Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2102.06979 v1 pith:LPB7RYFZ submitted 2021-02-13 cs.CV

Normalized Convolution Upsampling for Refined Optical Flow Estimation

classification cs.CV
keywords flowopticalupsamplerupsamplingnormalizedapproachapproachescnns
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Optical flow is a regression task where convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have led to major breakthroughs. However, this comes at major computational demands due to the use of cost-volumes and pyramidal representations. This was mitigated by producing flow predictions at quarter the resolution, which are upsampled using bilinear interpolation during test time. Consequently, fine details are usually lost and post-processing is needed to restore them. We propose the Normalized Convolution UPsampler (NCUP), an efficient joint upsampling approach to produce the full-resolution flow during the training of optical flow CNNs. Our proposed approach formulates the upsampling task as a sparse problem and employs the normalized convolutional neural networks to solve it. We evaluate our upsampler against existing joint upsampling approaches when trained end-to-end with a a coarse-to-fine optical flow CNN (PWCNet) and we show that it outperforms all other approaches on the FlyingChairs dataset while having at least one order fewer parameters. Moreover, we test our upsampler with a recurrent optical flow CNN (RAFT) and we achieve state-of-the-art results on Sintel benchmark with ~6% error reduction, and on-par on the KITTI dataset, while having 7.5% fewer parameters (see Figure 1). Finally, our upsampler shows better generalization capabilities than RAFT when trained and evaluated on different datasets.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.