculations in both low- and high-frequency regimes at high intensities.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work supplies a systematic perturbative route to effective Hamiltonians in intense-coupling regimes where standard approximations fail, with potential implications for quantum control and strong-coupling phenomena. Credit is due for the explicit comparison to independent Floquet numerics and the physical interpretation of non-orthogonality as encoding asymmetric coupling. The result is tempered by the requirement that detuning still permits a controlled perturbative expansion in the coupling strength.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and the high-intensity demonstration: the claim that QD-RSPT remains accurate where canonical approximations fail rests on the assumption that the light-matter coupling stays perturbative relative to detuning. When the effective Rabi frequency becomes comparable to or larger than the detuning, the truncation error is uncontrolled; the reported Floquet agreement may therefore be regime-specific rather than generally robust, requiring explicit bounds or counter-example tests.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract and introduction would benefit from a clearer statement of the intensity and detuning ranges over which the Floquet comparisons were performed.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful review and constructive feedback. We address the single major comment below, clarifying the perturbative nature of the method while agreeing to strengthen the discussion of its validity regime.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and the high-intensity demonstration: the claim that QD-RSPT remains accurate where canonical approximations fail rests on the assumption that the light-matter coupling stays perturbative relative to detuning. When the effective Rabi frequency becomes comparable to or larger than the detuning, the truncation error is uncontrolled; the reported Floquet agreement may therefore be regime-specific rather than generally robust, requiring explicit bounds or counter-example tests.

    Authors: We agree that QD-RSPT remains a perturbative approach whose validity requires the bare light-matter coupling to remain small compared with the detuning to the non-essential states; the effective Rabi frequency generated inside the essential subspace can be large without violating this condition. The Floquet comparisons in the manuscript are performed inside this controlled regime, which is why the agreement is excellent. The manuscript already emphasizes robustness for non-negligible detuning, but we accept that an explicit statement of the perturbative parameter and its bounds would improve clarity. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated paragraph (and, if space permits, a short counter-example) specifying the regime of controlled truncation error. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation from standard QD-RSPT is independent of target results

full rationale

The paper derives effective Hamiltonians via quasi-degenerate Rayleigh-Schrödinger perturbation theory (QD-RSPT) applied to the light-matter Hamiltonian, then reconciles this with a proposed quasi-degenerate extension of adiabatic elimination. All load-bearing steps are explicit perturbative expansions whose validity is checked by direct numerical comparison to independent Floquet calculations rather than to any fitted parameter or self-citation. No equation reduces to its own input by construction, no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work, and no ansatz is smuggled via citation. The method therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the applicability of perturbation theory extensions to intense regimes, with no new free parameters or entities introduced.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Quasi-degenerate perturbation theory applies to the light-matter system
    The paper relies on QD-RSPT being valid for the regimes considered.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5744 in / 1136 out tokens · 35369 ms · 2026-06-28T06:03:38.917640+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Quantitative analysis of resonant ionization by smooth laser pulses: Connection between effective Hamiltonian theory and strong-field dressed continua

    physics.atom-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Asymmetric Autler-Townes doublets arise from coherent resonant-nonresonant interplay in an effective Hamiltonian; an essential-state model with continuum coupling reproduces TDSE simulations for helium while the stron...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

103 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Note that the conver- gence of the RS perturbative series forn→∞cannot be taken for granted, but robust results will often be achieved with truncation at a low orders [64–66]. If the model space is degenerate, i.e.P H 0P=E 0P, the expressions simplify to χ[n]=G Q(QV χ [n−1]− n−1 ∑ m=1 χ[n−m]V χ[m−1]),(22) where we defined theQ-space resolvent GQ∶= Q E0−QH...

    arXiv 1965

  2. [2]

    Wollenhaupt, A

    M. Wollenhaupt, A. Assion, O. Bazhan, Ch. Horn, D. Liese, Ch. Sarpe-Tudoran, M. Winter, and T. Baumert, Control of interferences in an Autler- Townes doublet: Symmetry of control parameters, Physical Review A68, 015401 (2003)

    2003

  3. [3]

    Bayer, D

    T. Bayer, D. Gräfing, S. Kerbstadt, D. Pengel, K. Eick- hoff, L. Englert, and M. Wollenhaupt, Time-resolved 3D imaging of ultrafast spin–orbit wave packet dynamics, New Journal of Physics21, 033001 (2019)

    2019

  4. [4]

    W. Li, J. Zhang, Y. Jin, D. Zhang, D. Ding, and K. Ueda, Partial-Wave Resolved Spin-Orbit Dynamics, Physical Review Letters135, 143201 (2025)

    2025

  5. [5]

    Zhang, S

    L. Zhang, S. Carlström, O. Smirnova, M. Ivanov, and D. Ye, Spin Polarization in Strong-Field Ionization as Sensor of Trapped Electron Orbits, Physical Review Letters135, 193201 (2025)

    2025

  6. [6]

    Anand, S

    M. Anand, S. Pabst, O. Kwon, and D. E. Kim, At- tosecond counter-rotating-wave effect in xenon driven by strong fields, Physical Review A95, 053420 (2017)

    2017

  7. [7]

    Bertolino, S

    M. Bertolino, S. Carlström, J. Peschel, F. Zapata, E. Lindroth, and J. M. Dahlström, Thomas–Reiche– Kuhn correction for truncated configuration-interaction spaces: Case of laser-assisted dynamical interference, Physical Review A106, 043108 (2022)

    2022

  8. [8]

    Vismarraet al., Dynamic Interference of Chirped Photoelectrons, Physical Review Letters135, 033202 (2025)

    F. Vismarraet al., Dynamic Interference of Chirped Photoelectrons, Physical Review Letters135, 033202 (2025)

    2025

  9. [9]

    Li, M.-F

    M. Li, M.-F. Xie, H. Wang, L. Jia, J. Li, W. Wang, J. Cai, X. Hong, X. Shi, Y. Lv, X. Zhao, S. Luo, W.-C. Jiang, L.-Y. Peng, and D. Ding, Observation of Laser-Assisted Dynamic Interference by Attosecond Controlled Photoelectron Spectroscopy, Physical Re- view Letters133, 253201 (2024)

    2024

  10. [10]

    Tóth and A

    A. Tóth and A. Csehi, Probing strong-field two-photon transitions through dynamic interference, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics54, 035005 (2021)

    2021

  11. [11]

    Ferray, A

    M. Ferray, A. L’Huillier, X. F. Li, L. A. Lompre, G. Mainfray, and C. Manus, Multiple-harmonic con- version of 1064 nm radiation in rare gases, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics21, L31 (1988)

    1988

  12. [12]

    Krausz and M

    F. Krausz and M. Ivanov, Attosecond physics, Reviews of Modern Physics81, 163 (2009)

    2009

  13. [13]

    Emmaet al., First lasing and operation of an ångstrom-wavelength free-electron laser, Nature Pho- tonics4, 641 (2010)

    P. Emmaet al., First lasing and operation of an ångstrom-wavelength free-electron laser, Nature Pho- tonics4, 641 (2010)

    2010

  14. [14]

    Allariaet al., Highly coherent and stable pulses from the FERMI seeded free-electron laser in the extreme ultraviolet, Nature Photonics6, 699 (2012)

    E. Allariaet al., Highly coherent and stable pulses from the FERMI seeded free-electron laser in the extreme ultraviolet, Nature Photonics6, 699 (2012)

    2012

  15. [15]

    N. S. Mirianet al., Generation and measurement of in- tense few-femtosecond superradiant extreme-ultraviolet free-electron laser pulses, Nature Photonics15, 523 (2021)

    2021

  16. [16]

    Nandiet al., Observation of Rabi dynamics with a short-wavelength free-electron laser, Nature608, 488 (2022)

    S. Nandiet al., Observation of Rabi dynamics with a short-wavelength free-electron laser, Nature608, 488 (2022)

    2022

  17. [17]

    Nandiet al., Generation of entanglement using a short-wavelength seeded free-electron laser, Science Ad- vances10, eado0668 (2024)

    S. Nandiet al., Generation of entanglement using a short-wavelength seeded free-electron laser, Science Ad- vances10, eado0668 (2024)

    2024

  18. [18]

    Richteret al., Strong-field quantum control in the extreme ultraviolet domain using pulse shaping, Nature 636, 337 (2024)

    F. Richteret al., Strong-field quantum control in the extreme ultraviolet domain using pulse shaping, Nature 636, 337 (2024)

    2024

  19. [19]

    Olofsson and J

    E. Olofsson and J. M. Dahlström, Photoelectron signa- ture of dressed-atom stabilization in an intense XUV field, Physical Review Research5, 043017 (2023)

    2023

  20. [20]

    Olofsson, E

    E. Olofsson, E. L. Fulton, R. Tahouri, M. Bertolino, J. M. N. Djiokap, and J. M. Dahlström, Control of photoionization by resonant phase-locked pulse pairs (2025), arXiv:2510.09441 [quant-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  21. [21]

    M.Dörr, O.Latinne,andC.J.Joachain,Timeevolution of two-photon population transfer between the 1s and 2s states of a hydrogen atom, Physical Review A55, 3697 (1997)

    1997

  22. [22]

    L. P. Yatsenko, B. W. Shore, T. Halfmann, K. Bergmann, and A. Vardi, Source of metastable H(2s) atoms using the Stark chirped rapid-adiabatic-passage technique, Physical Review A60, R4237 (1999)

    1999

  23. [23]

    J. N. Bruhnke, E. Olofsson, A. Stenquist, and J. M. Dahlström, Giant counter-rotating oscillations on the attosecond timescale, Physical Review Research7, L042019 (2025)

    2025

  24. [24]

    Kumar, J

    S. Kumar, J. D. Piel, C. H. Greene, and N. Shiv- aram, Broadband femtosecond lasers enable efficient two-photon excitation of the ultranarrow linewidth sin- glet 1s2s state in helium, Physical Review Research8, 013009 (2026)

    2026

  25. [25]

    T. M. Linkeret al., Attosecond inner-shell lasing at ångström wavelengths, Nature642, 934 (2025)

    2025

  26. [26]

    F. H. M. Faisal,Theory of Multiphoton Processes (Springer, New York, 1987)

    1987

  27. [27]

    B.W.Shore,The Theory of Coherent Atomic Excitation (Wiley VCH, New York, 1990)

    1990

  28. [28]

    Cohen-Tannoudji, G

    C. Cohen-Tannoudji, G. Grynberg, and J. Dupont-Roc, Atom-Photon Interactions: Basic Processes and Appli- cations(Wiley-VCH, New York, 1998)

    1998

  29. [29]

    Huang, J

    L. Huang, J. Luneau, J. Schirk, F. Wallner, C. M. F. Schneider, S. Filipp, K. Liegener, and P. Rabl, Theory of Multi-photon Processes for Applications in Quantum Control (2025), arXiv:2509.16074 [quant-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  30. [30]

    N. V. Vitanov and S. Stenholm, Population transfer via a decaying state, Physical Review A56, 1463 (1997)

    1997

  31. [31]

    Kinos, L

    A. Kinos, L. Rippe, S. Kröll, and A. Walther, Design- ing gate operations for single-ion quantum computing in rare-earth-ion-doped crystals, Physical Review A104, 052624 (2021)

    2021

  32. [32]

    Kumlin, C

    J. Kumlin, C. Braun, C. Tresp, N. Stiesdal, S. Hoffer- berth, and A. Paris-Mandoki, Quantum optics with Ry- dberg superatoms, Journal of Physics Communications 7, 052001 (2023)

    2023

  33. [33]

    Paulisch, H

    V. Paulisch, H. Rui, H. K. Ng, and B.-G. Englert, Be- yond adiabatic elimination: A hierarchy of approxima- tions for multi-photon processes, The European Physi- cal Journal Plus129, 12 (2014)

    2014

  34. [34]

    Brion, L

    E. Brion, L. H. Pedersen, and K. Mølmer, Adiabatic elimination in a lambda system, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical40, 1033 (2007)

    2007

  35. [35]

    H. C. Baker, Non-Hermitian quantum theory of multi- photon ionization, Physical Review A30, 773 (1984)

    1984

  36. [36]

    B. T. Torosov and N. V. Vitanov, Adiabatic elimination of a nearly resonant quantum state, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics45, 135502 (2012)

    2012

  37. [37]

    M. Sanz, E. Solano, and I. L. Egusquiza, Beyond Adi- abatic Elimination: Effective Hamiltonians and Sin- 15 gular Perturbation, inApplications + Practical Con- ceptualization + Mathematics = Fruitful Innovation, Mathematics for Industry, edited by R. S. Anderssen, P. Broadbridge, Y. Fukumoto, K. Kajiwara, T. Tak- agi, E. Verbitskiy, and M. Wakayama (Sprin...

    2016

  38. [38]

    K. N. Zlatanov, G. S. Vasilev, and N. V. Vitanov, Morris-Shore transformation for nondegenerate sys- tems, Physical Review A102, 063113 (2020)

    2020

  39. [39]

    Lindgren and J

    I. Lindgren and J. Morrison,Atomic Many-Body The- ory, edited by V. I. Goldanskii, R. Gomer, F. P. Schäfer, and J. P. Toennies, Springer Series in Chemical Physics, Vol. 13 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1982)

    1982

  40. [40]

    D. F. James and J. Jerke, Effective Hamiltonian theory and its applications in quantum information, Canadian Journal of Physics85, 625 (2007)

    2007

  41. [41]

    Gamel and D

    O. Gamel and D. F. V. James, Time-averaged quantum dynamics and the validity of the effective Hamiltonian model, Physical Review A82, 052106 (2010)

    2010

  42. [42]

    Macrì, L

    N. Macrì, L. Giannelli, E. Paladino, and G. Falci, Coarse-Grained Effective Hamiltonian via the Magnus Expansion for a Three-Level System, Entropy25, 234 (2023)

    2023

  43. [43]

    K. D. Barajas and W. C. Campbell, Multi-Timescale Coherent Control via Quantum Averaging The- ory for High-Fidelity Gate Operations (2025), arXiv:2503.08886 [quant-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    K.D.BarajasandW.C.Campbell,QuantumAveraging Theory for Multi-Timescale Driven Quantum Systems (2025), arXiv:2503.09761 [quant-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  45. [45]

    J. R. Schrieffer and P. A. Wolff, Relation between the Anderson and Kondo Hamiltonians, Physical Review 149, 491 (1966)

    1966

  46. [46]

    Shavitt and L

    I. Shavitt and L. T. Redmon, Quasidegenerate pertur- bation theories. A canonical van Vleck formalism and its relationship to other approaches, The Journal of Chem- ical Physics73, 5711 (1980)

    1980

  47. [47]

    L. S. Cederbaum, J. Schirmer, and H.-D. Meyer, Block diagonalisation of Hermitian matrices, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General22, 2427 (1989)

    1989

  48. [48]

    A. B. Klimov and L. L. Sanchez-Soto, Method of small rotations and effective Hamiltonians in nonlinear quan- tum optics, Physical Review A61, 063802 (2000)

    2000

  49. [49]

    A. B. Klimov, L. L. Sánchez-Soto, A. Navarro, and E. C. Yustas, Effective Hamiltonians in quantum op- tics: A systematic approach, Journal of Modern Optics 49, 2211 (2002)

    2002

  50. [50]

    J. R. Morris and B. W. Shore, Reduction of degenerate two-level excitation to independent two-state systems, Physical Review A27, 906 (1983)

    1983

  51. [51]

    L. G. Hanson, J. Zhang, and P. Lambropoulos, Manifes- tations of atomic and core resonances in photoelectron energy spectra, Physical Review A55, 2232 (1997)

    1997

  52. [52]

    L. P. Yatsenko, V. I. Romanenko, B. W. Shore, T. Half- mann, and K. Bergmann, Two-photon excitation of the metastable 2s state of hydrogen assisted by laser- induced chirped Stark shifts and continuum structure, Physical Review A71, 033418 (2005)

    2005

  53. [53]

    Zhang, Y

    X. Zhang, Y. Zhou, Y. Liao, Y. Chen, J. Liang, Q. Ke, M. Li, A. Csehi, and P. Lu, Effect of nonresonant states in near-resonant two-photon ionization of hydro- gen, Physical Review A106, 063114 (2022)

    2022

  54. [54]

    A. Tóth, S. Borbély, Y. Zhou, and A. Csehi, Role of dynamic Stark shifts in strong-field excitation and subsequent ionization, Physical Review A107, 053101 (2023)

    2023

  55. [55]

    Chu, Recent Developments in Semiclassical Flo- quet Theories for Intense-Field Multiphoton Processes, inAdvances in Atomic and Molecular Physics, Vol

    S.-I. Chu, Recent Developments in Semiclassical Flo- quet Theories for Intense-Field Multiphoton Processes, inAdvances in Atomic and Molecular Physics, Vol. 21, editedbyD.R.BatesandB.Bederson(AcademicPress,

  56. [56]

    Schweizer, P

    W. Schweizer, P. Faßbinder, and R. González-Férez, Model Potentials for Alkali Metal Atoms and Li-like Ions, Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables72, 33 (1999)

    1999

  57. [57]

    Frisch, Toward a systematic molecular orbital theory for excited states, The Journal of Physical Chemistry96, 135 (1992)

    J.B.Foresman, M.Head-Gordon, J.A.Pople,andM.J. Frisch, Toward a systematic molecular orbital theory for excited states, The Journal of Physical Chemistry96, 135 (1992)

    1992

  58. [58]

    Dreuw and M

    A. Dreuw and M. Head-Gordon, Single-Reference ab Initio Methods for the Calculation of Excited States of Large Molecules, Chemical Reviews105, 4009 (2005)

    2005

  59. [59]

    I.Lindgren,TheRayleigh-Schrodingerperturbationand the linked-diagram theorem for a multi-configurational model space, Journal of Physics B: Atomic and Molec- ular Physics7, 2441 (1974)

    1974

  60. [60]

    Durand, Direct determination of effective Hamilto- nians by wave-operator methods

    P. Durand, Direct determination of effective Hamilto- nians by wave-operator methods. I. General formalism, Physical Review A28, 3184 (1983)

    1983

  61. [61]

    Brouder, G

    C. Brouder, G. H. Duchamp, F. Patras, and G. Z. Tóth, The Rayleigh-Schrödinger perturbation series of quasi- degenerate systems, International Journal of Quantum Chemistry112, 2256 (2012)

    2012

  62. [62]

    Suzuki and R

    K. Suzuki and R. Okamoto, Degenerate Perturbation Theory in Quantum Mechanics, Progress of Theoretical Physics70, 439 (1983)

    1983

  63. [63]

    B. H. Brandow, Formal theory of effectiveπ-electron hamiltonians, International Journal of Quantum Chem- istry15, 207 (1979)

    1979

  64. [64]

    J. P. Killingbeck and G. Jolicard, The Bloch wave op- erator: Generalizations and applications: Part I. The time-independent case, Journal of Physics A: Mathe- matical and General36, R105 (2003)

    2003

  65. [65]

    C. M. Bender and T. T. Wu, Anharmonic Oscillator. II. A Study of Perturbation Theory in Large Order, Phys- ical Review D7, 1620 (1973)

    1973

  66. [66]

    E. R. Vrscay and J. Cizek, Continued fractions and Rayleigh–Schrödinger perturbation theory at large or- der, Journal of Mathematical Physics27, 185 (1986)

    1986

  67. [67]

    U. D. Jentschura, Resummation of the divergent per- turbation series for a hydrogen atom in an electric field, Physical Review A64, 013403 (2001)

    2001

  68. [68]

    J. H. Shirley, Solution of the Schrödinger Equation with a Hamiltonian Periodic in Time, Physical Review138, B979 (1965)

    1965

  69. [69]

    Guérin, F

    S. Guérin, F. Monti, J.-M. Dupont, and H. R. Jauslin, On the relation between cavity-dressed states, Flo- quet states, RWA and semiclassical models, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General30, 7193 (1997)

    1997

  70. [70]

    Lewenstein, M

    M. Lewenstein, M. F. Ciappina, E. Pisanty, J. Rivera- Dean, P. Stammer, T. Lamprou, and P. Tzallas, Gener- ation of optical Schrödinger cat states in intense laser– matter interactions, Nature Physics17, 1104 (2021)

    2021

  71. [71]

    Stammer, J

    P. Stammer, J. Rivera-Dean, A. Maxwell, T. Lam- prou, A. Ordóñez, M. F. Ciappina, P. Tzallas, and M. Lewenstein, Quantum Electrodynamics of Intense Laser-Matter Interactions: A Tool for Quantum State Engineering, PRX Quantum4, 010201 (2023). 16

    2023

  72. [72]

    Tsatrafyllis, I

    N. Tsatrafyllis, I. K. Kominis, I. A. Gonoskov, and P. Tzallas, High-order harmonics measured by the photon statistics of the infrared driving-field exiting the atomic medium, Nature Communications8, 15170 (2017)

    2017

  73. [73]

    Gorlach, O

    A. Gorlach, O. Neufeld, N. Rivera, O. Cohen, and I. Kaminer, The quantum-optical nature of high har- monic generation, Nature Communications11, 4598 (2020)

    2020

  74. [74]

    R. V. Gothelf, C. S. Lange, and L. B. Madsen, High- order harmonic generation in a crystal driven by quan- tum light, Physical Review A111, 063105 (2025)

    2025

  75. [75]

    Stenquist, J

    A. Stenquist, J. N. Bruhnke, F. Zapata, and J. M. Dahlström, Entanglement transfer in a composite electron–ion–photon system, Reports on Progress in Physics88, 080502 (2025)

    2025

  76. [76]

    Chu and D

    S.-I. Chu and D. A. Telnov, Beyond the Floquet theo- rem: Generalized Floquet formalisms and quasienergy methods for atomic and molecular multiphoton pro- cesses in intense laser fields, Physics Reports390, 1 (2004)

    2004

  77. [77]

    C. J. Joachain, N. J. Kylstra, and R. M. Potvliege, Atoms in Intense Laser Fields(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011)

    2011

  78. [78]

    Chu, Quasienergy formalism for intense field multi- photon ionization of atoms induced by circularly polar- ized radiation, Chemical Physics Letters54, 367 (1978)

    S.-I. Chu, Quasienergy formalism for intense field multi- photon ionization of atoms induced by circularly polar- ized radiation, Chemical Physics Letters54, 367 (1978)

    1978

  79. [79]

    Ho, S.-I

    T.-S. Ho, S.-I. Chu, and J. V. Tietz, Semiclassical many- mode floquet theory, Chemical Physics Letters96, 464 (1983)

    1983

  80. [80]

    Chu and W

    S.-I. Chu and W. P. Reinhardt, Intense Field Multipho- ton Ionization via Complex Dressed States: Application totheHAtom,PhysicalReviewLetters39,1195(1977)

    1977

Showing first 80 references.