REVIEW 1 cited by
Warm non-minimally coupled Peccei-Quinn Inflation and de Sitter Swampland Conjecture
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
In this study, we explore the dynamics of warm inflation within a non-minimally coupled Peccei-Quinn (PQ) framework and evaluate its compatibility with the de Sitter Swampland Conjecture. Our model incorporates a PQ scalar field that is non-minimally coupled to gravity, facilitating inflation through a dissipative process that sustains a thermal bath, thereby distinguishing it from conventional cold inflation. We analyze the dissipation coefficient defined as $\Gamma(T, \sigma) = C_n T^n \sigma^p M^{1-n-p}$, where $C_n$ is a dimensionless constant, $M$ is a mass scale, and $n$ and $p$ are numerical powers. Our investigation focuses on three specific cases: (a) A temperature-dependent dissipation coefficient with an inverse relation, $\Gamma = C_{-1}\,\sigma^2/T$, where $n=-1$ and $p=2$; (b) A dissipation coefficient linear in field $\phi$, $\Gamma = C_{0} \sigma$, where $n=0$ and $p=1$; and (c) A dissipation coefficient linear in temperature $T$, $\Gamma = C_{1} T$, where $n=1$ and $p=0$. By examining the slow-roll dynamics in these inflationary scenarios, we derive essential cosmological parameters, including the scalar spectral index and the tensor-to-scalar ratio. We compare our results with the latest observational data from Planck 2018. Our findings suggest that the model is consistent with observational constraints while simultaneously satisfying the de Sitter Swampland conditions.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Dark Matter Constraints in Myrzakulov $F(R,T)$ Gravity: A Vielbein Approach in Weitzenb\"{o}ck Spacetime with Observational Data
The paper claims a torsion-based F(R,T) model can replace dark matter but provides no derivations, likelihoods, or data, leaving the claim unsupported.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.