Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Understanding the Capabilities and Limitations of Large Language Models for Cultural Commonsense

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.04655 v1 pith:LQAWFOGM submitted 2024-05-07 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords commonsenseculturalllmslanguageunderstandingmodelscapabilitiescontext
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated substantial commonsense understanding through numerous benchmark evaluations. However, their understanding of cultural commonsense remains largely unexamined. In this paper, we conduct a comprehensive examination of the capabilities and limitations of several state-of-the-art LLMs in the context of cultural commonsense tasks. Using several general and cultural commonsense benchmarks, we find that (1) LLMs have a significant discrepancy in performance when tested on culture-specific commonsense knowledge for different cultures; (2) LLMs' general commonsense capability is affected by cultural context; and (3) The language used to query the LLMs can impact their performance on cultural-related tasks. Our study points to the inherent bias in the cultural understanding of LLMs and provides insights that can help develop culturally aware language models.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Characterizing Bias: Benchmarking Large Language Models in Simplified versus Traditional Chinese

    cs.CL 2025-05 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    A new benchmark shows LLMs are more accurate in Simplified Chinese for regional terms but favor Taiwanese names in simulated hiring, revealing task-dependent bias between Chinese script variants.

Pith tools